Electronic health record-enabled routine assessment of medication adherence after solid organ transplantation: the time is now.

Medication nonadherence after solid organ transplantation is recognized as an important impediment to long-term graft survival. Yet, assessment of adherence is often not part of routine care. In this Personal Viewpoint, we call for the transplant community to consider implementing a systematic process to screen and assess medication adherence. We believe acceptable tools are available to support integrating adherence assessments into the electronic health record. Creating a standard assessment can be done efficiently and cost-effectively if we come together as a community. More importantly, such monitoring can improve outcomes and strengthen provider-patient relationships. We further discuss the practical challenges and potential rebuttals to our position.

The measure of impact: Proposal of quality metrics for solid organ transplant pharmacy practice.

As healthcare continues its transition toward value-based care, it is increasingly important for transplant pharmacists to demonstrate their impact on patient care, health-related outcomes, and healthcare costs. Evidence-based quality and performance metrics are recognized as crucial tools for measuring the value of service. Yet, there is a lack of well-developed and agreed-upon specific metrics for many clinical pharmacy specialties, including solid organ transplantation. To address this need, a panel of transplant pharmacy specialists conducted a detailed literature review and engaged in several panel discussions to identify quality metrics to be considered for assessing the value of clinical pharmacy services provided to solid organ transplant recipients and living donors. The proposed metrics are based on the Donabedian model and are categorized to coincide with the typical phases of transplant care. The measures focus on key issues that arise in transplant recipients related to medication therapy, including adverse drug events, nonadherence, and clinical outcomes attributable to medication therapy management. This article proposes a comprehensive set of measures, any number of which transplant pharmacists can adopt and measure over time to objectively gauge the value of services they are providing to transplant recipients, the transplant center, and the overall healthcare system.

Benefits of early vascular provider involvement in wound care center management of patients with underlying arterial disease.

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can reduce wound healing rates by ≤30%. Current literature suggests wound outcomes are improved when management is driven by vascular providers. However, whether this benefit is derived solely from early vascular provider involvement remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 80 limbs with chronic wounds and underlying PAD seen at our institution's wound center between July 2022 and July 2023. Arterial disease was defined by the following criteria: (1) prior PAD diagnosis, (2) ankle-brachial-index of <0.9 or toe pressure of <70 mm Hg, or (3) absent peripheral pulses. Patients were divided into early (<6 week) vascular provider exposure (EVE; n = 45) or late/no vascular exposure (LNVE; n = 35). Providers included vascular surgeons and affiliated advanced practitioners. The primary outcome studied was overall time to wound healing. Statistical analysis included χ2 tests, t test, Pearson correlation, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression modeling (variables included in a multivariate model if univariate effect on healing was associated at P < .1). RESULTS: Baseline demographic profiles were similar between groups with exception of lower baseline albumin (P = .037), more heart failure (P = .013), and more prior peripheral endovascular interventions (P = .013) in the EVE group. Although the initial wound locations and sizes were similar, EVE wounds had significantly higher WIfI wound scores (1.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.6 ± 0.1; P = .039). Although more LNVE patients developed radiographic osteomyelitis (31.8% vs 55.6%; P = .033), fewer underwent operative debridement or amputation (100% vs 63.2%; P = .008). On univariate analysis, healing time tended to be shorter in EVE, but not significantly (P = .089). When controlled for comorbidities, however, healing rates were nearly two-fold higher in EVE (hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-4.84). LNVE wounds also took significantly longer to reach checkpoints including time to >75% granulation (P = .05), 15% weekly size decrease (P = .044), and epithelialization (P = .026). LNVE patients required more wound center visits (P = .024) and procedures (P = .005) with a longer time to intervention (P = .041). All EVE patients obtained ankle-brachial indices, with 90.9% of them available at their first wound care visit (P < .001). Although a slightly greater proportion of patients underwent a major amputation in EVE (15.6% vs 11.4%; P = .595), this difference did not attain significance; additionally, 100% of EVE patients had documented discussion of nonsalvageable limbs before amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Early exposure to vascular practitioners improves wound healing time, timeliness to intervention, and wound center and hospital resource use in patients with PAD. Further investigation into benefits of vascular involvement within community wound center models could significantly improve awareness and accessibility of arterial wound care in smaller/remote communities.

Medication Safety Events After Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Veterans Treated at VA Versus Non-VA Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Fragmentation of health care across systems can contribute to mistakes in prescribing and filling medications among patients treated for myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to compare omissions, duplications, and delays in outpatient medications used for secondary prevention among veterans treated for MI at Veterans Affairs (VA) versus non-VA hospitals. METHODS: We utilized national VA and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data (2012-2018) to identify veterans 65 years or older hospitalized for MI and measured the use of outpatient medications for secondary prevention in the 30 days after MI among those treated at VA versus non-VA hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 118,456 veterans experiencing MI were included; of which 102,209 were hospitalized at non-VA hospitals. An omission in any medication class occurred more frequently among veterans treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals (82.8% vs 67.8%, P < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, the odds of omissions in any medication class were higher among those treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals (odds ratio: 3.04; 95% CI: 2.88-3.20). Duplications occurred more frequently in veterans treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals: 1.9% versus 1.6% had 1 or more for non-VA versus VA hospitals ( P < 0.001). Veterans treated at non-VA hospitals were more likely to have delays of 3 days or more in prescription fills after hospital discharge (88.4% vs 70.6% across all classes, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Omissions, duplications, and delays in outpatient prescribing of secondary prevention medications were more common among 118,456 veterans treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals for MI. Interventions aimed at improving care transitions and optimizing medication use among veterans treated at non-VA hospitals should be implemented.

Evolving trends in immunosuppression use and cytomegalovirus infection risk over the past decade in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The goal was to determine trends in immunosuppression use and its impact on cytomegalovirus (CMV) outcomes over the past 10 years. METHODS: This was a single-center longitudinal cohort study of adult kidney recipients transplanted between Jan 2012 and June 2021. Baseline and follow-up data were gathered via chart abstraction and analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 2392 kidney transplants conducted, 131 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 52 years, 41% were female, 57% were black, and 19% were CMV high-risk. The use of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) induction (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 1.3-2.1), tacrolimus (FK) level >8 ng/mL (OR 1.1, 1.09-1.11), CMV D+/R- rates (OR 1.06, 1.02-1.10), white blood cell count <3000 (OR 1.22, 1.18-1.26) and valganciclovir prophylaxis (OR 1.7, 1.6-1.9) have significantly increased over the past 10 years.  Rejection rates (OR 0.86, 0.82-0.91) and BK viremia >2000 (OR 0.91, 0.91-0.98) have decreased. RATG induction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.35, 1.2-1.5), FK >8 ng/mL (aHR 3.5, 3.2-3.9), Belatacept conversion (aHR 2.5, 2.1-3.1), and rejection (aHR 1.8, 1.6-2.0) were significant risk factors for developing CMV infection, while mycophenolate mofetil <1500 mg (aHR 0.52, 0.47-0.59), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) conversion (0.77, 0.56-0.89), cyclosporine-A conversion (aHR 0.68, 0.56-0.84) were associated with lower risk of CMV infection. CONCLUSION: Increasing use of potent immunosuppression coupled with higher CMV D+/R- F rates may be driving higher rates of CMV infection. Cyclosporine and mTORi conversion appears to be protective against CMV.  A more individualized immunosuppression regimen based on infection risk merits consideration.

Impact of CYP3A5 genotype on de-novo LCP tacrolimus dosing and monitoring in kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: LCP tac has a recommended starting dose of 0.14 mg/kg/day in kidney transplant. The goal of this study was to assess the influence of CYP3A5 on perioperative LCP tac dosing and monitoring. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study of adult kidney recipients receiving de-novo LCP tac. CYP3A5 genotype was measured and 90-day pharmacokinetic and clinical were assessed. Patients were classified as CYP3A5 expressors (*1 homozygous or heterozygous) or nonexpressors (LOF *3/*6/*7 allele). RESULTS: In this study, 120 were screened, 90 were contacted and 52 provided consent; 50 had genotype results, and 22 patients expressed CYP3A5*1. African Americans (AA) comprised 37.5% of nonexpressors versus 81.8% of expressors (P = 0.001). Initial LCP tac dose was similar between CYP3A5 groups (0.145 vs. 0.137 mg/kg/day; P = 0.161), whereas steady state dose was higher in expressors (0.150 vs. 0.117 mg/kg/day; P = 0.026). CYP3A5*1 expressors had significantly more tac trough concentrations of less than 6 ng/ml and significantly fewer tac trough concentrations of more than 14 ng/ml. Providers were significantly more likely to under-adjust LCP tac by 10 and 20% in CYP3A5 expressors versus nonexpressors (P < 0.03). In sequential modeling, CYP3A5 genotype status explained the LCP tac dosing requirements significantly more than AA race. CONCLUSION: CYP3A5*1 expressors require higher doses of LCP tac to achieve therapeutic concentrations and are at higher risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations, persisting for 30-day posttransplant. LCP tac dose changes in CYP3A5 expressors are more likely to be under-adjusted by providers.

Results of a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a bioinformatics-enabled pharmacist intervention in transplant recipients.

An ambulatory medication safety dashboard was developed to identify missing labs, concerning labs, drug interactions, nonadherence, and transitions in care. This system was tested in a 2-year, prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled multicenter study. Pharmacists at 5 intervention sites used the dashboard to address medication safety issues, compared with usual care provided at 5 control sites. A total of 2196 transplant events were included (1300 intervention vs 896 control). During the 2-year study, the intervention arm had a 11.3% (95% confidence interval, 7.1%-15.5%) absolute risk reduction of having ≥1 emergency department (ED) visit (44.2% vs 55.5%, respectively; P < .001, respectively) and a 12.3% (95% confidence interval, 8.2%-16.4%) absolute risk reduction of having ≥1 hospitalization (30.1% vs 42.4%, respectively; P < .001). In those with ≥1 event, the median ED visit rate (2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1, 5] vs 2 [IQR 1, 4]; P = .510) and hospitalization rate (2 [IQR 1, 3] vs 2 [IQR 1, 3]; P = .380) were similar. Treatment effect varied by comorbidity burden, previous ED visits or hospitalizations, and heart or lung recipients. A bioinformatics dashboard-enabled, pharmacist-led intervention reduced the risk of having at least one ED visit or hospitalization, predominantly demonstrated in lower risk patients.

The expanded role of the transplant pharmacist: A 10-year follow-up.

The role of the transplant pharmacist is recognized by transplant programs, governmental groups, and professional organizations as an essential part of the transplant multidisciplinary team. This role has evolved drastically over the last decade with the advent of major advances in the science of transplantation and the growth of the field, which necessitate expanded pharmacy services to meet the needs of patients. Data now exist within all realms of the phases of care for a transplant recipient regarding the utility and benefit of a solid organ transplant (SOT) pharmacist. Furthermore, governing bodies now have the opportunity to use Board Certification in Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacotherapy as a mechanism to identify and recognize specialty knowledge and expertise within the field of SOT pharmacotherapy. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overarching review of the current and future state of SOT pharmacy while also identifying major changes to the profession, forthcoming challenges, and expected areas of growth.

A viewpoint describing the American Society of Transplantation rationale to conduct a comprehensive patient survey assessing unmet immunosuppressive therapy needs.

This viewpoint aims to "set the stage" and provide the rationale for the proposed development of a large-scale, comprehensive survey assessing transplant patients' perceived unmet immunosuppressive therapy needs. Research in organ transplantation has historically focused on reducing the incidence and impact of rejection on allograft survival and minimizing or eliminating the need for chronic immunosuppressive therapies. There has been less emphasis and investment in therapies to improve patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life and side-effects. Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) is a new and important emphasis of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that provides a guiding philosophy for incorporating the patient experience into drug development and evaluation. The American Society of Transplantation (AST) Board of Directors commissioned this working group to prepare for the conduct of a comprehensive patient survey assessing unmet immunosuppressive therapy needs. This paper aims to describe the basis for why it is important to conduct this survey and briefly outline the plan for broad stakeholder engagement to ensure the information gained is diverse, inclusive, and relevant for advancing PFDD in organ transplant recipients.

Impact of converting adult kidney transplant recipients with high tacrolimus variability from twice daily immediate release tacrolimus to once daily LCP-Tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: The influence of converting to once daily, extended-release LCP-Tacrolimus (Tac) for those with high tacrolimus variability in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is not well-studied. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult KTRs converted from Tac immediate release to LCP-Tac 1-2 years post-transplant. Primary measures were Tac variability, using the coefficient of variation (CV) and time in therapeutic range (TTR), as well as clinical outcomes (rejection, infections, graft loss, death). RESULTS: A total of 193 KTRs included with a follow-up of 3.2 ± .7 years and 1.3 ± .3 years since LCP-Tac conversion. Mean age was 52 ± 13 years; 70% were African American, 39% were female, 16% living donor and 12% donor after cardiac death (DCD). In the overall cohort, tac CV was 29.5% before conversion, which increased to 33.4% after LCP-Tac (p = .008). In those with Tac CV >30% (n = 86), conversion to LCP-Tac reduced variability (40.6% vs. 35.5%; p = .019) and for those with Tac CV >30% and nonadherence or med errors (n = 16), LCP-Tac conversion substantially reduced Tac CV (43.4% vs. 29.9%; p = .026). TTR significantly improved for those with Tac CV >30% with (52.4% vs. 82.8%; p = .027) or without nonadherence or med errors (64.8% vs. 73.2%; p = .005). CMV, BK, and overall infections were significantly higher prior to LCP-Tac conversion. In the overall cohort, 3% had rejection before conversion and 2% after (p = NS). At end of follow-up, graft and patient survival were 94% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In those with high Tac CV, conversion to LCP-Tac is associated with a significant reduction in variability and improvement in TTR, particularly in those with nonadherence or medication errors.

A Critical Analysis of the Specific Pharmacist Interventions and Risk Assessments During the 12-Month TRANSAFE Rx Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Medication safety issues have detrimental implications on long-term outcomes in the high-risk kidney transplant (KTX) population. Medication errors, adverse drug events, and medication nonadherence are important and modifiable mechanisms of graft loss. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and types of interventions made during a pharmacist-led, mobile health-based intervention in KTX recipients and the impact on patient risk levels. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected during a 12-month, parallel-arm, 1:1 randomized clinical controlled trial including 136 KTX recipients. Participants were randomized to receive either usual care or supplemental, pharmacist-driven medication therapy monitoring and management using a smartphone-enabled app integrated with telemonitoring of blood pressure and glucose (when applicable) and risk-based televisits. The primary outcome was pharmacist intervention type. Secondary outcomes included frequency of interventions and changes in risk levels. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were randomized to the intervention and included in this analysis. The mean age at baseline was 50.2 years; 51.5% of participants were male, and 58.8% were black. Primary pharmacist intervention types were medication reconciliation and patient education, followed by medication changes. Medication reconciliation remained high throughout the study period, whereas education and medication changes trended downward. From baseline to month 12, we observed an approximately 15% decrease in high-risk patients and a corresponding 15% increase in medium- or low-risk patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: A pharmacist-led mHealth intervention may enhance opportunities for pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions and mitigate risk levels in KTX recipients.

Significant hospitalization cost savings to the payer with a pharmacist-led mobile health intervention to improve medication safety in kidney transplant recipients.

This was an economic analysis of a 12-month, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial in adult kidney recipients 6 to 36 months posttransplant (NCT03247322). All participants received usual posttransplant care, while the intervention arm received supplemental clinical pharmacist-led medication therapy monitoring and management, via a smartphone-enabled mHealth app, integrated with risk-based televisits. Hospitalization charges were captured from the study institution accounts payable and non-study institution hospitalization charges were estimated using multiple imputation. Multivariable modeling was used to assess the impact of the intervention on charges. The intervention significantly reduced rates of hospitalization (1.08 per patient-year in the control arm vs 0.65 per patient-year in the intervention arm, p = .007). The control arm had estimated hospitalization costs of $870,468 vs $390,489 in the intervention arm. Modeling demonstrated a 49% lower hospitalization charge risk in the intervention arm (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91; p = .022). From a payer or societal perspective, the net estimated cost savings, after accounting for intervention delivery costs, was $368,839, with a return on investment (ROI) of $4.30 for every $1 spent. These results demonstrate that a mHealth-enabled, pharmacist-led intervention significantly reduced hospitalization costs for payers over a 12-month period and has a positive ROI.

Etiologies and Outcomes Associated With Tacrolimus Levels Out of a Typical Range That Lead to High Variability in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: High tacrolimus intrapatient variability (tac IPV) is associated with poor outcomes in kidney transplantation, including rejection, donor-specific antibodies, and graft loss. A common cause of high tac IPV is related to patient nonadherence, but this is yet to be conclusively demonstrated. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study comprising adult kidney recipients, who received transplants between 2015 and 2017, with follow-ups through February 2020. The goal of this study was to identify the most common etiologies of tac levels outside the typical range, which lead to high tac IPV, and assess the etiology-specific associations between high tac IPV and graft outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression was used to assess time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: In total, 537 adult kidney recipients were included; 145 (27%) were identified as having a high tac IPV (>40%) 3-102 months post-transplant. Common etiologies of tac levels significantly outside the standard goal range (6-12 ng/mL) leading to high tac IPV included patient nonadherence (20%), infections (19%), tac-related toxicities (17%), and undocumented issues (27%). In multivariable Cox modeling, those with high tac IPV because of nonadherence had a 3.5 times higher risk of late acute rejection (P = 0.019) and 2.2 times higher risk of late graft loss (P = 0.044). No other etiologies in the typical tac level range were significantly associated with either acute rejection or graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Although high tac IPV has many causes, only high tac IPV caused by nonadherence is consistently associated with poor allograft outcomes.

A comprehensive review of the impact of tacrolimus intrapatient variability on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation.

Tacrolimus (Tac) is widely used to prevent rejection and graft loss in solid organ transplantation. A limiting characteristic of Tac is the high intra and interpatient variability associated with its use. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is necessary to facilitate Tac management and to avoid undesirable clinical outcomes. However, whole blood trough concentrations commonly utilized in TDM are not strong predictors of the detrimental clinical outcomes of interest. Recently, researchers have focused on Tac intrapatient variability (Tac IPV) as a novel marker to better assess patient risk. Higher Tac IPV has been associated with a number of mechanisms leading to shortened graft survival. Medication nonadherence (MNA) is considered to be the primary determinant of high Tac IPV and perhaps the most modifiable risk factor. An understanding of the methodology behind Tac IPV is imperative to its recognition as an important prognostic measure and integration into clinical practice. Therapeutic interventions targeting MNA and reducing Tac IPV are crucial to improving long-term graft survival.

Impact of a multidisciplinary multimodal opioid minimization initiative in kidney transplant recipients.

Opioid use after kidney transplant has been shown to be a risk factor for chronic opioid use, which leads to an increased risk of mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early impact of a multimodal pain regimen and education quality improvement program on opioid use after kidney transplant 2 months after implementation. This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of post-operative opioid use, comparing the average daily Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) of the patients who received education on opioids and a multimodal pain regimen (preoperative TAP/QL block, scheduled APAP and gabapentin) compared to a historical control group. Despite having no differences in pre-transplant opioid exposure, daily and overall inpatient opioid utilization was significantly reduced in the multimodal pain protocol cohort (38.6 vs 8.0 MME/day; P < .001); 5% of patients in the multimodal pain protocol cohort were discharged with an opioid prescription, compared to 96% of controls (P < .001). Our early results demonstrate that a multimodal pain protocol can effectively and dramatically reduce short-term opioid utilization in kidney transplant recipients.

Preliminary assessment of safety and adherence to a once-daily immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplantation: Results of a randomized controlled pilot study.

Medication non-adherence is common after transplant and a major contributor to graft loss. The objective of this pilot study was to obtain preliminary safety and adherence data of a complete once-daily immunosuppression regimen of Extended-release-tacrolimus (LCP-tac), everolimus, and prednisone vs LCP-tac, mycophenolate Twice daily (BID), and prednisone through a randomized controlled pilot study of 40 patients (20 in each arm). At 3 ± 2 months post-transplant, patients were randomized to receive LCP-tac and everolimus once daily or LCP-tac and mycophenolate BID (control arm) for 6 months; 80 met eligibility, and 40 were randomized. Mean age was 51 ± 14 years, 33% were female, 45% African American, and 55% had a Calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) >20%. Both regimens were well-tolerated, and medication side effect burden tended to be less severe in the intervention group. Self-reported high medication adherence decreased in the control arm from baseline to 6 months (80%-59%), while remaining the same in the intervention arm throughout the study (45%-47%). For safety assessment, there was no rejection, graft loss, or death in either arm. These results provide preliminary evidence of the safety of a novel once-daily immunosuppression regimen. The impact of this once-daily regimen on medication adherence requires a larger long-term study.

Dosing Requirements of Extended-Release Tacrolimus (Astagraf XL) in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted from Immediate-Release Tacrolimus (AAAKTRS).

BACKGROUND: The formal recommendation for converting twice-daily tacrolimus immediate release (IR) to once-daily tacrolimus extended release (ER) is a 1:1 dose conversion. However, more recent clinical analysis has shown that this may not be true; some patients may require a higher dose. In addition, de novo dosing tacrolimus ER has revealed that African Americans require approximately 20%-30% higher doses than Caucasians to achieve similar levels. As a result, this study sought to identify the appropriate dose conversion in the African American kidney transplant population, a population at high risk of rejection. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, open-label study comparing the difference in dose-normalized trough and total daily dose necessary to reach steady-state therapeutic goal, after conversion from tacrolimus IR to tacrolimus ER, in 25 African American kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS: After conversion to tacrolimus ER, there was a significant decrease in dose-normalized trough (C0) (0.44 versus 0.59, P = 0.03). Statistically significant differences were seen in both total daily and weight-based doses, when reported as actual values (15 versus 10 mg and 0.16 versus 0.11 mg/kg, respectively), as well as when standardized to achieve a target tacrolimus C0 of 8 ng/mL (18.1 versus 13.6 mg and 0.17 versus 0.15 mg/kg, respectively). The median standardized dose conversion required was 1.3 [1.0, 1.4], for the overall population. There were no instances of biopsy-proven acute rejection, allograft loss, or study drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center, open-label conversion study demonstrated that there was a statistically and clinically significant decrease in dose-normalized trough after conversion from tacrolimus IR to tacrolimus ER in an African American kidney transplant population and that a 1:1 dose conversion is unlikely to meet therapeutic goals.

Costs and factors associated with heart failure following kidney transplantation - a single-center retrospective cohort study.

The number of adults with heart failure (HF) will increase by ~50% between 2012 and 2030. Among kidney transplant recipients, HF accounts for 16% of all post-transplant admissions. We describe the burden of HF and predictors of healthcare utilization following kidney transplantation. We retrospectively identified adults who underwent kidney transplantation at our institution (01/2007-12/2017). Data were acquired from electronic health records, with healthcare utilization obtained from a statewide database. The HF incidence rate and prevalence were estimated for each year, total charges for HF and non-HF patients were compared, and logistic regression was employed for a 3-year predictive model of healthcare utilization associated with HF. Among 1731 kidney transplant recipients, the post-transplant HF incidence rate ranged from 1.91 (year 3) to 6.80 (year 10) per 100 person-years, while the prevalence increased from 31.7% (year 1) to 48.1% (year 10). Median charges were $75 837 (HF) compared to $42 940 (non-HF) per person-year (P < 0.001). Pretransplant HF [odds ratio (OR) = 3.12] and an eGFR < 45 (OR = 4.73) were the strongest predictors of HF encounters (P < 0.05 for both). We observed a high and increasing prevalence of HF, which was associated with twice the costs. Kidney transplant recipients would benefit from interventions aimed at mitigating HF risk factors.

Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of an mHealth Medication Adherence Intervention on Tacrolimus Trough Concentration Variability: Post Hoc Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of late allograft loss in kidney transplantation (KT). Tacrolimus trough coefficient of variation (CV), measured using the coefficient of variation, is strongly correlated with acute rejection, graft function, and graft loss. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if this mobile health (mHealth) intervention aimed at improving medication adherence in a nonadherent KT population would affect high intrapatient tacrolimus variability. METHODS: A 6-month, prospective, parallel-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to determine the effects of an mHealth intervention on tacrolimus CV. Intervention arm participants utilized an electronic medication tray and an mHealth app to monitor home-based adherence. Tailored motivational reinforcement messages were delivered to promote competence for adherence. Tacrolimus CV was measured using a 12-month rolling average, assessed at monthly intervals (6-month intervention period and 6 months after completion of the study); 80 were included, 40 in each arm. RESULTS: At baseline, tacrolimus CV was similar between arms (37% ± 15% intervention, 37% ± 13% control, P = 0.894). Patients randomized to the intervention had a significant reduction in mean 12-month tacrolimus CVs (P = 0.046) and a significant improvement in the proportion achieving low tacrolimus CV (tacrolimus CV < 40%; P = 0.001), as compared with the control arm. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: High tacrolimus CV is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft loss; these results offer the potential promise of improved medication adherence and clinical outcomes through the use of innovative technology.

Joint effect of race/ethnicity or location of residence and sex on low density lipoprotein-cholesterol among veterans with type 2 diabetes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death among United States women. Rural residence and ethnic-minority status are individually associated with increased CV mortality. Managing dyslipidemia is important in the prevention of CV mortality. However, the impact of race/ethnicity and location of residence on sex differences in dyslipidemia management is not well understood. Therefore, we sought to understand the joint effects of race/ethnicity and location of residence on lipid management differences between veteran men and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Veterans Health Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to perform a longitudinal cohort study of veterans with T2D (2007-2016). Mixed effects logistic regression with a random intercept was used to model the association between sex and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) > 100 mg/dL and its interaction with race/ethnicity and location of residence after adjusting for all measured covariates. RESULTS: When female sex and rural location of residence were both present, they were associated with an antagonistic harmful effect on LDL. Similar antagonistic harmful effects on LDL were observed when the joint effect of female sex and several minority race/ethnicity groups were evaluated. After adjusting for measured covariates, the odds of LDL > 100 mg/dL were higher for urban women (OR = 2.66, 95%CI 2.48-2.85) and rural women (OR = 3.26, 95%CI 2.94-3.62), compared to urban men. The odds of LDL > 100 mg/dL was the highest among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women (OR = 5.38, 95%CI 4.45-6.51) followed by non-Hispanic White (NHW) women (OR = 2.59, 95%CI 2.44-2.77), and Hispanic women (OR = 2.56, 95%CI 1.79-3.66). CONCLUSION: Antagonistic harmful effects on LDL were observed when both female sex and rural location of residence were present. These antagonistic effects on LDL were also present when evaluating the joint effect of female sex and several minority race/ethnicity groups. Disparities were most pronounced in NHB and rural women, who had 5.4 and 3.3 times the odds of elevated LDL versus NHW and urban men after adjusting for important covariates. These striking effect sizes in a population at high cardiovascular risk (i.e., older with T2D) suggest interventions aimed at improving lipid management are needed for individuals falling into one or more groups known to face health disparities.