Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Equity ; 5(1): 872-878, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35018321

RESUMO

This article presents the structure and function of the Health Equity Collective in developing a systemic approach to promoting health equity across the Greater Houston area. Grounded in Kania and Kramer's five phases of collective impact for coalition building, The Collective operationalizes its mission through its backbone team, steering committees, and eight workgroups; each has goals that mutually reinforce and advance its vision. To date, Phase I (generating ideas), Phase II (initiating action), and Phase III (organizing for impact) have been completed. Phases IV (implementation) and Phase V (sustainability) are currently underway.

2.
J Healthc Inf Manag ; 23(4): 38-45, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19894486

RESUMO

Effective clinical decision support (CDS) is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives, but care delivery organizations (CDO) typically struggle with CDS deployment. Ensuring safe and effective medication delivery to patients is a central focus of CDO performance improvement efforts, and this article provides an overview of best-practice strategies for applying CDS to these goals. The strategies discussed are drawn from a new guidebook, co-published and co-sponsored by more than a dozen leading organizations. Developed by scores of CDS implementers and experts, the guidebook outlines key steps and success factors for applying CDS to medication management. A central thesis is that improving outcomes with CDS interventions requires that the CDS five rights be addressed successfully. That is, the interventions must deliver the right information, to the right person, in the right format, through the right channel, at the right point in workflow. This paper provides further details about these CDS five rights, and highlights other important strategies for successful CDS programs.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital/organização & administração , Modelos Organizacionais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
3.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 25(7): 913-918, 2018 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29701854

RESUMO

Objective: The Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) guides were released in 2014 to help health systems conduct proactive risk assessment of electronic health record (EHR)- safety related policies, processes, procedures, and configurations. The extent to which SAFER recommendations are followed is unknown. Methods: We conducted risk assessments of 8 organizations of varying size, complexity, EHR, and EHR adoption maturity. Each organization self-assessed adherence to all 140 unique SAFER recommendations contained within 9 guides (range 10-29 recommendations per guide). In each guide, recommendations were organized into 3 broad domains: "safe health IT" (total 45 recommendations); "using health IT safely" (total 80 recommendations); and "monitoring health IT" (total 15 recommendations). Results: The 8 sites fully implemented 25 of 140 (18%) SAFER recommendations. Mean number of "fully implemented" recommendations per guide ranged from 94% (System Interfaces-18 recommendations) to 63% (Clinical Communication-12 recommendations). Adherence was higher for "safe health IT" domain (82.1%) vs "using health IT safely" (72.5%) and "monitoring health IT" (67.3%). Conclusions: Despite availability of recommendations on how to improve use of EHRs, most recommendations were not fully implemented. New national policy initiatives are needed to stimulate implementation of these best practices.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/normas , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
4.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2012: 1360-5, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23304415

RESUMO

Bar coded medication administration (BCMA), the automated electronic verification of medications by nurses at the patient bedside, provides an additional layer of safety to the process of medication administration in the hospital setting. We performed a retrospective, descriptive study of BCMA alerts for elevated potassium (>5.5 mg/dL) in place within a multihospital healthcare system. Overall, 642 BCMA alerts were analyzed with a 21.3% acceptance rate. In subgroup analysis, we found that the BCMA acceptance rate was 6.9% for patients aged less than one year, and 85.6% for patients aged greater than one year. The major contributing factor to the low overall acceptance rate was the high frequency of alerts in patients less than 1 year of age. Modifications to rules logic may be necessary for this specific population. While BCMA alerts can beneficial, they should be carefully implemented with periodic post-implementation analysis and refinement.


Assuntos
Processamento Eletrônico de Dados , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Hiperpotassemia , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA