Real-World Treatment of Hypertension on Hemodialyses Data from a Large Polish Database.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of hypertension among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing hemodialysis (HD) ranges from 72 to 88% depending on applied diagnostic criteria and the chosen method of blood pressure measurement. Despite the guidelines recommending the widespread use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) in patients with kidney disease, their utilization in patients on HD may be suboptimal, especially in patients with preserved diuresis. This hesitance that often steams from concern is often due to fear of a decrease in eGFR and a subsequent decrease in diuresis. The aim of this study was to compare clinical characteristics, blood pressure, safety, and HD adequacy indices in hypertensive HD patients on multiple antihypertensive drug regimens, including diuretic treated with RASB (RASB group) or without RASB (no-RASB) with preserved residual diuresis. We sought to examine the real-life use of RASB in HD patients in relation to their clinical characteristics, blood pressure, safety, and HD adequacy. METHODS: From a database of 5,879 patients receiving HD (mean age 65.2 ± 14.2 years, 60% of males) of the largest provider of HD in the country, we selected the subgroup treated with at least three antihypertensive medications including diuretics. We compared patients treated with RASB to counterparts without RASB (no-RASB). RESULTS: The RASB group has similar age and gender proportions as well as BMI and bioimpedance compared to counterparts. However, dry body mass was significantly lower in the RASB group (78.1 ± 18.3 kg vs. 80.0 ± 18.2 kg, p < 0.017). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus was similar in both groups, but RASB-treated patients have cardiovascular diseases more frequently (70.1 vs. 60.8%; p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure and the number of antihypertensive drugs used were significantly higher in RASB patients than in counterparts (146 ± 16 mm Hg vs. 144 ± 15 mm Hg; p < 0.001 and 4.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.5; p < 0001, respectively). RASB-treated patients have significantly longer dialysis vintage (52.7 ± 44.4 months vs. 40.2 ± 40.9 months; p < 0.001) and dialysis time (722 ± 87.1 min/week vs. 713 ± 93.4 min/week; p < 0.017) than counterparts. Serum potassium was slightly but significantly higher in RASB (5.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L vs. 5.1 ± 0.7 mmol/L; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the real world setting, RASB can be safely used in HD patients treated with diuretics with preserved residual diuresis. Given that many HD patients present numerous multimorbidities, RASB should not only be considered as an additional hypotensive drug in poorly controlled hypertension but also in other compelling indications in HD patients. The tendency toward hyperkalemia in HD patients could be effectively managed with appropriate diet and HD prescription adjustments.

Resistant hypertension in dialysis.

Hypertension is the most common finding in chronic kidney disease patients, with prevalence ranging from 60% to 90% depending on the stage and etiology of the disease. It is also a significant independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, progression to end-stage kidney disease and mortality. According to the current guidelines, resistant hypertension is defined in the general population as uncontrolled blood pressure on three or more antihypertensive drugs in adequate doses or when patients are on four or more antihypertensive drug categories irrespective of the blood pressure control, providing that antihypertensive treatment included diuretics. The currently established definitions of resistant hypertension are not directly applicable to the end-stage kidney disease setting. The diagnosis of true resistant hypertension requires confirmation of adherence to therapy and confirmation of uncontrolled blood pressure values by ambulatory blood pressure measurement or home blood pressure measurement. In addition, the term "apparent treatment-resistant hypertension," defined as an uncontrolled blood pressure on three or more antihypertensive medication classes, or use of four or more medications regardless of blood pressure level was introduced. In this comprehensive review we focused on the definitions of hypertension, and therapeutic targets in patients on renal replacement therapy, including the limitations and biases. We discussed the issue of pathophysiology and assessment of blood pressure in the dialyzed population, management of resistant hypertension as well as available data on prevalence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension in end-stage kidney disease. To conclude, larger sample-size and even higher quality studies about drug adherence should be conducted in the population of patients with the end-stage kidney disease who are on dialysis. It also should be determined how and when blood pressure should be measured in the group of dialysis patients. Additionally, it should be stated what the target blood pressure values in this group of patients really are. The definition of resistant hypertension in this group should be revisited, and its relationship to both subclinical and clinical endpoints should be established.

A new threshold for kidney asymmetry improves association with abnormal renal-aortic ratio for diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) reflects more widespread atherosclerosis deposition and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. According to the guidelines, a discrepancy in the size of the kidneys of over 15 mm found in an ultrasound should initiate the RAS diagnostic algorithm. This study aims to find the optimal threshold for renal asymmetry that better reflects the frequency of a significantly abnormal renal-aortic ratio (RAR), justifying further RAS diagnostic workup, than the currently used cut-off of 15 mm difference in renal diameters. METHODS: The analysis included 1175 patients (mean age: 52 years, IQR: 38-66, men/women: 597/578) who underwent Doppler ultrasonography screening of renal arteries with recorded kidney size and RAR calculation. Ultrasound features of RAS were defined as a RAR greater than 3.5 or signs of renal artery occlusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created and analyzed for absolute differences in kidney size and abnormal RAR. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cut-off values for sensitivity and specificity analysis. RESULTS: The final analysis included 169 patients with a significant difference in renal dimension. RAS features were met in 61 patients. According to ROC curve analysis, the optimal index of renal asymmetry was 12 mm. The sensitivity and specificity for this method were 82.0% and 83.3%, respectively, and AUC was 86.3%. CONCLUSION: Changing the definition of a significant difference in kidney size from 15 mm to 12 mm increases sensitivity and specificity for abnormal RAR and this finding may accelerate the diagnosis of RAS.

[Red man syndrome as a complication of vancomycin therapy]. / Zespól czerwonego czlowieka jako powiklanie leczenia wankomycyna.

Red man syndrome (RMS) is a side effect of vancomycin therapy and manifests itself mainly by a red blotchy rash with itching and sometimes muscle pain and a decrease of arterial blood pressure. A CASE REPORT: 24-year-old patient admitted to hospital with a history of chest pain radiating to the back. EKG has shown the depression of PQ, in the ECHO mark of liquid in the pericardial cavity and the increase of CRP and troponin concentrations. The patient was diagnosed with acute pericarditis and treated with ibuprofen and colchicine. Due to the increasing parameters of inflammation, a bacterial etiology was suspected and vancomycin was administered. During antibiotic therapy, there were symptoms of a mild adverse reaction in the form of a maculopapular rash and periodic decreases in blood pressure. RMS was diagnosed and symptoms resolved after treatment with cetirizine. CONCLUSIONS: RMS should be distinguished from anaphylaxis and treated according to the diagnosis.

Dyspnoe, cough and fever in 80-year old patient with chronic heart failure.

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) in developed countries exceeds 10% in adults over 70 year old. At the following report we aim to present a case of HF worsening complicated by gout attack. CASE REPORT: 80-year old patient was admitted to the hospital, with the suspicion of pneumonia, because of 3-day history of dyspnoe, cough and fever. Patient reported redness, swelling and pain in the area of left elbow. Prior to admission patient was diagnosed with bursitis and treated with antibiotic without symptoms resolution. There was past medical history of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, intermittent claudication, COPD. One month before, patient was hospitalized due to HF worsening. Diuretics' dosage was increased at that time and symptoms resolved. On admission: blood pressure 145/88 mm Hg, HR 96/min irregular, saturation O2 88% without oxygen therapy. On physical examination, bilateral pulmonary crackles, redness, tenderness of left elbow were found. Laboratory tests demonstrated elevated parameters of inflammation - leukocytosis 13.4G/L, neutrophilia 11G/L, CRP 142.5 mg/L, but normal procalcitonin 0.27 ng/ml. Moreover, high NTproBNP 8573 pg/ml and hyperuricemia 13.1 mg/dl were detected. Chest X-ray indicated pulmonary venous congestion. ECG revealed atrial fibrillation with QRS rate of 100/min, left axis deviation. Therefore, gout attack was diagnosed and after colchicine administration symptoms resolved quickly. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical signs including fever, elevated parameters of inflammation and dyspnoe justify pneumonia consideration in differential diagnosis. Importantly, non-infectious causes of inflammatory conditions, like gout must be also considered. Patients with HF often develop hyperuricemia due to diuretic treatment, aggravated catabolism and often co-prevalent chronic kidney disease.

The effect of statins on sympathetic activity: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Beyond lipid-lowering properties, statins decrease sympathetic nervous activity. Due to the limited number of studies and included participants, a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled studies using microneurography (MSNA) was performed to assess sympatholytic effect of statins. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of online databases (Cochrane, Embase, and EBSCO) for published human studies up to April 2014. Randomized controlled trials (parallel and crossover design) were eligible for inclusion if results of statins versus placebo treatments on sympathetic activity were measured with MSNA. RESULTS: Data from five studies with a total number of subjects n = 82 were included into the meta-analysis. MSNA expressed as bursts/min and as bursts/100 heartbeats was lower in the statin group than in the placebo group with a mean difference of -4.37 95% CI (-7.03; -1.70), p < 0.0013 and -5.85 95% CI (-7.56; -4.13), p < 0.0001, respectively. No significant publication bias was observed. Meta-regression revealed no significant effect of baseline total cholesterol or dose of statin. No change in blood pressure and heart rate was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Published data show that regardless of type and dose, statins reduce sympathetic activity measured by microneurography. The role of decreased sympathetic outflow during statin therapy on clinical end points needs to be clarified.

Does the control of negative emotions influence blood pressure control and its variability?

The aim was to assess the control of negative emotions in treated patients with hypertension in comparison with normotensive individuals and to evaluate the association between suppression of negative emotions, control of blood pressure (BP) on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and blood pressure variability (BPV). We studied 195 patients (women/men: 89/106); mean age 45.4 ± 15.9 years. All patients had ABPM and completed the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS). The total CECS score and scores for subscales for anger, depression and anxiety were analyzed together with mean BP values from ABPM, and their SD and coefficient of variation as BPV measures. The mean CECS score was 54 ± 12 in all subjects; highest in uncontrolled hypertension 56 ± 11, intermediate 53 ± 12 in controlled hypertension and lowest 48 ± 12 in normotensive subjects. The reference value for the Polish population is 50 ± 11. Significant differences of mean CECS scores among groups were observed (p = 0.0165) also in multivariate analysis. The difference between uncontrolled hypertension and normotension was significant (p = 0.0262). Few significant, weak correlations were observed between CECS score or its subscales and ABPM derivates in all subjects. Conclusion. Suppression of negative emotions may adversely affect BP control in treated hypertensive patients and it should be considered a cause of uncontrolled hypertension.

Iron Management and Anemia in Patients on the Active Kidney Transplant List.

INTRODUCTION: Iron metabolism disorders and anemia are one of the main complications of end-stage renal disease that may affect the evaluation process for kidney transplantation. The study aimed to assess the iron metabolism in hemodialysis patients in relation to waiting list status. STUDY METHOD: The study included 5068 hemodialysis patients, including those on the active waiting list (N = 449) and those who were not eligible for the waitlist (N = 4619). Demographic and biochemical data, Charlson's comorbidity index, duration of hemodialysis therapy and, respectively, hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels were compared in both groups of patients. RESULTS: Patients on the active waiting list were significantly younger -53.2 vs 67.2 years (P < .001), with a lower Charlson comorbidity index score: 3.33 vs 4.42 (P < .001). The duration of hemodialysis therapy was similar: 66.0 vs 63.2 months (P = .416), the incidence of anemia according to World Health Organization (90.6%, vs 91.2%) and KDIGO (72.4% vs 70.4%). The degree of anemia correction in terms of hemoglobin concentration and transferrin saturation was comparable in both groups and amounted to an average of 10.9 g/dL (P = .349) for hemoglobin concentration and 32.7% vs 33.4% (P = .513) for transferrin saturation. However, there was a statistically significant difference in ferritin concentration: 554 ug/L vs 733 ug/L (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on the active list have significantly lower ferritin levels despite similar duration of hemodialysis treatment and comparable hemoglobin values. This may be due to lower inflammation, and less frequent blood transfusions, and lead to a lower risk of immunization and an increased chance of potential kidney transplantation.

Apparently Resistant Hypertension in Polish Hemodialyzed Population: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and determinants of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) in an unselected large population of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with hemodialysis (HD) throughout the country. METHODS: A database of 5879 patients (mean age 65.2 ± 14.2 years, 60% of males receiving hemodialysis) was obtained from the biggest provider of hemodialysis in the country. Hypertension and aTRH were defined using pre- or/and post-dialysis BP values. Patients with and without aTRH (non-aTRH) were compared. RESULTS: Using pre- and post-dialysis criteria, hypertension was diagnosed in 90.7% and 89.1% of subjects, respectively. According to pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure criteria, aTRH incidences were 40.9% and 38.4%, respectively. The hypertensive patients with aTRH versus non-aTRH were younger, had a higher rate of cardiovascular disease, lower dialysis vintage, shorter time on dialysis, higher eKt/V, higher ultrafiltration, higher pre- and post-dialysis BP and HR, and higher use of antihypertensive drugs. Factors that increase the risk of aTRH according to both pre- and post-dialysis BP criteria were age-OR 0.99 [0.98-0.99] and 0.99 [0.98-0.99], the history of CVD 1.26 [1.08-1.46] and 1.30 [1.12-1.51], and diabetes 1.26 [1.08-1.47] and 1.28 [1.09-1.49], adjusted OR with 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-life world, as much as 40% of HD patients may have aTRH. In ESKD HD patients, aTRH seems to be multifactorial, influenced by patient-related rather than dialysis-related factors. Various definitions of aTRH preclude easy comparisons between studies.

The Effect of Antihypertensive Medications on Testing for Primary Aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a potentially curable form of secondary hypertension caused by excessive renin-independent aldosterone secretion, leading to increased target organ damage and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of PA requires measuring renin and aldosterone to calculate the aldosterone-to-renin ratio, followed by confirmatory tests to demonstrate renin-independent aldosterone secretion and/or PA subtype differentiation. Various antihypertensive drug classes interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis and hence evaluation for PA should ideally be performed off-drugs. This is, however, often precluded by the risks related to suboptimal control of blood pressure and serum potassium level in the evaluation period. In the present review, we summarized the evidence regarding the effect of various antihypertensive drug classes on biochemical testing for PA, and critically appraised the issue whether and which antihypertensive medications should be withdrawn or, conversely, might be continued in patients evaluated for PA. The least interfering drugs are calcium antagonists, alpha-blockers, hydralazine, and possibly moxonidine. If necessary, the testing may also be attempted during treatment with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers but renin and aldosterone measurements must be interpreted in the context of known effects of these drugs on these parameters. Views are evolving on the feasibility of testing during treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, as these drugs are now increasingly considered acceptable in specific patient subsets, particularly in those with severe hypokalemia and/or poor blood pressure control on alternative treatment.

Geographic disparities in the application of endovascular repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - Polish population analysis.

PURPOSE: Differences between the regions of the same country regarding the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have rarely been published. The aim of the study was to analyze the absolute and relative number of unruptured AAA repairs, utilizing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. open aneurysm repairs (OAR) and compare the AAA patients population from all 16 administrative districts in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the Polish National Health Fund data of all patients who underwent elective treatment of AAA between 1st January 2011 and 22nd March 2016 and analyzed the absolute/relative number of all AAA repairs, OAR, EVAR and incidence of concomitant diseases in distinctive regions. Relationships between the utilization of EVAR and the number of procedures, age, gender and concomitant diseases were studied. RESULTS: A total of 7805 patients (mean age 70.9 ± 8.1 yrs) underwent OAR (n = 2336) or EVAR (n = 5469). The age and the incidence of concomitant diseases differed significantly between districts. The highest absolute number of all repairs was performed in the Masovian district (n = 1442), while the highest relative number of all repairs in the Lublin district (36.3/100,000 65+/year). The utilization of EVAR ranged from 34.5% to 93.9% and correlated positively with the number of EVAR, age and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurrence and negatively with OAR number. CONCLUSIONS: Striking differences in the relative numbers of unruptured AAA repairs and in the population characteristics in various districts of the country point to the possibility of different health needs in the regions and variations in standards of care.

Estimation of 24-hour urinary sodium, potassium, and creatinine excretion in patients with hypertension: can spot urine measurements replace 24-hour urine collection?

Owing to inconvenience of a 24­hour urine collection, diagnostic methods based on spot urine samples are becoming increasingly popular. Spot urine sodium measurements could replace 24­hour urinary sodium (24hUNa) excretion, considered a surrogate measure of dietary sodium intake. Spot urine-based approaches to estimating 24hUNa and 24­hour urinary potassium (24hUK) excretion are potentially useful in patients with hypertension, for example, to identify increased urinary potassium excretion in individuals with primary aldosteronism and high dietary sodium intake in those with resistant hypertension. In this review, we summarized our research on spot urine-based estimation of 24hUNa, 24hUK, and 24­hour urinary creatinine (24hUCr) excretion to avoid the need for a 24­hour urine collection in patients with hypertension. We found that the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) formula was generally the best for predicting the average 24hUNa and 24hUK excretion in hospitalized patients with hypertension, while the Kawasaki equation was inferior for estimating 24hUNa and the Tanaka equation was inferior for estimating 24hUK excretion. However, all 3 equations were imprecise in terms of estimating individual 24hUNa or 24hUK excretion. We also confirmed the general utility of the equations for estimating 24hUCr excretion in hypertensive individuals but with significant differences between various equations, the best formulas being Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKDEPI) and Rule. Compared with the combined PAHO/CKD­EPI formula, the Tanaka and Kawasaki equations underestimated increased 24hUNa and 24hUK excretion. Thus, the combined PAHO/CKD­EPI formula might be the best for identifying increased 24hUNa and 24hUK excretion in patients with hypertension.

Performance of 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion-estimating equations in relation to measured 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion in hospitalized hypertensive patients.

Estimated 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (24 hrUCr) may be useful for converting spot urine analyte/creatinine ratio into estimated 24-hour urinary excretion of the evaluated analyte, and for verifying completeness of 24-hour urinary collections. We compared various published 24 hrUCr-estimating equations against measured 24 hrUCr in hospitalized hypertensive patients. 24 hrUCr was measured in 293 patients and estimated using eight formulas (CKD-EPI, Cockcroft-Gault, Walser, Goldwasser, Rule, Gerber-Mann, Kawasaki, Tanaka). We used the Pearson correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman method, and the percentage of estimated 24 hrUCr within 15%, 30% (P30), and 50% of measured 24hUCr to compare estimated and measured 24 hrUCr. Differences between the mean bias by eight formulas were evaluated using the Friedman rank sum test. Overall, the best formulas were CKD-EPI (mean bias 0.002 g/d, P30 86%) and Rule (mean bias 0.022 g/d, P30 89%), although both tended to underestimate 24 hrUCr with higher excretion values. The Gerber-Mann formula and the Asian formulas (Tanaka, Kawasaki) were less precise in our study population but superior in an analysis restricted to subjects with highest measured 24 hrUCr per body weight. We found significant differences between 24 hrUCr-estimating equations in hypertensive patients. In addition, formula performance was critically affected by inclusion criteria based on measured 24 hrUCr per body weight.

Relationship between alexithymia and variability of blood pressure measured with ABPM in hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Studies indicates that dysregulation of emotions plays an important role in the etiology of elevated blood pressure (BP). One of the signatures of emotional dysregulation is alexithymia defined as an impaired ability to experience and express emotions. Previous work indicated that primary hypertension (HT) is marked by higher alexithymia, but little research examined the relationship between alexithymia and variability of evaluated BP with 24 h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in HT patients. METHOD: Fifty-five participants diagnosed with hypertension and a matched group of thirty-nine healthy participants filled in The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), a clinical-demographic questionnaire, and were assessed with 24 h ABPM. RESULTS: After removing those with white coat HT, as expected, hypertensive individuals had a higher total score and all three alexithymia subscales. Furthermore, alexithymia was positively correlated with average values of systolic BP. CONCLUSION: These findings provided support for the contention that alexithymia is associated with elevated BP, the higher level of alexithymia the higher systolic BP in 24 h BP measurement. Future studies may examine the causal relationship between alexithymia and HT and evaluate the effectiveness of emotional regulation training interventions to reduce BP in people suffering from primary hypertension.

Low Diastolic Blood Pressure is Not Related to Risk of First Episode of Stroke in a High-Risk Population: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.

Background Hypertension is the most prevalent and leading risk factor for stroke. SPRINT (The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) assessed the effects on cardiovascular event risk of intensive compared with standard systolic blood pressure reduction. In this secondary analysis of SPRINT data, we investigated how low on-treatment diastolic blood pressure ( DBP ) influenced risk for stroke events. Methods and Results For this analysis, we used SPRINT _ POP (Primary Outcome Paper) Research Materials from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center. Data for 8944 SPRINT participants were analyzed from the period after target blood pressure was achieved until the end of the trial. Overall, there were 110 stroke events, including 49 from the intensive-treatment arm and 61 in the standard-treatment group. In participants with DBP <70 mm Hg, stroke risk was higher than with DBP ≥70 mm Hg (hazard ratio, 1.467; 95% CI 1.009-2.133; P=0.0445). Univariable Cox proportional hazard risk analysis showed that in the whole group, age and cardiovascular and chronic renal diseases were stroke risk factors. These risk factors were related to lower DBP and higher pulse pressure, however, not to study arm. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that only age, history of cardiovascular disease, current smoking status and on-treatment systolic blood pressure were significantly related to stroke risk. Conclusions Low on-treatment DBP is not related to the risk for the first stroke, in contrast to older age, the history of cardiovascular disease, current smoking status, and on-treatment systolic blood pressure. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01206062.

Age is the main determinant of glycated hemoglobin levels in a general Polish population without diabetes: The NATPOL 2011 Study.

BACKGROUND: Measurements of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in non-diabetics can identify subjects who are at increased risk for future cardiovascular (CV) events. There is no consensus agreement whether the addition of HbA1c improves the CV risk prediction. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess mean values of HbA1c levels in a representative sample of general, diabetes mellitus (DM)-free Polish population, and its subgroups, and to identify important covariants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: HbA1c was measured in blood samples collected from 1,868 participants (males/ females (M/F) 901/967, age: range 18-74, mean 44.03 years) of NATPOLL 2011 study without previously and newly diagnosed DM. Univariate and multivariate analyses of HbA1c level in relationship to age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipids, creatinine, C-reactive protein (CRP), gender, and smoking status were performed. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c level was 5.46 ±0.31% in the entire population and significantly higher levels were found in subjects with male gender, hypertension, fasting hyperglycemia, abdominal obesity, and higher BMI values but not in smokers. Univariate analysis revealed numerous significant correlations of HbA1c with the highest values correlation coefficient values for age (r = 0.55), FPG (r = 0.43), WC (r = 0.36), and BMI (r = 0.36). The best, final multivariate model explained 40% of HbA1c variance and the most important covariant was the age, explaining approx. 50% of R2, followed by FPG and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c in non-diabetic level is associated with certain CV risk factors, mainly with age. Since known risk factors explain less than a half of HbA1c variance, the inclusion of HbA1c into the assessment may increase the performance of algorithms predicting CV risk.

Comparison of three formulas to estimate 24-hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion in patients hospitalized in a hypertension unit.

Measurements of 24-hour urinary sodium (24hrUNa) and potassium (24hrUK) excretion are useful in hypertensives but 24-hour urine collection may be difficult or unreliable. We compared three formulas (Tanaka, Kawasaki, Pan American Health Organization [PAHO]) proposed to estimate 24hrUNa and 24hrUK based on spot urine measurements. We studied 382 patients admitted to a hypertension unit. Sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels were measured using standard laboratory methods in a morning urine sample, followed by 24-hour urinary collection. Agreement between estimated and measured 24hrUNa and 24hrUK was evaluated using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Measured 24hrUNa was 158 ± 75 mmol/d and 24hrUK was 54 ± 24 mmol/d. The correlation coefficient was r = 0.53 for estimated versus measured 24hrUNa, r = 0.69-0.73 for estimated versus measured 24hrUK (all P < .001). The mean bias for 24hrUNa was significantly smaller for Tanaka (10.5 mmol/d) and PAHO (11.5 mmol/d) compared with Kawasaki formula (-29.9 mmol/d). The mean bias for 24hrUK was significantly smaller for Kawasaki (7.3 mmol/d) and PAHO (8.3 mmol/d) compared with Tanaka formula (16.5 mmol/d). Using a single morning urine sample, we found the PAHO formula to be the best for predicting mean 24hrUK and 24hrUNa in hospitalized hypertensive patients. However, precision and accuracy of all the evaluated formulas was inadequate.

Short- and long-term survival after open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm-Polish population analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare short and long-term mortality and readmissions in patients with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open aneurysm repair (OAR). DESIGN: Retrospective survival analysis based on prospectively collected medical records of the national Polish public health insurer. MATERIALS: In the National Health Fund database we identified all patients who underwent elective open or endovascular treatment of AAA between January 1st 2011 and March 22nd 2016. The data on mortality, selected concomitant diseases and readmissions were collected. A total of 7805 patients (mean age 70.9±8.1 yrs, 85.8% males) underwent OAR (n = 2336) or EVAR (n = 5469). A median follow up was 27.5 months (IQR range 10.0-38.4 months). METHODS: The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality, secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and readmissions. Kaplan-Meier (K-M), Cox proportional-hazards and propensity score analyses were performed for primary and secondary outcomes adjusting for repair type of AAA (OAR vs. EVAR), age, sex and concomitant diseases. RESULTS: EVAR patients had higher all-cause mortality (6.4% vs. 4.6% P = 0.002, adjHR 1.34, 95%CI 1.07-1.67, P = 0.010) compared with OAR. The mortality risks for OAR patients decreased below those for EVAR patients after 9.9 months. Of all the tested confounding factors only age independently and significantly influenced long-term mortality. Readmissions occurred more often in EVAR than in OAR (16.5% vs. 8.4% P<0.001, adjHR 2.15, 95%CI 1.84-2.52, P<0.001) independently from other covariants. Survival and readmissions Kaplan-Meier curves remained statistically different between OAR and EVAR patients after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefit of EVAR over OAR disappeared early during the first year after procedure, particularly in patients below 70 years of age, accompanied by an increased frequency of readmissions of EVAR patients. Our data suggest re-evaluation of the strategy for AAA management in vascular units in the country.

[The usefulness of plasma cystatin C determination as a marker of glomerular filtration rate]. / Przydatnosc oznaczania cystatyny C dia oceny wielkosci przesaczania klebuszkowego.

Cystatin C is a low molecular weight protein; a cysteine proteinase inhibitor. As it is freely filtrated in the renal glomeruli, and not reabsorbed into circulation, therefore it may be used as a marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We discuss clinical studies which were focused on the feasibility of plasma Cys C determination as a marker of GFR in various populations. Many of these studies suggest that plasma Cys C may be superior to plasma creatinine for the detection of patients with early decline in renal function. Recent data indicate, that Cys C may be a risk marker or factor of death or cardiovascular event in high-risk populations.

Diagnostic value of potassium level in a spot urine sample as an index of 24-hour urinary potassium excretion in unselected patients hospitalized in a hypertension unit.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperaldosteronism may be associated with elevated 24-hour urinary potassium excretion. We evaluated the diagnostic value of spot urine (SU) potassium as an index of 24-hour urinary potassium excretion. METHODS: We measured SU and 24-hour urinary collection potassium and creatinine in 382 patients. Correlations between SU and 24-hour collections were assessed for potassium levels and potassium/creatinine ratios. We used the PAHO formula to estimate 24-hour urinary potassium excretion based on SU potassium level. The agreement between estimated and measured 24-hour urinary potassium excretion was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. To evaluate diagnostic performance of SU potassium, we calculated areas under the curve (AUC) for SU potassium/creatinine ratio and 24-hour urinary potassium excretion estimated using the PAHO formula. RESULTS: Strongest correlation between SU and 24-hour collection was found for potassium/creatinine ratio (r = 0.69, P<0.001). The PAHO formula underestimated 24-hour urinary potassium excretion by mean 8.3±18 mmol/d (95% limits of agreement -28 to +44 mmol/d). Diagnostic performance of SU potassium/creatinine ratio was borderline good only if 24-hour urinary potassium excretion was largely elevated (AUC 0.802 for 120 mmol K+/24 h) but poor with lower values (AUC 0.696 for 100 mmol K+/24 h, 0.636 for 80 mmol K+/24 h, 0.675 for 40 mmol K+/24 h). Diagnostic performance of 24-hour urinary potassium excretion estimated by the PAHO formula was excellent with values above 120 mmol/d and good with lower values (AUC 0.941 for 120 mmol K+/24 h, 0.819 for 100 mmol K+/24 h, 0.823 for 80 mmol K+/24 h, 0.836 for 40 mmol K+/24 h). CONCLUSIONS: Spot urine potassium/creatinine ratio might be a marker of increased 24-hour urinary potassium excretion and a potentially useful screening test when reliable 24-hour urine collection is not available. The PAHO formula allowed estimation of the 24-hour urinary potassium excretion based on SU measurements with reasonable clinical accuracy.