Benign hepaticojejunostomy strictures after pancreatoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine the causes of benign hepaticojejunostomy strictures (BHSs) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and the outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) treatment for BHSs. METHODS: A total of 175 patients who underwent PD between January 2013 and December 2020 and who were followed up for at least 1 year were included. Preoperative data, operative outcomes, and postoperative courses were compared between the BHS group and the group of patients who did not develop stenosis during follow-up (non-BHS group). The course of treatment in the BHS group was also examined. RESULTS: BHS occurred in 13 of 175 patients (7.4%). Multivariate analysis of the BHS and non-BHS groups revealed that male sex (OR; 3.753, 95% CI; 1.029-18.003, P = 0.0448) and a preoperative bile duct diameter less than 8.8 mm (OR; 7.51, 95% CI; 1.75-52.40, P = 0.0053) were independent risk factors for the development of BHS. In the BHS group, all patients underwent ERC using enteroscopy. The success rate of the ERC approach to the bile duct was 92.3%. Plastic stents were inserted in 6 patients, and metallic stents were inserted in 3 patients. The median observation period since the last ERC was 17.9 months, and there was no recurrence of stenosis in any of the 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with narrow bile ducts are at greater risk of BHS after PD. Recently, BHS after PD has been treated with ERC-related procedures, which may reduce the burden on patients.

Relationship between pancreatic resection volume and post-operative glucose intolerance in distal pancreatectomy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Some researchers are concerned that the performance of pancreatic resection in cases of low malignancy with distal localization will increase, resulting in the occurrence or worsening of post-operative glucose intolerance. Herein, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between the pancreatic resection ratio and post-operative glucose intolerance in distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS: Total 135 patients who underwent DP at our hospital and were followed up for > 12 months between January 2013 and December 2022 were included. Of these, 52 patients were included, excluding those with pre-operative diabetes and those who underwent pancreatectomy using other than a stapling device. The pancreatic resection ratio (%) was measured using pancreatic volumetry by manually tracing the pancreatic area on computed tomography images obtained before and after surgery and the relationship with post-operative glucose intolerance was investigated. RESULTS: Among the 52 patients, 13 (25.0%) showed post-operative worsening of glucose tolerance (impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] group). The pancreatic resection ratios were 51.1% and 34.8% in the IGT (13 patients) and non-IGT groups (39 patients), respectively (p = 0.0027). The cut-off value for the IGT group was 46.5%. The resection site was divided into two groups as follows. One group was resected near the portal vein (portal group) and the other group was resected more caudally (caudal group). Mean pancreatic resection ratios were 46.5% and 28.5% in cases of resection of the portal group (30 patients) and caudal group (22 patients), respectively (p < 0.0001). The thickness of the pancreas at the resection site was 13.1 mm in the portal group and 17.7 mm in the caudal group (p < 0.0001) and the incidence of pancreatic fistula was 6.7% and 9.1%, respectively (p = 0.7472). The incidence of post-operative glucose intolerance was 40.0% (12/30) in the portal group and 4.5% (1/22) in the caudal group (p = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: In cases of low-grade tumors and benign disease, pancreatic resection with preservation of the remaining pancreatic volume should be considered whenever possible.

Elective Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting for Acute Cholecystitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) on subsequent cholecystectomy. We retrospectively compared the surgical outcomes of EGBS, followed by elective cholecystectomy with those of immediate cholecystectomy (IC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 503 patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent EGBS as initial treatment for acute cholecystitis, followed by elective cholecystectomy, were included in the EGBS group and patients who underwent IC during hospitalization were included in the IC group. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare the surgical outcomes. In addition, the factors that increased the amount of bleeding were examined by multivariate analysis after matching. RESULTS: Fifty-seven matched pairs were obtained after propensity matching the EGBS group and the IC group. The rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the EGBS versus IC groups was 91.2% versus 49.1% ( P < 0.001). The amount of bleeding was 5 mL in the EGBS versus 188 mL in the IC group ( P < 0.001). In the EGBS and IC groups, multivariate analysis of factors associated with more blood loss revealed IC (odds ratio: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.25-20.76, P = 0.022) as an independent risk factor. CONCLUSION: EGBS as the initial treatment for acute cholecystitis and subsequent elective cholecystectomy after the inflammation has disappeared can be performed in minimally invasive procedures and safely.

Giant Adrenal Lipoma with Hemorrhage Requiring Extended Surgical Resection.

Adrenal lipoma is a rare, benign tumor, reported to account for 0.7% of primary adrenal tumors. A 69-year-old man presented with left lateral abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) was performed, and a huge, irregularly shaped retroperitoneal tumor of uneven internal density was identified, with the border between the tumor and the pancreas and kidney being unclear. Active hemorrhage was also depicted. The tumor consisted mainly of fat, with the exception of the hematoma; it measured 200 mm; and the boundary between it and nearby organs, such as the pancreas, was unclear. Despite angiography being performed twice, the responsible vessel was not identified. Thus, for the purpose of both diagnosis and treatment, we resected the tumor, and considering the possibility of a malignancy, such as liposarcoma, we also resected the pancreatic body and tail and the spleen. The final histopathologic diagnosis was benign adrenal lipoma with hemorrhage, with no invasion to surrounding tissue. Hemorrhage within an adrenal tumor is rare. Most adrenal lipomas are small "incidentalomas" and asymptomatic. With development of a large adrenal lipoma comes the possibility of hemorrhage along with the possibility of features suggestive of malignancy. We encountered a giant adrenal lipoma with hemorrhage and, because of the aforementioned features, performed extended surgical resection, seen in retrospect as oversurgery. The widespread use of CT has led to an increased number of reported cases of adrenal lipoma. We anticipate an accumulation of case reports, which will allow for development of an appropriate treatment algorithm.

The impact of blood type on the mortality of patients with severe abdominal trauma: a multicenter observational study.

Few studies have investigated the relationship between blood type and trauma outcomes according to the type of injury. We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study in twelve emergency hospitals in Japan. Patients with isolated severe abdominal injury (abbreviated injury scale for the abdomen ≥ 3 and that for other organs < 3) that occurred between 2008 and 2018 were divided into four groups according to blood type. The association between blood type and mortality, ventilator-free days (VFD), and total transfusion volume were evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression models. A total of 920 patients were included, and were divided based on their blood type: O, 288 (31%); A, 345 (38%); B, 186 (20%); and AB, 101 (11%). Patients with type O had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than those of other blood types (22% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). This association was observed in multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.48 [1.25-2.26], p = 0.012). Furthermore, type O was associated with significantly higher cause-specific mortalities, fewer VFD, and larger transfusion volumes. Blood type O was associated with significantly higher mortality and larger transfusion volumes in patients with isolated severe abdominal trauma.