Recognition of 1,N2-ethenoguanine by alkyladenine DNA glycosylase is restricted by a conserved active-site residue.

The adenine, cytosine, and guanine bases of DNA are susceptible to alkylation by the aldehyde products of lipid peroxidation and by the metabolic byproducts of vinyl chloride pollutants. The resulting adducts spontaneously cyclize to form harmful etheno lesions. Cells employ a variety of DNA repair pathways to protect themselves from these pro-mutagenic modifications. Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) is thought to initiate base excision repair of both 1,N6-ethenoadenine (ϵA) and 1,N2-ethenoguanine (ϵG). However, it is not clear how AAG might accommodate ϵG in an active site that is complementary to ϵA. This prompted a thorough investigation of AAG-catalyzed excision of ϵG from several relevant contexts. Using single-turnover and multiple-turnover kinetic analyses, we found that ϵG in its natural ϵG·C context is very poorly recognized relative to ϵA·T. Bulged and mispaired ϵG contexts, which can form during DNA replication, were similarly poor substrates for AAG. Furthermore, AAG could not recognize an ϵG site in competition with excess undamaged DNA sites. Guided by previous structural studies, we hypothesized that Asn-169, a conserved residue in the AAG active-site pocket, contributes to discrimination against ϵG. Consistent with this model, the N169S variant of AAG was 7-fold more active for excision of ϵG compared with the wildtype (WT) enzyme. Taken together, these findings suggest that ϵG is not a primary substrate of AAG, and that current models for etheno lesion repair in humans should be revised. We propose that other repair and tolerance mechanisms operate in the case of ϵG lesions.

Molecular recognition of pre-tRNA by Arabidopsis protein-only Ribonuclease P.

Protein-only ribonuclease P (PRORP) is an enzyme responsible for catalyzing the 5' end maturation of precursor transfer ribonucleic acids (pre-tRNAs) encoded by various cellular compartments in many eukaryotes. PRORPs from plants act as single-subunit enzymes and have been used as a model system for analyzing the function of the metazoan PRORP nuclease subunit, which requires two additional proteins for efficient catalysis. There are currently few molecular details known about the PRORP-pre-tRNA complex. Here, we characterize the determinants of substrate recognition by the single subunit Arabidopsis thaliana PRORP1 and PRORP2 using kinetic and thermodynamic experiments. The salt dependence of binding affinity suggests 4-5 contacts with backbone phosphodiester bonds on substrates, including a single phosphodiester contact with the pre-tRNA 5' leader, consistent with prior reports of short leader requirements. PRORPs contain an N-terminal pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) domain, truncation of which results in a >30-fold decrease in substrate affinity. While most PPR-containing proteins have been implicated in single-stranded sequence-specific RNA recognition, we find that the PPR motifs of PRORPs recognize pre-tRNA substrates differently. Notably, the PPR domain residues most important for substrate binding in PRORPs do not correspond to positions involved in base recognition in other PPR proteins. Several of these residues are highly conserved in PRORPs from algae, plants, and metazoans, suggesting a conserved strategy for substrate recognition by the PRORP PPR domain. Furthermore, there is no evidence for sequence-specific interactions. This work clarifies molecular determinants of PRORP-substrate recognition and provides a new predictive model for the PRORP-substrate complex.