Comparison of clinical and laboratory data of adult patients with cutaneous IgA vasculitis and non-IgA vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: Immune complex vasculitides may be subdivided into adult IgA small vessel vasculitis (aIgA-SVV; i.e. adult Henoch-Schönlein purpura) and non-IgA-SVV (hypersensitivity vasculitis, etc.). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and laboratory parameters of inpatients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for aIgA-SVV and non-IgA-SVV. METHODS: Twenty-nine adults aged ≥ 20 years with aIgA-SVV [according to the European League Against Rheumatism/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (EULAR/PRINTO/PRES) criteria] and 53 adults with non-IgA-SVV (according to the 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides) were compared with respect to a variety of clinical and laboratory parameters by uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Compared with patients with aIgA-SVV, the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly higher in patients with non-IgA-SVV. Serum C3 levels and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration in patients with non-IgA-SVV were significantly lower compared with patients with aIgA-SVV. Proteinuria and haematuria were significantly more common in patients with aIgA SVV, and were significantly correlated with systemic immune-inflammation biomarkers only in patients with aIgA-SVV. In patients with aIgA-SVV, higher lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein were strong independent predictors for the presence of proteinuria and proteinuria. In patients with non-IgA-SVV, female sex was a protective factor for proteinuria, while skin lesions on the upper extremities proved to be a significant independent predictor of haematuria. CONCLUSIONS: We detected several clinical and laboratory differences between patients with aIgA-SVV and non-IgA-SVV. Distinct predictors for renal involvement were not observed in either group, indicating that aIgA-SVV and non-IgA-SVV are similar conditions but do not appear to represent the same entity.

Anti-acid therapy in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease: long-term outcomes from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs frequently in patients with SSc. We investigated whether the presence of GERD and/or the use of anti-acid therapy, specifically proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), are associated with long-term outcomes, especially in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with SSc and SSc-ILD from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis (DNSS) database (2003 onwards). Kaplan-Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with GERD vs without GERD (SSc and SSc-ILD), and PPI vs no PPI use (SSc-ILD only). Progression was defined as a decrease in either percentage predicted forced vital capacity of ≥10% or single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of ≥15%, or death. RESULTS: It was found that 2693/4306 (63%) registered patients with SSc and 1204/1931 (62%) with SSc-ILD had GERD. GERD was not associated with decreased OS or decreased PFS in patients in either cohort. In SSc-ILD, PPI use was associated with improved OS vs no PPI use after 1 year [98.4% (95% CI: 97.6, 99.3); n = 760 vs 90.8% (87.9-93.8); n = 290] and after 5 years [91.4% (89.2-93.8); n = 357 vs 70.9% (65.2-77.1); n = 106; P < 0.0001]. PPI use was also associated with improved PFS vs no PPI use after 1 year [95.9% (94.6-97.3); n = 745 vs 86.4% (82.9-90.1); n = 278] and after 5 years [66.8% (63.0-70.8); n = 286 vs 45.9% (39.6-53.2); n = 69; P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: GERD had no effect on survival in SSc or SSc-ILD. PPIs improved survival in patients with SSc-ILD. Controlled, prospective trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Real-world outcomes using PD-1 antibodies and BRAF + MEK inhibitors for adjuvant melanoma treatment from 39 skin cancer centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies and BRAF + MEK inhibitors are widely used for adjuvant therapy of fully resected high-risk melanoma. Little is known about treatment efficacy outside of phase III trials. This real-world study reports on clinical outcomes of modern adjuvant melanoma treatment in specialized skin cancer centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective study investigating stage III-IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant nivolumab (NIV), pembrolizumab (PEM) or dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) between 1/2017 and 10/2021. The primary endpoint was 12-month recurrence-free survival (RFS). Further analyses included descriptive and correlative statistics, and a multivariate linear-regression machine learning model to assess the risk of early melanoma recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 1198 patients from 39 skin cancer centers from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were analysed. The vast majority received anti PD-1 therapies (n = 1003). Twelve-month RFS for anti PD-1 and BRAF + MEK inhibitor-treated patients were 78.1% and 86.5%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.998 [95% CI 1.335-2.991]; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) in anti PD-1 (95.8%) and BRAF + MEK inhibitor (96.9%) treated patients (p > 0.05) during the median follow-up of 17 months. Data indicates that anti PD-1 treated patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have lower recurrence rates compared to patients with no irAEs (HR 0.578 [95% CI 0.443-0.754], p = 0.001). BRAF mutation status did not affect overall efficacy of anti PD-1 treatment (p > 0.05). In both, anti PD-1 and BRAF + MEK inhibitor treated cohorts, data did not show any difference in 12-month RFS and 12-month OS comparing patients receiving total lymph node dissection (TLND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy only (p > 0.05). The recurrence prediction model reached high specificity but only low sensitivity with an AUC = 0.65. No new safety signals were detected. Overall, recorded numbers and severity of adverse events were lower than reported in pivotal phase III trials. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent advances in adjuvant melanoma treatment, early recurrence remains a significant clinical challenge. This study shows that TLND does not reduce the risk of early melanoma recurrence and should only be considered in selected patients. Data further highlight that variables collected during clinical routine are unlikely to allow for a clinically relevant prediction of individual recurrence risk.

Extracorporeal photopheresis for systemic sclerosis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by excessive production of collagen. Extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy, phototherapy) (ECP) involves repeated exposure of peripheral blood lymphocytes to ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation. The rationale for treating patients with SSc by ECP lies in its presumed immunomodulatory effects, though, rigorous data on the specific effects of ECP are limited, particularly in patients with SSc. The objective was to evaluate the effects of extracorporeal photopheresis as a treatment modality for patients with SSc. We searched the databases CENTRAL and MEDLINE on 13 March 2022 and included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on patients diagnosed with SSc and treated with ECP. Primary outcome was the change of skin scores. We applied independent extraction and judgment by multiple observers. We conducted a meta-analysis applying the inverse variance method and the random effects model; the main outcome measure was standard mean difference of skin scores. We identified three relevant RCTs including 162 randomized (132 analyzed) people who received ECP in a simple parallel design. Pooled data of the three studies were indifferent. We estimated a standard mean difference from baseline of -0.11 (95% confidence interval -0.45 to 0.23), p = 0.54, I2  = 0%. We did not identify serious treatment-related adverse events. The evidence base for extracorporeal photopheresis on skin scores in patients with systemic sclerosis was not high enough to support a superior effect when compared to no treatment, sham photopheresis, or D-penicillamine.

Impact of extracorporeal photopheresis on blood and coagulation parameters.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered a safe treatment modality. We aimed to assess blood parameters including coagulation during ECP over time. We performed a long-term retrospective single-center chart review (laboratory parameters) of adult patients (n = 172) who had received ECP for any indication. We observed a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and leukocytes compared to baseline levels after only one ECP procedure. This decrease persisted after 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months of ECP. A significant pathological decline of hemoglobin was observed in a higher proportion (26.4% and 25.2%, respectively) of patients after 6 (p = 0.0007) and 12 (p = 0.012) months of ECP. Mean corpuscular volume as well as hematocrit was significantly decreased at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months of evaluation compared to baseline (p < 0.05). After 9 and 12 months of ECP we observed a further decline in lymphocyte counts (p < 0.05). Various coagulation parameters did not change significantly during ECP treatment. Even though not all alterations observed in peripheral blood of ECP patients in the present study were of clinical significance, risk for developing persistent anemia must be considered in patients undergoing ECP.

Sarcoidal immune reaction following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a milestone in combating the current pandemic. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence that COVID-19 vaccination also may trigger immune- or autoimmune-mediated skin diseases. We here report the association of COVID-19 vaccination with sarcoidal immune reaction.

Outcome of extracorporeal photopheresis in mycosis fungoides patients is not predicted by quotients of systemic immune-inflammatory biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immune-inflammatory biomarkers (SIIBs) have not been studied in mycosis fungoides (MF) patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether recently proposed SIIBs are suitable to predict ECP treatment outcome and overall prognosis of patients with MF. METHODS: Twenty-nine MF patients were retrospectively evaluated who had undergone ECP. SIIBs included neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and pan-immune-inflammation value. RESULTS: Lymphocyte count (P = .021), CD4+/CD8+ cells (P = .00006), CD4+/CD56+ NK cells (P = .00008), and LDH levels (P = .0041) significantly declined after 6-month ECP. We could not detect significant cutoff values for baseline SIIBs capable of predicting advanced disease, overall response to 6-month ECP, or 5-year lymphoma-specific (LS) survival (P > .05). Circulating baseline counts of CD4+/CD7- cells (cutoff: ≤ 12.2; P = .010) and CD4+/CD26- cells (cutoff: ≤ 19.5; P < .0001) significantly predicted ECP treatment response after 6 months. Moreover, CD4+/CD8+ ratio (cutoff: > 1.34; P = .045) and increased thrombocyte counts (cutoff: >259 000; P = .010) were baseline predictors for 5-year LS death. CONCLUSION: ECP appears to be beneficial in early-stage CTCL as well. Lower percentages of circulating CD4+/CD7- and CD4+/CD26- lymphocytes at baseline correlate with response to ECP. In this study, however, baseline SIIBs did not appear to serve as suitable biomarkers for the prediction of treatment outcome and LS survival.

Older age onset of systemic sclerosis - accelerated disease progression in all disease subsets.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous, multisystem disease. It can occur at any age, but most patients develop the disease between the age of 40 to 50 years. There is controversial evidence on whether/how the age at disease onset affects their clinical phenotype. We here investigate the relationship between age at disease onset and symptoms in a large cohort of SSc patients (lcSSc, dcSSc and SSc-overlap syndromes). METHODS: Clinical data of the registry of the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma including 3281 patients were evaluated and subdivided into three age groups at disease onset (<40 years, 40-60 years, >60 years). RESULTS: Among all SSc patients, 24.5% developed their first non-Raynaud phenomenon symptoms at the age <40 years, and 22.5% were older than 60 years of age. In particular, older patients at onset developed the lcSSc subset significantly more often. Furthermore, they had pulmonary hypertension more often, but digital ulcerations less often. Remarkably, the course of the disease was more rapidly progressing in the older cohort (>60 years), except for gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal involvement. No significant difference was found for the use of corticosteroids. However, significantly, fewer patients older than 60 years received immunosuppressive treatment. CONCLUSION: In this large registry, ∼25% of patients developed SSc at an age above 60 years with an increased frequency of lcSSc. In this age group, an onset of internal organ involvement was significantly accelerated across all three subsets. These findings suggest that, in the elderly cohort, more frequent follow-up examinations are required for an earlier detection of organ complications.