Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
EMBO J ; 33(22): 2623-42, 2014 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25257310

RESUMO

Sister chromatid cohesion mediated by the cohesin complex is essential for chromosome segregation during cell division. Using functional genomic screening, we identify a set of 26 pre-mRNA splicing factors that are required for sister chromatid cohesion in human cells. Loss of spliceosome subunits increases the dissociation rate of cohesin from chromatin and abrogates cohesion after DNA replication, ultimately causing mitotic catastrophe. Depletion of splicing factors causes defective processing of the pre-mRNA encoding sororin, a factor required for the stable association of cohesin with chromatin, and an associated reduction of sororin protein level. Expression of an intronless version of sororin and depletion of the cohesin release protein WAPL suppress the cohesion defect in cells lacking splicing factors. We propose that spliceosome components contribute to sister chromatid cohesion and mitotic chromosome segregation through splicing of sororin pre-mRNA. Our results highlight the loss of cohesion as an early cellular consequence of compromised splicing. This may have clinical implications because SF3B1, a splicing factor that we identify to be essential for cohesion, is recurrently mutated in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.


Assuntos
Cromátides , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B , Mutação , Proteínas de Neoplasias , Fosfoproteínas , Splicing de RNA , RNA Neoplásico , Ribonucleoproteína Nuclear Pequena U2 , Troca de Cromátide Irmã , Cromátides/genética , Cromátides/metabolismo , Genômica/métodos , Células HeLa , Humanos , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Fosfoproteínas/genética , Fosfoproteínas/metabolismo , Precursores de RNA/genética , Precursores de RNA/metabolismo , Fatores de Processamento de RNA , RNA Neoplásico/genética , RNA Neoplásico/metabolismo , Ribonucleoproteína Nuclear Pequena U2/genética , Ribonucleoproteína Nuclear Pequena U2/metabolismo
2.
Biochem Soc Trans ; 38(6): 1660-6, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21118144

RESUMO

Two closely connected mechanisms safeguard the fidelity of chromosome segregation in eukaryotic cells. The mitotic checkpoint monitors the attachment of kinetochores to microtubules and delays anaphase onset until all sister kinetochores have become attached to opposite poles. In addition, an error correction mechanism destabilizes erroneous attachments that do not lead to tension at sister kinetochores. Aurora B kinase, the catalytic subunit of the CPC (chromosomal passenger complex), acts as a sensor and effector in both pathways. In this review we focus on a poorly understood but important aspect of mitotic control: what prevents the mitotic checkpoint from springing into action when sister centromeres are split and tension is suddenly lost at anaphase onset? Recent work has shown that disjunction of sister chromatids, in principle, engages the mitotic checkpoint, and probably also the error correction mechanism, with potentially catastrophic consequences for cell division. Eukaryotic cells have solved this 'anaphase problem' by disabling the mitotic checkpoint at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition. Checkpoint inactivation is in part due to the reversal of Cdk1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1) phosphorylation of the CPC component INCENP (inner centromere protein; Sli15 in budding yeast), which causes the relocation of the CPC from centromeres to the spindle midzone. These findings highlight principles of mitotic checkpoint control: when bipolar chromosome attachment is reached in mitosis, the checkpoint is satisfied, but still active and responsive to loss of tension. Mitotic checkpoint inactivation at anaphase onset is required to prevent checkpoint re-engagement when sister chromatids split.


Assuntos
Anáfase/genética , Cromátides/metabolismo , Segregação de Cromossomos , Fuso Acromático/metabolismo , Animais , Aurora Quinase B , Aurora Quinases , Proteína Quinase CDC2/metabolismo , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Genes cdc , Humanos , Fosforilação , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismo , Estresse Mecânico , Leveduras/genética , Leveduras/fisiologia
3.
Curr Biol ; 24(6): 638-45, 2014 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24583019

RESUMO

Two mechanisms safeguard the bipolar attachment of chromosomes in mitosis. A correction mechanism destabilizes erroneous attachments that do not generate tension across sister kinetochores [1]. In response to unattached kinetochores, the mitotic checkpoint delays anaphase onset by inhibiting the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C(Cdc20)) [2]. Upon satisfaction of both pathways, the APC/C(Cdc20) elicits the degradation of securin and cyclin B [3]. This liberates separase triggering sister chromatid disjunction and inactivates cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) causing mitotic exit. How eukaryotic cells avoid the engagement of attachment monitoring mechanisms when sister chromatids split and tension is lost at anaphase is poorly understood [4]. Here we show that Cdk1 inactivation disables mitotic checkpoint surveillance at anaphase onset in human cells. Preventing cyclin B1 proteolysis at the time of sister chromatid disjunction destabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments and triggers the engagement of the mitotic checkpoint. As a consequence, mitotic checkpoint proteins accumulate at anaphase kinetochores, the APC/C(Cdc20) is inhibited, and securin reaccumulates. Conversely, acute pharmacological inhibition of Cdk1 abrogates the engagement and maintenance of the mitotic checkpoint upon microtubule depolymerization. We propose that the simultaneous destruction of securin and cyclin B elicited by the APC/C(Cdc20) couples chromosome segregation to the dissolution of attachment monitoring mechanisms during mitotic exit.


Assuntos
Anáfase/fisiologia , Proteína Quinase CDC2/fisiologia , Cinetocoros/fisiologia , Pontos de Checagem da Fase M do Ciclo Celular/fisiologia , Cromátides/fisiologia , Ciclina B/fisiologia , Ciclina B1/fisiologia , Células HeLa , Humanos , Não Disjunção Genética/fisiologia , Separase/fisiologia
4.
Curr Biol ; 20(15): 1402-7, 2010 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20619651

RESUMO

The mitotic checkpoint monitors the attachment of kinetochores to microtubules and delays anaphase onset until all sister kinetochores have become attached to opposite poles [1, 2]. Correct bipolar attachment leads to kinetochore deformation and tension and satisfies the checkpoint [3-6]. What prevents mitotic checkpoint reactivation when sister centromeres are split and tension is lost at anaphase onset? Aurora B kinase, the catalytic subunit of the chromosomal passenger protein complex (CPC) [7], acts as a sensor at inner centromeres for the status of attachment [5, 8]. Phosphorylation of Aurora B targets at erroneously attached kinetochores elicits the correction of these attachments and the activation of the mitotic checkpoint. At anaphase, the CPC leaves the centromeres and relocates to the spindle midzone [7]. This iconic translocation might prevent the checkpoint from reengaging after anaphase onset. To test this hypothesis, we experimentally retained Aurora B and the CPC at the centromere throughout anaphase in human cells. Preventing CPC translocation caused the untimely recruitment of mitotic checkpoint proteins to kinetochores at anaphase in an Aurora B kinase activity-dependent manner. Our results suggest that the relocalization of the CPC, an evolutionarily conserved event in eukaryotes, is a key mechanism that incapacitates the mitotic checkpoint at anaphase.


Assuntos
Anáfase , Centrômero/metabolismo , Proteínas Cromossômicas não Histona/metabolismo , Cinetocoros/metabolismo , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismo , Aurora Quinase B , Aurora Quinases , Células HeLa , Humanos , Proteínas de Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA