Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 27(11): 1750-1757, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057048

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Japan, HPV vaccination rates has dramaticaly declined since 2013. Since mothers are the ones making the decision to vaccinate their daughters against HPV, we probed the mothers' intention to receive vaccinations for themselves and to vaccinate their daughters against HPV, and their reasoning. METHODS: An internet survey was conducted in March of 2021. Through the screening, 1576 participants were extracted from a survey panel and divided into 3 groups based on their daughter's birth fiscal year (Group 1: 1994 to 1999, Group 2: 2000 to 2003, Group3: 2004 to 2008). The chi-square test and residual analysis were used for the statistical analysis of comparison among the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent variables with mothers intention to get their daughters vaccinated under specific situations. RESULTS: The percentage of respondents without anxiety regarding their daughter's general vaccination was significantly higher in Group 1 (p < 0.05). In the mothers of daughters born in or after 2000 when vaccination rates declined (Groups 2 and 3), a situation in which 'The daughter's best friends were vaccinated before her' made the mothers think positively about HPV vaccination, and to the same degree as a situation in which 'You received a notice from your local government recommending vaccination' (Group 2: 41.6% (214/514) and 40.5% (208/514), Group 3: 48.5% (257/530) and 47.0% (249/530)). CONCLUSION: If mothers who have had their daughters vaccinated were to recommend HPV vaccination to their close friends, 'the best friend effect' should promote others to be vaccinated.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Amigos , Japão , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinação , Mães , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
2.
J Epidemiol ; 25(1): 50-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311031

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Finding ways to improve the cervical cancer screening rates among young women has been seen as a critical national health problem in many countries, including Japan. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening conducted by a local government under financial support from the Japanese national government. METHODS: The personal cervical cancer screening information was analyzed for all female residents of Toyonaka City, including any past screening history and clinical results since the year 2009, when a free-coupon program for screening was started. These results were compared to results from 2008, prior to implementation of the free-coupon screening program. RESULTS: The screening rates of women eligible for the free-coupon peaked dramatically compared to women of similar age who paid for their screening; however, the rates for the ineligible-age population also increased significantly in parallel to those in the free-coupon program, possibly by indirect peer and publicity effects. In women aged 20 to 25 years, the consecutive screening rate after a free-coupon screening was significantly lower than for those women who received a regular residential screening. After a free-coupon screening, the rate for participating in consecutive screenings depended significantly on the institution where the participant received her first screening test. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, for a generation of young women 20-25 years of age, a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening was effective in increasing the first-time participation rate for screening; however, the increase in first-time participation did not lead to the expected increase in consecutive screenings.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental , Humanos , Japão , Governo Local , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Adulto Jovem
3.
Exp Ther Med ; 19(4): 2973-2982, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32256783

RESUMO

Identification and screening of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is important to prevent liver cancer. Comprehensive antiviral treatments should follow three sequential steps: Hepatitis screening (step 1; examination of HB surface antigen and HCV antibody), medical examination (step 2; examination of HBV-DNA and/or HCV-RNA and performance of abdominal ultrasonography) and antiviral treatment (step 3). Patients who underwent these three steps were studied to determine effective information sources (factors) for raising awareness of comprehensive treatments. A total of 182 patients from 11 medical institutions were who were undergoing antiviral treatment were investigated. The number of patients who accessed each of the 18 information sources in each of the three steps and the percentage of these information sources that directly influenced the participants to make treatment-related decisions were calculated. 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' was the most common information source (64.3, 77.5, and 75.8% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a public health nurse (PHN),' 'recommendation from friends or family,' and 'recommendation from work colleagues' were the next most common human factors (3.3-19.8%). 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' had the greatest influence (76.9, 73.0, and 77.5% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a PHN' (50.0, 26.3 and 64.3%), 'recommendations from friends and family' (58.3, 38.9 and 58.3%), and 'recommendations from work colleagues' (33.3, 33.3 and 42.9%) were highly influential factors. Media such as TV commercial messages and programs also had high recognition, but were not directly influential. The findings of the present study indicated that recommendations from primary care physicians, friends, family and work colleagues influenced patients' decision-making regarding hepatitis screening, examination and treatment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA