A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effect of Nurse-Led Educational Intervention at the Time of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Quality of Life, Symptom Severity and Rehospitalisation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common condition associated with impaired quality of life (QOL) and recurrent hospitalisation. Catheter ablation for AF is a well-established treatment for symptomatic patients despite medical therapy. We sought to examine the effect of point specific nurse-led education on QOL, AF symptomatology and readmission rate post AF ablation. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing AF ablation were randomised to Nurse Intervention (NI) versus Control (C), n=22 vs. 19. Both groups were well matched with respect to age, sex and AF subtype. All patients completed SF36 and AF Symptom Checklist, Frequency and Severity Scale questionnaires at baseline and six months post ablation. The NI group underwent nurse education on admission, prior to discharge, and with telephone contact. RESULTS: Baseline SF-36 and AF Symptom Checklist, Frequency and Severity scores were similar. The NI group showed significant differences compared to Control with respect to higher QOL on the SF-36 score of Physical Functioning and Vitality at six months. There were significant improvements in seven components of the AF Symptom Checklist, Frequency and Severity at six months in the NI group with a trend in a further seven. There was no difference in AF related hospital readmissions at six months between C and NI groups (10.5% vs. 13.6%, p=ns). CONCLUSION: Nurse-led education at time of AF ablation is associated with improved QOL and reduced symptom frequency and severity compared to usual care.

Assessment of oesophageal position by direct visualization with luminal contrast compared with segmentation from pre-acquired computed tomography scan-implications for ablation strategy.

AIMS: Atrio-oesophageal fistula is a rare but often fatal complication of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Various strategies are employed to evaluate the oesophageal position in relation to the posterior left atrium (LA). These include segmentation of the oesophagus from a pre-acquired computed tomography (CT) scan and direct, real-time assessment of the oesophageal position using contrast at the time of the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients with drug-refractory AF underwent CT scanning prior to AF ablation. The LA and oesophagus were segmented from this scan. The oesophagus was deemed midline, ostial if it crossed directly behind any of the pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, or antral if it passed within 5 mm of a PV ostium. Under general anaesthesia at the time of ablation, the same patients were administered contrast via an oro-gastric tube to outline the oesophagus. Catheters were placed at the PV ostia and oesophageal position in relation to the PVs was established radiographically using a postero-anterior view. Oesophageal position assessed by real-time assessment correlated with the CT scan in only 59% of patients. In 34% the oesophagus was more right sided on direct visualization, while in 7% it was more left sided. CONCLUSION: Segmentation of the oesophagus from the CT scan did not correlate the real-time oesophageal position at the time of the procedure in over 40% of patients under general anaesthesia. Reliance on the determination of oesophageal position by previously acquired CT may be misleading at best and provide a false sense of security when ablating in the posterior LA.

Left ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia originating from the noncoronary cusp: electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characterization and radiofrequency ablation.

Noncoronary cusp (NCC) ventricular tachycardia is a rare form of monomorphic outflow tract tachycardia, and its electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics have not been well described previously. The NCC should be considered for catheter ablation if attempts to eliminate ventricular tachyarrhythmia were unsuccessful in the other common anatomical sites of the left ventricular outflow tract.

Pulmonary venous isolation versus additional substrate modification as treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation alone is ineffective in maintaining sinus rhythm in up to one third of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared pulmonary vein antral isolation plus additional limited ablation along the inferoposterior left atrium and epicardially within the adjacent coronary sinus (PVAI + CS) to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) alone in patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were prospectively randomized to PVAI vs. PVAI + CS. All patients were seen 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after ablation and underwent 24-h ambulatory Holter monitoring. RESULTS: Following a single procedure, 17 out of 22 patients (77%) remained arrhythmia free off antiarrhythmic medication after PVAI at 18 months vs. 10 out of 20 (50%) after PVAI + CS (p < 0.01). After PVAI, three patients had recurrent paroxysmal AF, and two had atrial tachycardia, whereas after PVAI + CS, three patients had recurrent paroxysmal AF, and seven had atrial tachycardia. All patients in the PVAI + CS group with atrial tachycardia who underwent a second procedure were found to have peri-mitral macro-reentry as the underlying mechanism. Eighty-one percent of patients remained arrhythmia free off medication after 1.09 procedures in the PVAI group vs. 80% after 1.35 procedures in the PVAI + CS group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The addition of limited ablation along the inferoposterior left atrium and within the adjacent coronary sinus to PVAI alone did not reduce the recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and was associated with an increased rate of peri-mitral macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia.