The Scope and Distribution of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries Associated With Combat-Related Extremity Limb Salvage.

PURPOSE: Chronic pain and functional limitations secondary to nerve injuries are a major barrier to optimal recovery for patients following high-energy extremity trauma. Given the associated skeletal and soft tissue management challenges in the polytraumatized patient, concomitant nerve injuries may be overlooked or managed in delayed fashion. Whereas previous literature has reported rates of peripheral nerve injuries at <10% in the setting of high-energy extremity trauma, in our experience, the incidence of these injuries has been much higher. Thus, we sought to define the incidence, pain sequelae, and functional outcomes following upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries in the combat-related limb salvage population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent limb salvage procedures to include flap coverage for combat-related upper extremity trauma at a single institution between January 2011 and January 2020. We collected data on patient demographics; perioperative complications; location of nerve injuries; surgical interventions; chronic pain; and subjective, patient-reported functional limitations. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients underwent flap procedures on 49 upper extremities following combat-related trauma. All patients were male with a median age of 27 years, and 96% (n = 47) of injuries were sustained from a blast mechanism. Thirty-three of the 49 extremities (67%) sustained associated nerve injuries. The most commonly injured nerve was the ulnar (51%), followed by median (30%) and radial/posterior interosseous (19%). Of the 33 extremities with nerve injuries, 18 (55%) underwent surgical intervention. Nerve repair/reconstruction was the most common procedure (67%), followed by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR, 17%). Chronic pain and functional limitation were common following nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity peripheral nerve injury is common following high-energy combat-related trauma with high rates of chronic pain and functional limitations. Surgeons performing limb salvage procedures to include flap coverage should anticipate associated peripheral nerve injuries and be prepared to repair or reconstruct the injured nerves, when feasible. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

A Modified Scapular-Parascapular Flap Design for Optimal Coverage of the Residual Limb.

BACKGROUND: Large soft tissue defects associated with major limb amputation pose a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon due to the 3-dimensional contour of the residual limb and the need to withstand the unnatural shear forces imparted by prosthetic sockets. Fasciocutaneous flaps based on the circumflex scapular system have proven useful for residual limb coverage due to the durability of the tissue provided, the absence of functional morbidity, and the ease of reelevation. A modified, bilobed flap design that incorporates large Burrow triangles into each limb serves to leverage the perforasome anatomy of the posterior trunk to provide maximal 3-dimensional coverage and favorable flap geometry while also facilitating donor site closure. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed for all patients who underwent reconstruction of a residual limb after major amputation using the modified, bilobed scapular-parascapular free flap design at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center between 2018 and 2021. A computer-based application was used to calculate flap area and dimensions based on photographs of preoperative and intraoperative markings. RESULTS: Six patients with varying amputation levels (2 transtibial, 1 transfemoral, 1 hip-disarticulation, 1 hemipelvectomy, 1 transradial) underwent soft tissue coverage using the modified flap design. Mean flap area was 318.4 cm 2 with 51.1 cm 2 attributable to the modified design. This represents a 16% increase over a conventional bilobed design. There were no partial or complete flap failures. CONCLUSIONS: The modified scapular-parascapular flap design enables harvest of a larger and more versatile fasciocutaneous flap with geometry that is well suited for coverage of the residual limb.

Functional Limb Restoration Through Amputation: Minimizing Pain and Optimizing Function With the Use of Advanced Amputation Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the role of advanced orthoplastic techniques in harnessing the full potential of elective amputation as a functionally restorative procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Once considered the unfortunate consequence of failed reconstructive efforts, recent outcomes studies have prompted a re-evaluation of the role of amputation in the management of complex extremity trauma. However, even as amputation is appropriately afforded greater consideration as part of the reconstructive algorithm, reconstructive techniques that are commonly utilized in pursuit of limb salvage are rarely applied to amputation. METHODS: The following case demonstrates the successful application of orthoplastic reconstructive techniques to achieve optimal pain and functional outcomes in a 41-year-old active duty soldier who underwent an elective transtibial amputation after prolonged, limb salvage. RESULTS: The patient presented with a large osteocutaneous proximal tibial defect secondary to trauma and subsequent osteomyelitis. The patient underwent a free scapular-parascapular fasciocutaneous flap to provide soft tissue coverage and facilitate the skeletal reconstruction necessary for either continued limb salvage or amputation. Due to tibial allodynia and severely limited ankle function, the patient subsequently elected for amputation in favor of continued limb salvage. Thus, a transtibial amputation was performed concurrently with a pedicled vascularized fibula to address the proximal tibial defect. A modified agonist-antagonist myoneural interface procedure was used to maximize post-amputation function, with creation of regenerative peripheral nerve interface constructs to prophylax against neurogenic pain. After the operation, the patient achieved improved function of the extremity with the use of a prosthesis and reported substantially improved pain while remaining on active duty in a warfighting military occupational specialty. CONCLUSIONS: By addressing all of the reconstructive components commonly considered in limb salvage, an orthoplastic approach to amputation surgery can minimize pain and maximize the rehabilitative potential of the amputee.

Institutional Experience and Orthoplastic Collaboration Associated with Improved Flap-based Limb Salvage Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Flap-based limb salvage surgery balances the morbidity and complexity of soft tissue transfer against the potential benefit of preserving a functional limb when faced with a traumatized extremity with composite tissue injury. These composite tissue injuries are well suited for multidisciplinary management between orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. Thus, it makes intuitive sense that a collaborative, orthoplastic approach to flap-based limb salvage surgery can result in improved outcomes with decreased risk of flap failure and other complications, raising the question of whether this orthoplastic team approach should be the new standard of care in limb salvage surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there an association between increased annual institutional volume and perioperative complications to include free and local flap failure (substantial flap viability loss necessitating return to the operating room for debridement of a major portion or all of the flap or amputation)? (2) Is an integrated orthoplastic collaborative approach to managing combat-related traumatic injuries of the extremities individually associated with a decreased risk of flap failure and overall flap-related complications? (3) What other factors, such as location of injury, injury severity score, and initial inpatient length of stay, were associated with flap necrosis and flap-related complications? METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent flap-based limb salvage for combat-related extremity trauma in the United States Military Health System's National Capital Region between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2012. In total, 307 patients underwent 330 flap procedures. Of the 330 flaps, 59% (195) were local or pedicled flaps and 41% (135) were free flaps. Patients were primarily male (99% [303]), with a median (interquartile range) age of 24 years old (IQR 21 to 29), and 87% (267 of 307) of injuries were sustained from a blast mechanism. We collected data on patient demographics, annual case volume involving flap coverage of extremities, mechanism of injury, flap characteristics, perioperative complications, flap failure, flap revision, isolated orthopaedic management versus an integrated orthoplastic approach, and other salvage procedures. For the purposes of this study, orthoplastic management refers to operative management of flap coverage with microvascular surgeons present for soft tissue transfer after initial debridement and fixation by orthopaedic surgery. The orthoplastic management was implemented on a case-by-case basis based on individual injury characteristics and the surgeon's discretion with no formal starting point. When implemented, the orthoplastic team consisted of an orthopaedic surgeon and microvascular-trained hand surgeons and/or plastic surgeons. In all, 77% (254 of 330) of flaps were performed using this model. We considered perioperative flap complications as any complication (such as infection, hematoma, dehiscence, congestion, or necrosis) resulting in return to the operating room for re-evaluation, correction, or partial debridement of the flap. We defined flap failure as a return to the operating room for debridement of a major portion of the flap or amputation secondary to complete or near-complete loss of flap viability. Of the flap procedures, 12% (40 of 330) were classified as a failure and 14% (46 of 330) experienced complications necessitating return to the operating room. Over the study period, free flaps were not more likely to fail than pedicled flaps (11% versus 13%; p = 0.52) or have complications necessitating additional procedures (14% versus 16%; p = 0.65). RESULTS: Our multiple linear regression model demonstrated that an increased number of free flaps performed in our institution annually in any given year was associated with a lower likelihood of failure per case (r = -0.17; p = 0.03) and lower likelihood of reoperation for each flap (r = -0.34; p < 0.001), after adjusting for injury severity and team type (orthoplastic or orthopaedic only). We observed a similar relationship for pedicled flaps, with increased annual case volume associated with a decreased risk of flap failure and reoperation per case after adjusting for injury severity and team type (r = -0.21; p = 0.003 and r = -0.22; p < 0.001, respectively). Employment of a collaborative orthoplastic team approach was associated with decreased flap failures (odds ratio 0.4 [95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9]; p = 0.02). Factors associated with flap failure included a lower extremity flap (OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.3 to 6.2]; p = 0.01) and use of muscle flaps (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.1 to 5.3]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Although prior reports of combat-related extremity trauma have described greater salvage success with the use of pedicled flaps, these reports are biased by institutional inexperience with free tissue transfer, the lack of a coordinated multiservice effort, and severity of injury bias (the most severe injuries often result in free tissue transfer). Our institutional experience, alongside a growing body of literature regarding complex extremity trauma in the civilian setting, suggest a benefit to free tissue coverage to treat complex extremity trauma with adequate practice volume and collaboration. We demonstrated that flap failure and flap-related complications are inversely associated with institutional experience regardless of flap type. Additionally, a collaborative orthoplastic approach was associated with decreased flap failures. However, these results must be interpreted with consideration for potential confounding between the increased case volume coinciding with more frequent collaboration between orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. Given these findings, consideration of an orthoplastic approach at high-volume institutions to address soft tissue coverage in complex extremity trauma may lead to decreased flap failure rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Residual Limb Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, and Limb Function: A Prospective Study of 33 Major Limb Amputees.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation is an emerging surgical technique to treat neuroma pain whereby sensory and mixed motor nerves are transferred to nearby redundant motor nerve branches. In a recent randomized controlled trial, targeted muscle reinnervation was recently shown to reduce postamputation pain relative to conventional neuroma excision and muscle burying. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve residual limb pain and phantom limb pain in the period before surgery to 1 year after surgery? (2) Does targeted muscle reinnervation improve Patient-reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) pain intensity and pain interference scores at 1 year after surgery? (3) After 1 year, does targeted muscle reinnervation improve functional outcome scores (Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey [OPUS] with Rasch conversion and Neuro-Quality of Life [Neuro-QOL])? METHODS: Data on patients who were ineligible for randomization or declined to be randomized and underwent targeted muscle reinnervation for pain were gathered for the present analysis. Data were collected prospectively from 2013 to 2017. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 10 of whom lacked 1-year follow-up, leaving 33 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes measured were the difference in residual limb and phantom limb pain before and 1 year after surgery, assessed by an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were change in PROMIS pain measures and change in limb function, assessed by the OPUS Rasch for upper limbs and Neuro-QOL for lower limbs before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: By 1 year after targeted muscle reinnervation, NRS scores for residual limb pain from 6.4 ± 2.6 to 3.6 ± 2.2 (mean difference -2.7 [95% CI -4.2 to -1.3]; p < 0.001) and phantom limb pain decreased from 6.0 ± 3.1 to 3.6 ± 2.9 (mean difference -2.4 [95% CI -3.8 to -0.9]; p < 0.001). PROMIS pain intensity and pain interference scores improved with respect to residual limb and phantom limb pain (residual limb pain intensity: 53.4 ± 9.7 to 44.4 ± 7.9, mean difference -9.0 [95% CI -14.0 to -4.0]; residual limb pain interference: 60.4 ± 9.3 to 51.7 ± 8.2, mean difference -8.7 [95% CI -13.1 to -4.4]; phantom limb pain intensity: 49.3 ± 10.4 to 43.2 ± 9.3, mean difference -6.1 [95% CI -11.3 to -0.9]; phantom limb pain interference: 57.7 ± 10.4 to 50.8 ± 9.8, mean difference -6.9 [95% CI -12.1 to -1.7]; p ≤ 0.012 for all comparisons). On functional assessment, OPUS Rasch scores improved from 53.7 ± 3.4 to 56.4 ± 3.7 (mean difference +2.7 [95% CI 2.3 to 3.2]; p < 0.001) and Neuro-QOL scores improved from 32.9 ± 1.5 to 35.2 ± 1.6 (mean difference +2.3 [95% CI 1.8 to 2.9]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted muscle reinnervation demonstrates improvement in residual limb and phantom limb pain parameters in major limb amputees. It should be considered as a first-line surgical treatment option for chronic amputation-related pain in patients with major limb amputations. Additional investigation into the effect on function and quality of life should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) to "standard treatment" of neuroma excision and burying into muscle for postamputation pain. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To date, no intervention is consistently effective for neuroma-related residual limb or phantom limb pain (PLP). TMR is a nerve transfer procedure developed for prosthesis control, incidentally found to improve postamputation pain. METHODS: A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted. 28 amputees with chronic pain were assigned to standard treatment or TMR. Primary outcome was change between pre- and postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) pain scores for residual limb pain and PLP at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included NRS for all patients at final follow-up, PROMIS pain scales, neuroma size, and patient function. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, changes in PLP scores at 1 year were 3.2 versus -0.2 (difference 3.4, adjusted confidence interval (aCI) -0.1 to 6.9, adjusted P = 0.06) for TMR and standard treatment, respectively. Changes in residual limb pain scores were 2.9 versus 0.9 (difference 1.9, aCI -0.5 to 4.4, P = 0.15). In longitudinal mixed model analysis, difference in change scores for PLP was significantly greater in the TMR group compared with standard treatment [mean (aCI) = 3.5 (0.6, 6.3), P = 0.03]. Reduction in residual limb pain was favorable for TMR (P = 0.10). At longest follow-up, including 3 crossover patients, results favored TMR over standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this first surgical RCT for the treatment of postamputation pain in major limb amputees, TMR improved PLP and trended toward improved residual limb pain compared with conventional neurectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02205385 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in the Upper Extremity Amputee: A Technical Roadmap.

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) offers the potential for improved prosthetic function by reclaiming the neural control information that is lost as a result of upper extremity amputation. In addition to the prosthetic control benefits, TMR is a potential treatment for postamputation neuroma pain. Here, we present our surgical technique for TMR nerve transfers in transhumeral and shoulder disarticulation patients.

Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain.

BACKGROUND: Postamputation neuroma pain can prevent comfortable prosthesis wear in patients with limb amputations, and currently available treatments are not consistently effective. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a decade-old technique that employs a series of novel nerve transfers to permit intuitive control of upper-limb prostheses. Clinical experience suggests that it may also serve as an effective therapy for postamputation neuroma pain; however, this has not been explicitly studied. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated the effect of TMR on residual limb neuroma pain in upper-extremity amputees. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of all 28 patients treated with TMR from 2002 to 2012 at Northwestern Memorial Hospital/Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (Chicago, IL, USA) and San Antonio Military Medical Center (San Antonio, TX, USA). Twenty-six of 28 patients had sufficient (> 6 months) followup for study inclusion. The amputation levels were shoulder disarticulation (10 patients) and transhumeral (16 patients). All patients underwent TMR for the primary purpose of improved myoelectric control. Of the 26 patients included in the study, 15 patients had evidence of postamputation neuroma pain before undergoing TMR. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients presenting with neuroma pain before TMR, 14 experienced complete resolution of pain in the transferred nerves, and the remaining patient's pain improved (though did not resolve). None of the patients who presented without evidence of postamputation neuroma pain developed neuroma pain after the TMR procedure. All 26 patients were fitted with a prosthesis, and 23 of the 26 patients were able to operate a TMR-controlled prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: None of the 26 patients who underwent TMR demonstrated evidence of new neuroma pain after the procedure, and all but one of the 15 patients who presented with preoperative neuroma pain experienced complete relief of pain in the distribution of the transferred nerves. TMR offers a novel and potentially more effective therapy for the management of neuroma pain after limb amputation.

Thighplasty at the Time of Stage-1 Bone-Anchored Osseointegration Surgery.

Background: For patients with transfemoral amputations and difficulty tolerating conventional socket-based prostheses, osseointegrated (OI) implants have enabled increased prosthetic use, improved patient satisfaction, and shown promising functional outcomes1,2. Although the use of OI implants effectively eliminates the soft-tissue-related challenges that have plagued socket-based prostheses, the presence of a permanent, percutaneous implant imparts a host of new soft-tissue challenges that have yet to be fully defined. In patients undergoing OI surgery who have redundant soft tissue, we perform a thighplasty to globally reduce excess skin and fat, tighten the soft-tissue envelope, and improve the contour of the residual limb. Description: First, the orthopaedic surgical team prepares the residual femur for implantation of the OI device. After the implant is inserted, the residual hamstrings and quadriceps musculature are closed over the end of the femur, and the subcutaneous tissue and skin are closed in a layered fashion. Although the anatomic location and amount of excess soft tissue are patient-dependent, we perform a standard pinch test to determine the amount of soft tissue that can be safely removed for the thighplasty. Once the proposed area of resection is marked, we proceed with longitudinal, sharp dissection down to the level of the muscular fascia. At this point, we use another pinch test to confirm the amount of soft-tissue resection that will allow for adequate resection without undue tension3. Excess subcutaneous fat and skin are carefully removed along the previously marked incisions, typically overlying the medial compartment of the thigh in the setting of patients with transfemoral amputations. The thighplasty incision is closed in a layered fashion over 1 or 2 Jackson-Pratt drains, depending on the amount of resection. Alternatives: Depending on the amount of redundant soft tissue, thighplasty may not be necessary at the time of OI surgery; however, in our experience, excess soft tissue surrounding the transcutaneous aperture can predispose the patient to increased shear forces at the aperture, increased drainage, and increased risk of infection4. Rationale: Although superficial infectious complications are most common following OI surgery, the need for soft-tissue refashioning and excision is one of the most common reasons for reoperation1,5. Our group has been more aggressive than most in our use of a vertical thighplasty procedure to globally reduce soft-tissue motion in the residual limb to avoid reoperation. Expected Outcomes: Although much of the OI literature has focused on infectious complications, recent studies have demonstrated reoperation rates of 18% to 36% for redundant soft tissue following OI surgery1,5. We believe that thighplasty at the time of OI not only reduces the likelihood of reoperation but may also decrease infectious complications by reducing relative motion and inflammation at the skin-implant interface4,6. Important Tips: The thighplasty procedure is ideally performed as part of the first stage of the OPRA (Osseointegrated Prosthesis for the Rehabilitation of Amputees) procedure to limit the likelihood of problematic ischemia-related complications.We utilize a confirmatory pinch test both before and throughout the thighplasty procedure to ensure adequate resection without undue tension.The thighplasty excision pattern utilizes a long vertical limb designed to decrease the circumferential laxity of the residual limb. Maximal tension is borne on the vertical limb and not on the transverse extensions, as these are prone to scar widening and distortion of surrounding tissues.Closed-suction drainage is utilized liberally to decrease the likelihood of a symptomatic seroma. Acronyms and Abbreviations: OI = osseointegratedOPRA = Osseointegrated Prosthesis for the Rehabilitation of AmputeesPVNS = pigmented villonodular synovitisT-GCT = tenosynovial giant-cell tumor.BMI = body mass indexPMH = past medical history.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective technique for the prevention and management of phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) among amputees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptomatic neuroma recurrence and neuropathic pain outcomes between cohorts undergoing TMR at the time of amputation (ie, acute) versus TMR following symptomatic neuroma formation (ie, delayed). METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective chart review was conducted using patients undergoing TMR between 2015 and 2020. Symptomatic neuroma recurrence and surgical complications were collected. A subanalysis was conducted for patients who completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, interference, and behavior scales and an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) form. RESULTS: A total of 105 limbs from 103 patients were identified, with 73 acute TMR limbs and 32 delayed TMR limbs. Nineteen percent of the delayed TMR group had symptomatic neuromas recur in the distribution of original TMR compared with 1% of the acute TMR group ( P < 0.05). Pain surveys were completed at final follow-up by 85% of patients in the acute TMR group and 69% of patients in the delayed TMR group. Of this subanalysis, acute TMR patients reported significantly lower PLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05), RLP PROMIS pain intensity ( P < 0.05), and RLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05) scores in comparison to the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent acute TMR reported improved pain scores and a decreased rate of neuroma formation compared with TMR performed in a delayed fashion. These results highlight the promising role of TMR in the prevention of neuropathic pain and neuroma formation at the time of amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Emerging Value of Osseointegration for Intuitive Prosthetic Control after Transhumeral Amputations: A Systematic Review.

Background: Upper extremity limb loss profoundly impacts a patient's quality of life and well-being and carries a significant societal cost. Although osseointegration allows the attachment of the prosthesis directly to the bone, it is a relatively recent development as an alternative to conventional socket prostheses. The objective of this review was to identify reports on osseointegrated prosthetic embodiment for transhumeral amputations and assess the implant systems used, postoperative outcomes, and complications. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines assessed functional outcomes, implant longevity and retention, activities of daily living, and complications associated with osseointegrated prostheses in transhumeral amputees. Results: The literature search yielded 794 articles, with eight of these articles (retrospective analyses and case series) meeting the inclusion criteria. Myoelectric systems equipped with Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees implants have been commonly used as transhumeral osseointegration systems. The transhumeral osseointegrated prostheses offered considerable improvements in functional outcomes, with participants demonstrating enhanced range of motion and improved performance of activities compared with traditional socket-based prostheses. One study demonstrated the advantage of an osseointegrated implant as a bidirectional gateway for signal transmission, enabling intuitive control of a bionic hand. Conclusions: Osseointegrated prostheses hold the potential to significantly improve the quality of life for individuals with transhumeral amputations. Continued research and clinical expansion are expected to lead to the realization of enhanced efficacy and safety in this technique, accompanied by cost reductions over time as a result of improved efficiencies and advancements in device design.

Utility of Thermal Imaging in Predicting Superficial Infections in Transfemoral Osseointegrated Implants.

Background: Superficial infection is a common minor complication of transcutaneous implants that can be challenging to predict or diagnose. Although it remains unclear whether superficial infections progress to deep infections (which may require implant removal), predicting and treating any infection in these patients is important. Given that flap thinning during stage II surgery requires compromising vascularity for stability of the skin penetration aperture, we hypothesized that early skin temperature changes predict long-term superficial infection risk. Methods: We obtained standardized thermal imaging and recorded surface temperatures of the aperture and overlying flaps 2 weeks postoperatively for the first 34 patients (46 limbs) treated with the Osseointegrated Prosthesis for the Rehabilitation of Amputees transfemoral implant system. We used two-sided t tests to compare temperatures surrounding the aperture and adjacent soft tissues in patients with and without subsequent infection. Results: During median follow-up of 3 years, 14 limbs (30.4%) developed 23 superficial infections. At patients' initial 2-week visit, mean skin temperature surrounding the aperture was 36.3ºC in limbs that later developed superficial infections and 36.7ºC in uninfected limbs (P = 0.35). In four patients with bilateral implants who later developed superficial infection in one limb, average temperature was 1.5ºC colder in the infected limb (P = 0.12). Conclusions: Superficial infections remain a frequent complication of transfemoral osseointegration surgery. We did not find differences in early heat signatures between limbs subsequently complicated and those not complicated by superficial infection. Further research should explore more objective measures to predict, diagnose, and prevent infections after osseointegration surgery.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain.

Over the past decade, the field of prosthetics has witnessed significant progress, particularly in the development of surgical techniques to enhance the functionality of prosthetic limbs. Notably, novel surgical interventions have had an additional positive outcome, as individuals with amputations have reported neuropathic pain relief after undergoing such procedures. Subsequently, surgical techniques have gained increased prominence in the treatment of postamputation pain, including one such surgical advancement - targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). TMR involves a surgical approach that reroutes severed nerves as a type of nerve transfer to "target" motor nerves and their accompanying motor end plates within nearby muscles. This technique originally aimed to create new myoelectric sites for amplified electromyography (EMG) signals to enhance prosthetic intuitive control. Subsequent work showed that TMR also could prevent the formation of painful neuromas as well as reduce postamputation neuropathic pain (e.g., Residual and Phantom Limb Pain). Indeed, multiple studies have demonstrated TMR's effectiveness in mitigating postamputation pain as well as improving prosthetic functional outcomes. However, technical variations in the procedure have been identified as it is adopted by clinics worldwide. The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed step-by-step description of the TMR procedure, serving as the foundation for an international, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05009394), including nine clinics in seven countries. In this trial, TMR and two other surgical techniques for managing postamputation pain will be evaluated.

Concurrent Validity of PROMIS With DASH and DVPRS in Transhumeral Amputees.

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess whether select domains of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) significantly correlate with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) among transhumeral amputees. METHODS: We prospectively administered DASH, DVPRS, and PROMIS (including Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, and Pain Behavior domains) testing to patients presenting for consideration of osseointegration after transhumeral amputation. Concurrent validity was assessed via Pearson correlation testing. RESULTS: The mean DASH score of the cohort was 32.8. The mean DVPRS score was 1.8. The mean PROMIS scores were 33.8, 50.5, and 50.6 for Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, and Pain Behavior domains, respectively. Pearson testing demonstrated a significant, inverse correlation between DASH and PROMIS Upper Extremity scores (r = -0.85, P = .002). There was also significant correlation between DVPRS and PROMIS Pain Interference scores (r = 0.69, P = .03). The PROMIS Pain Behavior domain did not significantly correlate with either DASH or DVPRS. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity and Pain Interference scores demonstrated significant concurrent validity with traditional measures (DASH and DVPRS) of patient-reported outcome in our population of transhumeral amputees.

Preventing biological waste: Effective use of viable tissue in traumatized lower extremities.

Severe open lower extremity trauma requires debridement to remove contamination and devitalized tissues. Aggressive debridement should be balanced with preservation of viable tissue. These often damaged but preserved viable tissues are "spare parts" that augment the options available for reconstruction. The long-term goal of reconstruction should be functional limb restoration and optimization. Injury patterns, levels, and patient factors will determine whether this endeavor is better accomplished with limb salvage or amputation. This article reviews the rationale and strategies for preserving spare parts throughout debridement and then incorporating them as opportunistic grafts in the ultimate reconstruction to facilitate healing and maximize extremity function. Level of Evidence: 5.

Current Concepts in Lower Extremity Amputation: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the goals of lower extremity reconstruction and identify clinical scenarios favoring amputation. 2. Understand lower extremity amputation physiology and biomechanics. 3. Review soft-tissue considerations to achieve durable coverage. 4. Appreciate the evolving management of transected nerves. 5. Highlight emerging applications of osseointegration and strategies to improve myoelectric prosthetic control. SUMMARY: Plastic surgeons are well versed in lower extremity reconstruction for traumatic, oncologic, and ischemic causes. Limb amputation is an increasingly sophisticated component of the reconstructive algorithm and is indicated when the residual limb is predicted to be more functional than a salvaged limb. Although plastic surgeons have traditionally focused on limb salvage, they play an increasingly vital role in optimizing outcomes from amputation. This warrants a review of core concepts and an update on emerging reconstructive techniques in amputee care.

Beyond Limb Salvage: Limb Restoration Efforts Following Remote Combat-Related Extremity Injuries Optimize Outcomes and Support Sustained Surgical Readiness.

INTRODUCTION: As the combat operational tempo of the military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has declined over the last decade, there has been a decrease in the number of patients requiring acute limb salvage. In their place, a growing population of patients with persistent functional deficits, pain, and inadequate soft tissue coverage stemming from prior limb salvage strategies have returned to our institution seeking revision surgery. Herein, we examine our institution's evolving surgical approach to extremity reconstruction from 2011 through 2019, culminating in the development of our limb restoration concept. We also discuss the impact of this orthoplastic approach on the acute management of complex extremity trauma and its role in providing sustained surgical readiness during interwar years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all limb reconstructive procedures performed at our tertiary care military treatment facility between September 1, 2011 to December 31, 2019 to characterize the trends in extremity reconstruction procedures performed at our institution. Cases were identified as limb restoration procedures if they involved secondary/revision reconstructive procedures designed to optimize function, treat pain, or improve the durability of the injured extremity following initial reconstruction efforts. RESULTS: Nearly 500 limb restoration procedures were performed during the study period. These procedures steadily increased since 2011, reaching a maximum of 120 in 2018. Orthoplastic procedures such as osseointegration, targeted muscle reinnervation, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, agonist-antagonist myoneural interface, and soft tissue resurfacing flap reconstruction accounted for the rise in secondary/revision reconstruction performed during this time period. CONCLUSION: Limb restoration is a collaborative orthoplastic approach that utilizes state-of-the-art surgical techniques for treating complex extremity trauma. Although limb restoration originally developed in response to managing the long-term sequelae of combat extremity trauma, the concept can be adapted to the acute management setting. Moreover, limb restoration provides military surgeons with a means for maintaining critical war-time surgical skills during the current low casualty rate era. Level of Evidence: V, therapeutic.

Experience in Providing Ambulatory Surgery From an Expeditionary Fast Transport Mobile and Rapidly Deployable Expeditionary Medical Unit During Continuing Promise 2018.

INTRODUCTION: This article describes the surgical component of the Continuing Promise 2018 (CP-18) medical training and military cooperation mission. We report on the surgical experience and lessons learned from performing peacetime ambulatory surgeries in a tent-based facility constructed on partner nation territory. METHODS: This CP mission was unique in utilizing a land-based expeditionary surgical facility. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to collect prospective deidentified patient data and aggregate information on all surgical cases performed. Specific aims of this study included describing surgical patient characteristics and evaluating conservatively selected cases performed in this environment. Body mass index (BMI) was used as a crude screening tool for perioperative risk to assist patient selection. Our secondary aim was to report lessons learned from preparation, logistics, and host nation exchanges. The team coordinated medical credentialing and documentation of all medical supplies with each host nation. Advance teams collaborated with local physicians in country to arrange training exchanges and identify surgical candidates. RESULTS: The mission was conducted from February to April 2018. Only two of five planned partner nation visits were completed. The surgical facility supported 78 procedures over 14 surgical days, averaging over six cases performed per core surgical day. Patients were predominantly female, with a mean age of 25.4 and a mean BMI of 31.1. The average surgical time was 37.5 minutes, the average anesthesia time was 70 minutes, and the average recovery time was 47.6 minutes. No significant complications or adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: CP-18 was the first CP mission to perform elective ambulatory surgery on foreign soil using a tent-based facility in a noncombat, nondisaster environment instead of a hospital or amphibious ship. This mission demonstrated that such a facility may be employed to safely perform low-risk ambulatory surgeries on carefully selected patients. The Expeditionary Medical Unit, coupled with the fast transport vessel enabled rapid expeditionary surgical facility setup with significant military and disaster relief applications. Expansion of surgical indications should be performed carefully and deliberately to avoid complications and damage to international relationships.

A Longitudinal Perspective on Conversion to Amputation for Combat-Related Extremity Injuries Treated With Flap-Based Limb Salvage.

OBJECTIVES: To define the rate and primary drivers behind early and late amputation after flap-based limb salvage in the setting of combat extremity trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level II trauma center. PATIENTS: 307 (303 men, 4 women) patients who underwent flap-based limb salvage treatment between 2003 and 2014. INTERVENTION: We reviewed patient medical records, radiographs, and clinical photographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Early and late amputation rates, time to amputation, reason for amputation. RESULTS: 307 patients accounted for 323 limbs that underwent flap-based limb salvage treatment (187 lower extremities, 136 upper extremities). A total of 58 extremities (18%) initially treated with flap-based limb salvage ultimately underwent amputation at a median of 480 days (IQR, 285-715 days) from injury. Periarticular fractures and lower extremity injuries were risk factors for early and late amputation. Other independent risk factors for early amputation were flap complications and vascular injuries, whereas risk factors for late amputation were fractures that went on to nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that a subset of patients ultimately require major limb amputation despite having achieved what is initially considered "successful" limb salvage. Flap-related complications, vascular injury, and lower extremity site of injury were associated with early amputation after successful expeditionary efforts at limb preservation. Conversion to late amputation was associated with lower extremity periarticular fractures and fracture nonunion. Chronic pain and persistent limb dysfunction were the most common reasons for late amputation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Transtibial Amputation With Fibulectomy and Fibular Collateral Ligament-Biceps Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To describe our clinical experience and surgical technique of transtibial amputation with fibulectomy and fibular collateral ligament-biceps reconstruction for management of, particularly short, transtibial amputations with proximal fibula prominence, overt instability, or inadequate soft-tissue coverage. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level II trauma center. PATIENTS: Twelve consecutive patients who underwent transtibial amputation with fibulectomy and fibular collateral ligament-biceps reconstruction between 2008 and 2021. INTERVENTION: We reviewed patient medical records, radiographs, and clinical photographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications, instability, and pain. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent acute transtibial amputation with fibulectomy and reconstruction, whereas 4 patients underwent amputation revision with fibulectomy and reconstruction for chronic pain. All 12 patients were men, with a median age of 39 years (interquartile range, 33-46). All injuries were due to high-energy mechanisms, including improvised explosive device (n = 8), rocket-propelled grenade (n = 2), gunshot wound (n = 1), and motor vehicle accident (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 8.5 years (interquartile range, 3.4-9.3), there was one complication, a postoperative suture abscess. No patients had subjective lateral knee instability after the procedure, and the average pain scores decreased from 4.75 to 1.54 ( P = 0.01). All patients returned to regular prosthesis wear and maintained independent functioning with activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with fibulectomy and fibular collateral ligament-biceps reconstruction demonstrated no subjective or clinical postoperative instability and may be a useful adjunct for managing transtibial amputations with fibular instability or prominence, pain, or skin breakdown at the fibular head. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.