Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eye Contact Lens ; 44 Suppl 2: S105-S112, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953599

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates pigment component distribution and depth in decorative soft contact lenses (DSCLs) using a variety of analytical methods. METHODS: We sampled 18 DSCLs using optical microscopy, optical coherence tomography analysis, Z-stack analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX), and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) to evaluate the distribution and depth of pigment components. RESULTS: Pigment distribution in DSCLs was easily observed with optical methods including Z-stack analysis. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, SEM/EDX, and TOF-SIMS were used to evaluate the level of pigment exposure on the lens surface and the results showed significant differences between the methods. Pigment components were detected in 16 samples by SEM/EDX, but not by XPS. Pigment components were only detected in eight samples using TOF-SIMS. CONCLUSIONS: It may be necessary to show that a nanometer-thick monomolecular film does not exist on the surface of DSCLs, to demonstrate the exposure of a pigment particle. Taking into account the principle behind each of the measurement methods and the resolution and sensitivity of each of the analytical methods compared, TOF-SIMS may be the most appropriate method to accurately judge pigment exposure on DSCLs. The Z-stack method may be useful for estimating the depth of pigment components in DSCLs.


Assuntos
Corantes/análise , Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura/métodos , Espectrometria de Massa de Íon Secundário/métodos , Espectrometria por Raios X/métodos , Propriedades de Superfície
2.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 141(2): 199-206, 2021.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33518641

RESUMO

Pharmaceuticals reportedly cause damage to some polymeric medical devices that administer them. Because this phenomenon and its causes still remain unclear, in this study, all the possible combinations of polymeric materials and pharmaceutical ingredients that could cause failures were identified by conducting a comprehensive analysis on a wide variety of such combinations and through verification tests using the products. The results of the simple immersion tests and the reports of clinical failures indicated that the failures were not caused by the lack of chemical resistance of the polymers but by the environmental stress cracking (ESC) induced by a combination of the stress generated in the material and the interaction with a specific chemical. Therefore, we evaluated all combinations that could cause ESC by developing and applying a simple method for testing ESC. Polycarbonate and polyethylene terephthalate were found to be damaged by alkaline solutions and oils and fats, and surfactants solutions. These failures were also confirmed by the verification tests. Results from the stress state verification, fractographic analysis, and other studies confirmed that these failures were caused by ESC. Cytotoxicity owing to the induction of ESC was not detected in any combination. These results indicated that the residual stress generated during the manufacturing process was one of the reasons for the failure of the medical devices. This residual stress can be eliminated by employing additional processes such as annealing, thereby preventing medical device failures induced through interactions with pharmaceutical ingredients.


Assuntos
Falha de Equipamento , Teste de Materiais/métodos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Polímeros/química , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Desenho de Equipamento , Polietilenotereftalatos , Estresse Mecânico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA