Critical care of the end-stage liver disease patient awaiting liver transplantation.

Patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation frequently require intensive care admission and management due to either complications of liver failure or to intercurrent illness, particularly infection. Mortality in such patients is high and the development of an illness necessitating intensive care unit management can influence transplant candidacy. Specialized support frequently requires hemodynamic support, mechanical ventilation, and renal support. In this review, areas of management of particular importance to patients with end-stage liver disease in the intensive care unit are discussed. These areas are hepatic encephalopathy, infectious diseases, cardiovascular support, mechanical ventilation, renal support and combined transplantation, and decisions regarding delisting. Current knowledge specific to these patients, when available, is discussed, current practice is described, and areas of uncertainty in the evidence are discussed.

Improvement in 3-month patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) in terms of gastrointestinal symptom burden has been evaluated previously using patient-reported outcomes. However, data are lacking concerning the sustained effect of conversion over time, and the potential impact of concomitant calcineurin inhibitor. METHODS: In this 3-month, prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, open-label trial, MMF-treated renal transplant patients with gastrointestinal symptoms receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus were converted to equimolar doses of EC-MPS. Change in gastrointestinal symptom burden was evaluated using a validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). RESULTS: A significant improvement in GSRS score was observed from baseline (2.61, 95% CI 2.54-2.68) to month 1 (1.87, 95% CI 1.81-1.93) after conversion to EC-MPS and was sustained to month 3 (1.81, 95% CI 1.74-188; both P<0.0001 versus baseline). The mean change in overall GSRS score from baseline to month 1 was -0.74 overall (cyclosporine: -0.73 and tacrolimus: -0.74; all P<0.0001 versus baseline), with a slight further improvement (-0.79) at month 3 (cyclosporine: -0.82 and tacrolimus: -0.78; all P<0.0001 versus baseline). A significant improvement in GSRS subscale scores was also observed in the total population regardless of calcineurin inhibitor at month 1, sustained to month 3 (all P<0.0001 versus baseline). The improvement in GSRS score postconversion was similar in African-American and non-African-American patients, and in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study in 728 patients demonstrates that following conversion from MMF to EC-MPS, regardless of concomitant calcineurin inhibitor, GSRS is improved and sustained over 3 months.

Kidney and liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a pilot safety and efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients have historically been excluded from consideration for transplantation out of concern for the effects of immunosuppression on the progression of HIV disease. Improvements in HIV-related morbidity and mortality with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have prompted a reevaluation of transplantation as a treatment option for HIV-infected patients with end-stage kidney and liver disease. METHODS: Eligible patients met standard transplant criteria. They had undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (viral load) for 3 months (kidney) or were predicted to achieve viral load suppression posttransplantation if unable to tolerate HAART (liver); a CD4+ T-cell count of more than 200 cells/microL (kidney) or more than 100 cells/microL (liver) for 6 months; and no history of opportunistic infections and neoplasm. Standard immunosuppression included prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland), and cyclosporine (Neoral, Novartis, East Hanover, NJ). RESULTS: Fourteen patients received transplants (10 kidney transplants, mean follow-up 480 days; four liver transplants, mean follow-up 380 days). All of the kidney transplant recipients (100%) are alive and with functioning grafts, and three of four liver transplant patients (75%) are alive and well with functioning grafts (all liver transplant patients with normal liver function tests). The one death occurred 445 days posttransplantation in a liver recipient coinfected with hepatitis C virus, who died as the result of its rapid reoccurrence. Rejection occurred in 5 of 10 kidney transplant recipients but did not occur in any of the four liver transplant recipients. HIV viral loads have remained undetectable in all patients maintained with HAART. CD4 counts have remained stable in patients not treated for rejection. Patients receiving protease inhibitors require 25% of the dose of cyclosporine compared with patients receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: There has been no evidence of significant HIV progression and no adverse effect of HIV on allograft function. Rejection is a concern in kidney transplant recipients, as is the possible poor outcome in hepatitis C virus-coinfected liver transplant recipients. Preliminary data are encouraging and indicate that transplantation should be a treatment option for individuals with well-controlled HIV disease.

Long-term renal function and cardiovascular disease risk in obese kidney donors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increasing demand for live-donor kidneys has encouraged the use of obese donors despite the absence of long-term outcome data and evidence that obesity can adversely affect renal function. We wished to determine whether obesity increased the risk for renal dysfunction and other medical comorbidities in donors several years after donation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Ninety-eight patients who donated a kidney 5 to 40 years previously were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) at donation and evaluated for renal dysfunction and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Patients who were from the 2005 through 2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database; did not have renal disease; and were matched for age, gender, race, and BMI served as two-kidney control subjects. RESULTS: Renal function in obese (BMI > or =30) and nonobese (BMI <30) donors was similar, and both donor groups had reduced renal function compared with BMI-matched two-kidney control subjects. Obesity was associated with more hypertension and dyslipidemias in both donors and two-kidney control subjects; however, there were no significant differences between the two groups within each BMI category. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that obese donors are not at higher risk for long-term reduced renal function compared with nonobese donors and that the increased incidence of hypertension and other cardiovascular disease risk factors in obese donors is due to their obesity and is not further exacerbated by nephrectomy. These findings support the current practice of using otherwise healthy overweight and obese donors but emphasize the need for more intensive preoperative education and postoperative health care maintenance in this donor group.

Early graft function after living donor kidney transplantation predicts rejection but not outcomes.

Poor early graft function (EGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) has been intensely studied. Much less is known about poor EGF after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Data were collected on 469 LDKTs performed between 1/1/97 and 12/31/01 to determine risk factors for and outcomes associated with poor EGF, defined as either delayed or slow graft function (DGF or SGF). The incidence of DGF and SGF were 4.7% and 10.7%, respectively. Diabetic etiology (OR 2.22; p = 0.021) and warm ischemia time (WIT) (OR 1.05 per min increment; p = 0.0025) emerged as independently associated with poor EGF. Neither functional graft survival nor 1-year graft function differed among the EGF groups. However, DGF and SGF strongly predisposed to acute rejection (AR), which compromised functional graft survival (p = 0.0007) and 1-year graft function. Therefore, we conclude that diabetic etiology of renal disease and WIT are the dominant risk factors for poor EGF after LDKT. Poor EGF did not directly compromise functional graft survival but strongly predisposed to AR. We suggest that immunosuppression should be intensified in the poor EGF setting to maximize LDKT longevity, as AR does impair functional graft survival.