The influence of delayed gastric emptying on quality of life after partial duodenopancreatectomy.

PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is temporarily compromised after pancreatic surgery, but no evidence for a negative impact of postoperative complications on QoL has been provided thus far. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreatic surgery and is associated with a high level of distress. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the influence of DGE on QoL. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study analysed QoL after partial duodenopancreatectomy (PD) via the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The QoL of patients with and without postoperative DGE was compared. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2022, 251 patients were included, 85 of whom developed DGE (34%). Within the first postoperative year, compared to patients without DGE, those with DGE had a significantly reduced QoL, by 9.0 points (95% CI: -13.0 to -5.1, p < 0.001). Specifically, physical and psychosocial functioning (p = 0.020) decreased significantly, and patients with DGE suffered significantly more from fatigue (p = 0.010) and appetite loss (p = 0.017) than patients without DGE. After the first postoperative year, there were no significant differences in QoL or symptom scores between patients with DGE and those without DGE. CONCLUSION: Patients who developed DGE reported a significantly reduced QoL and reduced physical and psychosocial functioning within the first year after partial pancreatoduodenectomy compared to patients without DGE.

Caffeine for intestinal transit after laparoscopic colectomy: randomized clinical trial (CaCo trial).

BACKGROUND: Coffee has been suggested to help postoperative gastrointestinal motility but the mechanism is not known. This trial assessed whether caffeine shortened time to bowel activity after laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled superiority trial (October 2015 to August 2020). Patients aged at least 18 years undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy were assigned randomly to receive 100 mg or 200 mg caffeine, or a placebo (250 mg corn starch) three times a day orally. The primary endpoint was the time to first bowel movement. Secondary endpoints included colonic transit time, time to tolerance of solid food, duration of hospital stay, and perioperative morbidity. RESULTS: Sixty patients were assigned randomly to either the 200-mg caffeine group (20 patients), the 100-mg caffeine group (20) or the placebo group (20). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean(s.d.) time to first bowel movement was 67.9(19.2) h in the 200-mg caffeine group, 68.2(32.2) h in the 100-mg caffeine group, and 67.3(22.7) h in the placebo group (P = 0.887). The per-protocol analysis and measurement of colonic transit time confirmed no measurable difference with caffeine. CONCLUSION: Caffeine was not associated with reduced time to first bowel movement. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02510911 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Does Side Really Matter? Survival Analysis among Patients with Right- Versus Left-Sided Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Right- and left-sided colon cancer are increasingly regarded as two independent disease entities based on different gene expression profiles as well as underlying genetic mutations. Data regarding prognosis and survival are heterogeneous and more favorable in cases of left-sided colon cancer. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncological outcome for patients with left-sided versus right-sided stage I-III colon cancer. METHODS: Overall, 318 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for right- or left-sided sided colon cancer between 2001 and 2014 were analyzed. Analysis was performed applying a prospectively maintained database with respect to overall, disease-specific, and relative survival, using Cox regression and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients (48.7%) presented with right-sided colon cancer and 163 patients (51.3%) presented with left-sided colon cancer. In risk-adjusted Cox regression analysis, tumor location had no significant impact on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-2.92; p = 0.197), disease-specific survival (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.76-2.44; p = 0.301), and relative survival (HR 1.70, 95% CI 0.89-3.27; p = 0.107). After propensity score matching, the results from risk-adjusted Cox regression analysis were confirmed. Stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, patients with right-sided stage II colon cancer had a statistically significant superior relative survival compared with patents with left-sided colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: No significant negative impact on overall, disease-specific, or relative survival could be observed in patients with right- versus left-sided colon cancer after risk adjustment, using multivariable Cox regression and propensity score analyses.

Effect of lymphadenectomy in curative gallbladder cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Only a small fraction of resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients receive a thorough lymphadenectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in GBC surgery. METHODS: On May 19, 2019, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English or German articles published since 2002. Studies assessing the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in GBC surgery were included. Fixed effect and random effects models were used to summarise the hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Of the 530 identified articles, 18 observational studies (27,570 patients, 10 population-based, 8 cohort studies) were reviewed. In the meta-analysis, lymphadenectomy did not show a significant benefit for T1a tumours (n = 495; HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 0.65-2.86; P = 0.41). Lymphadenectomy showed a significant survival benefit in T1b (n = 1618; HR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.50-0.94; P = 0.02) and T2 (n = 6204; HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.56-0.83; P < 0.01) tumours. Lymphadenectomy improved survival in the 2 studies assessing T3 tumours (n = 1961). A conclusive analysis was not possible for T4 tumours due to a low case load. Among patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, improved survival was observed in patients with a higher number of resected lymph nodes (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.45-0.71; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Regional lymphadenectomy improves survival in T1b to T3 GBC. A minimum of 6 retrieved lymph nodes are necessary for adequate staging, indicating a thorough lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1a tumours should be evaluated for lymphadenectomy, especially if lymph node metastases are suspected.

Urgent surgery in colon cancer has no impact on survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in early detection of colon cancer, a minority of patients still require urgent surgery. Whether such urgent conditions result in poor outcome remains a topic of debate. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, patients suffering exclusively from colon cancer and receiving either elective or emergent resection between 2001 and 2014 were analyzed with respect to overall, disease-specific, and relative survival using Cox regression and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: From a total of 877 patients analyzed, 2.7% (24) presented with complications requiring urgent surgery. Propensity-scoring identified strongly biased patient characteristics (0.097 ± 0.069 vs 0.028 ± 0.043; P < 0.001). An unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed urgent surgery as a statistically significant prognostic factor with an approximately 207% increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62-5.81; P = 0.003). After adjusting the data according to the propensity score analysis, urgent surgery was not associated with a decreased overall (HR = 1.67; 95%CI; 0.84-3.36; P = 0.174), disease-specific (HR = 1.62; 95% CI; 0.81-3.24; P = 0.201) or relative survival (HR = 1.86; 95% CI: 0.92-3.79; P = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: After risk-adjustment, using multivariable Cox regression and propensity score analyses, no significant disadvantage could be noted with regard to overall, disease-specific, or relative survival in patients with exclusively colon cancer who received emergent oncological resection.

Peridural analgesia does not impact survival in patients after colon cancer resection: a retrospective propensity score-adjusted analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the putative impact of peridural analgesia on oncological outcome in patients undergoing resection of stages I-IV colon cancer. METHODS: In a single-center study, 876 patients undergoing resection for primary colon cancer (AJCC stages I-IV) between 2001 and 2014 were analyzed. Mean follow-up of the entire cohort was 4.2 ± 3.5 years. Patients who did and did not receive peridural analgesia were compared using Cox regression and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 208 patients (23.7%) received peridural analgesia. Patients' characteristics were biased with regard to the use of peridural analgesia (propensity score 0.296 ± 0.129 vs. 0.219 ± 0.108, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the use of peridural analgesia had no impact on overall (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59-1.11, p = 0.175), cancer-specific (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.09, p = 0.111), and disease-free survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.19, p = 0.430). The 5-year overall survival after propensity score matching was 60.9% (95% CI 54.8-67.7%) for patients treated with peridural analgesia compared with 54.1% (95% CI 49.5-59.1%) for patients not treated with peridural analgesia. Cancer-specific and disease-free survival showed similar non-significant results. CONCLUSIONS: Peridural analgesia in patients after colon cancer resection was not associated with a better oncological outcome after risk adjusting in multivariable Cox regression and propensity score analyses. Hence, oncological outcome should not serve as a reason for the use of peridural analgesia in patients with colon cancer.

CCL19-producing fibroblastic stromal cells restrain lung carcinoma growth by promoting local antitumor T-cell responses.

BACKGROUND: A particular characteristic of non-small cell lung cancer is the composition of the tumor microenvironment with a very high proportion of fibroblastic stromal cells (FSCs). OBJECTIVE: Lapses in our basic knowledge of fibroblast phenotype and function in the tumor microenvironment make it difficult to define whether FSC subsets exist that exhibit either tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressive properties. METHODS: We used gene expression profiling of lung versus tumor FSCs from patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Moreover, CCL19-expressing FSCs were studied in transgenic mouse models by using a lung cancer metastasis model. RESULTS: CCL19 mRNA expression in human tumor FSCs correlates with immune cell infiltration and intratumoral accumulation of CD8+ T cells. Mechanistic dissection in murine lung carcinoma models revealed that CCL19-expressing FSCs form perivascular niches to promote accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the tumor. Targeted ablation of CCL19-expressing tumor FSCs reduced immune cell recruitment and resulted in unleashed tumor growth. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a distinct population of CCL19-producing FSCs fosters the development of an immune-stimulating intratumoral niche for immune cells to control cancer growth.

Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present analysis was to assess whether small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gastric GIST on a population-based level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on patients aged 18 years or older with histologically proven GIST was extracted from the SEER database from 1998 to 2011. OS and CSS for small bowel GIST were compared with OS and CSS for gastric GIST by application of adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: GIST were located in the stomach (n = 3011, 59 %), duodenum (n = 313, 6 %), jejunum/ileum (n = 1288, 25 %), colon (n = 139, 3 %), rectum (n = 172, 3 %), and extraviscerally (n = 173, 3 %). OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the duodenum [OS, HR 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.19; CSS, HR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.76-1.29] and in the jejunum/ileum (OS, HR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.85-1.10; CSS, HR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.81-1.10) were similar to those of patients with gastric GIST in multivariate analyses. Conversely, OS and CSS of patients with GIST in the colon (OS, HR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.07-1.83; CSS, HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.41-2.54) and in an extravisceral location (OS, HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.14-1.77; CSS, HR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.11-1.84) were significantly worse than those of patients with gastric GIST. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to common belief, OS and CSS of patients with small bowel GIST are not statistically different from those of patients with gastric GIST when adjustment is made for confounding variables on a population-based level. The prognosis of patients with nongastric GIST is worse because of a colonic and extravisceral GIST location. These findings have implications regarding adjuvant treatment of GIST patients. Hence, the dogma that small bowel GIST patients have worse prognosis than gastric GIST patients and therefore should receive adjuvant treatment to a greater extent must be revisited.

Predictive value of mucinous histology in colon cancer: a population-based, propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: This investigation aimed to assess whether mucinous histology impacts overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in colon cancer. METHODS: Colon cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2011 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. OS and CSS were assessed using Cox regression and propensity score methods. RESULTS: Out of 121 628 patients, 12 863 (10.6%) had a mucinous histology. Five-year OS and CSS for mucinous adenocarcinoma were 54.4% (95% CI: 53.4-55.5%) and 66.5% (95% CI: 65.5-67.5%) compared with 60.2% (95% CI: 59.8-60.5%) and 71.9% (95% CI: 71.5-72.2%) for non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (P<0.001). This survival disadvantage disappeared in multivariable analyses (hazard ratio (HR)=1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, P=0.269 and HR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.06, P=0.169), and after propensity score matching (OS: HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.93-1.04, P=0.606 and CSS: HR=0.99, 95% CI:0.92-1.06, P=0.783). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based investigation, a mucinous histology did not negatively impact survival. Hence, the present study does not provide evidence to change treatment strategies in patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon.

Improved Survival After Primary Tumor Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Propensity-adjusted, Population-based SEER Trend Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate about nonpalliative primary tumor surgery in metastatic breast cancer patients. This issue has become even more relevant with the introduction of increasingly sensitive imaging modalities. METHODS: Metastatic breast cancer patients were identified in the SEER registry between 1998 and 2009. The effect of primary tumor surgery on overall and cancer-specific mortality using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression modeling and stratified propensity score matching was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 16,247 women with metastatic breast cancer were included. Of those 7600 women underwent primary tumor surgery although 8647 did not have any surgery at all. Primary tumor surgery decreased from 62.0% in 1998 to 39.1% in 2009 (P < 0.001). Primary tumor surgery was associated with decreased overall mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-0.55, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.48-0.54, P < 0.001) in the propensity score-matched model. The benefit of primary tumor surgery increased from 1998 to 2009 for overall mortality (1998: HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89, 2009: HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.35-0.50) and cancer-specific mortality (1998: HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.89, 2009: HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.33-0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The present study-the first population-based analysis using propensity score methods-provides evidence of a favorable impact of primary tumor surgery on mortality in metastatic breast cancer patients. Most importantly, the benefit of primary tumor surgery increased over time from 1998 to 2009. Although the final results of ongoing randomized studies are awaited, currently available evidence should be discussed with metastatic breast cancer patients.

Comparative Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Treatment Prior to Total Mesorectal Excision and Total Mesorectal Excision Alone in Selected Stage II/III Low and Mid Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate that all rectal cancer patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages II and III disease should be subjected to neoadjuvant therapy. However, improvements in surgical technique have resulted in single-digit local recurrence rates with surgery only. METHODS: Operative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes of patients with and without neoadjuvant therapy were compared between January 2002 and December 2013. For this purpose, all patients resected with low anterior rectal resection (LAR) and total mesorectal excision (TME) who had or had not been irradiated were identified from the authors' prospectively maintained database. Patients who were excluded were those with high rectal cancer or AJCC stage IV disease; in the surgery-only group, patients with AJCC stage I disease or with pT4Nx rectal cancer; and in the irradiated patients, patients with ypT4Nx or cT4Nx rectal cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 454 consecutive patients were included. A total of 342 (75 %) patients were irradiated and 112 (25 %) were not irradiated. Median follow-up for all patients was 48 months. Among patients with and without irradiation, pathological circumferential resection margin positivity rates (2.9 vs. 1.8 %, p = 0.5) were not different. At 5 years, in irradiated patients compared with surgery-only patients, the incidence of local recurrence was decreased (4.5 vs. 3.8 %, p = 0.5); however, systemic recurrences occurred more frequently (10 vs. 17.8 %, p = 0.2). Irradiation did not affect overall or disease-free survival (neoadjuvant treatment vs. surgery-only: 84.9 vs. 88.2 %, p = 0.9; 76 vs. 79.1 %, p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The current study adds to the growing evidence that suggests a selective rather than generalized indication for neoadjuvant treatment in stages II and III rectal cancer.

Prognostic Relevance of Mucinous Subtype in a Population-based Propensity Score Analysis of 40,083 Rectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of mucinous histology in colorectal cancer remains unclear, especially for rectal neoplasms. The objective of this study was to evaluate if mucinous subtype has a relevant impact on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with adenocarcinomas of the rectum. METHODS: On the basis of the data set of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute of the United States, patients with rectal cancer between 2004 and 2011 were identified. Risk-adjusted Cox regression analysis and propensity score methods were used to assess OS and CSS. RESULTS: In total, 40,083 patients with stage I-IV rectal cancer, of whom 2483 (6.2 %) had mucinous histology, were included in this study. In unadjusted analysis, the 5-year OS and CSS for patients with a mucinous adenocarcinoma was 54.3 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 52.0-56.7] and 61.4 % (95 % CI 59.1-63.9) compared to 66.4 % (95 % CI 65.8-67.0) and 74.5 % (95 % CI 73.9-75.1) for patients with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (P < 0.001). The survival disadvantage persisting in risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23, 95 % CI 1.15-1.31, P < 0.001 and 1.25, 95 % CI 1.16-1.35, P < 0.001) disappeared after propensity score matching (OS: HR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.76-1.21, P = 0.722; CSS: HR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.80-1.40, P = 0.693). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based, propensity score matched analysis shows that mucinous histology itself does not constrain survival in rectal cancer patients. Therefore, treatment decisions should not be different according to mucinous histology.

Prognosis of Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Carcinoma Compared to Sporadic Colorectal Carcinoma: A Matched Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients have an increased risk of developing colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In contrast to clinical and pathogenetic differences, little is known about how prognosis compares between these patients and those with sporadic CRC. The aim of this study was to compare their characteristics and prognosis and identify independent risk factors for patients with UC-associated CRC. METHODS: A total of 126 patients who underwent surgery in our department (1984-2010) for UC-associated (n = 63) or sporadic (n = 63) CRC were included in this analysis. Patients were matched according to sex, tumor location, and disease stage. Clinical parameters and overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival were compared. In subgroup analyses, clinical parameters of UC patients were correlated with survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 129 months in the UC group and 99 months in the sporadic CRC group. UC patients were significantly younger and had more multifocal, high-grade, and mucinous carcinomas. Five-year overall survival rate for UC-associated and sporadic CRC was similar (65.7 vs. 63.2%, p = 0.98). Recurrence-free survival for International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage II disease was superior in the sporadic CRC group (p = 0.039). In a subgroup analysis of UC patients, a shorter duration of UC (p = 0.045) and male sex (p = 0.005) were associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite multiple clinical and histopathologic differences between UC-associated and sporadic CRC patients, overall survival and disease-specific survival are similar. In a subgroup analysis of UC patients with CRC, female sex was associated with a significantly better prognosis. This finding implies that estrogens may play a protective role in UC-associated CRC carcinogenesis.

Better survival in right-sided versus left-sided stage I - III colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The distinction between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer has recently received considerable attention due to differences regarding underlying genetic mutations. There is an ongoing debate if right- versus left-sided tumor location itself represents an independent prognostic factor. We aimed to investigate this question by using propensity score matching. METHODS: Patients with resected, stage I - III colon cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2012). Both univariable and multivariable Cox regression as well as propensity score matching were used. RESULTS: Overall, 91,416 patients (51,937 [56.8 %] with right-sided, 39,479 [43.2 %] with left-sided colon cancer; median follow-up 38 months) were eligible. In univariable analysis, patients with right-sided cancer had worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95 % CI:1.29-1.36, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.26, 95 % CI:1.21-1.30, P < 0.001) compared to patients with left-sided cancer. After propensity score matching, the prognosis of right-sided carcinomas was better regarding overall (HR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.89 - 0.94, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.90, 95 % CI:0.87 - 0.93, P < 0.001). In stage I and II, the prognosis of right-sided cancer was better for overall (HR = 0.89, 95 % CI:0.84-0.94 and HR = 0.85, 95 % CI:0.81-0.89) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.71, 95 % CI:0.64 - 0.79 and HR = 0.75, 95 % CI:0.70-0.80). Right- and left-sided colon cancer had a similar prognosis for stage III (overall: HR = 0.99, 95 % CI:0.95-1.03 and cancer-specific: HR = 1.04, 95 % CI:0.99-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based analysis on stage I - III colon cancer provides evidence that the prognosis of localized right-sided colon cancer is better compared to left-sided colon cancer. This questions the paradigm from previous research claiming a worse survival in right-sided colon cancer patients.

Modest overall survival improvements from 1998 to 2009 in metastatic gastric cancer patients: a population-based SEER analysis.

BACKGROUND: An increasing fraction of gastric cancer patients present with distant metastases at diagnosis. The objective of the present 11-year population-based trend analysis was to assess the survival rates in patients who underwent and in patients who did not undergo palliative gastrectomy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic gastric cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1998 and 2009. Time trend and impact of palliative gastrectomy on survival were assessed by both a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching. RESULTS: We identified 8249 patients with stage IV gastric cancer. The rate of metastatic disease increased from 31.0 % in 1998 to 37.5 % in 2009 (P < 0.001). The palliative gastrectomy rate dropped from 18.8 to 10.2 % (P = 0.004). The median survival for patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy (N = 1445, 17.4 %) and for patients who did not undergo palliative gastrectomy (N = 6804, 82.4 %) was 7 and 3 months, respectively. There was an increase in median overall survival from 2 months (1998) to 3 months (2009) in the no-gastrectomy group, and from 6.5 to 8 months in the gastrectomy group. The 3-year cancer-specific survival rates were 2.1 % (95 % confidence interval 1.7-2.5 %) for patients who did not undergo palliative gastrectomy and 9.4 % (95 % confidence interval 7.8-11.2 %) for patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy (P < 0.001). Palliative gastrectomy was associated with an increased cancer-specific survival in propensity-score-adjusted Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio 0.50, 95 % confidence interval 0.46-0.55, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: On a population-based level, only modest improvements in prognosis for metastatic gastric cancer were observed in patients who underwent and in patients who did not undergo palliative gastrectomy. Considering the low rate of midterm survivors in both groups, only a small subgroup of patients benefits from palliative gastrectomy.

Predictors for regional lymph node metastasis in T1 rectal cancer: a population-based SEER analysis.

BACKGROUND: Local resection of early-stage rectal cancer significantly reduces perioperative morbidity compared with radical resection. Identifying patients at risk of regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial for long-term survival after local resection. METHODS: Patients after oncological resection of T1 rectal cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results register 2004-2012. Potential predictors of LNM and its impact on cancer-specific survival were assessed in logistic and Cox regression with and without multivariable adjustment. RESULTS: In total, 1593 patients with radical resection of T1 rectal cancer and a minimum of 12 retrieved regional lymph nodes were identified. The overall LNM rate was 16.3 % (N = 260). A low risk of LNM was observed for small tumor size (P = 0.002), low tumor grade (P = 0.002) and higher age (P = 0.012) in multivariable analysis. The odds ratio for a tumor size exceeding 1.5 cm was 1.49 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.13], for G2 and G3/G4 carcinomas 1.69 (95 % CI 1.07-2.82) and 2.72 (95 % CI 1.50-5.03), and for 65- to 79-year-old and over 80-year-old patients 0.65 (95 % CI 0.43-0.96) and 0.39 (95 % CI 0.18-0.77), respectively. Five-year cancer-specific survival for patients with LNM was 90.0 % (95 % CI 85.3-95.0 %) and for patients without LNM 97.1 % (95 % CI 95.9-98.2 %, hazard ratio = 3.21, 95 % CI 1.82-5.69, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based analysis, favorable cancer-specific survival rates were observed in nodal-negative and nodal-positive T1 rectal cancer patients after primary radical resection. The predictive value of tumor size, grading and age for LNM should be considered in medical decision making about local resection.

Prognostic Relevance of Palliative Primary Tumor Removal in 37,793 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Population-Based, Propensity Score-Adjusted Trend Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether palliative primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with incurable stage IV disease is associated with improved survival. BACKGROUND: There is a heated debate regarding whether or not an asymptomatic primary tumor should be removed in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal disease. METHODS: Stage IV colorectal cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1998 and 2009. Patients undergoing surgery to metastatic sites were excluded. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were compared between patients with and without palliative primary tumor resection using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models and stratified propensity score methods. RESULTS: Overall, 37,793 stage IV colorectal cancer patients were identified. Of those, 23,004 (60.9%) underwent palliative primary tumor resection. The rate of patients undergoing palliative primary cancer resection decreased from 68.4% in 1998 to 50.7% in 2009 (P < 0.001). In Cox regression analysis after propensity score matching primary cancer resection was associated with a significantly improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) of death = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.39-0.42, P < 0.001] and cancer-specific survival (HR of death = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.38-0.40, P < 0.001). The benefit of palliative primary cancer resection persisted during the time period 1998 to 2009 with HRs equal to or less than 0.47 for both overall and cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this population-based cohort of stage IV colorectal cancer patients, palliative primary tumor resection was associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival. Therefore, the dogma that an asymptomatic primary tumor never should be resected in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer metastases must be questioned.

Efficacy of a Single Preoperative Dexamethasone Dose to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting After Thyroidectomy (the tPONV Study): A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Does dexamethasone given before thyroidectomy reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in a randomized controlled trial? BACKGROUND: PONV is an unsettling problem that commonly occurs in patients after thyroidectomy. Various preventive measures have been studied; however, many of these studies have been criticized for their biases (eg, use of opioids, sex selection) or were even retracted. METHODS: This single-institution, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority study was performed between January 1, 2011, and May 30, 2013. Patients undergoing thyroidectomy for benign disease were allocated by a block randomized list to receive a preoperative single dose of dexamethasone (8 mg) or placebo. Patients and staff were blinded to the treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PONV assessed at 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 48 hours after surgery. To observe an incidence reduction of 50%, a total of 152 patients were required for the study. RESULTS: The total incidence of PONV was reported in 65 of 152 patients (43%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35-51). In the intention-to-treat analysis, PONV occurred in 22 of 76 patients (29%; 95% CI, 20-40) in the treatment arm and in 43 of 76 patients (57%; 95% CI, 45-67) in the control arm (P = 0.001; odds ratio = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.61; absolute risk reduction = 28%; 95% CI, 12-42). The number needed to treat was 4. No severe dexamethasone-related adverse events were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of preoperative dexamethasone administration is an effective, safe, and economical measure to reduce PONV incidence after thyroidectomy.

Population-based SEER trend analysis of overall and cancer-specific survival in 5138 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present population-based analysis was to assess survival patterns in patients with resected and metastatic GIST. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven GIST were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 1998 through 2011. Survival was determined applying Kaplan-Meier-estimates and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. The impact of size and mitotic count on survival was assessed with a generalized receiver-operating characteristic-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 5138 patients were included. Median age was 62 years (range: 18-101 years), 47.3% were female, 68.8% Caucasians. GIST location was in the stomach in 58.7% and small bowel in 31.2%. Lymph node and distant metastases were found in 5.1 and 18.0%, respectively. For non-metastatic GIST, three-year overall survival increased from 68.5% (95 % CI: 58.8-79.8%) in 1998 to 88.6% (95 % CI: 85.3-92.0%) in 2008, cancer-specific survival from 75.3% (95 % CI: 66.1-85.9%) in 1998 to 92.2% (95 % CI: 89.4-95.1%) in 2008. For metastatic GIST, three-year overall survival increased from 15.0% (95 % CI: 5.3-42.6%) in 1998 to 54.7% (95 % CI: 44.4-67.3%) in 2008, cancer-specific survival from 15.0% (95 % CI: 5.3-42.6%) in 1998 to 61.9% (95 % CI: 51.4-74.5%) in 2008 (all PTrend < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first SEER trend analysis assessing outcomes in a large cohort of GIST patients over a 11-year time period. The analysis provides compelling evidence of a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in overall and cancer-specific survival from 1998 to 2008, both for resected as well as metastatic GIST.

Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe and frequent complication of rectal cancer resection, with an incidence rate of approximately 9 %. Although the impact of AL on morbidity and short-term mortality has been established, the literature is contradictory regarding its influence on long-term, cancer-specific survival. The present investigation assessed the long-term survival of 584 patients with stage I-III rectal cancer. METHODS: The 10-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival were analyzed in 584 patients from a single tertiary center. All patients had undergone curative rectal cancer resection between 1991 and 2010. Patients with and without AL were compared using both a multivariate Cox hazards model and propensity score analysis. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients developed AL (11.0 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 8.7 to 13.8 %). The median follow-up was 5.2 years for all patients; and 7.4 years for patients still alive at the end of the investigated period. AL did persistently not impair cancer-specific survival based on unadjusted Cox regression (hazard ratio of death (HR) = 1.27, 95 % CI = 0.65 to 2.48, P = 0.489); risk-adjusted Cox regression (HR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.54 to 2.20, P = 0.799); and propensity score matching (HR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 0.57 to 2.43, P = 0.660). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present propensity score analysis, the oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resections were not impaired by the development of anastomotic leakage.