Antiemetic use among pregnant women in the United States: the escalating use of ondansetron.

PURPOSE: To examine ondansetron use in pregnancy in the context of other antiemetic use among a large insured United States population of women delivering live births. METHODS: We assessed ondansetron and other antiemetic use among pregnant women delivering live births between 2001 and 2015 in 15 data partners contributing data to the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database. We identified live birth pregnancies using a validated algorithm, and all forms of ondansetron and other available antiemetics were identified using National Drug Codes or procedure codes. We assessed the prevalence of antiemetic use by trimester, calendar year, and formulation. RESULTS: In over 2.3 million pregnancies, the prevalence of ondansetron, promethazine, metoclopramide, or doxylamine/pyridoxine use anytime in pregnancy was 15.2, 10.3, 4.0, and 0.4%, respectively. Ondansetron use increased from <1% of pregnancies in 2001 to 22.2% in 2014, with much of the increase attributable to oral ondansetron beginning in 2006. Promethazine and metoclopramide use increased modestly between 2001 (13.8%, 3.2%) and 2006 (16.0%, 6.0%) but decreased annually through 2014 (8.0%, 3.2%). Doxylamine/pyridoxine, approved for management of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy in 2013, was used in 1.8% of pregnancies in 2014. For all antiemetics, use was highest in the first trimester. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a marked increase in ondansetron use by study year, prescribed to nearly one-quarter of insured pregnant women in 2014, occurring in conjunction with decreased use of promethazine and metoclopramide. Given the widespread use of ondansetron in pregnancy, data establishing product efficacy and methodologically rigorous evaluation of post-marketing safety are needed. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Assessment of health risks resulting from early-life exposures: Are current chemical toxicity testing protocols and risk assessment methods adequate?

Abstract Over the last couple of decades, the awareness of the potential health impacts associated with early-life exposures has increased. Global regulatory approaches to chemical risk assessment are intended to be protective for the diverse human population including all life stages. However, questions persist as to whether the current testing approaches and risk assessment methodologies are adequately protective for infants and children. Here, we review physiological and developmental differences that may result in differential sensitivity associated with early-life exposures. It is clear that sensitivity to chemical exposures during early-life can be similar, higher, or lower than that of adults, and can change quickly within a short developmental timeframe. Moreover, age-related exposure differences provide an important consideration for overall susceptibility. Differential sensitivity associated with a life stage can reflect the toxicokinetic handling of a xenobiotic exposure, the toxicodynamic response, or both. Each of these is illustrated with chemical-specific examples. The adequacy of current testing protocols, proposed new tools, and risk assessment methods for systemic noncancer endpoints are reviewed in light of the potential for differential risk to infants and young children.

Assessing congenital malformation risk from medications used in pregnancy: The contribution of NBDPS in pregnancy labeling of prescription drug products.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining human pregnancy data to inform product labeling is important for drug and biological products. METHODS: Collection and analyses of safety data on their use during pregnancy is usually performed after approval. RESULTS: The Centers for Disease Control National Birth Defects Prevention Study has provided important data on the relationship between drug use in pregnancy and birth defects. CONCLUSION: The Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule will set new and improved standards for the inclusion of information about the use of prescription drugs and biological products during pregnancy; the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, along with other data sources, will be critical for providing safety data to inform product labeling.

Safe lists for medications in pregnancy: inadequate evidence base and inconsistent guidance from Web-based information, 2011.

PURPOSE: Medication use during pregnancy is common and increasing. Women are also increasingly getting healthcare information from sources other than their physicians. METHODS: This report summarizes an environmental scan that identified 25 active Internet sites that list medications reported to be safe for use in pregnancy and highlights the inadequate evidence base and inconsistent guidance provided by these sites. RESULTS: These lists included 245 different products, of which 103 unique components had been previously evaluated in terms of fetal risk by the Teratogen Information System (TERIS), a resource that assesses risk of birth defects after exposure under usual conditions by consensus of clinical teratology experts. For 43 (42%) of the 103 components that were listed as 'safe' on one or more of the Internet sites surveyed, the TERIS experts were unable to determine the fetal risk based on published scientific literature. For 40 (93%) of these 43, either no data were available to assess human fetal risk or the available data were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Women who see a medication on one of these 'safe' lists would be led to believe that there is no increased risk of birth defects resulting from exposure. Thus, women are being reassured that fetal exposure to these medications is safe even though a sufficient evidence base to determine the relative safety or risk does not exist.

Monitoring for teratogenic signals: pregnancy registries and surveillance methods.

Pregnant women should have access to medications that have been adequately studied for use to facilitate evidence-based risk-benefit discussions with their health care providers. Pregnant women experience acute medical emergencies, have existing conditions that require continued medical treatment or may develop pregnancy-induced conditions, making drug use during pregnancy unavoidable. Drug labeling is the primary source of information about a drug's use. The safety and efficacy data found in the label is derived from well-controlled clinical trials conducted prior to a drug's approval. However, pregnant women are rarely enrolled in clinical trials unless a product is specifically indicated for a pregnancy-related condition. Consequently, information regarding a product's use during pregnancy is usually collected postapproval. Current data collection tools include pregnancy exposure registries, retrospective cohort studies, pregnancy surveillance programs, case-control studies, spontaneous reports of adverse events and case reports. Each tool has strengths and limitations in its ability to detect teratogenic signals. Combinations of different sources of data are necessary to acquire the most complete picture of potential teratogenic risk, as no single method can capture all desired data to help pregnant patients and women of child bearing potential make appropriate risk benefits decisions along with their health care providers.

Essential fatty acid supplementation of DHA and ARA and effects on neurodevelopment across animal species: a review of the literature.

Docosahexanoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) are long chain essential fatty acids used as supplements in commercial infant formula. DHA/ARA deficient states are associated with adverse neurological outcomes in animals and humans. Preterm infants are at risk for DHA/ARA deficiency. A few clinical reports on the effects of fatty acid supplementation have shown benefit in preterm, low birth weight, and normal infants in the first year of life, whereas others did not. Studies in animals have reported shortened gestation, fetal growth retardation, reduced infant body mass, and increased fetal mortality with consumption of fatty acids during pregnancy. To understand the data that support fatty acid supplementation in infant formula, a review of the animal model literature was undertaken, to examine the effects of DHA/ARA on neurodevelopment, including the effects on visual acuity. Several points emerged from this review. (1) Animal studies indicate that requirements for DHA/ARA vary depending on developmental age. Alterations of the ratio of DHA/ARA can impact developmental outcome. (2) The available studies suggest that while supplementation of DHA/ARA in an appropriate ratio can increase tissue levels of these fatty acids in the brain and retina, tissues sensitive to depletion of fatty acids, the benefit of routine supplementation remains unclear. Few studies measure functional outcome relative to changes in physiologic pools of DHA/ARA after supplementation. (3) Animal literature does not support a clear long-term benefit of replenishing DHA/ARA tissue levels and administration of these fatty acids at concentrations above those in human milk suggests adverse effects on growth, survival, and neurodevelopment.

Juvenile animal studies and pediatric drug development retrospective review: use in regulatory decisions and labeling.

Juvenile animal toxicity studies are conducted to support applications for drugs intended for use in children. They are designed to address specific questions of potential toxicity in the growing animal or provide data about long-term safety effects of drugs that cannot be obtained from clinical trials. Decisions to conduct a juvenile animal study are based on existing data, such as a safety signal already identified in adult studies, or previous knowledge of the drug or chemical class for its potential to impair growth or developmental milestones. In 2006, the FDA issued an industry guidance in which considerations for determining when a juvenile animal study is warranted were outlined. A retrospective study was conducted covering years both before and after the issued guideline to examine the contribution of juvenile animal toxicity studies to the risk/benefit assessment of pediatric drugs at the FDA. The initial findings were presented as part of the May 2010 HESI workshop on the value of juvenile animal studies. The objective of the review was to better understand the value that the juvenile animal study contributes to regulatory decision making for pediatric drug development by looking at when the studies have been included in the product assessment; what, if any, impact the studies had on the regulatory decisions made; and whether the data were incorporated into the label. The data described below represent a first look at impact of the juvenile animal study since the pediatric legislation and the juvenile animal guidance were issued in the US.

Transcriptomics analysis of early embryonic stem cell differentiation under osteoblast culture conditions: Applications for detection of developmental toxicity.

The mouse embryonic stem cell test (mEST) is a promising in vitro assay for predicting developmental toxicity. In the current study, early differentiation of D3 mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) under osteoblast culture conditions and embryotoxicity of cadmium sulfate were examined. D3 mESCs were exposed to cadmium sulfate for 24, 48 or 72h, and whole genome transcriptional profiles were determined. The results indicate a track of differentiation was identified as mESCs differentiate. Biological processes that were associated with differentiation related genes included embryonic development and, specifically, skeletal system development. Cadmium sulfate inhibited mESC differentiation at all three time points. Functional pathway analysis indicated biological pathways affected included those related to skeletal development, renal and reproductive function. In summary, our results suggest that transcriptional profiles are a sensitive indicator of early mESC differentiation. Transcriptomics may improve the predictivity of the mEST by suggesting possible modes of action for tested chemicals.

Developing osteoblasts as an endpoint for the mouse embryonic stem cell test.

The mouse Embryonic Stem cell Test (EST) using cardiomyocyte differentiation is a promising in vitro assay for detecting potential embryotoxicity; however, the addition of another differentiation endpoint, such as osteoblasts, may improve the predictive value of the test. A number of variables such as culture conditions and starting cell number were investigated. A 14 day direct plating method of D3 mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) was used to test the predictivity of osteoblast differentiation as an endpoint in the EST. Twelve compounds were tested using the prediction model developed in the ECVAM validation study. Eight of the compounds selected from the EST validation study served as model compounds; four additional compounds known to produce skeletal defects were also tested. Our results indicate comparable chemical classification between the validated cardiomyocyte endpoint and the osteoblast endpoint. These results suggest that differentiation to osteoblasts may provide confirmatory information in predicting embryotoxicity.

Comparative juvenile safety testing of new therapeutic candidates: relevance of laboratory animal data to children.

Differences in drug response in patients of various ages including children and the elderly are common, often leading to challenges in optimizing dosages and duration of use. For example, developmental changes in renal function can dramatically alter the plasma clearance of compounds with extensive renal elimination and thus can enhance renal and systemic toxicity of these drugs. Preclinical and clinical research of new therapeutics is initially focused on adults, and provides little relevant information for children especially those who are still going through skeletal and organ development. The organ systems in the pediatric population that can be most susceptible are lungs, brain, kidneys, immune, skeletal, and reproductive systems. Considering that significant differences can exist between adult and juvenile populations that may affect drug safety, major regulatory agencies around the world are encouraging and sometimes requiring companies to generate preclinical juvenile animal data to predict for potential drug toxicity in children. However, data generated from such studies are useful only if obtained using the most appropriate species at the most relevant age considering comparability of specific organ system development in question. Other factors in the design of juvenile safety studies should include the indication, existing toxicological data and likely route of human exposure. This report will discuss these factors with a focus on reviewing species-specific developmental schedules for specific target organs and relevance of preclinical data in the design and conduct of clinical pediatric studies. Specific examples will be used to discuss the relationship of preclinical juvenile toxicity observations to risk assessment in humans.

Pre- and postnatal development studies of lasofoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), in Sprague-Dawley rats.

BACKGROUND: Lasofoxifene is a nonsteroidal selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) developed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The purpose of these studies was to evaluate the effects of lasofoxifene on the postnatal development, behavior, and reproductive performance of offspring of female rats given lasofoxifene during organogenesis and lactation. METHODS: Two range-finding studies were conducted to determine the effects of lasofoxifene at doses from 0.01-10 mg/kg on parturition and lactation in pregnant rats and on the early postnatal development of the offspring, and to optimize the dosing regimen. Maternal milk and plasma were sampled for concentrations of lasofoxifene on Lactation Days 4, 7, and 14. In the pre- and postnatal development study, lasofoxifene was administered to pregnant and lactating rats by oral gavage at dose levels of 0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 mg/kg on Gestation Days 6-17 and Lactation Days 1-20. Maternal body weight and food consumption were measured throughout pregnancy, and body weight was measured throughout lactation. Parturition was monitored closely. The F1 offspring were measured for viability, body weight, anogenital distance, the appearance of postnatal developmental indices and reflex behaviors, sensory function, in an age-appropriate functional observational battery, motor activity, auditory startle, passive avoidance, and the Cincinnati Water Maze. The F1 generation was assessed for reproductive function, and the F2 offspring were measured for body weight and viability throughout the lactation period. RESULTS: In the range-finding studies, indications of maternal toxicity included decreased body weight and food consumption, increased length of gestation, prolonged parturition, dystocia, and increased offspring mortality at birth. Concentrations of lasofoxifene in maternal plasma were similar to those in milk, increased with increasing dose, and remained consistent over a 10-day period. In the pre- and postnatal development study, maternal body weights and food consumption were decreased in all treated groups during gestation. Length of gestation was increased, parturition was prolonged, and dystocia was noted in the dams in the 0.1 mg/kg group. There was increased pup mortality in the F1 litters in the 0.1 mg/kg group and all treated groups had decreased offspring body weights beginning at 1 week of age, continuing into the postweaning period and, for the F1 males, into adulthood. Female F1 offspring in the 0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg groups had increased body weights as adults. There were delays in the age of appearance of preputial separation in the males in the 0.1 mg/kg group and vaginal opening in the females in all treated groups. Body temperature was decreased by <0.5 degrees C after weaning for male and female offspring in the 0.1 mg/kg group. The sensory, behavioral, and functional measures, including the tests of learning and memory, were unaffected by treatment. Mating success was lower for the F1 animals in the 0.1 mg/kg group, but there were no effects on the reproductive parameters. Mating, reproduction, and maternal behavior of the F1 animals in the 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg groups and the survival and body weights of the F2 offspring in all treated groups through Postnatal Day 21 were unaffected by treatment. CONCLUSION: The maternal findings in this study were related to the pharmacologic activity of lasofoxifene. Inhibition of growth of the F1 offspring after perinatal exposure to lasofoxifene was observed, but there were no significant effects on the sensory, behavioral, or functional measures, including learning and memory. There were no effects on the F2 generation. The findings are consistent with those reported for at least one other SERM. The findings of this study do not suggest increased risk for the primary indication of use in postmenopausal women.

Comparison of developmental toxicology of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) in rats using selected dosing paradigms.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the literature for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suggests that a low incidence of developmental anomalies occurs in rats given NSAIDs on specific days during organogenesis. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]), an irreversible cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 inhibitor, induces developmental anomalies when administered to Wistar rats on gestational day (GD) 9, 10, or 11 (Kimmel CA, Wilson JG, Schumacher HJ. Teratology 4:15-24, 1971). There are no published ASA studies using the multiple dosing paradigm of GDs 6 to 17. Objectives of the current study were to compare results between Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Wistar strains when ASA is administered on GD 9, 10, or 11; to compare the malformation patterns following single and multiple dosings during organogenesis in SD rats; and to test the hypothesis that maternal gastrointestinal toxicity confounds the detection of low incidence malformations with ASA when a multiple dosing paradigm is used. METHODS: ASA was administered as a single dose on GD 9 (0, 250, 500, or 625 mg/kg), 10 (0, 500, 625, or 750 mg/kg), or 11 (0, 500, 750, or 1000 mg/kg) and from GD 6 to GD 17 (0, 50, 125, or 250 mg/kg a day) in the multiple dose study to SD rats. Animals were killed on GD 21, and fetuses were examined viscerally. RESULTS: The literature evaluation suggested that NSAIDs induce ventricular septal defects (VSDs) and midline defects (MDs) in rats and diaphragmatic hernia (DH), MDs, and VSDs in rabbits (Cook JC et al., 2003); hence, the present study focused on these malformations, even though ASA induces several other low-incidence malformations. In single dose studies, DH, MD, and VSD were induced on GDs 9 and 10. VSD also was noted following treatment on GD 11. In contrast, DH and MD were noted in the multiple dose study design only in the high-dose group, and VSD was noted across all dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: High concordance in major developmental anomalies between Wistar and SD rats were noted with the exception of VSD in the SD rats and hydrocephalus in the Wistar rats. Variations and malformations were similar when ASA was administered as a single dose or during the period of organogenesis (GDs 6 to 17). It was also evident that, by titrating the dose to achieve a maximum tolerated dose, malformations that normally occur at low incidence, as reported from previous single dose studies, could also be induced with ASA given at multiple doses.

Analysis of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug literature for potential developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed to pregnant women. Some case-control studies have linked the NSAIDs aspirin and indomethacin with a risk of congenital abnormalities and low birthweight. High doses of aspirin produce developmental toxicity in rats (e.g., gastroschisis/umbilical hernia, diaphragmatic hernia [DH]) when administered during sensitive windows of development. Unlike other NSAIDs, aspirin irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenases (COXs) 1 and 2. Hence, the developmental toxicity seen in rats after exposure to aspirin may be due to the irreversible inhibition of COX-1 and/or COX-2. If so, other NSAIDs, which act through a reversible inhibition of COX, may produce a weak developmental toxicity signal or no developmental toxicity signal when tested in preclinical models. To investigate this relationship, a comprehensive analysis of the NSAID developmental toxicity literature was undertaken to determine whether NSAIDs other than aspirin induce developmental anomalies similar to those elicited by aspirin. METHODS: Developmental toxicity studies were identified through literature searches of PubMed and TOXNET, and pregnancy outcome data were extracted and tabulated. By using a set of defined criteria, each study was evaluated for quality and assigned to one of five tiers. The relation between certain malformations and NSAID treatment was analyzed for the best studies (tiers 1-4) by using concurrent control data (Mantel-Haenszel and permutation tests) and by combining the concurrent control data with historical control data (chi2 test and permutation tests). RESULTS: A qualitative analysis of these data led to a focus on three types of malformations: DH, ventricular septal defects (VSDs), and midline defects (MDs). In rats, the incidences of VSD and MD were increased among fetuses treated with NSAIDs when compared with the concurrent controls. The extent of the increase was attenuated when the data from the aspirin studies were excluded from the analysis. There were no qualifying (i.e., tiers 1-4) aspirin studies conducted in rabbits, but the incidences of the three defects were increased over control incidences among non-aspirin NSAID-treated animals. Statistical analysis of these data was subsequently conducted. When tiers 1-4 were combined and compared with concurrent controls plus the most appropriate historical control database, the strongest associations were between NSAID treatment and VSD in rats, VSD in rabbits, and MD in rabbits. There also was some suggestion of an association between NSAID treatment and DH in rabbits. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the non-clinical NSAID literature demonstrated a possible association between exposure to NSAIDs and developmental anomalies. The anomalies were similar for aspirin and for other NSAIDs, but effects occurred at a much lower incidence with non-aspirin NSAIDs than previously reported with aspirin. Such a finding is consistent with the concept that reversible inhibition of COX-1 and/or COX-2 by other NSAIDs would produce weaker developmental toxicity signals than aspirin. However, there were limitations of the evaluated studies: (1) there were very few robust International Conference on Harmonization-compliant studies conducted with NSAIDs in the published literature; (2) many of the studies were conducted at doses well below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), where effects are rarely seen; and (3) numerous studies were conducted above the MTD, where reduced numbers of fetuses hampered detection of low-incidence findings. Although weak associations were observed, these limitations prevented us from definitively determining the presence or absence of a developmental toxicity signal from the existing body of NSAID data. Further exploration of this hypothesis will require assessing the potential association in animal models by using dose levels centered around the MTD.