Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 99
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(6): 1170-1181, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331098

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Produtos Biológicos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Psoríase , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Vacinação/normas , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , SARS-CoV-2 , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico
2.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(5): 789-808, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316462

RESUMO

Methotrexate (MTX) is a readily accessible drug, first used in 1948 and employed for a wide variety of indications since then. However, despite widespread off-label use, FDA labeling does not include approved indications for the use of MTX for many inflammatory skin diseases in pediatric patients, including morphea, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata, among others. Without published treatment guidelines, some clinicians may be hesitant to use MTX off-label, or uncomfortable prescribing MTX in this population. To address this unmet need, an expert consensus committee was convened to develop evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for use of MTX to treat pediatric inflammatory skin disease. Clinicians with experience and expertise in clinical research, drug development, and treating inflammatory skin disease in pediatric patients with MTX were recruited. Five committees were created based on major topic areas: (1) indications and contraindications, (2) dosing, (3) interactions with immunizations and medications, (4) adverse effects (potential for and management of), and (5) monitoring needs. Pertinent questions were generated and addressed by the relevant committee. The entire group participated in a modified Delphi process to establish agreement on recommendations for each question. The committee developed 46 evidence- and consensus-based recommendations, each with >70% agreement among members, across all five topics. These are presented in tables and text, along with a discussion of supporting literature, and level of evidence. These evidence- and consensus-based recommendations will support safe and effective use of MTX for the underserved population of pediatric patients who may benefit from this valuable, time-honored medication.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Psoríase , Humanos , Criança , Metotrexato , Consenso , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(1): 68-76, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34256035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is associated with comorbid systemic metabolic disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess possible associations of comorbid obesity, history of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia with response to biologic treatment at 6 months among patients in CorEvitas' Psoriasis Registry. METHODS: Participants included 2924 patients initiating biologic therapy (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi], interleukin [IL]-17i, IL-12/23i, or IL-23i) with baseline and 6-month follow-up visits available. Logistic regressions resulted in adjusted odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for achievement of response in select outcomes for those with obesity and history of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia relative to those without each. RESULTS: Overall, obesity reduced by 25% to 30% odds of achieving PASI75 (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.88) and PASI90 (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.81). History of diabetes reduced odds of achieving PASI75 by 31% (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85) and PASI90 by 21% (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.98). Obesity was associated with lower response to TNFi and IL-17i classes. Independent of obesity, diabetes was associated with poorer outcomes when on IL-17i therapy and hypertension, to a lesser extent, when on the TNFi class. No significant associations were found in the hyperlipidemia group. LIMITATIONS: The study assessed only short-term effectiveness and small sample sizes limited the power to detect differences. CONCLUSION: Assessment of comorbid disease burden is important for improved likelihoods of achieving treatment response with biologics.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensão , Psoríase , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 85(2): 330-336, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31562945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) published treatment targets for US patients with plaque psoriasis. However, data are lacking on how well existing therapies help achieve these goals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of an interleukin 17 inhibitor, ixekizumab, in achieving these treatment targets. METHODS: Post hoc analysis was performed on pooled data from 4 phase III clinical trials assessing ixekizumab for plaque psoriasis: the UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3 trials and the IXORA-S trial. Treatment response was evaluated using the NPF-defined acceptable response (affected body surface area [BSA] of 3% or less or BSA improvement of 75% or higher at 12 weeks of treatment) and target response (BSA of 1% or less at 12 weeks and every 6 months thereafter). RESULTS: In the UNCOVER trials (n = 2701), acceptable and target response rates at week 12 were 73.9% and 51.8% with ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks, 35.7% and 14.9% with etanercept 50 mg, and 3.0% and 0.6% with placebo, respectively. In the IXORA-S trial (n = 302), acceptable and target response rates at week 12 were significantly higher with ixekizumab every 2 weeks versus ustekinumab (acceptable response 68.4% vs 38.6%, P < .0001; target response 50.7% vs 24.1%, P < .0001). LIMITATIONS: Data were from controlled studies and may not reflect real-world practice. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients treated with ixekizumab in 4 phase III clinical trials achieved NPF, patient-centered treatment targets.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(5): 1254-1268, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422626

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity. CONCLUSIONS: These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Pandemias , Psoríase/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
6.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(1): 96-103, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32032692

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many patients with psoriasis are bothered by symptoms in highly visible, pruritic areas, such as the scalp. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate to severe scalp psoriasis. METHODS: This phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized adults with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis who had inadequate response/intolerance to at least 1 topical scalp psoriasis therapy (NCT03123471). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved Scalp Physician Global Assessment response, defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear), with at least a 2-point reduction, at week 16. Secondary endpoints included at least a 4-point improvement from baseline in Whole Body Itch and Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) and mean improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at week 16. RESULTS: There were 303 randomized patients (placebo: n = 102; apremilast: n = 201). With apremilast, significantly more patients achieved Scalp Physician Global Assessment (43.3% vs 13.7%), Scalp Itch NRS (47.1% vs 21.1%), and Whole Body Itch NRS (45.5% vs 22.5%) response, and significantly greater DLQI improvement was observed versus placebo (-6.7 vs -3.8; all P < .0001). Common adverse events with apremilast were diarrhea (30.5%), nausea (21.5%), headache (12.0%), and vomiting (5.5%). LIMITATIONS: Patients with mild disease were not enrolled. CONCLUSION: Apremilast showed efficacy for the treatment of moderate to severe scalp psoriasis.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatoses do Couro Cabeludo/tratamento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Administração Oral , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/efeitos adversos , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(6): 1704-1716, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891785

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance about management of psoriatic disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: A task force (TF) of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was convened. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by questions received by the NPF. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF approved 22 guidance statements. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements. All guidance statements proposed were recommended, 9 with high consensus and 13 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality. CONCLUSION: These statements provide guidance for the management of patients with psoriatic disease on topics ranging from how the disease and its treatments impact COVID-19 risk and outcome, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is intended to be a living document that will be updated by the TF as data emerge.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/normas , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Comitês Consultivos/normas , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Técnica Delphi , Dermatologia/normas , Epidemiologia/normas , Humanos , Infectologia/normas , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/imunologia , Reumatologia/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 81(4): 923-930, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31163241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the impact of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy on patient-reported measures of health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of adalimumab and phototherapy on health-related quality of life. METHODS: We examined patient-reported outcomes from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01553058). The Dermatology Life Quality Index and EQ-5D-3L were evaluated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 97 patients: 30.9% were female, mean age was 43.5 years (standard deviation, 14.0), and median Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was 16.7 (interquartile range, 13.9-21.6). At week 12, patients being treated with adalimumab (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-8.17) and phototherapy (OR, 8.83; 95% CI, 2.47-31.57) were more likely to achieve the minimal clinically important difference in the Dermatology Life Quality Index compared with those receiving placebo. There were higher odds of achieving the minimal clinically important difference for the EQ-5D-3L Index score when comparing phototherapy versus placebo (OR, 9.78; 95% CI, 2.99-31.95) and phototherapy versus adalimumab (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.42-11.70). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, secondary analysis, generalizability. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy and adalimumab both improve skin-related quality of life and overall health-related quality of life compared with placebo in patients with psoriasis; however, patients treated with phototherapy achieved more improvement in overall health-related quality of life compared with patients treated with adalimumab.


Assuntos
Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Terapia Ultravioleta , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diferença Mínima Clinicamente Importante , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
11.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 78(2): 383-394, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29332708

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a significant association between psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Many treatments for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are also used for IBD. OBJECTIVE: To assess therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis and concurrent IBD. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for clinical studies of biologic and systemic psoriasis medications in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease, for the period from January 1, 1947, to February 14, 2017. Randomized, controlled, double-blinded studies were selected if available. If not, the next highest level of available evidence was selected. RESULTS: Of the 2282 articles identified, 132 were selected. Infliximab and adalimumab have demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative; colitis, and Crohn's disease. Ustekinumab has demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn's disease. Certolizumab has demonstrated efficacy in psoriatic arthritis and Crohn's disease. Etanercept, secukinumab, brodalumab, and ixekizumab have demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis but may exacerbate or induce IBD. Guselkumab has demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis. LIMITATIONS: There are no known clinical trials of treatment specifically for concurrent psoriasis and IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab and adalimumab have demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease; other agents have demonstrated efficacy for some, but not all, of these indications.


Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/terapia , Acitretina/uso terapêutico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Certolizumab Pegol/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico
12.
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc ; 18(2): S46-S49, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28941493

RESUMO

Given the change in our population to one that is more racially and ethnically diverse, the topic of diversity in dermatology residency programs has gained attention. In a field that has become highly competitive, diversity is lagging behind. What are the reasons for this? The existing diversity among medical school matriculants is reflective of the applicant pool, and although modest, there has been an increase in applications and acceptances from minority populations. However, these proportions do not carry through to the population applying to dermatology residency. Making sense of this and planning how to recruit a more diverse applicant pool will improve the quality and cultural competency of future dermatologists.


Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Dermatologia/educação , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
13.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 76(3): 377-390, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28212759

RESUMO

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the skin that is increasingly being recognized as a systemic inflammatory disorder. Psoriatic arthritis is a well-known comorbidity of psoriasis. A rapidly expanding body of literature in various populations and settings supports additional associations between psoriasis and cardiometabolic diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, kidney disease, malignancy, infection, and mood disorders. The pathogenesis of comorbid disease in patients with psoriasis remains unknown; however, shared inflammatory pathways, cellular mediators, genetic susceptibility, and common risk factors are hypothesized to be contributing elements. As additional psoriasis comorbidities continue to emerge, education of health care providers is essential to ensuring comprehensive medical care for patients with psoriasis.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Infecções/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia
14.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 76(3): 393-403, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28212760

RESUMO

As summarized in the first article in this continuing medical education series, the currently available epidemiologic data suggest that psoriasis may be a risk factor for cardiometabolic disease. Emerging data also suggest associations between psoriasis and other comorbidities beyond psoriatic arthritis, including chronic kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, hepatic disease, certain malignancies, infections, and mood disorders. Recognizing the comorbid disease burden of psoriasis is essential for ensuring comprehensive care of patients with psoriasis. The clinical implications of the comorbid diseases that are associated with psoriasis and recommendations for clinical management are reviewed in this article.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Infecções/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Comorbidade , Contraindicações , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Infecções/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Humor/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/terapia , Psoríase/terapia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores
16.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 76(2): 290-298, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27908543

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An urgent need exists in the United States to establish treatment goals in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: We aim to establish defined treatment targets toward which clinicians and patients with psoriasis can strive to inform treatment decisions, reduce disease burden, and improve outcomes in practice. METHODS: The National Psoriasis Foundation conducted a consensus-building study among psoriasis experts using the Delphi method. The process consisted of: (1) literature review, (2) pre-Delphi question selection and input from general dermatologists and patients, and (3) 4 Delphi rounds. RESULTS: A total of 25 psoriasis experts participated in the Delphi process. The most preferred instrument was body surface area (BSA). The most preferred time for evaluating patient response after starting new therapies was at 3 months. The acceptable response at 3 months postinitiation was either BSA 3% or less or BSA improvement 75% or more from baseline. The target response at 3 months postinitiation was BSA 1% or less. During the maintenance period, evaluation every 6 months was most preferred. The target response at every 6 months maintenance evaluation is BSA 1% or less. LIMITATIONS: Although BSA is feasible in practice, it does not encompass health-related quality of life, costs, and risks of side effects. CONCLUSION: With defined treatment targets, clinicians and patients can regularly evaluate treatment responses and perform benefit-risk assessments of therapeutic options individualized to the patient.


Assuntos
Psoríase/terapia , Superfície Corporal , Fundações , Humanos , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Estados Unidos
17.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 16(8): 760-766, 2017 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28809991

RESUMO

Inverse or intertriginous psoriasis commonly involves skin fold areas including the axillae, perianal skin, intergluteal cleft, inframammary, genital/inguinal, abdominal, and retroauricular folds. After reviewing the literature for new treatments, a task force was convened to update a consensus on inverse psoriasis therapy. Short-term treatment continues to be low-potency topical steroids. In order to avoid steroid-induced adverse effects, long-term therapy includes topical immunomodulators, calcitriol, and calcipotriene. Second and third-line therapies include antimicrobials, emollients, and tar-based products. Inverse psoriasis resistant to topical therapy has been shown to respond to botulinum toxin injections, excimer laser therapy, and certain systemic agents (such as anti-TNF and anti-IL12/IL23 therapy). Based on promising results from case reports and prior clinical experience, these systemic agents should be strongly considered in inverse psoriasis resistant to topical therapy. However, they need further evidence-based evaluation. The use of randomized trials and objective severity indices may allow for more robust therapeutic data.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(8):760-766.

.


Assuntos
Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Cutânea , Calcitriol/análogos & derivados , Calcitriol/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/uso terapêutico
20.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 75(4): 798-805.e7, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27461230

RESUMO

Treatment with systemic immunomodulatory agents is indicated for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. In these patients, surgery may confer an increased risk of infectious or surgical complications. We conducted a literature review to examine studies addressing the use of methotrexate, cyclosporine, and targeted immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa inhibitors, interleukin [IL]-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors) in patients undergoing surgery. We examined 46 total studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. One study in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis reviewed 77 procedures and did not find an elevated risk of postoperative complications with tumor necrosis factor-alfa and IL-12/23 inhibitors even with major surgeries. Based on level III evidence, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, methotrexate, and cyclosporine can be safely continued through low-risk operations in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. For moderate- and high-risk surgeries, a case-by-case approach should be taken based on the patient's individual risk factors and comorbidities.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunomodulação , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacologia , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prognóstico , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/cirurgia , Medição de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA