Prevention of epileptogenesis - are we there yet?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent progress in preventing epileptogenesis in patients with epilepsy. RECENT FINDINGS: The recent success of epilepsy prevention and disease modification in tuberous sclerosis using simple EEG biomarkers to guide treatment initiation, and the identification of biomarkers to enrich the targeted patient population has made clinical trials of epilepsy prevention after acquired central nervous system (CNS) insults such as traumatic brain injury, stroke or infection both feasible and timely. Two such trials are currently on-going to prevent poststroke epilepsy. SUMMARY: No disease-modifying or preventive treatments exist for epilepsy, and their development remains a major unmet need.. We have entered though the era of change in the treatment of epilepsy from symptomatic only to disease prevention. In this review, we summarize developments and review opportunities, challenges, and potential solutions to develop preventive treatment for acquired epilepsies in humans. The 'Holy Grail' of epilepsy is within our reach.

Evidence based noninvasive presurgical evaluation for patients with drug resistant epilepsies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current practices and evidence for the diagnostic accuracy and the benefits of presurgical evaluation. RECENT FINDINGS: Preoperative evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies and subsequent epilepsy surgery leads to a significant proportion of seizure-free patients. Even those who are not completely seizure free postoperatively often experience improved quality of life with better social integration. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy are available for Video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electric and magnetic source imaging, and functional MRI for lateralization of language and memory. There are currently no evidence-based international guidelines for presurgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery. SUMMARY: Presurgical evaluation is a complex multidisciplinary and multiprofessional clinical pathway. We rely on limited consensus-based recommendations regarding the required staffing or methodological expertise in epilepsy centers.

The risk of unprovoked seizure occurrence after status epilepticus in adults.

OBJECTIVE: Status epilepticus (SE) may lead to long-term consequences. This study evaluated the risk and predictors of seizure occurrence after SE, with a focus on SE due to acute symptomatic etiologies. METHODS: Prospectively collected data about adults surviving a first non-hypoxic SE were reviewed. The outcome was the occurrence of unprovoked seizures during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and log-rank test were used to analyze the time to seizure occurrence and determine the statistical significance between etiological groups. Three subcategories within acute etiology were considered according to the presence of the following: (1) structural lesion (acute-primary); (2) brain involvement during systemic disorders (acute-secondary); and (3) drug or alcohol intoxication/withdrawal (acute-toxic). Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Two hundreds fifty-seven individuals were included. Fifty-four subjects (21.0%) developed seizures after a median of 9.9 (interquartile range 4.3-21.7) months after SE. The estimated 1-, 2-, and 5-year rates of seizure occurrence according to acute SE etiologies were 19.4%, 23.4%, and 30.1%, respectively, for acute-primary central nervous system (CNS) pathology; 2.2%, 2.2%, and 8.7%, respectively, for acute-secondary CNS pathology; and 0%, 9.1%, and 9.1%, respectively, for acute-toxic causes. Five-year rates of seizure occurrence for non-acute SE causes were 33.9% for remote, 65.7% for progressive, and 25.9% for unknown etiologies. In multivariate Cox regression model, progressive etiology (adjusted HR [adjHR] 2.27, 95% CI 1.12-4.58), SE with prominent motor phenomena evolving in non-convulsive SE (adjHR 3.17, 95% CI 1.38-7.25), and non-convulsive SE (adjHR 2.38, 95% CI 1.16-4.90) were independently associated with higher hazards of unprovoked seizures. Older people (adjHR .98, 95% CI .96-.99) and people with SE due to acute-secondary CNS pathology (adjHR .18, 95% CI .04-.82) were at decreased risk of seizure occurrence. SIGNIFICANCE: SE carries a risk of subsequent seizures. Both the underlying cause and epileptogenic effects of SE are likely to contribute.

Psychological precursors of epileptic seizures.

Psychological stress is the most commonly self-reported precursor of epileptic seizures. However, retrospective and prospective studies remain inconclusive in this regard. Here, we explored whether seizures would be preceded by significant changes in reported stressors or resource utilization. This study is based on high-frequency time series through daily online completion of personalized questionnaires of 9-24 items in epilepsy outpatients and compared responses 1-14 days before seizures with interictal time series. Fourteen patients (79% women, age = 23-64 years) completed daily questionnaires over a period of 87-898 days (median = 277 days = 9.2 months). A total of 4560 fully completed daily questionnaires were analyzed, 685 of which included reported seizure events. Statistically significant changes in preictal compared to interictal dynamics were found in 11 of 14 patients (79%) across 41 items (22% of all 187 items). In seven of 14 patients (50%), seizures were preceded by a significant mean increase of stressors and/or a significant mean decrease of resource utilization. This exploratory analysis of long-term prospective individual patient data on specific stressors and personal coping strategies generates the hypothesis that medium-term changes in psychological well-being may precede the occurrence of epileptic seizures in some patients.

Staged treatment response in status epilepticus: Lessons from the SENSE registry.

OBJECTIVES: Although in epilepsy patients the likelihood of becoming seizure-free decreases substantially with each unsuccessful treatment, to our knowledge this has been poorly investigated in status epilepticus (SE). We aimed to evaluate the proportion of SE cessation and functional outcome after successive treatment steps. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort (Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus [SENSE]), in which 1049 incident adult SE episodes were prospectively recorded at nine European centers. We analyzed 996 SE episodes without coma induction before the third treatment step. Rates of SE cessation, mortality (in ongoing SE or after SE control), and favorable functional outcome (assessed with modified Rankin scale) were evaluated after each step. RESULTS: SE was treated successfully in 838 patients (84.1%), 147 (14.8%) had a fatal outcome (36% of them died while still in SE), and 11 patients were transferred to palliative care while still in SE. Patients were treated with a median of three treatment steps (range 1-13), with 540 (54.2%) receiving more than two steps (refractory SE [RSE]) and 95 (9.5%) more than five steps. SE was controlled after the first two steps in 45%, with an additional 21% treated after the third, and 14% after the fourth step. Likelihood of SE cessation (p < 0.001), survival (p = 0.003), and reaching good functional outcome (p < 0.001) decreased significantly between the first two treatment lines and the third, especially in patients not experiencing generalized convulsive SE, but remained relatively stable afterwards. SIGNIFICANCE: The significant worsening of SE prognosis after the second step clinically supports the concept of RSE. However, and differing from findings in human epilepsy, RSE remains treatable in about one third of patients, even after several failed treatment steps. Clinical judgment remains essential to determine the aggressiveness and duration of SE treatment, and to avoid premature treatment cessation in patients with SE.

Magnetic resonance imaging fingerprints of status epilepticus: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Status epilepticus (SE) is frequently associated with peri-ictal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities (PMA). However, the anatomical distribution of these alterations has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to assess the localization patterns of PMA in patients with SE. METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, we compared the distribution and combinations of diffusion-restricted PMA to diffusion-restricted lesions caused by other neurological conditions. All patients of the SE group and the control group underwent MRI including a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. Patients with SE were imaged within 48 h after its onset. RESULTS: We enrolled 201 patients (51 with SE and 150 controls). The most frequent locations of PMA in SE were cortex (25/51, 49%), followed by hippocampus (20/51, 39%) and pulvinar of thalamus (10/51, 20%). In the control group, the cortex was involved in 80 of 150 (53%), white matter in 53 of 150 (35%), and basal ganglia in 33 of 150 (22%). In the control group, the pulvinar of thalamus was never affected and hippocampal structures were rarely involved (7/150, 5%). Involvement of the pulvinar of thalamus and the hippocampus had high specificity for SE at 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 98-100) and 95% (95% CI = 91-98), respectively. The sensitivity, however, was low for both locations (pulvinar of thalamus: 20%, 95% CI = 10-33; hippocampus: 39%, 95% CI = 26-54). SIGNIFICANCE: Diffusion-restricted MRI lesions observed in the pulvinar of thalamus and hippocampus are strongly associated with SE. These changes may help physicians in diagnosing SE-related changes on MRI in an acute setting, especially in cases of equivocal clinical and electroencephalographic manifestations of SE.

Call for the use of the ILAE terminology for seizures and epilepsies by health care professionals and regulatory agencies to benefit patients and caregivers.

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) introduced a classification for seizure types in 2017 and updated the classification for epilepsy syndromes in 2022. These classifications aim to improve communication among healthcare professionals and help patients better describe their condition. So far, regulatory agencies have used different terminology. This paper stresses the crucial need for consistently adopting ILAE terminology in both regulatory processes and clinical practice. It highlights how language plays a significant role in healthcare communication and how standardized terminology can enhance patient comprehension. The ongoing review of guidelines by regulatory bodies offers a timely opportunity. Aligning regulatory terminologies holds the potential to facilitate discussions on future drug development and harmonize practices across diverse regions, ultimately fostering improved care and research outcomes in epilepsy treatment.

Which terms should be used to describe medications used in the treatment of seizure disorders? An ILAE position paper.

A variety of terms, such as "antiepileptic," "anticonvulsant," and "antiseizure" have been historically applied to medications for the treatment of seizure disorders. Terminology is important because using terms that do not accurately reflect the action of specific treatments may result in a misunderstanding of their effects and inappropriate use. The present International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) position paper used a Delphi approach to develop recommendations on English-language terminology applicable to pharmacological agents currently approved for treating seizure disorders. There was consensus that these medications should be collectively named "antiseizure medications". This term accurately reflects their primarily symptomatic effect against seizures and reduces the possibility of health care practitioners, patients, or caregivers having undue expectations or an incorrect understanding of the real action of these medications. The term "antiseizure" to describe these agents does not exclude the possibility of beneficial effects on the course of the disease and comorbidities that result from the downstream effects of seizures, whenever these beneficial effects can be explained solely by the suppression of seizure activity. It is acknowledged that other treatments, mostly under development, can exert direct favorable actions on the underlying disease or its progression, by having "antiepileptogenic" or "disease-modifying" effects. A more-refined terminology to describe precisely these actions needs to be developed.

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European academy of neurology registry on adult refractory status epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE).

BACKGROUND: Status Epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency associated with a high rate of functional decline and mortality. Large randomized trials have addressed the early phases of treatment for convulsive SE. However, evidence regarding third-line anesthetic treatment and the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is scarce. One trial addressing management of refractory SE with deep general anesthesia was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment. Multicenter prospective registries, including the Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus (SENSE), have shed some light on these questions, but many answers are still lacking, such as the influence exerted by distinct EEG patterns in NCSE on the outcome. We therefore initiated a new prospective multicenter observational registry to collect clinical and EEG data that combined may further help in clinical decision-making and defining SE. METHODS: Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European Academy of Neurology Registry on refractory Status Epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE) is a prospective, multicenter registry for patients treated for SE. The primary objectives are to document patient and SE characteristics, treatment modalities, EEG, neuroimaging data, and outcome of consecutive adults admitted for SE treatment in each of the participating centers and to identify factors associated with outcome and refractoriness. To reach sufficient statistical power for multivariate analysis, a cohort size of 3000 patients is targeted. DISCUSSION: The data collected for the registry will provide both valuable EEG data and information about specific treatment steps in different patient groups with SE. Eventually, the data will support clinical decision-making and may further guide the planning of clinical trials. Finally, it could help to redefine NCSE and its management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT number: NCT05839418.

Electroconvulsive Therapy in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been suggested as a treatment option for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review was to conduct an extensive literature review on the role of ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Scopus for journal articles from database inception until February 2024. Articles were then selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: We identified five retrospective case series with 28 adult patients receiving ECT for RSE or SRSE. ECT was administered within 3-70 days (mean 20 days) after the development of SE, and the mean number of ECT courses ranged from 1 to 12 sessions for each patient. ECT was administered in fixed or titrated doses. A total of 20 out of 28 patients (71%) showed clinical improvement, with two (7%) having complete cessation of seizures. It is essential to note that given the lack of control, there could be overreporting of clinical improvement in these studies. 11 patients (39%) were reported as deceased due to causes that were not directly related to ECT treatment. Four patients (14%) reported adverse effects of ECT, including memory, concentration, and/or cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: There are level-4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence and low-level Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Education evidence that suggest ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. In light of the limitations of the existing evidence, clinicians should carefully consider individual patients' clinical contexts when deciding on the appropriateness of ECT as a treatment option. Further research, including prospective studies with controlled designs, is needed to elucidate the efficacy, safety, and optimal regime of ECT in the management of RSE and SRSE.

Acute symptomatic status epilepticus: Splitting or lumping? A proposal of classification based on real-world data.

This study aimed to group acute symptomatic etiologies of consecutive episodes of status epilepticus (SE) into different subcategories and explore their associations with clinical outcome. Etiologies were first categorized as "acute," "remote," "progressive," "SE in defined electroclinical syndromes," and "unknown." Four subcategories of acute etiologies were then defined: (1) withdrawal, low levels, or inappropriate prescription of antiseizure medications, or sleep deprivation in patients with pre-existing epilepsy; (2) acute insults to central nervous system (CNS; "acute-primary CNS"); (3) CNS pathology secondary to metabolic disturbances, systemic infection, or fever ("acute-secondary CNS"); and (4) drug/alcohol intoxication or withdrawal. Poor outcome at discharge, defined as worsening of clinical conditions (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at discharge higher than mRS at baseline), was reported in 55.6% of cases. The etiological categories of acute-primary CNS (odds ratio [OR] = 3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-6.18), acute-secondary CNS (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.11-2.91), and progressive SE (OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.57-4.47), age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.06), nonconvulsive semiology with coma (OR = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.52-6.17), and refractoriness (OR = 4.31, 95% CI = 2.39-7.77) and superrefractoriness to treatment (OR = 8.24, 95% CI = 3.51-19.36) increased the odds of poor outcome. Heterogeneity exists within the spectrum of acute symptomatic causes of SE, and distinct etiological subcategories may inform about the clinical outcome.

Diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Defining electroencephalographic and clinical response to diagnostic intravenous antiseizure medication trials.

OBJECTIVE: The Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 include a diagnostic trial with intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications (ASMs) to assess electroencephalographic (EEG) and clinical response as a diagnostic criterion for definite NCSE and possible NCSE. However, how to perform this diagnostic test and assessing the EEG and clinical responses have not been operationally defined. METHODS: We performed a Delphi process involving six experts to standardize the diagnostic administration of IV ASM and propose operational criteria for EEG and clinical response. RESULTS: Either benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-BZD ASMs can be used as first choice for a diagnostic IV ASM trial. However, non-BZDs should be considered in patients who already have impaired alertness or are at risk of respiratory depression. Levetiracetam, valproate, lacosamide, brivaracetam, or (if the only feasible drug) fosphenytoin or phenobarbital were deemed appropriate for a diagnostic IV trial. The starting dose should be approximately two thirds to three quarters of the full loading dose recommended for treatment of status epilepticus, with an additional smaller dose if needed. ASMs should be administered during EEG recording under supervision. A monitoring time of at least 15 min is recommended. If there is no response, a second trial with another non-BDZ or BDZs may be considered. A positive EEG response is defined as the resolution of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern for at least three times the longest previously observed spontaneous interval of resolution (if any), but minimum of one continuous minute. For a clinical response, physicians should use a standardized examination before and after IV ASM administration. We suggest a definite time-locked improvement in a focal deficit or at least one-step improvement on a new dedicated one-domain 10-level NCSE response scale. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed standardized approach of a diagnostic IV ASM trial further refines the ACNS and Salzburg diagnostic criteria for NCSE.

Perampanel for the treatment of people with idiopathic generalized epilepsy in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate perampanel (PER) when used under real-world conditions to treat people with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) included in the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study. METHODS: The multinational, retrospective, pooled analysis PERMIT explored the use of PER in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice across 17 countries. This subgroup analysis included PERMIT participants with IGE. Time points for retention and effectiveness measurements were 3, 6, and 12 months (last observation carried forward, defined as "last visit," was also applied to effectiveness). Effectiveness was evaluated by seizure type (total seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS], myoclonic seizures, absence seizures) and included ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom rate (defined as no seizures since at least the previous visit). Safety/tolerability was monitored throughout PER treatment and evaluated by documenting the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including psychiatric AEs and those leading to treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: The Full Analysis Set included 544 people with IGE (51.9% women, mean age = 33.3 years, mean epilepsy duration = 18.1 years). At 3, 6, and 12 months, 92.4%, 85.5%, and 77.3% of participants were retained on PER treatment, respectively (Retention Population, n = 497). At the last visit, responder and seizure freedom rates were, respectively, 74.2% and 54.6% (total seizures), 81.2% and 61.5% (GTCS), 85.7% and 66.0% (myoclonic seizures), and 90.5% and 81.0% (absence seizures) (Effectiveness Population, n = 467). AEs occurred in 42.9% of patients and included irritability (9.6%), dizziness/vertigo (9.2%), and somnolence (6.3%) (Tolerability Population, n = 520). Treatment discontinuation due to AEs was 12.4% over 12 months. SIGNIFICANCE: This subgroup analysis of the PERMIT study demonstrated the effectiveness and good tolerability of PER in people with IGE when administered under everyday clinical practice conditions. These findings are in line with clinical trial evidence, supporting PER's use as broad-spectrum antiseizure medication for the treatment of IGE.

Recognition and perception of emotions in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Perception and recognition of emotions are fundamental prerequisites of human life. Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) may have emotional and behavioral impairments that might influence socially desirable interactions. We aimed to investigate perception and recognition of emotions in patients with JME by means of neuropsychological tests and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHODS: Sixty-five patients with JME (median age = 27 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 23-34) were prospectively recruited at the Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. Patients were compared to 68 healthy controls (median age = 24 years, IQR = 21-31), matched for sex, age, and education. All study participants underwent the Networks of Emotion Processing test battery (NEmo), an fMRI paradigm of "dynamic fearful faces," a structured interview for psychiatric and personality disorders, and comprehensive neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: JME patients versus healthy controls demonstrated significant deficits in emotion recognition in facial and verbal tasks of all emotions, especially fear. fMRI revealed decreased amygdala activation in JME patients as compared to healthy controls. Patients were at a higher risk of experiencing psychiatric disorders as compared to healthy controls. Cognitive evaluation revealed impaired attentional and executive functioning, namely psychomotor speed, tonic alertness, divided attention, mental flexibility, and inhibition of automated reactions. Duration of epilepsy correlated negatively with parallel prosodic and facial emotion recognition in NEmo. Deficits in emotion recognition were not associated with psychiatric comorbidities, impaired attention and executive functions, types of seizures, and treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This prospective study demonstrated that as compared to healthy subjects, patients with JME had significant deficits in recognition and perception of emotions as shown by neuropsychological tests and fMRI. The results of this study may have importance for psychological/psychotherapeutic interventions in the management of patients with JME.

Phenobarbital in Status epilepticus - Rediscovery of an effective drug.

Phenobarbital (PB) is one of the oldest Antiseizure Medicines (ASMs), which is in clinical use since 1912. Its value in the treatment of Status epilepticus is currently discussed controversially. Phenobarbital has fallen out of favor in many countries across Europe because of reports of hypotension, arrhythmias, and hypopnea. Phenobarbital has a strong antiseizure effect with remarkably little sedation. It exerts its clinical effects, through the increase of GABE-ergic inhibition and decrease of glutamatergic excitation by inhibition of AMPA receptors. Despite good preclinical evidence, there are remarkably few randomized controlled studies on humans in SE, which suggest, that it is at least as good as lorazepam in first-line treatment in early SE, and significantly better than valproic acid in benzodiazepine-resistant SE. Data from randomized trials and large non-randomized prospective and retrospective studies suggest, that Phenobarbital is well tolerated even if used in very high dose protocols. Thus, despite its decline in its popularity at least in Europe and North America, it should be considered a highly cost-effective treatment for early and established SE, not only in resource-limited settings. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

The potential of intravenous topiramate for the treatment of status epilepticus.

There is considerable clinical evidence that topiramate (TPM) has a high potential in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (RSE, SRSE). Because TPM is only approved for oral administration, it is applied as suspension via a nasogastric tube for SE treatment. However, this route of administration is impractical in an emergency setting and leads to variable absorption with unpredictable plasma levels and time to peak concentration. Thus, the development of an intravenous (i.v.) solution for TPM is highly desirable. Here we present data on two parenteral formulations of TPM that are currently being developed. One of these solutions is using sulfobutylether-ß-cyclodextrin (SBE-ß-CD; Captisol®) as an excipient. A 1% solution of TPM in 10% Captisol® has been reported to be well tolerated in safety studies in healthy volunteers and patients with epilepsy or migraine, but efficacy data are not available. The other solution uses the FDA- and EMA-approved excipient amino sugar meglumine. Meglumine is much more effective to dissolve TPM in water than Captisol®. A 1% solution of TPM can be achieved with 0.5-1% of meglumine. While the use of Captisol®-containing solutions is restricted in children and patients with renal impairment, such restrictions do not apply to meglumine. Recently, first-in-human data were reported for a meglumine-based solution of TPM, indicating safety and efficacy when used as a replacement for oral administration in a woman with epilepsy. Based on the multiple mechanisms of action of TPM that directly target the molecular neuronal alterations that are thought to underlie the loss of efficacy of benzodiazepines and other anti-seizure medications during prolonged SE and its rapid brain penetration after i.v. administration, we suggest that parenteral (i.v.) TPM is ideally suited for the treatment of RSE and SRSE. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Shorter duration of slow wave sleep is related to symptoms of depression in patients with epilepsy.

Slow wave sleep duration and spectral abnormalities are related to both epilepsy and depression, but it is unclear how depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy are affected by slow wave sleep duration and clinical factors, and how the spectral characteristics of slow wave sleep reflect a potential interaction of epilepsy and depression. Long-term video-EEG monitoring was conducted in 51 patients with focal epilepsy, 13 patients with generalized epilepsy, and 9 patients without epilepsy. Slow wave sleep segments were manually marked in the EEG and duration as well as EEG power spectra were extracted. Depressive symptoms were documented with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). At least mild depressive symptoms (BDI > 9) were found among 23 patients with focal epilepsy, 5 patients with generalised epilepsy, and 6 patients who had no epilepsy diagnosis. Slow wave sleep duration was shorter for patients with at least mild depressive symptoms (p =.004), independently from epilepsy diagnosis, antiseizure medication, age, and sex. Psychoactive medication was associated with longer slow wave sleep duration (p =.008). Frontal sigma band power (13-15 Hz) during slow wave sleep was higher for patients without epilepsy and without depressive symptoms as compared to patients without depressive symptoms but with focal epilepsy (p =.005). Depressive symptoms affect slow wave sleep duration of patients with epilepsy similarly as in patients without epilepsy. Since reduced slow wave sleep can increase the likelihood of seizure occurrence, these results stress the importance of adequate treatment for patients with epilepsy who experience depressive symptoms.

Clinical scores and clusters for prediction of outcomes in status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening condition and may have long-term negative sequelae. Short- and long-term outcomes encompass mortality, deterioration of functional status compared to baseline, refractoriness to treatment, recurrence of SE, and development of epilepsy, cognitive impairment, and behavioral disturbances. So far, the greatest amount of evidence is available for the prediction of short-term mortality. Conversely, the knowledge regarding long-term consequences among SE survivors is still scarce and several issues have not yet been resolved. The heterogeneity of SE renders the prognostication of outcomes challenging. Although aetiology is the main determinant of the outcome, different prognostic predictors have been identified. In this regard, data on group effects need to be integrated into prognostic scores to allow individual risk stratification. Importantly, many of the present scores are not designed to enable repetition to follow patient evolution. A new paradigm for the assessment of SE outcomes should consider variables that become available and/or can be retested during the course of SE. Neuroimaging findings, serum biomarkers, treatment characteristics, complications during SE, peri-ictal and postictal characteristics after SE cessation look as promising determinants of outcome and are suitable for inclusion in future models to enhance the quality and increase the reliability of prediction. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Imaging of status epilepticus: Making the invisible visible. A prospective study on 206 patients.

BACKGROUND: Peri-ictal MRI abnormalities (PMA) frequently affect the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, pulvinar of the thalamus, corpus callosum, and cerebellum. In this prospective study, we aimed to characterize the spectrum of PMA in a large cohort of patients with status epilepticus. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 206 patients with SE and an acute MRI. The MRI protocol included diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and T1-weighted imaging pre-and post-contrast application. Peri-ictal MRI abnormalities were stratified as either neocortical or non-neocortical. Amygdala, hippocampus, cerebellum, and corpus callosum were regarded as non-neocortical structures. RESULTS: Peri-ictal MRI abnormalities were observed in 93/206 (45%) of patients in at least one MRI sequence. Diffusion restriction was observed in 56/206 (27%) of patients, which was mainly unilateral in 42/56 (75%) affecting neocortical structures in 25/56 (45%), non-neocortical structures in 20/56 (36%) and both areas in 11/56 (19%) of patients. Cortical DWI lesions were located mostly in frontal lobes 15/25 (60%); non-neocortical diffusion restriction affected either the pulvinar of the thalamus or hippocampus 29/31 (95%). Alterations in FLAIR were observed in 37/203 (18%) of patients. They were mainly unilateral 24/37 (65%); neocortical 18/37 (49%), non-neocortical 16/37 (43%), or affecting both neocortical and non-neocortical structures 3/37 (8%). In ASL, 51/140 (37%) of patients had ictal hyperperfusion. Hyperperfused areas were located mainly in the neocortex 45/51 (88%) and were unilateral 43/51 (84%). In 39/66 (59%) of patients, PMA were reversible in one week. In 27/66 (41%), the PMA persisted and a second follow-up MRI was performed three weeks later in 24/27 (89%) patients. In 19/24 (79%) PMA were resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the patients with SE had peri-ictal MRI abnormalities. The most prevalent PMA was ictal hyperperfusion followed by diffusion restriction and FLAIR abnormalities. Neocortex was most frequently affected especially the frontal lobes. The majority of PMAs were unilateral. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Intravenous topiramate for seizure emergencies - First in human case report.

Topiramate (TPM) is widely used in focal and generalized epilepsies. It is commercially available as tablets and sprinkles capsules for oral treatment. Previous studies comparing intravenous (IV) to oral TPM in healthy adults showed more rapid pharmacodynamic effects in cases of IV administration. Despite promising findings, no clinical application in humans followed. We present a case of a pregnant woman with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure in the third trimenon due to low TPM levels attributed to pregnancy followed by repeated prolonged absences. We applied a new meglumine-based solution (1%) of TPM (10 mg/ml) in two IV infusions of 200 mg each under EEG monitoring over a total duration of 1 hour. The infusion was well tolerated and led to a rapid increase in plasma TPM levels. A clinical as well as electroencephalographic improvement was documented within the first hours. To the best available knowledge, this is the first reported case where IV TPM was used therapeutically for seizure treatment in humans. It is also the first time that the new meglumine-based solution was used in a human with epilepsy. The advantages of IV route delivery and the solution's quick preparation, high tolerability, and low toxicity make it ideal for use in many clinical settings and high-care patients. IV TPM seems to be a reasonable adjunctive option for adults with seizures, previously stabilized on oral TPM, who need rapid plasma concentration boosting. Although our experience was successful in using injectable TPM in seizure emergencies, randomized controlled clinical trials are required to make recommendations for the use of IV TPM on patients with epilepsy. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022 in Salzburg, Austria.