Systemic arterial pulsatility index (SAPi) predicts adverse outcomes in advanced heart failure patients.

Ventriculo-arterial (VA) coupling has been shown to have physiologic importance in heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that the systemic arterial pulsatility index (SAPi), a measure that integrates pulse pressure and a proxy for left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, would be associated with adverse outcomes in advanced HF. We evaluated the SAPi ([systemic systolic blood pressure-systemic diastolic blood pressure]/pulmonary artery wedge pressure) obtained from the final hemodynamic measurement in patients randomized to therapy guided by a pulmonary arterial catheter (PAC) and with complete data in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for the outcomes of (a) death, transplant, left ventricular assist device (DTxLVAD) or hospitalization, (DTxLVADHF) and (b) DTxLVAD. Among 142 patients (mean age 56.8 ± 13.3 years, 30.3% female), the median SAPi was 2.57 (IQR 1.63-3.45). Increasing SAPi was associated with significant reductions in DTxLVAD (HR 0.60 per unit increase in SAPi, 95% CI 0.44-0.84) and DTxLVADHF (HR 0.81 per unit increase, 95% CI 0.70-0.95). Patients with a SAPi ≤ 2.57 had a marked increase in both outcomes, including more than twice the risk of DTxLVAD (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.11-4.30) over 6 months. Among advanced heart failure patients with invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ESCAPE trial, SAPi was strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. These findings support further investigation of the SAPi to guide treatment and prognosis in HF undergoing invasive hemodynamic monitoring.

Increased left and right atrial volume indices are associated with decreased survival times post-cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Left and right atrial volume indices (LAVI and RAVI) are markers of cardiac remodeling. LAVI and RAVI are associated with worse outcomes in other cardiac conditions. This study aimed to determine the associations of these atrial volume indices with survival time post-cardiac arrest. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study of patients with a sudden cardiac arrest event during index hospitalization from 2014-2018 based on pre-arrest parameters. The analysis was stratified based on whether a pulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (pVT/VF) event or a pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole event occurred. Cox proportional hazards regression and model selection with best subsets approach evaluated the association of atrial volume parameters with survival times in the context of other covariates. RESULTS: Of 305 patients studied (64 ± 14 years, 37% female), the mean LAVI was 34.0 ± 15.8 mL/m2 (based on 162 reliable measurements), and mean RAVI was 25.0 ± 15.6 mL/m2 (based on 163 measurements). Increased atrial volume indices were most strongly associated with survival in patients who had sustained pVT/VF (LAVI HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.90, p = 0.020; RAVI HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.30-1.05, p = 0.074). In multivariable best subsets Cox regression with LAVI, RAVI, and 13 other scaled covariates, LAVI < 34 ml/m2 was by far the best single predictor of survival (p < 0.0001), and the next best predictor was the absence of pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSION: Among patients with cardiac arrest from ventricular arrhythmias, those with no more than mild left atrial enlargement pre-arrest by LAVI measurement had the best prognosis. Additional studies are indicated to validate the importance of this finding for clinical management decisions. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In patients with sudden cardiac arrest associated with ventricular arrhythmias, a left atrial volume index (LAVI) < 34 mL/m2 prior to the arrest had the strongest association with survival among fifteen candidate predictors. Pulmonary hypertension was more common in patients with an elevated right atrial volume index (RAVI), and the absence of pulmonary hypertension was the next best pre-arrest parameter predictive of survival. Larger studies are indicated to validate the use of LAVI for clinical management decisions in this condition.

Cadaveric Dissection in Relation to Problem-Based Learning Case Sequencing: A Report of Medical Student Musculoskeletal Examination Performances and Self-Confidence.

Mercer University School of Medicine utilizes a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for educating medical students in the basic clinical sciences. In 2014, an adjustment was piloted that enabled PBL cases to align with their corresponding cadaver dissection that reviewed the content of anatomy contained in the PBL cases. Faculty had the option of giving PBL cases in sequence with the cadaveric dissection schedule (sequential group) or maintaining PBL cases out of sequence with dissections (traditional group). During this adjustment, students' academic performances were compared. Students' perception of their own preparedness for cadaveric dissection, their perceived utility of the cadaver dissections, and free-response comments were solicited via an online survey. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing student mean examination score values between the sequential and traditional groups on both multidisciplinary examinations (79.39 ± 7.63 vs. 79.88 ± 7.31, P = 0.738) and gross anatomy questions alone (78.15 ± 10.31 vs. 79.98 ± 9.31, P = 0.314). A statistically significant difference was found between the sequential group's and traditional group's (63% vs. 29%; P = 0.005) self-perceived preparedness for cadaveric dissections in the 2017 class. Analysis of free-response comments found that students in the traditional group believed their performance in PBL group, participation in PBL group and examination performance was adversely affected when compared to students with the sequential schedule. This study provides evidence that cadaveric dissections scheduled in sequence with PBL cases can lead to increased student self-confidence with learning anatomy but may not lead to improved examination scores.