Early Exacerbation Relapse is Increased in Patients with Asthma and Bronchiectasis (a Post hoc Analysis).

PURPOSE: Asthma is a common comorbidity in patients with bronchiectasis and has been shown to increase the risk of bronchiectasis exacerbations. This paper explores the impact of comorbid asthma on patients receiving intravenous antibiotic treatment for bronchiectasis exacerbations. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the Meropenem randomised controlled trial of 90 patients that had intravenous antibiotic treatment for bronchiectasis exacerbations. The participants were split into two groups: group 1 (asthma and bronchiectasis) and group 2 (bronchiectasis). The authors assessed response to treatment and time to next exacerbation. RESULTS: There were 38 participants in group 1 and 34 participants in group 2. The groups were found to be comparable in terms of age, sex, and bronchiectasis severity (median (95% CI) group 1 and then group 2 data): age 64.0(59.3, 68.6) and 63.6(57.9, 69.4) years old, p = 0.8; 57.9% and 64.7% female, p = 0.6; Bronchiectasis Severity Index 11.1(9.8, 12.4) and 10.1(8.2, 12.0), p = 0.3. There was a similar response to treatment between the groups, but group 1 were found to relapse early by day 14, 31.6% in group 1 and 11.8% in group 2, p = 0.03. In the Cox proportional hazards model, asthma was the only independent risk factor for early relapse by day 14 (odds ratio (95% CI) 3.16 (1.02-9.79), p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The clinical response to treatment was similar but patients with coexisting asthma were at increased risk of early relapse within 14 days of stopping intravenous antibiotic therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02047773.

Feasibility of shortening intravenous antibiotic therapy for bronchiectasis based on bacterial load: a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence to guide the duration of intravenous antibiotics for bronchiectasis exacerbations. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess whether it is feasible, based on bacterial load, to shorten intravenous antibiotics during exacerbations and whether 14 days of treatment is superior. METHODS: We recruited participants requiring intravenous antibiotics for exacerbations. Participants were randomised into two groups: to receive antibiotics for 14 days (14-day group) or to have a shorter duration of treatment based on bacterial load (bacterial load-guided group (BLGG)). Bacterial load was checked on days 0, 7, 10, 14 and 21. If the bacterial load was <106 CFU·mL-1 on day 7 or day 10 in the BLGG, antibiotics were stopped the following day. RESULTS: A total of 47 participants were in the 14-day group and 43 were in the BLGG. 88% of participants in the BLGG were able to stop antibiotics by day 8 and potentially 81% of participants in the 14-day group could have stopped antibiotics at day 8. There was a nonsignificant trend for increased clinical improvement by day 21 in the 14-day group compared to the BLGG. However, overall group data showed the median (interquartile range) time to next exacerbation was 27.5 days (12.5-60 days) in the 14-day group and 60 days (18-110 days) in the in BLGG (p=0.0034). In a Cox proportional hazard model, participants in the 14-day group were more likely to experience exacerbations (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.16-2.80, p=0.009) than those in the BLGG, and those with mild bronchiectasis were less likely to experience exacerbations than patients with more severe bronchiectasis (HR 0.359, 95% CI 0.13-0.99, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial load-guided therapy is feasible in most exacerbations requiring intravenous antibiotics. There was a nonsignificant trend for increased clinical improvement by day 21 with 14 days of antibiotics compared with bacterial load-guided therapy but paradoxically there was a prolonged time to next exacerbation in the BLGG.

A prospective cohort study of the use of domiciliary intravenous antibiotics in bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: We introduced domiciliary intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in patients with bronchiectasis to promote patient-centred domiciliary treatment instead of hospital inpatient treatment. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of domiciliary IV antibiotic therapy in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. METHODS: In this prospective study conducted over 5 years, we assessed patients' eligibility for receiving domiciliary treatment. All patients received 14 days of IV antibiotic therapy and were monitored at baseline/day 7/day 14. We assessed the treatment outcome, morbidity, mortality and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients received 196 courses of IV antibiotics. Eighty courses were delivered as inpatient treatment, 32 as early supported discharge (ESD) and 84 as domiciliary therapy. There was significant clinical and quality of life improvement in all groups, with resolution of infection in 76% in the inpatient group, 80% in the ESD group and 80% in the domiciliary group. Morbidity was recorded in 13.8% in the inpatient group, 9.4% in the ESD group and 14.2% in the domiciliary IV group. No mortality was recorded in either group. Thirty-day readmission rates were 13.8% in the inpatient group, 12.5% in the ESD group and 14.2% in the domiciliary group. Total bed days saved was 1443. CONCLUSION: Domiciliary IV antibiotic therapy in bronchiectasis is clinically effective and was safe in our cohort of patients.