Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 34(6): 871-878, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531539

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In addition to the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods, patient-reported satisfaction with imaging methods is important. OBJECTIVE: To report a secondary outcome of the prospective international multicenter Imaging Study in Advanced ovArian Cancer (ISAAC Study), detailing patients' experience with abdomino-pelvic ultrasound, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) for pre-operative ovarian cancer work-up. METHODS: In total, 144 patients with suspected ovarian cancer at four institutions in two countries (Italy, Czech Republic) underwent ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI for pre-operative work-up between January 2020 and November 2022. After having undergone all three examinations, the patients filled in a questionnaire evaluating their overall experience and experience in five domains: preparation before the examination, duration of examination, noise during the procedure, radiation load of CT, and surrounding space. Pain perception, examination-related patient-perceived unexpected, unpleasant, or dangerous events ('adverse events'), and preferred method were also noted. RESULTS: Ultrasound was the preferred method by 49% (70/144) of responders, followed by CT (38%, 55/144), and WB-DWI/MRI (13%, 19/144) (p<0.001). The poorest experience in all domains was reported for WB-DWI/MRI, which was also associated with the largest number of patients who reported adverse events (eg, dyspnea). Patients reported higher levels of pain during the ultrasound examination than during CT and WB-DWI/MRI (p<0.001): 78% (112/144) reported no pain or mild pain, 19% (27/144) moderate pain, and 3% (5/144) reported severe pain (pain score >7 of 10) during the ultrasound examination. We did not identify any factors related to patients' preferred method. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound was the imaging method preferred by most patients despite being associated with more pain during the examination in comparison with CT and WB-DWI/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03808792.


Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Satisfação do Paciente , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Idoso , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Imagem Corporal Total/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 294(6): 1227-1233, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27501926

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study investigated the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection, co-infection with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and associated risk factors in a cohort of sexually active young women enrolled in an ongoing trial on HPV vaccination at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO, Milan, Italy). METHODS: Cervical samples were collected from 591 girls (median age 18.8 years) at the beginning of their sexual activity. At the time of sample collection, 354 women had not yet been vaccinated, and 237 women had been vaccinated for at least 12 months. All samples were analyzed through a molecular assay for the detection of C. trachomatis infection. Demographic, behavioral risk factors and high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) status were investigated. RESULTS: The prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 4.9 % and HPV/C. trachomatis co-infection rate was 1.5 %. The exact analysis has not underlined statistical significance for the variables considered, except for the infection with HR-HPV (p < 0.001). The prevalence of C. trachomatis infection among women who had not been immunized and those already vaccinated was similar (5.6 vs 3.8 %). However, the rate of HPV/C. trachomatis co-infection was twice as high in unvaccinated women (2 %) compared to vaccinated women (0.8 %). CONCLUSIONS: Over 16 % of young women had at least one of the two STIs investigated. The risk of C. trachomatis infection was higher in HR-HPV infected compared to HR-HPV uninfected young women. The rate of co-infection was halved in HPV-vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women. This study underlines that HPV vaccination can confer benefits also in terms of co-infections prevention, leading to a decreased risk of developing cervical malignancies.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecções por Chlamydia/microbiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/virologia , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Coinfecção/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/microbiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/microbiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/virologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA