RESUMO
Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health threat, especially in HIV patients who may experience immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Diagnosing and defining IRIS in non-HIV patients remains challenging. A 63-year-old male with acute leukaemia underwent induction therapy with a regimen containing fludarabine. Febrile neutropenia led to further investigations, revealing non-cavitary pulmonary TB, prompting anti-tuberculosis therapy (ATT) alongside resumed leukaemia treatment with sorafenib. Persistent extra-pulmonary TB, specifically lymph node involvement, were observed and IRIS was suspected, evidenced by enlarged lymphadenopathies, scrofula, and skin lesions that developed during the 13-month course of ATT, with no recurrence after its cessation. This article explores a case of lymph node TB-associated paradoxical IRIS in a non-HIV leukaemia patient, revealing the intricate interplay between tuberculosis and haematological malignancies and emphasizing the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria and treatment consensus. Challenges in lymph node TB diagnosis and management highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches. The report explores the potential immunomodulatory effects of fludarabine and sorafenib, questioning their roles in TB-IRIS. This case illuminates TB-IRIS dynamics in non-HIV patients, urging further research and collaborative efforts to enhance understanding and outcomes. As medical complexities persist, personalized therapeutic approaches and advancements in TB-IRIS research are crucial.
RESUMO
Invasive pneumococcal disease is a serious infection with an elevated case-fatality rate that can be even higher among patients with asplenia. Its impact has been blunted by the widespread use of vaccines; even recently, in 2021, two new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines emerged. The authors present a case of a 58-year-old male, splenectomised with the immunisation schedule complete, who died of invasive pneumococcal disease with a fulminant course. It is highlighted that fever in a patient with impaired splenic function is an emergency, and despite the success of immunisation in reducing pneumococcal carriage and invasive disease, serotypes continue to change. Also, the local epidemiology may help guide situations where the immunisation recommendations are dubious regarding the implementation of the new vaccines.
RESUMO
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a type of double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid virus belonging to the herpesviridae family. Following a primary infection, the virus becomes latent in various types of white blood cells. Cytomegalovirus infection can remain latent or become active, especially in immunocompromised individuals, such as those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), where CMV reactivation can occur. In this context, CMV infection is common and associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Pneumonia is one of the most serious complications, with mortality rates exceeding 50%. Additionally, even in the absence of organ-specific disease, CMV infection is related to increased mortality unrelated to hematologic neoplasm recurrence. Given the frequency and severity of this infection in HSCT patients, it is crucial to implement effective strategies for monitoring, prevention, and treatment. This guideline was developed to identify patient groups that benefit from a systematic approach to CMV infection and to define the most appropriate strategy for each group. Monitoring CMV viral load in peripheral blood is crucial, especially in patients at moderate to high risk of active infection. Primary prophylaxis with letermovir (an antiviral drug) is recommended to reduce the incidence of active infection, especially in high-risk patients. Secondary prophylaxis with valganciclovir (antiviral drug) is recommended after an episode of active infection, while preemptive and disease treatment is based on monitoring viral load and clinical response. The aim of this guideline is to improve the approach to CMV infection in HSCT patients, ensuring an effective and safe preventive and therapeutic approach.
O vírus citomegálico (CMV) é um tipo de vírus de ácido desoxirribonucleico de dupla cadeia que pertence à família herpesviridae. Após uma infeção primária, o vírus torna-se latente em vários tipos de glóbulos brancos. A infeção por CMV pode permanecer latente ou tornar-se ativa, especialmente em indivíduos imunodeprimidos, como aqueles submetidos a transplantes de células progenitoras hematopoiéticas (TPH), onde a reativação do CMV pode ocorrer. Neste contexto, a infeção por CMV é comum e associada a elevadas taxas de morbilidade e mortalidade. A pneumonite é uma das complicações mais graves, com taxas de mortalidade superiores a 50%. Além disso, mesmo na ausência de doença específica do órgão, a infeção por CMV está relacionada com um aumento da mortalidade não relacionada com a recidiva da neoplasia hematológica. Dada a frequência e gravidade desta infeção em doentes submetidos a TPH, é crucial implementar estratégias eficazes de monitorização, prevenção e tratamento. Este protocolo foi desenvolvido para identificar os grupos de doentes que se beneficiam de uma abordagem sistematizada para a infeção por CMV e definir a estratégia mais adequada para cada grupo. A monitorização da carga viral de CMV no sangue periférico é fundamental, especialmente em doentes com risco moderado a elevado de infeção ativa. A profilaxia primária com letermovir (fármaco antiviral) é recomendada para reduzir a incidência de infeção ativa, especialmente em doentes com alto risco. A profilaxia secundária com valganciclovir (fármaco antiviral) é recomendada após um episódio de infeção ativa, enquanto o tratamento de antecipação e de doença é baseado na monitorização da carga viral e na resposta clínica. Este protocolo visa melhorar a abordagem da infeção por CMV em doentes submetidos a TPH, garantindo uma abordagem preventiva e terapêutica eficaz e segura.
RESUMO
Background: Blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE) is a diagnostic challenge, therefore our objective was to pinpoint high-risk cohorts for BCNE. Methods: The study included adult patients with definite endocarditis. Data were collected via the Infectious Diseases International Research Initiative (ID-IRI). The study analysing one of the largest case series ever reported was conducted across 41 centers in 13 countries. We analysed the database to determine the predictors of BCNE using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: Blood cultures were negative in 101 (11.65 %) of 867 patients. We disclosed that as patients age, the likelihood of a negative blood culture significantly decreases (OR 0.975, 95 % CI 0.963-0.987, p < 0.001). Additionally, factors such as rheumatic heart disease (OR 2.036, 95 % CI 0.970-4.276, p = 0.049), aortic stenosis (OR 3.066, 95 % CI 1.564-6.010, p = 0.001), mitral regurgitation (OR 1.693, 95 % CI 1.012-2.833, p = 0.045), and prosthetic valves (OR 2.539, 95 % CI 1.599-4.031, p < 0.001) are associated with higher likelihoods of negative blood cultures. Our model can predict whether a patient falls into the culture-negative or culture-positive groups with a threshold of 0.104 (AUC±SE = 0.707 ± 0.027). The final model demonstrates a sensitivity of 70.3 % and a specificity of 57.0 %. Conclusion: Caution should be exercised when diagnosing endocarditis in patients with concurrent cardiac disorders, particularly in younger cases.