Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus?

BACKGROUND: Development of incisional hernia after open abdominal surgery remains a major cause of post-operative morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the current practice of surgeons in terms of access to and closure of the abdominal cavity in elective open surgery. METHODS: Twelve surgical departments of the INSECT-Trial group documented the following variables for 50 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery: fascial closure techniques, applied suture materials, application of subcutaneous sutures, subcutaneous drains, methods for skin closure. Descriptive analysis was performed and consensus of treatment variables was categorized into four levels: Strong consensus >95%, consensus 75-95%, overall agreement 50-75%, no consensus <50%. RESULTS: 157 out of 599 patients were eligible for analysis (85 (54%) midline, 54 (35%) transverse incisions). After midline incisions the fascia was closed continuously in 55 patients (65%), using slowly absorbable (n = 47, 55%), braided (n = 32, 38%) sutures with a strength of 1 (n = 48, 57%). In the transverse setting the fascia was closed continuously in 39 patients (72%) with slowly absorbable (n = 22, 41%) braided sutures (n = 27, 50%) with a strength of 1 (n = 30, 56%). CONCLUSION: In the present evaluation midline incision was the most frequently applied access in elective open abdominal surgery. None of the treatments for abdominal wall closure (except skin closure in the midline group) is performed on a consensus level.

The expression patterns of peritoneal defensins.

BACKGROUND: Local defense mechanisms are important for the integrity of the peritoneum, but few details are known about the expression patterns of antimicrobial proteins such as human defensin in normal and damaged peritoneum. METHODS: Part A: The expression of different defensins in normal (n = 12), inflamed (n = 5), and metastatic peritoneum (n = 4) and in cultured human peritoneal mesothelial cells was analyzed using mRNA and immunohistochemistry. Part B: Using immunohistochemistry the expression of different defensins was analyzed in different subgroups: healthy controls (n = 25), patients with chronic appendicitis (n = 25) or acute appendicitis (n = 10), and end-stage renal disease patients (n = 25, with 15 on peritoneal dialysis). RESULTS: Part A: Human neutrophil peptides (HNP) 1 and 3 and human beta-defensins (HBD) 1 to 3 mRNA were detected in peritoneal specimens. In addition, HNP1,3, HBD1, HBD2, and HBD3 proteins were detected using immunohistochemistry. Part B: HBD1 showed a constitutive expression in mesothelium, while HBD2 and HNP1,3 were associated with inflammation. Decreased expressions of HNP1,3 were observed in end-stage renal disease patients and in patients on peritoneal dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, the expression patterns of defensins in normal and damaged peritoneum have been described. The reduced expression of some defensins in end-stage renal disease is of potential clinical interest against the background of the frequent infective complications seen in peritoneal dialysis.