Multi-Institutional Patterns of Use of Tumor-Treating Fields for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

(1) Background: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the device usage rates and patterns of use regarding Tumor-Treating Fields (TTFields) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) throughout the US. (2) Methods: We evaluated de-identified data from 33 patients with MPM enrolled in FDA-required HDE protocols at 14 institutions across the US from September 2019 to March 2022. (3) Results: The median number of total TTFields usage days was 72 (range: 6-649 days), and the total treatment duration was 160 months for all patients. A low usage rate (defined as less than 6 h per day, 25%) was observed in 34 (21.2%) months. The median TTFields usage in the first 3 months was 12 h per day (range: 1.9-21.6 h), representing 50% (range: 8-90%) of the potential daily duration. The median TTFields usage after 3 months decreased to 9.1 h per day (range: 3.1-17 h), representing 38% (range: 13-71%) of the daily duration, and was lower than usage in the first 3 months (p = 0.01). (4) Conclusions: This study represents the first multicenter analysis of real-world TTFields usage based on usage patterns for MPM patients in clinical practice. The real-world usage level was lower than the suggested daily usage. Further initiatives and guidelines should be developed to evaluate the impact of this finding on tumor control.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Systemic Dose Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: Single Arm Phase 2 Study.

PURPOSE: This is a single arm phase 2 study (Clinical trials.gov NCT02568033) to examine the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) along with full dose systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable stage 2 and stage 3 nonsmall cell lung cancer. Primary endpoints are disease free survival and toxicity. MATERIALS: Patients were treated with SBRT to all sites of gross disease. Dosing consisted of 60 Gy in 3 fractions for peripheral lung tumors, 50 Gy in 5 fractions for central lung tumors, and 40 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions for hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel for nonsquamous histology and cisplatin and docetaxel or cisplatin and paclitaxel for squamous histology. SBRT was given in between the chemotherapy cycles. There was a 7 days break between chemotherapy and SBRT. Quality of life was measured using functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung. RESULTS: Twenty two patients were enrolled and analyzed. Seventeen (77%) were stage III and 19 (86%) had lymph node involvement. Median follow-up for all patients was 23.1 months. Median overall survival is 27.2 months. Overall survival at 1 year was 82% and overall survival at 2 years was 53%. Median disease free survival is 16.0 months with a 2-year regional failure rate of 19% and 2-year distant failure rate of 47.2%. There were 6 grade 3 acute toxicities and 2 late grade 3 or higher toxicities including 1 grade 5 hemoptysis. Quality of life scores were unchanged compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: A combination of SBRT and full dose chemotherapy appears to be a safe and effective treatment for locally advanced NSCLC and warrants further investigation.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Treatment for Recurrent, Previously Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer.

PURPOSE: Locally recurrent, previously irradiated primary head and neck tumors have historically been associated with poor outcomes. Stereotactic body radiation therapy has emerged as a feasible and promising treatment option for tumor recurrence, particularly in nonsurgical candidates. This study aimed to assess the associated outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy used in this setting. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 25 patients treated with CyberKnife for unresectable, recurrent head and neck cancer in a previously irradiated field. The primary end points evaluated were rates of survival, tumor control, and treatment-related toxicities. RESULTS: Median survival of the study population was 7.5 months (range, 1.5-47.0 months). Median survival of the 20 (80%) patients who were treated with curative purpose was 8.3 months. One-year overall survival rate for the entire population was 32%. The respective 1-year and 2-year survival rates for the curative subcohort were 40% and 20%, respectively. Local and locoregional failure occurred in 8 (32%) and 7 (28%) patients, respectively. Low severe acute (4%) and late (6%) treatment-related toxicity rates were observed. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable, recurrent head and neck cancer. Significant tumor control rates are achievable with minimal severe toxicity. Although perhaps associated with patient selection and a heterogeneous sample, overall survival of stereotactic body radiation therapy outcomes appears unfavorable.

Risk-Stratified Initial Salvage Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Salvage treatment with either conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDCT) offers curative potential for patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumor (GCT). However, the optimal initial salvage strategy remains controversial, and the criteria for appropriate patient selection are not clear. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes for GCT patients receiving initial salvage therapy using a risk-stratified treatment approach. In general, patients with favorable-risk disease received CDCT with 4 cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, while patients with unfavorable-risk disease received HDCT per institutional protocol. The prognostic validity of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) and the International Prognostic Factors Study Group (IPFSG) risk groups were evaluated in this context. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received initial salvage therapy. Twenty-four patients (65%) achieved a favorable response (including complete response to chemotherapy alone, complete response after post-chemotherapy surgical resection, or partial response with negative tumor markers). The favorable response rates for the CDCT and HDCT treatment groups were 69% and 62%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 31 months, the median survival for CDCT-treated patients has not been reached, and the median survival for the HDCT-treated group was 24 months. Both the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group and the International Prognostic Factors Study Group risk groups were significantly associated with progression-free survival (log-rank P = .009 and P = .039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with favorable prognostic features may achieve durable remissions without requiring high-dose salvage chemotherapy. However, the criteria for optimal patient selection remain unclear, and these findings further support the need for a definitive randomized trial.

The impact of worry on attention to threat.

Prior research has often linked anxiety to attentional vigilance for threat using the dot probe task, which presents probes in spatial locations that were or were not preceded by a putative threat stimulus. The present study investigated the impact of worry on threat vigilance by administering this task during a worry condition and during a mental arithmetic control condition to 56 undergraduate students scoring in the low normal range on a measure of chronic worry. The worry induction was associated with faster responses than arithmetic to probes in the attended location following threat words, indicating the combined influence of worry and threat in facilitating attention. Within the worry condition, responses to probes in the attended location were faster for trials containing threat words than for trials with only neutral words, whereas the converse pattern was observed for responses to probes in the unattended location. This connection between worry states and attentional capture by threat may be central to understanding the impact of hypervigilance on information processing in anxiety and its disorders.