Magnetic resonance neurography in spinal cord injury: Imaging findings and clinical significance.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is unknown whether changes to the peripheral nervous system following spinal cord injury (SCI) are relevant for functional recovery or the development of neuropathic pain below the level of injury. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) at 3 T allows detection and localization of structural and functional nerve damage. This study aimed to combine MRN and clinical assessments in individuals with chronic SCI and nondisabled controls. METHODS: Twenty participants with chronic SCI and 20 controls matched for gender, age, and body mass index underwent MRN of the L5 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and the sciatic nerve. DRG volume, sciatic nerve mean cross-sectional area (CSA), fascicular lesion load, and fractional anisotropy (FA), a marker for functional nerve integrity, were calculated. Results were correlated with clinical assessments and nerve conduction studies. RESULTS: Sciatic nerve CSA and lesion load were higher (21.29 ± 5.82 mm2 vs. 14.08 ± 4.62 mm2 , p < 0.001; and 8.70 ± 7.47% vs. 3.60 ± 2.45%, p < 0.001) in individuals with SCI compared to controls, whereas FA was lower (0.55 ± 0.11 vs. 0.63 ± 0.08, p = 0.022). DRG volumes were larger in individuals with SCI who suffered from neuropathic pain compared to those without neuropathic pain (223.7 ± 53.08 mm3 vs. 159.7 ± 55.66 mm3 , p = 0.043). Sciatic MRN parameters correlated with electrophysiological results but did not correlate with the extent of myelopathy or clinical severity of SCI. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with chronic SCI are subject to a decline of structural peripheral nerve integrity that may occur independently from the clinical severity of SCI. Larger volumes of DRG in SCI with neuropathic pain support existing evidence from animal studies on SCI-related neuropathic pain.

Diagnostic Accuracy in Teleneurological Stroke Consultations.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of diagnosing acute cerebrovascular disease via a teleneurology service and the characteristics of misdiagnosed patients are insufficiently known. METHODS: A random sample (n = 1500) of all teleneurological consultations conducted between July 2015 and December 2017 was screened. Teleneurological diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis were compared. Diagnoses were then grouped into two main categories: cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and noncerebrovascular disease. Test characteristics were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 1078 consultations, 52% (n = 561) had a final diagnosis of CVD. Patients with CVD could be accurately identified via teleneurological consultation (sensitivity 95.2%, 95% CI 93.2-96.8), but we observed a tendency towards false-positive diagnosis (specificity 77.4%, 95% CI 73.6-80.8). Characteristics of patients with a false-negative CVD diagnosis were similar to those of patients with a true-positive diagnosis, but patients with a false-negative CVD diagnosis had ischemic heart disease less frequently. In retrospect, one patient would have been considered a candidate for intravenous thrombolysis (0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Teleneurological consultations are accurate for identifying patients with CVD, and there is a very low rate of missed candidates for thrombolysis. Apart from a lower prevalence of ischemic heart disease, characteristics of "stroke chameleons" were similar to those of correctly identified CVD patients.