Telemedicine in orthopaedics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative landscape.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis on observed trends regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine application in orthopaedics compared to other procedural, non-emergent specialties. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all telemedicine and in-person visits at a large single institution from January to December 2020. The number of patient visits, visit type, location, and provider specifics were collected. Comparisons were made between subspecialties (orthopaedic surgery, oncology, family medicine, rheumatology) for analyses. RESULTS: All specialties included were not conducting virtual visits at the beginning of 2020. By April 2020, orthopaedic virtual visits spiked to an all-time high of 33.5% of all patient visits as compared to oncology at 25.5%, rheumatology at 92.9%, and family medicine at 94%. By the end of the study period, orthopaedic virtual visits decreased back down to 6.5% of patient visits compared to oncology at 7.0%, and family medicine (17.4%) and rheumatology (26.2%). Orthopaedic providers practicing greater than 20 years had the highest average virtual visit rates. CONCLUSION: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has posed unique challenges for healthcare providers, there was a great advancement in the rollout and application of telemedicine. To mitigate the spread of infection from coronavirus and given the recent adjustments to reimbursement policies and HIPAA regulations, orthopaedics saw a dramatic expansion of telemedicine since April 2020. The pandemic may have served as a catalyst to adopt telehealth into clinical practice. However, telehealth saw a downtrend trend by December 2020, particularly in procedure-based fields like orthopaedics and oncology.

Recurrent Cardioembolic Strokes Due to Marantic Endocarditis As the Initial Presentation of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.

Metastases to the brain from primary colorectal carcinoma are rare. Existing literature describing cranial nerve palsy from metastatic colorectal cancer is scattered. To our knowledge, we are the first to describe the combination of CN deficits V, VII, and XII as the initial presentation of colorectal malignancy. The authors present the case of a patient with no past medical history who presented with multiple cranial nerve deficits of the right trigeminal, facial, and hypoglossal nerves. MRI of the brain revealed a mass in Meckel's cave, which explained the involvement of the trigeminal nerve (CN V) but not the facial (CN VII) and hypoglossal (CN XII) nerves. Further workup revealed multiple cardioembolic strokes caused by nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE). Extensive workup for the cause of his NBTE and subsequent cerebrovascular events revealed colorectal adenocarcinoma.