Preoperative Ultrasound Assessment of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma Patients Does not Provide Reliable Nodal Staging: Results From a Large Multicenter Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether preoperative ultrasound (US) assessment of regional lymph nodes in patients who present with primary cutaneous melanoma provides accurate staging. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that preoperative US could avoid the need for sentinel node (SN) biopsy, but in most single-institution reports, the sensitivity of preoperative US has been low. METHODS: Preoperative US data and SNB results were analyzed for patients enrolled at 20 centers participating in the screening phase of the second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial. Excised SNs were histopathologically assessed and considered positive if any melanoma was seen. RESULTS: SNs were identified and removed from 2859 patients who had preoperative US evaluation. Among those patients, 548 had SN metastases. US was positive (abnormal) in 87 patients (3.0%). Among SN-positive patients, 39 (7.1%) had an abnormal US. When analyzed by lymph node basin, 3302 basins were evaluated, and 38 were true positive (1.2%). By basin, the sensitivity of US was 6.6% (95% confidence interval: 4.6-8.7) and the specificity 98.0% (95% CI: 97.5-98.5). Median cross-sectional area of all SN metastases was 0.13 mm2; in US true-positive nodes, it was 6.8 mm2. US sensitivity increased with increasing Breslow thickness of the primary melanoma (0% for ≤1 mm thickness, 11.9% for >4 mm thickness). US sensitivity was not significantly greater with higher trial center volume or with pre-US lymphoscintigraphy. CONCLUSION: In the MSLT-II screening phase population, SN tumor volume was usually too small to be reliably detected by US. For accurate nodal staging to guide the management of melanoma patients, US is not an effective substitute for SN biopsy.

Sentinel lymph node melanoma metastases: Assessment of tumor burden for clinical prediction of outcome in the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I).

PURPOSE: As clinical management decisions in patients with Stage III melanoma have become more complex, precise pathologic characterization of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases has become critical to guide management. The extent of SLN involvement correlates with risk of adverse outcomes, but reported methods of disease quantification vary. We examined SLN metastases from patients participating in an international clinical trial and compared several methods of tumor burden quantification. METHODS: SLNs from 146 node-positive patients in the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) were centrally-reviewed and characterized by number of tumor-positive nodes, percent nodal area tumor replacement, maximum dimension of largest metastasis, tumor penetrative depth, number of tumor foci, metastasis microanatomic location, and extracapsular extension. These data were analyzed for correlation with non-SLN metastasis and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). RESULTS: The median number of tumor-involved SLNs was 1. The median maximum metastasis dimension was 1.11 mm. Median SLN area involvement was 1.5%. Tumor burden measures were highly correlated with each other. Factors associated with non-SLN metastasis by univariable analysis were primary tumor ulceration and extent of metastases. Tumor thickness, ulceration, non-SLN metastasis and multiple measures of SLN tumor burden were significantly related to MSS on univariable analysis. After multivariable adjustment, number of involved SLNs (p = 0.05) and percent nodal area tumor replacement (p = 0.02) were independent predictors of MSS. CONCLUSION: Central review of MSLT-I pathology indicates that primary tumor and SLN tumor characteristics predict non-SLN metastasis and MSS. Percent nodal involvement was more powerfully prognostic than the more commonly used maximum dimension of largest metastasis.