Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and QTc prolongation.

INTRODUCTION: The cause-and-effect relationship of QTc prolongation in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has not been studied well. OBJECTIVE: We attempt to better understand the relationship of QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients in this study. METHODS: This is a retrospective, hospital-based, observational study. All patients with normal baseline QTc interval who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection at two hospitals in Ohio, USA were included in this study. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients had QTc prolongation, and 210 patients continued to have normal QTc during hospitalization. The baseline QTc intervals were comparable in the two groups. Patients with QTc prolongation were older (mean age 67 vs. 60, P 0.003), more likely to have underlying cardiovascular disease (48% versus 26%, P 0.001), ischemic heart disease (29% versus 17%, P 0.026), congestive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (16% versus 8%, P 0.042), chronic kidney disease (23% versus 10%, P 0.005), and end-stage renal disease (12% versus 1%, P < 0.001). Patients with QTc prolongation were more likely to have received hydroxychloroquine (75% versus 59%, P 0.018), azithromycin (18% vs. 14%, P 0.034), a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin (29% vs 7%, P < 0.001), more than 1 QT prolonging agents (59% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). Patients who were on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) were less likely to develop QTc prolongation (11% versus 26%, P 0.014). QTc prolongation was not associated with increased ventricular arrhythmias or mortality. CONCLUSION: Older age, ESRD, underlying cardiovascular disease, potential virus mediated cardiac injury, and drugs like hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin, contribute to QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients. The role of ACEi in preventing QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients needs to be studied further.

Real world single center experience with saphenous vein grafts interventions: should filters be filtered out?

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) can be challenging due to no reflow phenomenon from distal embolization of debris and microvascular vasoconstriction, resulting in myocardial injury post-procedure. Guidelines promote the use of distal embolic protection devices (EPD) to protect the distal arterial bed during SVG PCI. However, this approach has shown less-than-optimal results in many studies. We report our data using the Borgess protocol [prophylactic intracoronary (IC) nicardipine injection and direct stenting], as an alternative to EPDs in a large series of SVG interventions. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study of our single center experience with SVG interventions between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [a composite of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 30 days post-procedure. RESULTS: There were 424 consecutive SVG interventions performed during the study period, and 76% of cases presented with acute coronary syndrome. Full adherence to the Borgess protocol was observed in 36% of cases; IC nicardipine was utilized in 72% of cases. MACE rate was 3.5% at 30 days driven primarily by MI (2.6%). CONCLUSION: The Borgess protocol approach to vein graft interventions proved good outcomes when compared to SVG PCI in randomized trials utilizing EPDs. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature and single center experience.

The Potential Role of Renal Denervation in the Management of Heart Failure.

Sympathetic nervous system activation in patients with heart failure is one of the main pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with the worse outcomes. Pharmacotherapies targeting neurohormonal activation have been at the center of heart failure management. Despite the advancement of therapies and the available treatments, heart failure continues to have an overall poor prognosis. Renal denervation was originally developed to lower systemic blood pressure in patients with poorly controlled hypertension, by modulating sympathetic outflow. However, more recently, multiple studies have investigated the effect of renal denervation in heart failure patients with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fractions (HFrEF). This paper provides an overview of the potential effect of renal denervation in altering the various pathophysiologic, sympathetically mediated pathways that contribute to heart failure, and reviews the literature that supports its future use in those patients.

Triple Valve Endocarditis With Aortic Root Abscess Presenting With Complete Heart Block and Distal Embolization.

Infective endocarditis (IE) carries a high mortality rate. Consequently, the prognosis is poorer in patients with multiple valve involvement. Due to poor prognosis of patients with endocarditis, early diagnosis and management of these patients can be challenging in the clinical setting. We describe a case of a 45-year-old man who came in with bacteremia secondary to a diabetic foot ulcer. Electrocardiogram (EKG) showed complete third-degree heart block which rose suspicion for possible valvular abscess formation. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed and revealed vegetations on the aortic and mitral valve. A follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed an abscess on the aortic valve along with vegetations on the mitral and tricuspid valve, the latter which was missed on TTE. The prompt utilization of TEE in detecting early and late mechanical complications of endocarditis is imperative in facilitating rapid clinical decision-making and early intervention. Patients with multi-valve endocarditis are at extremely high risk of complications and should be evaluated for surgical intervention immediately.

Clinical Outcomes and Disease Burden in Amyloidosis Patients with and Without Atrial Fibrillation-Insight from the National Inpatient Sample Database.

Amyloidosis is a systemic illness that affects multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems. Common manifestations include restrictive cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, nephrotic syndrome, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. It is unknown whether coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens the disease burden and outcomes in patients with systemic amyloidosis. In this study, those with a diagnosis of amyloidosis with and without coexisting AF were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-specifically, the National Inpatient Sample for the year 2016-based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. During 2016, a total of 2,997 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of amyloidosis, including 918 with concurrent AF. Greater rates of mortality (7.4% vs. 5.6%); heart block (6.8% vs. 2.8%); cardiogenic shock (5% vs. 1.6%); placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or permanent pacemaker (14.5% vs. 4.5%); renal failure (29% vs. 21%); heart failure (66% vs. 30%); and bleeding complications (5.7% vs. 2.8%) were observed in patients with a diagnosis of amyloidosis and coexisting AF when compared with in patients without AF. Interestingly, patients with amyloidosis without comorbid AF had greater odds of associated stroke relative to those with concurrent AF (7.9% vs. 3.4%).

In-hospital outcomes and prevalence of comorbidities in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with and without infective endocarditis: insight from the National Inpatient Sample (2013-2014).

In patients with infective endocarditis (IE), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is an uncommon phenomenon. Due to limited data, we intend to evaluate the clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with STEMI with and without underlying IE. Mortality and morbidity are exponentially worse in STEMI with concomitant IE when compared with without IE. Patients with primary diagnosis of STEMI with and without IE were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database of the National Inpatient Sample for the years 2013 and 2014 based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. During 2013 and 2014, a total of 117,386 patients were admitted with the principle diagnosis of STEMI, out of whom 305 had comorbid IE. There was a significantly increased in-hospital mortality (27.5% vs 10.8%), length of stay (LOS) (14 days vs 5 days), acute kidney injury (AKI; 44.9% vs 18.7%), stroke (23.6% vs 3%), aortic valve replacement (9.5% vs 0.3%), mitral valve replacement (0.2%-5.2%), sepsis (50% vs 6%) and acute respiratory failure (36.7% vs 16.7%) in patients with STEMI with IE when compared with patients with STEMI and without comorbid IE. STEMI without IE had a higher number of angiographies (58.7% vs 25.9%) and percutaneous coronary interventions (50.7% vs 14.4%) during the hospital course when compared with STEMI with IE. In conclusions, hospitalized patients with STEMI with a concurrent diagnosis of IE are at higher risk of in-hospital mortality, increased LOS, AKI, stroke, valve replacements, and acute respiratory failure.

In-hospital outcomes and prevalence of comorbidities in patients with infective endocarditis with and without heart blocks: Insight from the National Inpatient Sample.

Infective endocarditis (IE) complicated by heart block can have adverse outcomes and usually requires immediate surgical and cardiac interventions. Data on outcomes and trends in patients with IE with concurrent heart block are lacking. Patients with a primary diagnosis of IE with or without heart block were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database, specifically the National Inpatient Sample for the years 2013 and 2014, based on International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification Ninth Revision codes. During 2013 and 2014, a total of 18,733 patients were admitted with a primary diagnosis of IE, including 867 with concurrent heart blocks. Increased in-hospital mortality (13% vs 10.3%), length of stay (19 vs 14 days), and cost of care ($282,573 vs $223,559) were found for patients with IE complicated by heart block. Additionally, these patients were more likely to develop cardiogenic shock (8.9% vs 3.2%), acute kidney injury (40.1% vs 32.6%), and hematologic complications (19.3% vs 15.2%), and require placement of a pacemaker (30.6% vs 0.9%). IE and concurrent heart block resulted in increased requirement for aortic (25.7% vs 6.1%) and mitral (17.3% vs 4.2%) valvular replacements. Conclusion was made that IE with concurrent heart block worsens in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost for patients. Our analysis demonstrates an increase in cardiac procedures, specifically aortic and/or mitral valve replacements, and Implantable Cardiovascular Defibrillator/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/ Permanent Pacemaker (ICD/CRT/PPM) placement in IE with concurrent heart block. A close telemonitoring system and prompt interventions may represent a significant mitigation strategy to avoid the adverse outcomes observed in this study.

A single, shared origin for all three coronary arteries from the right coronary cusp: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Anomalous coronary arteries occur in less than 1% of the population and have been implicated in sudden cardiac and exercise-related death. The most common variant involves the left circumflex artery arising from a separate ostium than the left coronary artery. This case demonstrates a rare variation in which all three coronary arteries arise from a shared, single, ostium originating from the right coronary cusp. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 63-year-old Caucasian man with a history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation who presented for syncope. Inpatient ischemic workup, including coronary angiography, demonstrated a rare coronary anomaly which included all three coronary arteries arising from a shared, single, ostium originating from the right coronary cusp. Our patient was treated conservatively with an option for coronary bypass if symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Surgical management is indicated in high-risk patients, but the optimal management for a nonmalignant, shared origin for all three coronary arteries has not been explored in detail.

First-Degree Heart Block: The Guiding Light to Discovering an Aortic Root Abscess.

Minor conduction abnormalities such as first-degree heart blocks are generally overlooked on electrocardiogram (EKG) as their impact on clinical management is usually not substantial. However, they can be an important screening tool for early diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) and associated perivalvular complications, especially in patients with surgical valve replacements. This case report describes a 58-year-old male with a past medical history of bicuspid aortic valve status post replacement five years prior to presentation who initially presented with presumed symptoms of a complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) and later developed chest pain and shortness of breath. He showed no initial signs of infection including negative blood and urine cultures. EKG showed new onset prolonged PR interval. He then underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) which showed prosthetic valve dysfunction and subsequently underwent transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) which revealed vegetations on all leaflets and circumferential peri-aortic abscess encompassing both coronary ostia and extending towards the tricuspid and mitral valve leaflets. The patient then underwent redo-sternotomy for dissection of mediastinal adhesions, extraction of the aortic bio-prosthesis, and debridement of the aortic root abscess. The aortic root was replaced with a homograft and the valve cultures were positive for Enterococcus faecium. The patient developed complete heart block afterwards and received a permanent pacemaker; repeat cultures showed no further evidence of infection. This case report is presented to reiterate the importance of early detection of IE-related aortic valve abscess and their rare sequelae. Early screening for conduction abnormalities via EKG and subsequently a TEE can allow prompt identification and management of valvular abnormalities to prevent life-threatening complications and improve patient outcomes.

Intra-Arterial Hemodynamics to Guide the Percutaneous Treatment of a Difficult-to-Engage Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis.

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is the most frequent vascular complication after renal transplantation. TRAS is associated with resistant hypertension and allograft dysfunction, early diagnosis and either endovascular or surgical treatment is crucial to preserve graft function. Noninvasive imaging can usually detect the underlying stenosis. In this report we present a novel technique for successful angioplasty and stent deployment in a difficult-to-engage transplant-renal artery.

Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an update on technological developments and clinical applications.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with underlying sever aortic valve stenosis across all spectrum of the disease. CT imaging is so crucial to the pre procedural planning, to incorporate the information from the CT imaging in the decision making intraprocedurally and to predict and identity the post procedural complications.Areas covered: In this article, we review available studies on CT role in TAVR procedure and provide update on the technological developments and clinical applications.Expert opinion: CT imaging, with its high resolution, and in particular its utilization in aortic annular measurements, bicuspid aortic valve assessment, hypoattenuated leaflet thickening and valve in valve therapy proved to be the ideal approach to study the mechanisms of aortic stenosis, detection of high-risk anatomy, more accurate risk stratification and thus to allow a personalized catheter based intervention of the affected patients.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Multiple Arterial Grafts Versus Single Arterial Graft for Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown conflicting outcomes for multiple arterial graft (MAG) coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with single arterial grafts (SAGs). The predominant evidence supporting the use of MAGs is observational. The aim of this meta-analysis of RCTs is to compare outcomes following MAG and SAG. We searched multiple databases for RCTs comparing MAG versus SAG. The clinical outcomes studied were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stroke, sternal wound complications, and major bleeding. We used hazard ratio (HR), relative risk (RR), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for measuring outcomes. Ten RCTs (6392 patients) were included. The average follow-up in the studies was 4.2 years. The average age of the patients in the studies ranged from 56.3 years to 74.6. No significant difference was seen between MAG and SAG groups for all-cause mortality (11.8% vs 12.7%, HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.09, p 0.36), cardiac mortality (4.1% vs 4.5%, HR 0.96 95% CI 0.74 to 1.26, p 0.77), MI (3.5% vs 5.1%, HR 0.87 95% CI 0.67 to 1.12, p 0.28), and major bleeding (3.3% vs 4.9%, RR 0.85 95% CI 0.64 to 1.13, p 0.26). Repeat revascularization in MAG showed a lower RR than SAG when one of the confounding studies was excluded (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.99, p 0.04). The incidence of stroke was lower in MAG than SAG (2.9% vs 3.9%, RR 0.74 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98, p 0.03). MAG had higher incidence of sternal wound complications than SAG (2.9% vs 1.7%, RR 1.75 95% CI 1.19 to 2.55, p 0.004). In conclusion, MAG does not have a survival advantage compared with SAG but is better in revascularization and risk of stroke. This benefit may be set off by a higher incidence of sternal wound complications in MAG.

Coexisting Cirrhosis Worsens Inpatient Outcomes in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2013-2014.

Introduction Cirrhosis is known to be an important prognostic factor in determining morbidity and mortality in preoperative cardiac risk assessment for cardiac surgery. Data is limited on outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and comorbid liver cirrhosis. The objective of our study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients suffering from IE both with and without underlying liver cirrhosis as well as to determine rates of in-hospital mortality and factors that contribute to this outcome. Hypothesis Liver cirrhosis worsens clinical outcomes in patients with IE. Materials and methods Patients with a principal diagnosis of IE with and without liver cirrhosis were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization (HCUP) database, specifically the National Inpatient Sample for the years 2013 and 2014 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Results During 2013 and 2014, a total of 17,952 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of IE, out of whom 780 had concurrent liver cirrhosis. There was increased in-hospital mortality [15.6% vs 10.2%, aOR = 1.57 (1.27-1.93)], acute kidney injury [41.4% vs 32.6%, aOR = 1.45 (1.24-1.69)], and hematologic complications [32.1 vs 14.7%, aOR = 2.87 (2.44-3.37)] in patients with IE with liver cirrhosis when compared to patients with IE without liver cirrhosis. Patients having IE without liver cirrhosis underwent an increased number of interventions, i.e. aortic (7.2 vs 3.7%, aOR = 0.51 (0.34-0.76)) and mitral (4.9% vs 3.4%, aOR = 0.39 (0.23-0.69)) valvular replacements as compared to those with liver cirrhosis, which may explain the increased mortality seen in patients with liver cirrhosis. Conclusion Liver cirrhosis is an important prognostic risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients with IE. The coagulopathic state in addition to increased rates of bleeding complications and renal dysfunction make these patients poor surgical candidates thus contributing to higher mortality. Further research into the individual risk factors contributing to the increased mortality rates in patients with IE and cirrhosis is required.

Comparison of Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (MitraClip) in Patients <80 Years Versus ≥80 Years.

The influence of age on outcomes of patients selected for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) remains largely unknown in the United States. This study sought to assess the outcomes of TMVR in highly aged patients (≥80 years). We queried the National Readmission Database from January 2014 to December 2016 for elective TMVR hospitalizations. Propensity-score matching was used to compare in-hospital and 30-day outcomes between highly aged patients and those less than 80 years. Of 6,025 (weighted national estimate) hospitalizations for TMVR, total of 3,368 included highly aged patients (mean age 85.3) and 2,657 included patients less than 80 years (mean age 69). In the Propensity-score matched cohort (age≥ 80, n = 2,185; age <80, n = 2,197), highly aged patients had similar rates of in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 1.6%; p = 0.22), ischemic stroke (0.5% vs 0.5%; p = 0.83), cardiac tamponade (0.2% vs 0.4%; p = 0.58), cardiogenic shock (1.2% vs 1.7%; p = 0.25), and acute myocardial infarction (0.6% vs 0.4%; p = 0.30), but higher rates of discharge to skilled nursing facility(9.7% vs 4.5%; p <0.001), all-cause 30-day readmissions (14.2% vs 10.5%; p <0.001), and heart failure-related 30-day readmissions (4.7% vs 3.0%; p = 0.006), compared with those less than 80 years. TMVR therapy is safe and is associated with low rates of in-hospital adverse events but higher rate of 30-day readmissions in highly aged patients compared with patients less than 80 years. Evidence-based interventions proven to be effective in reducing the burden of heart failure readmissions should be utilized in these patients to further improve outcomes.

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoablation in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation is commonly performed using radiofrequency energy with cryoablation gaining acceptance. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which compared radiofrequency versus cryoablation for patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A systematic search strategy identified both published and unpublished articles from inception to November 10, 2016, in multiple databases. The primary outcomes for this meta-analysis were long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12-month follow-up and overall postoperative complication rates. For all included studies, the methodological quality was assessed through the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 247 articles were identified with eight being included in this review as they satisfied the prespecified inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial fibrillation at ≥12-month follow-up between those receiving cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation, respectively (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.67-1.43, I2 = 56%, p=0.90). Additionally, the secondary outcomes of duration of ablation, fluoroscopy time, and ablation time failed to reach significance. Cryoballoon ablation had significantly greater odds of postoperative phrenic nerve injury at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that cryoballoon ablation provides comparable benefits with regard to freedom from atrial fibrillation at medium-term follow-up, fluoroscopy time, ablation time, operative duration, and overall complication rate in comparison to radiofrequency ablation.