Dorsal Carpal Artery Perforator Flaps: An Anatomical and Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Hand injuries pose challenges due to complexity and aesthetic-functional concerns. Dorsum of hand injuries are difficult to treat due to thin skin cover and increased propensity to exposure of underlying structures. Perforator-based flaps can provide better outcomes with minimal donor site morbidity. This study aims to bridge the gap in anatomical knowledge and explore the potential benefits of dorsal carpal artery perforator flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was done from July 2021 to June 2023, focused on study of dorsal carpal artery perforators on 12 fresh frozen cadaveric hands. Anatomical study involved injection of red latex into arteries at the wrist, followed by dissection and measurements. During the clinical phase, we used the inferences gained from the anatomical study to identify and mark perforator of dorsal carpal arteries. We performed V-Y advancement flap based on the DCPs in 5 patients who had dorsum of hand defects due to trauma. RESULTS: The study was carried out on 6 fresh frozen cadavers (12 hands). Anatomical findings revealed the anatomical location, caliber, and consistent number of dorsal carpal artery perforators supplying the dorsum of the hand arranged in 2 rows. Clinically, we applied this insight to create V-Y flaps in 5 patients with successful outcomes, thus, offering DCP-based flap as an alternative to distant flaps. CONCLUSION: DCP-based flaps offer an efficient solution for reconstructing proximal hand defects over the dorsum, with minimal complications, enhancing our understanding of hand reconstruction options. The study's comprehensive anatomical insights and clinical outcomes contribute to improving hand defect management and surgical techniques.

Free Flap Monitoring Using Infrared Thermography: An Objective Adjunct to Clinical Monitoring.

Background Early detection of free flap compromise is critical for salvage of the flap. Various methods of free flap monitoring have been described, but clinical assessment is the standard method for among all. In this study, role of infrared thermography is evaluated for free flap monitoring. Materials and Methods In patients undergoing free flap surgery, monitoring was done using standard clinical parameters and infrared thermography as per our institutional protocol. Mean temperature difference (∆T) between the flap and the surrounding skin was calculated using the temperature readings from the thermal images intra- and postoperatively. The accuracy of infrared thermography in flap monitoring was assessed in comparison to the standard clinical protocol. Results Forty-one flaps were included in the analysis, out of which five flaps got compromised. It was observed that the mean temperature difference was higher (mean ∆T 0.20-0.59 vs. 2.38-3.32) when there was a flap compromise, and this temperature difference was evident even before the development of clinical signs. The temperature difference in venous thrombosis (mean ∆T 1.0-2.7) was found to be slightly lower than in arterial insufficiency (mean ∆T 2.1-4.4). For a ∆T cutoff value of 2°C, the thermal camera had a sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 98.9%, positive predictive value of 93.9%, and negative predictive value of 97.7%. Conclusion Infrared thermography is a valuable and noninvasive objective tool in free flap monitoring, which can detect flap compromise (increasing value of ∆T) even before it becomes clinically evident.

Innervated vastus lateralis muscle: complementing and completing the anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Reconstruction of composite abdominal wall defects is challenging. An anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has established itself in the algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction. Augmenting innervated vastus lateralis (iVL) muscle to ALT has added advantages. We describe previously unreported advantage of ALT with iVL.A woman in her 30s, suffering from Mullerian adenocarcinoma with metastasis to the right anterior abdominal wall and right inguinal lymph node, was taken for wide local excision and reconstruction. After excision, there was a 15×12 cm defect of the anterior abdominal wall. We reconstructed the defect with prosthetic mesh and pedicled composite ALT and iVL. There was venous congestion in the ALT flap and it could not be salvaged. We debrided the ALT flap and applied split skin graft over iVL. The grafted and donor sites healed well. The patient was able to do moderate strenuous activities. The presence of iVL allowed us to get away with minor procedure and averted the need for another flap.

Propeller vs. free fasciocutaneous flap in reconstruction of complex lower limb defects-A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Of all body regions, lower extremity wounds have been and remain the greatest challenge. Free flaps have been accepted as a reasonable option to solve this dilemma, but they require the complexity of microsurgery. This study aimed to compare the postoperative and clinical outcomes of propeller flap and fasciocutaneous free flap in the reconstruction of complex lower limb defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from July 2021 to June 2023. Selected patients were randomized into two groups: the propeller flap group and fasciocutaneous free flap group. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, and postoperative parameter, including esthetic analysis, scar assessment, neurosensory analysis, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity function, were estimated and statistically significant compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: Road traffic accident (73.3%) was the most common etiology for lower limb defects in both groups. The foot and lower third of the leg were the most common site of defect, constituting 79.99%. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in propeller flap as compared to fasciocutaneous free flaps. Flap size was smaller, with better neurosensory improvements in propeller flap group. Esthetic analysis, scar assessment, psychosocial analysis, and lower extremity functional analysis yielded similar results in both study groups. CONCLUSION: Propeller flap has better outcomes compared to free flap in terms of smaller size of flap, shorter duration of surgery, and reduced length of hospital stay. Comparable results were obtained with respect to esthetic score, scar assessment score, psychosocial analysis, and neurosensory recovery and lower extremity functional score.

Radiofrequency ablation of the hip: review.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves (the innervation of the anterior capsule of the hip) is an emerging treatment for chronic hip pain. Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30, older age, large acetabular/femoral head bone marrow lesions, chronic widespread pain, depression, and female sex increase the risk of developing hip pain. Chronic hip pain is a common condition with a wide range of etiologies, including hip osteoarthritis (OA), labral tears, osteonecrosis, post total hip arthroplasty (THA), post-operative dislocation/fracture, and cancer. The most common and well studied is hip OA. Management of chronic hip pain includes conservative measures (pharmacotherapy and exercise), surgery, and percutaneous procedures such as RFA. While surgery is effective, those whose medical comorbidities preclude surgery, those who do not wish to have surgery, and those whose pain persists after surgery (11-36% of patients) could benefit from RFA. Because of the aforementioned circumstances, hip RFA is often a palliative intervention. Hip RFA is an effective treatment, one recent retrospective study of 138 patients found 69% had >50% pain relief at 6 months. The most frequent adverse event reported for hip RFA is pain from needle placement. No serious bleeding events have been reported, despite the valid concern of the procedure's proximity to vasculature. This descriptive review details the pathophysiology of hip pain, its etiologies, its clinical presentation, conservative management, the anatomy/technique of hip RFA, hip RFA efficacy, and RFA adverse events.