Implementation and Evaluation of Gradient Strip Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in US Public Health Laboratories to Respond to Resistant Gonorrhea.

BACKGROUND: Gradient strip antimicrobial susceptibility testing using Etest is conducted by local public health jurisdictions participating in the Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) program to inform public health responses to resistant gonorrhea. Proficiency testing results across the participating laboratories were analyzed and a comparison of Etest with the agar dilution method was conducted. METHODS: Laboratories participating in SURRG performed Etest for azithromycin (AZM), cefixime (CFX), and ceftriaxone (CRO). Concurrence between minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained with Etest versus the agar dilution method using corresponding isolates was defined as ±1 double dilution. Specific levels of reduced susceptibility were termed "alerts" and included isolates with the following MICs: ≥2.0 µg/mL (AZM), ≥0.25 µg/mL (CFX), and ≥0.125 µg/mL (CRO). Categorical (alert/nonalert) agreement was calculated for MICs determined using Etest and agar dilution methods. RESULTS: Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea laboratories had high proficiency testing scores (≥98%) and low levels of interlaboratory variations in MICs. The overall concurrence of MICs (essential agreement) determined using agar dilution, and Etest was 96% (CRO), 96% (CFX), and 95% (AZM). Depending on the antibiotic tested, between 27% and 66% of isolates with alert MICs determined by Etest also had alert MICs using the reference agar dilution methodology; however, most of these alert MICs were detected at threshold levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MICs produced by SURRG laboratories using Etest have a high level of concurrence with agar dilution. Although confirmation of specific alert MICs varied, Etest facilities rapid detection and response to emerging resistant gonorrhea.

The Use of a Shared Services Model for Mycobacteriology Testing: Lessons Learned.

OBJECTIVES: Public health laboratories (PHLs) provide essential services in the diagnosis and surveillance of diseases of public health concern, such as tuberculosis. Maintaining access to high-quality laboratory testing is critical to continued disease detection and decline of tuberculosis cases in the United States. We investigated the practical experience of sharing tuberculosis testing services between PHLs through the Shared Services Project. METHODS: The Shared Services Project was a 9-month-long project funded through the Association of Public Health Laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during 2012-2013 as a one-time funding opportunity to consortiums of PHLs that proposed collaborative approaches to sharing tuberculosis laboratory services. Submitting PHLs maintained testing while simultaneously sending specimens to reference laboratories to compare turnaround times. RESULTS: During the 9-month project period, 107 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex submissions for growth-based drug susceptibility testing and molecular detection of drug resistance testing occurred among the 3 consortiums. The median transit time for all submissions was 1.0 day. Overall, median drug susceptibility testing turnaround time (date of receipt in submitting laboratory to result) for parallel testing performed in house by submitting laboratories was 31.0 days; it was 43.0 days for reference laboratories. The median turnaround time for molecular detection of drug resistance results was 1.0 day (mean = 2.8; range, 0-14) from specimen receipt at the reference laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: The shared services model holds promise for specialized tuberculosis testing. Sharing of services requires a balance among quality, timeliness, efficiency, communication, and fiscal costs.