Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 201: 111030, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752019

RESUMO

Starting in 2022, the calibration of various radon monitors received from customers was performed for the first time in Romania by LMRI at IFIN-HH, designated by CNCAN as a calibration laboratory. The purpose of the study was to analyze the radon monitors responses and their uncertainties, and finally compare their performance with the standard radon monitor AlphaGuard in order to improve the calibration process in the future. Measurement results and the uncertainty budgets are presented in the paper.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34831904

RESUMO

An interlaboratory comparison for European radon calibration facilities was conducted to evaluate the establishment of a harmonized quality level for the activity concentration of radon in air and to demonstrate the performance of the facilities when calibrating measurement instruments for radon. Fifteen calibration facilities from 13 different European countries participated. They represented different levels in the metrological hierarchy: national metrology institutes and designated institutes, national authorities for radiation protection and participants from universities. The interlaboratory comparison was conducted by the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) and took place from 2018 to 2020. Participants were requested to measure radon in atmospheres of their own facilities according to their own procedures and requirements for metrological traceability. A measurement device with suitable properties was used to determine the comparison values. The results of the comparison showed that the radon activity concentrations that were determined by European calibration facilities complying with metrological traceability requirements were consistent with each other and had common mean values. The deviations from these values were normally distributed. The range of variation of the common mean value was a measure of the degree of agreement between the participants. For exposures above 1000 Bq/m3, the variation was about 4% for a level of confidence of approximately 95% (k=2). For lower exposure levels, the variation increased to about 6%.


Assuntos
Poluentes Radioativos do Ar , Monitoramento de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Radônio , Poluentes Radioativos do Ar/análise , Calibragem , Humanos , Radônio/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA