In Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears, Female, Hispanic, African American, Asian, Socially Deprived, Federally Insured, and Uninsured Patients Are Less Commonly Treated Surgically.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate socioeconomic factors affecting whether a patient undergoes rotator cuff repair after a diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear. METHODS: From 2009 through 2018, claims for adult (≥18 years of age) patients who were diagnosed with a primary rotator cuff injury were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9th Revision-Clinical Modification (CM) and ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. SPARCS is a comprehensive all-payer database collecting all inpatient and outpatient pre-adjudicated claims in New York. ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify the initial diagnosis for each patient. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify subsequent rotator cuff surgery. The procedures identified were linked with the initial diagnosis, and patients were noted as either having or not having rotator cuff surgery. Logistic regression analysis was performed for variables including age, sex, race, Social Deprivation Index (SDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index, and primary insurance type to determine the effect of patient factors on the likelihood of having surgery after a diagnosis of rotator cuff injury. RESULTS: Of the 67,584 rotator cuff patients included in the analysis, 19,770 (29.3%) of the patients underwent surgical intervention. From the logistic regression, females relative to males (odds ratio [OR] = 0.798, P < .0001), increased SDI (OR = 0.994, p < .0001), African American compared with White race (OR = 0.694, P < .0001), Asian compared with White (OR = 0.832, P < .0001), Hispanic compared with White (OR = 0.693, P < .0001), other race (OR = 0.58, P < .0001), those with Medicare (OR = 0.601, P < .0001) or Medicaid (OR = 0.614, P < .0001) relative to private insurance, and self-pay relative to private insurance (OR = 0.727, P < .0001) were all associated with decreased odds of undergoing rotator cuff surgery. Older patients (OR = 1.012, P < .0001) and Workers' Compensation relative to private insurance (OR = 1.664, P < .0001) had increased odds of undergoing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study identified disparities in the likelihood of undergoing rotator cuff repair after a diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear based on patient demographic and socioeconomic factors. Individuals with higher SDI; African American, Asian, Hispanic, or other non-White races; and those with Medicare, Medicaid, or self-pay insurance had decreased odds of surgery, whereas older age and Workers' Compensation insurance were associated with increased odds of undergoing surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

A Posterior Acromial Bone Block Augmentation Is Biomechanically Effective at Restoring the Force Required To Translate the Humeral Head Posteriorly in a Cadaveric, Posterior Glenohumeral Instability Model.

PURPOSE: To assess the biomechanical utility of a posterior acromial bone block (PABB) for the treatment of posterior glenohumeral instability. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were obtained based upon an a priori power analysis. A 2.5-cm scapular spine autograft was harvested from all shoulders. A custom robot device was used to apply a 50-N compressive force to the glenohumeral joint. The humeral head was translated 10 mm posteroinferiorly at 30 degrees from the center of the glenoid at a rate of 1.0 mm/s in 6 consecutive conditions: (1) intact specimen, (2) intact with PABB, (3) posterior capsulolabral tear, (4) addition of the PABB, (5) removal of the PABB and repair of the capsulolabral tear (LR), and (6) addition of the PABB with LR. The maximum force required to obtain this translation was recorded. Paired t tests were performed to compare relevant testing conditions. RESULTS: Ten cadavers with a mean ± SD age of 54.4 ± 13.1 years and mean ± SD glenoid retroversion of 6.5 ± 1.0 degrees were studied. The PABB provided greater resistance force to humeral head translation compared to the instability state (instability, 29.3 ± 15.3 N vs PABB, 47.6 ± 21.0 N; P = .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], -27.6 to -10.0). When comparing PABB to LR, the PABB produced higher resistance force than LR alone (PABB, 47.6 ± 21.0 N; LR, 34.2 ± 20.5 N; P = .012; 95% CI, -23.4 to -4.1). An instability lesion treated with the PABB, with LR (P = .056; 95% CI, -0.30 to 20.4) or without LR (P = .351; 95% CI, -6.8 to 15.7), produced resistance forces similar to the intact specimen. CONCLUSIONS: A PABB is biomechanically effective at restoring the force required to translate the humeral head posteriorly in a cadaveric, posterior glenohumeral instability model. A posterior acromial bone block is a biomechanically feasible option to consider in patients with recurrent posterior instability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Augmentation of the posterior acromion may be a biomechanically feasible option to treat posterior shoulder instability.

Decreased prevalence of new-onset adhesive capsulitis in patients prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents that have well-known antifibrotic properties. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between ARB use and the rates of new-onset adhesive capsulitis as well as adhesive capsulitis requiring operative treatment. METHODS: Using a large national insurance database, a randomly generated cohort of patients with at least 3 continuous months of ARB use between January 2010 and December 2019 (n = 1,000,000) was compared to a separate randomly generated cohort without ARB use (n = 3,000,000). Rates of newly diagnosed adhesive capsulitis and associated manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and/or arthroscopic capsulotomy were calculated over a 1- and 2-year period following the completion of at least 3 continuous months of ARB therapy. Rates were compared using multivariable logistic regression to control for demographics and comorbidities. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and reported for each comparison. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. RESULTS: The mean age in the ARB cohort was 61.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.0), whereas in the control cohort, it was 54.8 years (SD = 12.3) (P < .001). The ARB cohort had significantly lower rates of newly diagnosed adhesive capsulitis compared with the control cohort at both 1 year (0.15% vs. 0.55%, P < .001) and 2 years (0.3% vs. 0.78%, P < .001). Similar findings were observed for the arthroscopic capsular release/MUA cohort associated with adhesive capsulitis. After adjusting for confounding factors, the lower rates of adhesive capsulitis and arthroscopic capsular release/MUA associated with adhesive capsulitis in the ARB cohort remained statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients prescribed ARBs experienced a decreased rate of newly diagnosed adhesive capsulitis, as well as adhesive capsulitis requiring surgical intervention when compared to a control cohort. These findings suggest a potential protective effect of ARBs against the development of adhesive capsulitis. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and establish a causal relationship.

Neurocognitive Concepts of Arthroscopic Surgical Training.

¼ Arthroscopy is used to treat a broad variety of orthopaedic conditions.¼ The technical aspects of arthroscopic surgery are distinct from traditional open surgery and require different approaches to education and training.¼ There are neurocognitive concepts related to learning, memory, and performance that are recognized and understood in many fields and relevant but not commonly and specifically considered in orthopaedic surgery.¼ The purpose of this review was to introduce and discuss neurocognitive principles and concepts of visuospatial motor skill acquisition and proficiency to provide a background to support the development of arthroscopy educational curricula and training.

Testosterone: A Review for Orthopaedic Surgeons.

¼ Testosterone replacement treatment (TRT) and anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) use is common and possibly increasing.¼ Diagnosing and treating hypogonadism in men is controversial.¼ Hypogonadism and the use of AASs seem to have a detrimental effect on the musculoskeletal system. The current literature on TRT and the musculoskeletal system shows an increased risk of tendon injury.¼ There may be a role for testosterone supplementation in the postoperative period.

Rotator Cuff Tears to Shoulder Instability: The Relationship Between Acromial Morphology and Shoulder Pathology.

¼ The acromion is a well-studied region of the scapula that has demonstrated substantial relationships to various shoulder pathologies.¼ Abnormal acromial morphology is associated with rotator cuff pathology, and our understanding of this risk factor inspired acromioplasty as an adjunctive treatment for rotator cuff tears.¼ The acromion is linked closely to shoulder kinematics and biomechanics, as it serves as the origin for the deltoid muscle.¼ In degenerative shoulder disease, eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been associated with a higher, flatter acromial roof.¼ Increasing literature is emerging connecting morphology of the acromion with shoulder instability.

Implant-related and medical complications in patients with sarcopenia undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective matched-cohort analysis.

Background: In the continually aging United States population, the number of patients with sarcopenia who undergo shoulder arthroplasty may concomitantly increase. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the rates of short-term implant-related and medical complications following shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without a recent diagnosis of sarcopenia. Methods: An exact 1:3 matched analysis of 4177 patients was performed using the PearlDiver database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare complications, Kaplan-Meier failure analysis was used to compare the cumulative hospital readmission rates. Two-sample T-testing was used to compare the 90-day cost of care. Results: Sarcopenic patients were significantly more likely to experience postoperative shoulder instability (odds ratio (OR) = 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-4.39) and periprosthetic infection (OR = 3.83, 95% CI, 1.74-8.67) within 1 year of their arthroplasty. Sarcopenic patients were at 25% and 41% greater risk of emergency department presentation and hospital readmission 1-year post-arthroplasty, respectively. Ninty-day total costs were greater among sarcopenics ($16 112.23 vs. 10 679.58, p < 0.001). Conclusion: These results are important for orthopaedic surgeons counselling patients with a low muscle mass on the potential for increased complications after undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty procedure.

Management of Bone Loss in Posterior Glenohumeral Shoulder Instability: Current Concepts.

¼ Posterior glenohumeral instability is relatively uncommon compared with anterior instability, but is becoming an increasingly recognized and surgically managed shoulder pathology.¼ Soft-tissue stabilization alone may not be sufficient in patients who present with substantial bone loss to the posterior glenoid and/or the anterior humeral head.¼ For posterior glenoid defects, posterior glenoid osteoarticular augmentation can be used, and posterior glenoid opening wedge osteotomy can be considered in cases of posterior instability with pathologic retroversion.¼ For humeral head lesions, several surgical treatment options are available including subscapularis transposition into the humeral head defect, autograft or allograft reconstruction, humeral rotation osteotomy, and shoulder arthroplasty.

Open treatment of posterior glenoid bone loss and bipolar bone loss.

Posterior glenohumeral instability is an increasingly common and challenging orthopaedic problem. While an arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization procedure (i.e., reverse Bankart repair) is effective in treating most cases of posterior instability, this procedure may be inadequate in shoulders with critical posterior glenoid bone loss (GBL), or in cases of an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. Thus, the purpose of the present manuscript was to report contemporary surgical approaches, techniques, and outcomes for the open treatment of glenoid or humeral head bone loss in posterior instability to help guide clinical decision making. Open osteoarticular augmentation procedures have emerged as a popular option to treat posterior bone loss, with bony auto- and allografts utilized from a variety of donor sites including iliac crest, scapular spine, acromion, distal clavicle, and distal tibia. The combination of glenoid retroversion and bone loss can be addressed with a posterior glenoid opening wedge osteotomy. Bipolar bone loss may be treated with a combination of the aforementioned techniques, in addition to a reverse remplissage, a modified McLaughlin procedure, or various arthroplasty-related options. Although short and mid-term outcomes are dependable, studies reporting long-term outcomes are sparse. Moreover, there is no current consensus regarding the most effective treatment of posterior shoulder instability in the setting of bone loss, and open surgical techniques continue to evolve. Further research is necessary to determine long-term effectiveness of these surgical options.

Short-term outcomes following open gluteus maximus transfer for the management of hip abductor tears.

Tears of the gluteus medius and minimus are an important cause of recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Although endoscopic and open abductor repairs have demonstrated promising outcomes, the success of these techniques is dependent on the size of the tear and the quality of the tissue. In patients presenting with abductor insufficiency and evidence of previous repair failure, large retracted tears, muscle atrophy and/or fatty infiltration, reconstruction/augmentation techniques should be considered. In the present study, we present a retrospective cohort study assessing patient outcomes following open gluteus maximus transfer for irreparable or severely retracted gluteus medius tears. Patients were included in the present study if they underwent open gluteus maximus transfer to address hip abductor tears that a senior surgeon deemed irreparable or at high risk for failure following isolated repair secondary to the following tear characteristics: large tears with >2 cm of retraction, the presence of extensive fatty infiltration (Goutallier Grade 3 or greater) and/or patients requiring revision abductor repair due to primary repair failure with associated pain and a Trendelenburg gait. Patients undergoing a concomitant, or those with a previous history of hip arthroplasty, were excluded from the study. All participants were prospectively enrolled in the study, and both pre- and post-operative patient-reported outcomes were collected at 6 months and 1 year including the modified Hip Harris Score, Visual Analog Score, Hip Outcomes Score of Activities Daily Living, Hip Outcomes Score for Sports-Related Activities and Overall Satisfaction with Hip. Pre-operative scores were compared with post-operative assessments using Student's t-test with a significance level of P < 0.05. Twenty-one patients and 22 hips were included. The average age was 69 (SD ±9.2) and 17 (81%) were females. The average body mass index was 30.0 (±6.2). The outcome scores at both 6 months and 1 year demonstrated significant improvements compared with pre-operative functional assessment. This article reports the utility of gluteus medius/minimus repair augmentation or reconstruction via gluteus maximus transfer demonstrating improvement in patient-reported outcomes at short-term follow-up.