Assessment of U=U understanding, PrEP awareness, HIV risk behaviours and factors associated with low HIV knowledge among users of Hornet, an online dating application for LGBTQ, in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Over 50% of HIV infections in Thailand annually occur among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women who use online applications to meet their sexual partners. We conducted a cross-sectional study assessing undetectable=untransmittable (U=U) understanding, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness, sexual behaviours and factors associated with HIV knowledge among users of Hornet in Thailand. METHODS: From November 2019 to January 2020, a survey was conducted using convenience sampling on Hornet in Thailand. HIV literacy was assessed via 22 questions, and multivariable linear regression was performed. RESULTS: 960 responses were assessed; median age was 34 years, the majority were MSM (80.4%), Thai (83.8%), had at least bachelor's degree (74.9%). Regarding the risk profiles, 39.1% reported inconsistent condom use, 15.0% used amphetamine-type stimulants, 56.9% had not taken PrEP in the last six months and 20.5% never had an HIV test. Only 22.8% thought that U=U was completely accurate. Lower HIV knowledge was associated with being from Africa (ß -8.13, 95% CI -14.39 to -1.87), age of 25 years or younger (ß -2.6, 95% CI -4.37 to -0.82), education less than bachelor's degree (ß -2.58, 95% CI -3.98 to -1.19), having more than one sexual partners (ß -2.41, 95% CI -4.13 to -0.69), paying three or more people to have intercourse (ß -2.5, 95% CI -4.26 to -0.74), not knowing one's HIV status (ß -3.56, 95% CI -5.45 to -1.68) and not answering about previous PrEP use (ß -4.11, 95% CI -7.86 to -0.36). Higher HIV knowledge was associated with being from Europe (ß 2.54, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.61), the Americas (ß 3.37, 95% CI 0.44 to 6.30) and previous PrEP use (ß 2.37, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.81). CONCLUSION: Among Hornet users in Thailand, the U=U message was unclear, and PrEP use was suboptimal. Large HIV knowledge gaps and high-risk behaviours were concerning. Educational campaigns in online spaces are needed to promote awareness and HIV prevention strategies.

A comparison of the efficacy and safety profiles of 10% salicylic acid and 10% urea creams in treating acanthosis nigricans in adolescents: a randomized double-blinded study.

Acanthosis nigricans is characterized by the presence of velvety hyperpigmentation of the skin over the neck and the flexural areas. Regardless of different modalities of treatment, none provides a definite standard cure. This study aims to assess the efficacy of topical 10% salicylic acid compared to 10% urea cream in treating acanthosis nigricans in adolescents. A randomized comparative, double-blind study is conducted on adolescents with acanthosis nigricans of the posterior neck. Treatment efficacy was assessed via a narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer at individual follow-up visits at weeks 2, 4, and 8, while the overall success rates were evaluated by the investigator-assessed and participant-assessed global evaluation scales (IGE and PGE). Acanthosis nigricans scoring chart (ANSC) and adverse effects are also assessed. A total of 39 participants with acanthosis nigricans enrolled and completed the study. Throughout the 8-week period of treatment, the use of 10% salicylic acid demonstrated strong effectiveness in treatment with 14.6 ± 10.6% improvement, while the 10% urea demonstrated 12.5 ± 10.9% improvement. Findings from the overall global evaluation scales were consistent with the results from the narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer. Treatment with 10% salicylic and 10% urea produced no serious local skin adverse reactions. Both medications improve neck hyperpigmentation associated with acanthosis nigricans in adolescents, in which the 10% salicylic acid and 10% urea cream demonstrate similar efficacy and safety profiles. Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20201123003.