Harmonization of Serum Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Measurements Paves the Way for the Adoption of a More Uniform Reference Interval.

BACKGROUND: The IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests developed a global harmonization approach for thyroid-stimulating hormone measurements. It is based on a multiassay method comparison study with clinical serum samples and target setting with a robust factor analysis method. Here we describe the Phase IV method comparison and reference interval (RI) studies conducted with the objective to recalibrate the participating assays and demonstrate the proof-of-concept. METHODS: Fourteen manufacturers measured the harmonization and RI panel; 4 of them quantified the harmonization and first follow-up panel in parallel. All recalibrated their assays to the statistically inferred targets. For validation, we used desirable specifications from the biological variation for the bias and total error (TE). The RI measurements were done with the assays' current calibrators, but data were also reported after transformation to the new calibration status. We estimated the pre- and postrecalibration RIs with a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. RESULTS: After recalibration, 14 of 15 assays met the bias specification with 95% confidence; 8 assays complied with the TE specification. The CV of the assay means for the harmonization panel was reduced from 9.5% to 4.2%. The RI study showed improved uniformity after recalibration: the ranges (i.e., maximum differences) exhibited by the assay-specific 2.5th, 50th, and 97.5th percentile estimates were reduced from 0.27, 0.89, and 2.13 mIU/L to 0.12, 0.29, and 0.77 mIU/L. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that harmonization increased the agreement of results from the participating immunoassays, and may allow them to adopt a more uniform RI in the future.

Standardization of Free Thyroxine Measurements Allows the Adoption of a More Uniform Reference Interval.

BACKGROUND: The IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests intended to standardize free thyroxine (FT4) immunoassays. We developed a Système International d'Unités traceable conventional reference measurement procedure (RMP) based on equilibrium dialysis and mass spectrometry. We describe here the latest studies intended to recalibrate against the RMP and supply a proof of concept, which should allow continued standardization efforts. METHODS: We used the RMP to target the standardization and reference interval (RI) panels, which were also measured by 13 manufacturers. We validated the suitability of the recalibrated results to meet specifications for bias (3.3%) and total error (8.0%) determined from biological variation. However, because these specifications were stringent, we expanded them to 10% and 13%, respectively. The results for the RI panel were reported as if the assays were recalibrated. We estimated all but 1 RI using parametric statistical procedures and hypothesized that the RI determined by the RMP was suitable for use by the recalibrated assays. RESULTS: Twelve of 13 recalibrated assays had a bias, meeting the 10% specification with 95% confidence; for 7 assays, this applied even for the 3.3% specification. Only 1 assay met the 13% total error specification. Recalibration reduced the CV of the assay means for the standardization panel from 13% to 5%. The proof-of-concept study confirmed our hypothesis regarding the RI but within constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Recalibration to the RMP significantly reduced the FT4 immunoassays' bias, so that the RI determined by the RMP was suitable for common use within a margin of 12.5%.

The Empower project - a new way of assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability.

BACKGROUND: Manufacturers and laboratories might benefit from using a modern integrated tool for quality management/assurance. The tool should not be confounded by commutability issues and focus on the intrinsic analytical quality and comparability of assays as performed in routine laboratories. In addition, it should enable monitoring of long-term stability of performance, with the possibility to quasi "real-time" remedial action. Therefore, we developed the "Empower" project. METHODS: The project comprises four pillars: (i) master comparisons with panels of frozen single-donation samples, (ii) monitoring of patient percentiles and (iii) internal quality control data, and (iv) conceptual and statistical education about analytical quality. In the pillars described here (i and ii), state-of-the-art as well as biologically derived specifications are used. RESULTS: In the 2014 master comparisons survey, 125 laboratories forming 8 peer groups participated. It showed not only good intrinsic analytical quality of assays but also assay biases/non-comparability. Although laboratory performance was mostly satisfactory, sometimes huge between-laboratory differences were observed. In patient percentile monitoring, currently, 100 laboratories participate with 182 devices. Particularly, laboratories with a high daily throughput and low patient population variation show a stable moving median in time with good between-instrument concordance. Shifts/drifts due to lot changes are sometimes revealed. There is evidence that outpatient medians mirror the calibration set-points shown in the master comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The Empower project gives manufacturers and laboratories a realistic view on assay quality/comparability as well as stability of performance and/or the reasons for increased variation. Therefore, it is a modern tool for quality management/assurance toward improved patient care.

Standardization of FT4 and harmonization of TSH measurements - a request for input from endocrinologists and other physicians.

Given the prevalence of thyroid disorders and the subtle signs and symptoms that may accompany subclinical disease, reliable laboratory testing for serum TSH and free thyroid hormones is important for both primary care physicians and endocrinologists. The laboratory community has recognized the need for standardization of thyroid function tests to achieve comparability of measurement results between methods. This applies in particular to tests for free T4 (FT4), which may be considered controversial in terms of clinical and analytical validity. However, variability is also observed with TSH testing - a fact which has not been emphasized in ongoing discussions regarding lowering the upper limit of normal and/or common decision limits to start treatment for hypothyroidism. In response to this need, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests worked over the years towards the goal of standardization of FT4 and TSH testing.

Measurements for 8 common analytes in native sera identify inadequate standardization among 6 routine laboratory assays.

BACKGROUND: External quality assessment (EQA) with commutable samples is essential for assessing the quality of assays performed by laboratories, particularly when the emphasis is on their standardization status and interchangeability of results. METHODS: We used a panel of 20 fresh-frozen single-donation serum samples to assess assays for the measurement of creatinine, glucose, phosphate, uric acid, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. The commercial random access platforms included: Abbott Architect, Beckman Coulter AU, Ortho Vitros, Roche Cobas, Siemens Advia, and Thermo Scientific Konelab. The assessment was done at the peer group level and by comparison against the all-method trimmed mean or reference method values, where available. The considered quality indicators were intraassay imprecision, combined imprecision (including sample-matrix interference), bias, and total error. Fail/pass decisions were based on limits reflecting state-of-the-art performance, but also limits related to biological variation. RESULTS: Most assays showed excellent peer performance attributes, except for HDL- and LDL cholesterol. Cases in which individual assays had biases exceeding the used limits were the Siemens Advia creatinine (-4.2%), Ortho Vitros phosphate (8.9%), Beckman Coulter AU triglycerides (5.4%), and Thermo Scientific Konelab uric acid (6.4%), which lead to considerable interassay discrepancies. Additionally, large laboratory effects were observed that caused interlaboratory differences of >30%. CONCLUSIONS: The design of the EQA study was well suited for monitoring different quality attributes of assays performed in daily laboratory practice. There is a need for improvement, even for simple clinical chemistry analytes. In particular, the interchangeability of results remains jeopardized both by assay standardization issues and individual laboratory effects.

A statistical basis for harmonization of thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassays using a robust factor analysis model.

BACKGROUND: Between-method equivalence ideally is achieved by calibration against an SI-traceable reference measurement procedure. For measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), it is unlikely to accomplish this goal in mid-term. Therefore, we investigated a statistical alternative based on a factor analysis (FA) model. METHODS: The FA model was applied to TSH results for 94 samples generated by 14 immunoassays (concentration range: 0.0005-78 mIU/L). The dataset did not fulfill the assumption of a homogeneous sample from an elliptically symmetric distribution, and, therefore, required standardization prior to application of the FA model. As outliers and missing values also occurred, the key quantities of the FA model had to be estimated with a method that can handle these complications. We selected a robust alternating regressions (RAR) method, which replaces in the minimization criterion of the fitting process the squared differences between results xij and model fit x^ij ${\hat x_{ij}}$ by a weighted absolute difference. The weights are adaptively determined in successive regressions, which down weighs the outliers. The weights for missing values are set to zero. RESULTS: The quality of the estimated targets was reflected by their central position in the distributions, and description of the relationship between results and targets by a simple two-parameter regression equation with high correlation coefficients and low SDs of the percentage-residuals. Mathematical recalibration eliminated the method differences and improved the between-method CV from 11% to 6%. CONCLUSIONS: RAR applied to a multimethod comparison dataset hampered by outliers and missing values, is fit to the purpose of harmonization.

Isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry candidate reference method for total testosterone in human serum.

BACKGROUND: We developed and evaluated a candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) to standardize testosterone measurements, provide highly accurate and precise value assignments for the CDC Hormone Standardization Program, and ensure accurate and comparable results across testing systems and laboratories. METHODS: After 2 liquid/liquid extractions of serum with a combination of ethyl acetate and hexane, we quantified testosterone by isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization in the positive ion mode monitoring 289→97 m/z (testosterone) and 292→112 m/z ((3)C(13) testosterone). We used calibrator bracketing and gravimetric measurements to give higher specificity and accuracy to serum value assignments. The candidate RMP was evaluated for accuracy by use of NIST-certified reference material SRM971 and validated by split-sample comparison to established RMPs. We evaluated intraassay and interassay imprecision, measurement uncertainty, potential interferences, and matrix effects. RESULTS: A weighted Deming regression comparison of the candidate RMP to established RMPs showed agreement with no statistical difference (slope 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, intercept 0.54, 95% CI -1.24 to 2.32) and a bias of ≤0.3% for NIST SRM971. The candidate RMP gave maximum intraassay, interassay, and total percent CVs of 1.5%, 1.4%, and 1.7% across the concentrations of testosterone typically found in healthy men and women. We tested structural analogs of testosterone and 125 serum samples and found no interferences with the measurement. CONCLUSIONS: This RMP for testosterone can serve as a higher-order standard for measurement traceability and can be used to provide an accuracy base to which routine methods can be compared in the CDC Hormone Standardization Program.

"Good samples make good assays" ­ the problem of sourcing clinical samples for a standardization project.

Clinical samples are the cornerstone in all aspects related to in vitro diagnostic testing. They are particularly valuable in the process of establishing/validating metrological traceability, because they eliminate commutability issues potentially associated with artificial calibrators. Therefore, they are essential for IFCC standardization projects. However, sourcing clinical specimens is particularly challenging. It mostly turns out that only dedicated supply sources can accommodate the varying specifications within reasonable timelines. Here we describe the torturous experience in this regard of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function tests (since transformed into a Committee). We always focused on obtaining high quality samples in sufficient volume to serve all project participants. We applied a step-up approach: in phase I, we used high volume (200 mL of plasma/serum) single donations from apparently healthy individuals, and switched in phase II and III to medium-sized volume clinical samples (15 ­ 30 mL) from well-defined patient categories. In the first two phases we observed for some assays a sample-related discrepant analytical performance for total/free triiodothyronine and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), whereas in phase III we faced a severe delay in obtaining the relevant panels for free thyroxine (FT4) and TSH (n = 90 and n = 100, respectively). Additional experiments only allowed us to exclude hypothesized causes of the observations. We believe that there would be merit in a collaborative effort by chairholders of similar projects to establish a sample procurement infrastructure based on a solid relationship with commercial supply sources with the support of a significant number of committed clinicians.

Long-term stability of laboratory tests and practical implications for quality management.

BACKGROUND: Long-term stability of analytical performance is required for adequate patient management. We investigated the use of patient data to document test stability, and the relevance of observed instabilities on a surrogate medical outcome. We used multiyear patient and internal quality control (IQC) data from two laboratories for tests to monitor chronic kidney and thyroid disease. METHODS: We plotted moving means of the 50th percentiles of stratified patient data and of the daily IQC means. We evaluated observed instabilities based on goals inferred from the analytes' biological variation and investigated their effect on classification of results against reference intervals. RESULTS: Patient and IQC data generally matched well, except for analytes, for which other than analytical variation sources prevailed. Analytical instabilities were predominantly due to reagent/calibrator lot changes, however, for immunoassays also to within-lot instabilities, urging frequent recalibrations. The relevance of biased results on medical decisions ranged from negligible to very pronounced, indicating the need for assessment of analytical performance in relation to quality goals inferred from biological variation. CONCLUSIONS: Patient percentiles offer great potential to assess/monitor the medium- to long-term analytical stability of a test within certain constraints. Differences in analytical quality between assays can significantly affect medical outcome.

Candidate reference measurement procedures for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 by using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] assays are characterized by poor between-assay comparability. This result emphasizes the need for reference measurement procedures (RMPs) to establish calibration traceability and assist in method validation. We aimed at developing candidate RMPs on the basis of isotope- dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) for separate quantification of serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3. METHODS: Hexa-deuterated 25(OH)D3/D2 was added to serum. This mixture was extracted with n-hexane and fractionated on Sephadex LH-20 before 2-dimensional LC-MS/MS. In the first dimension, both procedures used a C4 column; however, in the second dimension, the 25(OH)D2 procedure used a C18 and the 25(OH)D3 procedure used a Zorbax SB-CN column. Calibration was traceable to the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2972. Validation comprised assessment of interference and limit of quantification/detection. Imprecision and trueness were validated by analysis of the SRM 972 against specifications (CV<5% and bias<1.7%). The expanded uncertainty for quadruplicate measurements was estimated. RESULTS: Testing of potentially interfering substances was negative. Interference by 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was resolved by sufficient chromatographic resolution. The limits of quantification/detection were 1.1 nmol/L and 0.09 pmol/L for 25(OH)D3 and 1.2 nmol/L and 0.05 pmol/L for 25(OH)D(2). Mean total CVs and differences from the SRM 972 target (±1-sided 95% CI) were 2.1% and 1.1%±1.5% [25(OH)D3] and 3% and 1.3%±0.6% [25(OH)D2], respectively. The respective expanded uncertainties were 3.4% and 3.9%. CONCLUSIONS: From the validation data, we conclude that we achieved our objective of 2 state-of-the-art candidate RMPs for serum 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2.

Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures.

Results between different clinical laboratory measurement procedures (CLMP) should be equivalent, within clinically meaningful limits, to enable optimal use of clinical guidelines for disease diagnosis and patient management. When laboratory test results are neither standardized nor harmonized, a different numeric result may be obtained for the same clinical sample. Unfortunately, some guidelines are based on test results from a specific laboratory measurement procedure without consideration of the possibility or likelihood of differences between various procedures. When this happens, aggregation of data from different clinical research investigations and development of appropriate clinical practice guidelines will be flawed. A lack of recognition that results are neither standardized nor harmonized may lead to erroneous clinical, financial, regulatory, or technical decisions. Standardization of CLMPs has been accomplished for several measurands for which primary (pure substance) reference materials exist and/or reference measurement procedures (RMPs) have been developed. However, the harmonization of clinical laboratory procedures for measurands that do not have RMPs has been problematic owing to inadequate definition of the measurand, inadequate analytical specificity for the measurand, inadequate attention to the commutability of reference materials, and lack of a systematic approach for harmonization. To address these problems, an infrastructure must be developed to enable a systematic approach for identification and prioritization of measurands to be harmonized on the basis of clinical importance and technical feasibility, and for management of the technical implementation of a harmonization process for a specific measurand.

Full-scan mass spectral evidence for 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in serum of infants and adults.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) for assessing vitamin D status, it has been shown that the C-3 epimer can account for a significant proportion of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25OHD3) concentrations in infants. However, some question whether monitoring a single MS transition at a chromatographic retention time typical for 3-epi-25OHD3 sufficiently warrants conclusions about the identity of the substance generating the signal. Therefore, we aimed to substantiate the evidence for 3-epi-25OHD3 in infants by collision induced dissociation (CID)-MS/MS product ion scans. A second objective was mass spectrometric investigation of the presence and prevalence of the 3-epi metabolite in serum from adults. METHODS: Serum samples from six infants and 32 adults were studied using an ultra performance LC/tandem MS (UPLC/MS/MS) method designed to separate the 3-epi-25OHD3 from 25OHD3. Samples were submitted to liquid/liquid extraction and Sephadex LH-20 fractionation, prior to column-switching UPLC with MS/MS recording of CID product ion spectra of the [M+H](+) precursor ion. The respective standards were analyzed under identical UPLC/MS/MS conditions for comparison. RESULTS: In the chromatograms of all samples, two peaks eluted with retention characteristics and spectra closely matching those observed for the 25OHD3 and the 3-epi standards. The percentage of the 3-epi metabolite relative to 25OHD3 in infants ranged from 15% to 41%, and in adults from 2.5% to 17%. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary finding suggests that the prevalence of 3-epi-25OHD3 in serum of infants is considerable, and that even in adults the concentrations of this form should not be neglected.

Status of serum-calcium and -albumin measurement in Argentina assessed in 300 representative laboratories with 20 fresh frozen single donation sera.

BACKGROUND: The Fundación Bioquímica Argentina (FBA) performs external quality assessment (EQA) of >3200 laboratories. However, FBA realizes that sample non-commutability and predominant use of heterogeneous systems may bias the estimated performance and standardization status. To eliminate these confounding factors, a study using frozen single donation sera was undertaken with the focus on serum-calcium and -albumin measurement. METHODS: Target values were established from the results produced with homogeneous systems. In groups of n=7, system effects were investigated. Laboratory performance was evaluated from the correlation coefficient r between the measurement results for all sera and the target values. This allowed ranking of the laboratories and judgment of the deviation for individual samples (total error) against a 10% limit. The total error specification was a deviation for ≥ 5 samples exceeding 10% and/or causing a result outside the laboratory's reference interval. RESULTS: For calcium (n=303) (range: 2.06-2.42 mmol/L), 81 laboratories had an r-value <0.6, 43 even <0.4; the total error was relevant for 97 (10% limit) and 111 (reference interval) laboratories. For albumin (n=311) (range: 34.7-45.7 g/L) r was <0.7 (<0.4) in 44 (16) laboratories; 83 and 36 laboratories exceeded the total error criteria. Laboratories using homogeneous systems were generally ranked higher by correlation. System effects were moderate for calcium, but significant for albumin. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the need to improve the quality and harmonization of calcium and albumin testing in the investigated laboratories. To achieve this objective, we promote co-operation between laboratories, EQA provider and manufacturers.

IFCC international conventional reference procedure for the measurement of free thyroxine in serum: International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests (WG-STFT)(1).

The IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests proposes a candidate international conventional reference procedure (RMP) for measurement of the amount-of-substance concentration of free thyroxine in plasma/serum at physiological pH 7.40 and temperature (37.0°C). The unit for reporting measurement results is, by convention, pmol/L. The RMP is based on equilibrium dialysis isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ED-ID-LC/tandem MS). The rationale for proposing a conventional RMP is that, because of the physical separation step, it is unknown whether the measurement truly reflects the concentration of free thyroxine (FT4) in serum. Therefore, the ED part of the RMP has to strictly adhere to the following conditions: use of a dialysis buffer with a biochemical composition resembling the ionic environment of serum/plasma as closely as possible; buffering of the sample to a pH of 7.40 (at 37.0°C) before dialysis, however, without additional dilution; dialysis in a device with a dialysand/dialysate compartment of identical volume and separated by a membrane of regenerated cellulose and adequate cut-off; thermostatic control of the temperature during dialysis at 37.0°C±0.50°C. The convention does not apply to the ID-LC/tandem MS part, provided it is eligible to be nominated for review by the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine. Here, we describe the ED procedure, inclusive its validation and transferability, in greater detail. We recommend a protocol for successful calibration, measurement and monitoring of the accuracy/trueness and precision of the candidate conventional RMP. For details on our ID-LC/tandem MS procedures, we refer to the Supplement.

Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 3: total thyroxine and total triiodothyronine.

BACKGROUND: Because total thyroid hormone testing is performed on many automated clinical chemistry instruments, the IFCC Scientific Division commissioned the Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests to include total thyroxine (TT4) and total triiodothyronine (TT3) in its standardization efforts. METHODS: Existing SI-traceable reference measurement procedures (RMPs) were used to assign TT4 and TT3 values to 40 single-donor serum samples for subsequent use in a method comparison study with 11 TT4 and 12 TT3 immunoassays. Data from comparison of each immunoassay with the RMPs provided a basis for mathematical assay recalibration. RESULTS: Seven TT4 assays had a mean bias within 10% of the RMP, but 2 deviated by an average of -12% and another 2 by +17%. All TT3 assays showed positive biases, 4 within and 8 outside 10%, up to 32%. Mathematical recalibration effectively eliminated assay-specific biases, but sample-related effects remained, particularly for TT3. Correlation coefficients with the RMPs ranged from 0.82 to 0.97 for TT4 and from 0.32 to 0.92 for TT3. The within-run and total imprecision ranges for TT4 were 1.4% to 9.1% and 3.0% to 9.4%, respectively, and for TT3 2.1% to 7.8% and 2.8% to 12.7%, respectively. Approximately one-half of the assays matched the internal QC targets within approximately 5%; however, we observed within-run drifts/shifts. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that of the assays we examined, only 4 TT4 but the majority of the TT3 assays needed establishment of calibration traceability to the existing RMPs. Most assays performed well, but some would benefit from improved precision, within-run stability, and between-run consistency.

Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 2: free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine.

BACKGROUND: Free thyroxine (FT4) and free triiodothyronine (FT3) measurements are useful in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of thyroid disorders. The IFCC Scientific Division established a Working Group to resolve issues of method performance to meet clinical requirements. METHODS: We compared results for measurement of a panel of single donor sera using clinical laboratory procedures based on equilibrium dialysis-isotope dilution-mass spectrometry (ED-ID-MS) (2 for FT4, 1 for FT3) and immunoassays from 9 manufacturers (15 for FT4, 13 for FT3) to a candidate international conventional reference measurement procedure (cRMP) also based on ED-ID-MS. RESULTS: For FT4 (FT3), the mean bias of 2 (4) assays was within 10% of the cRMP, whereas for 15 (9) assays, negative biases up to -42% (-30%) were seen; 1 FT3 assay was positively biased by +22%. Recalibration to the cRMP eliminated assay-specific biases; however, sample-related effects remained, as judged from difference plots with biologic total error limits. Correlation coefficients to the cRMPs ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 0.92 to 0.78 (0.88 to 0.30). Within-run and total imprecision ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 1.0% to 11.1% (1.8% to 9.4%) and 1.5% to 14.1% (2.4% to 10.0%), respectively. Approximately half of the manufacturers matched the internal QC targets within approximately 5%; however, within-run instability was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that most assays had bias largely correctable by establishing calibration traceability to a cRMP and that the majority performed well. Some assays, however, would benefit from improved precision, within-run stability, and between-run consistency.

Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 1: thyroid-stimulating hormone.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory testing of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is an essential tool for the diagnosis and management of various thyroid disorders whose collective prevalence lies between 4% and 8%. However, between-assay discrepancies in TSH results limit the application of clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: We performed a method comparison study with 40 sera to assess the result comparability and performance attributes of 16 immunoassays. RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 assays gave mean results within 10% of the overall mean. The difference between the most extreme means was 39%. Assay-specific biases could be eliminated by recalibration to the overall mean. After recalibration of singlicate results, all assays showed results within the biological total error goal (22.8%), except for 1 result in each of 4 assays. For a sample with a TSH concentration of 0.016 mIU/L, 6 assays either did not report results or demonstrated CVs >20%. Within-run and total imprecision ranged from 1.5% to 5.5% and 2.5% to 7.7%, respectively. Most assays were able to match the internal QC targets within 5%. Within-run drifts and shifts were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonization of TSH measurements would be particularly beneficial for 3 of the 16 examined assays. These data demonstrate that harmonization may be accomplished by establishing calibration traceability to the overall mean values for a panel of patient samples. However, the full impact of the approach must be further explored with a wider range of samples. Although a majority of assays showed excellent quality of performance, some would benefit from improved within-run stability.