Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 93
Filtrar
1.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 146(1): 85-97, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435249

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Polypharmacy and late-life depression often congregate in the geriatric population. The primary objective is to identify determinants of polypharmacy in patients with depression, and second to examine polypharmacy in relation to various clinical phenotypes of depression and its course. METHODS: A longitudinal observational study using data of the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older persons (NESDO) including 375 patients with depression ≥ 60 years and 132 non-depressed comparisons. Linear and logistic regression were used to analyze both polypharmacy (dichotomous: ≥5 medications) and number of prescribed drugs (continuous) in relation to depression, various clinical phenotypes, and depression course. RESULTS: Polypharmacy was more prevalent among patients with depression (46.9%) versus non-depressed comparisons (19.7%). A lower level of education, lower cognitive functioning, and more chronic diseases were independently associated with polypharmacy. Adjusted for these determinants, polypharmacy was associated with a higher level of motivational problems, anxiety, pain, and an earlier age of onset. A higher number of drugs was associated with a worse course of late-life depression (OR = 1.24 [95% CI: 1.03-1.49], p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Older patients with depression have a huge risk of polypharmacy, in particular among those with an early onset depression. As an independent risk factor for chronic depression, polypharmacy needs to be identified and managed appropriately. Findings suggest that depression moderates polypharmacy through shared risk factors, including motivational problems, anxiety, and pain. The complex interaction with somatic health burden requires physicians to prescribe medications with care.


Assuntos
Depressão , Polimedicação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Distímico , Humanos , Dor
2.
Fam Pract ; 36(1): 12-20, 2019 01 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395196

RESUMO

Background: Depression is common among older adults and is typically treated with antidepressants. Objective: To determine the non-adherence rates to antidepressants among older adults in primary care, based on non-initiation, suboptimal implementation or non-persistence. Methods: We selected all patients aged ≥60 years and diagnosed with depression in 2012, from the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) Primary Care Database. Non-initiation was defined as no dispensing within 14 days of the first prescription; suboptimal implementation, as fewer than 80% of the days covered by dispensed dosages; and non-persistence, as discontinuation within 294 days after first dispense. First, we determined the antidepressant non-initiation, suboptimal implementation and non-persistence rates. Second, we examined whether comorbidity and chronic drug use were associated with non-adherence by mixed-effects logistic regression (non-initiation or suboptimal implementation as dependent variables) and a clustered Cox regression (time to non-persistence). Results: Non-initiation, suboptimal implementation and non-persistence rates were 13.5%, 15.2% and 37.1%, respectively. As the number of chronically used drugs increased, the odds of suboptimal implementation (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95) and of non-persistence (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92) reduced. Conclusions: Non-adherence to antidepressants is high among older patients with depression in primary care settings. Adherence is better when patients are accustomed to taking larger numbers of prescribed drugs, but this only provides partial explanation of the variance. GPs should be aware of the high rates of non-adherence. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to the optimal length of antidepressant therapy might be prudent first steps to improving adherence.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos
3.
Fam Pract ; 35(2): 186-192, 2018 03 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28973383

RESUMO

Background: A reform of Dutch mental health care aimed to substitute care from specialized care to general practice. Since 1 January 2014, Dutch general practitioners (GPs) are no longer allowed to refer patients without a psychiatric disorder to mental health care. Patients with non-complex psychological problems should be treated within general practice. Objective: To explore the feasibility of the Dutch mental health policy. Methods: We conducted an observational case study in a primary health care centre in 2014. The health care centre was a convenience sample; the participating GPs reorganized mental health care in line with the upcoming policy, and invited the researchers to monitor their referrals. We assessed how many patients with mental health problems (n = 408) were allocated to policy-concordant treatment. Additionally, 137 patients (33%) completed a follow up assessment on mental health problems 3 months after baseline. Results: The majority of the patients were allocated to treatment in line with the policy. Almost half of the patients (42%) were treated in a setting that was exactly policy-concordant, while the other half (47%) was treated in a setting that was even less specialized than was allowed. In general, patients showed improvement after 3 months, regardless of (non) policy-concordant treatment. Attrition rate after 3 months was high, probably due to the practical study design. Conclusion: There is potential for substitution of mental health care. Since the studied health care centre was specialized in mental health care, further research should explore if similar results can be found in other general practices.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral/organização & administração , Política de Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Encaminhamento e Consulta
4.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 53(10): 1071-1079, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923072

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Functional limitations give an indication of the total impact of diseases, such as depression, on individuals health and recovery. This study examines the change in several domains of functioning over 2 years in older persons depressed at baseline (non-remitted group and remitted group after 2 years) and in a non-depressed comparison group. METHODS: Data were used from a cohort study (Netherlands Study of Depression in Older persons [NESDO]) consisting of depressed older persons ≥ 60 years (N = 378) and a non-depressed comparison group (N = 132) with 2 years of follow-up (attrition rate 24%). Functional limitations (outcome) were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire every 6 months. Total scores and domain scores were used. Depression was classified according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. Severity of depression (predictor) was assessed with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) at 6-month intervals. RESULTS: Linear mixed models showed that the level of functional limitations differed between the three groups during 2 years of follow-up. The non-remitted group had the highest level of functional limitations during 2 years, followed by the remitted group. Stable low levels of functional limitations were found for the non-depressed group. Remission from depression was accompanied by improvements in functioning, however, compared to the non-depressed comparison group significant functional limitations remained. Higher severity of depression appeared as risk factor for a declining course of functioning, especially the social aspects of functioning. METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Participants that were more severely depressed and more functionally impaired at baseline had higher attrition rates than the participants that were included in the analytical sample. CONCLUSION: This study showed that depression in later life has long-term debilitating effects on functioning, enduring even after remission from depression. This implies that depression treatment in later life should aim broader than just symptomatic recovery, but also include functional recovery.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Depressão/psicologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
BMC Fam Pract ; 19(1): 102, 2018 06 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29954333

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the recovery of patients suffering from low back pain is highly context dependent, patient preferences about treatment options are seldom incorporated into the therapeutic plan. Shared decision-making (SDM) offers a tool to overcome this deficiency. The reinforcement by the general practitioner (GP) of a 'shared' chosen therapy might increase patients' expectations of favourable outcomes and thus contribute to recovery. METHODS: In the Netherlands, a clustered randomised controlled trial was performed to assess the effectiveness of shared decision-making followed by positive reinforcement of the chosen therapy (SDM&PR) on patient-related clinical outcomes. Overall, 68 GPs included 226 patients visiting their GP for a new episode of non-chronic low back pain. GPs in the intervention group were trained in implementing SDM&PR using a structured training programme with a focus on patient preferences in reaching treatment decisions. GPs in the control group provided care as usual. The primary outcome was the change in physical disability measured with the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMD) during the six-month follow-up after the first consultation. Physical disability (RMD), pain, adequate relief, absenteeism and healthcare consumption at 2, 6, 12 and 26 weeks were secondary outcomes. A multivariate analysis with a mixed model was used to estimate the differences in outcomes. RESULTS: Of the patients in the intervention and the control groups, 66 and 62%, respectively, completed the follow-up. Most patients (77%) recovered to no functional restrictions due to back pain within 26 weeks. No significant differences in the mean scores for any outcome were observed between intervention patients and controls during the follow-up, and in multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the main outcome during the six-month follow-up. Patients in the intervention group reported more involvement in decision-making. CONCLUSION: This study did not detect any improvement in clinical outcome or in health care consumption of patients with non-chronic low back pain after the training of GPs in SDM&PR. The implementation of SDM merely introduces task-oriented communication. The training of the GPs may have been more effective if it had focused more on patient-oriented communication techniques and on stressing the expectation of favourable outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NTR1960. The trial was registered in the NTR on August 20, 2009.


Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Dor Lombar/terapia , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Preferência do Paciente , Reforço Psicológico , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Países Baixos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 36(1): 47-55, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338537

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate developments in antidepressant prescriptions by Dutch general practitioners, alongside the national introduction of mental health nurses. Antidepressant prescriptions are very common in general practice, but are often not in line with recommendations. The recent introduction of mental health nurses may have decreased antidepressant prescriptions, as general practitioners (GPs) have greater potential to offer psychological treatment as a first choice option instead of medication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anonymised data from the medical records of general practices participating in the NIVEL Primary Care Database in 2011-2015 were analysed in an observational study. We used multilevel logistic regression analyses to determine whether total antidepressant prescriptions and antidepressants prescribed within one week of diagnosing anxiety or depression decreased in the period 2011-2015. We analysed whether changes in antidepressant prescriptions were associated with the employment or consultation of mental health nurses. RESULTS: Antidepressants were prescribed in 30.3% of all anxiety or depression episodes; about half were prescribed within the first week. Antidepressants prescriptions for anxiety or depression increased slightly in the period 2011-2015. The employment of mental health nurses was not associated with a decreased number of prescriptions of antidepressants. Patients who had at least one mental health nurse consultation had fewer immediate prescriptions of antidepressants, but not fewer antidepressants in general. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant prescriptions are still common in general practice. So far, the introduction of mental health nurses has not decreased antidepressant prescriptions, but it may have a postponing effect.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Medicina Geral , Padrões de Prática Médica , Psicoterapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Depressão/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermeiros Especialistas , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto Jovem
7.
Fam Pract ; 34(5): 539-545, 2017 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369380

RESUMO

Background: Late-life depression often coincides with chronic somatic diseases and, consequently, with polypharmacy, which may complicate medical treatment. Objective: To determine the associations between patients diagnosed with late-life depression in primary care and multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was performed using 2012 primary care data. Depressed patients aged ≥60 years were compared to age and gender matched patients diagnosed with other psychological diagnoses and mentally healthy controls. Morbidity and prescription data were combined, and regression analyses were performed for the associations between depression and chronic disease and chronic drug use. Results: We included 4477 patients; 1512 had a record of depression, 1457 of other mental health or psychological diagnoses and 1508 were controls. Depressed patients had a 16% [Prevalence Ratio (PR) 1.16; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 10%-24%] higher rate of chronic somatic disease and higher odds for multimorbidity (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.33-1.81) compared with controls. No differences existed between depressed patients and patients with other psychological diagnoses. Compared with controls, depressed patients had a 46% (95% CI 39-53%) higher rate of chronic drug use and higher odds for polypharmacy (OR 2.89; 95% CI 2.41-3.47). Depressed patients also had higher rates of chronic drug use and higher odds for polypharmacy compared with patients with other psychological diagnoses (PR 1.26; OR 1.75; both P < 0.001). Conclusions: Late-life depression in primary care patients is associated with more chronic drug use, even beyond the increased rates of comorbid somatic diseases. General practitioners should consider medication reviews to prevent unnecessary drug-related problems in these patients.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Multimorbidade , Polimedicação , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde
8.
BMC Fam Pract ; 18(1): 10, 2017 01 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28143421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substitution is the shift of care from specialized health care to less expensive and more accessible primary health care. It seems promising for restraining rising mental health care costs. The goal of this study was to investigate a potential for substitution of patients with psychological or social problems, but without severe psychiatric disorders, from Dutch specialized mental health care to primary care, especially family practices. METHODS: We extracted anonymized data from two national databases representing primary and specialized care in 2012. We calculated the number of patients with and without psychiatric disorder per 1,000 citizens in three major settings: family practices, primary care psychologists, and specialized care. Family physicians recorded psychopathology using the International Classification of Primary Care, while psychologists and specialists used the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition. RESULTS: Considerable numbers of patients without a diagnosed DSM-IV psychiatric disorder were treated by primary care psychologists (32.8%) or in specialized care (20.8%). Over half of the patients referred by family physicians to mental health care did not have a psychiatric disorder. CONCLUSION: A recent reform of Dutch mental health care, including new referral criteria, will likely increase the number of patients with psychological or social problems that family physicians have to treat or support. Enabling and improving diagnostic assessment and treatment in family practices seems essential for substitution of mental health care.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Saúde Mental , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Países Baixos , Encaminhamento e Consulta
9.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 31(7): 755-64, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26556009

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Even though the prevalence of mental disorders and social problems is high among elderly patients, it is difficult to detect these in a primary (home) care setting. Goal was the development and preliminary validation of a short observation list to detect six problem areas: anxiety, depression, cognition, suspicion, loneliness, and somatisation. METHODS: A draft list of indicators identified from a short review of the literature and the opinions of 22 experts was evaluated by general practitioners (GPs) and home care organisations for feasibility. It was then used by GPs and home care personnel to observe patients, who also completed validated tests for psychological disorders (General Health Questionnaire 12 item version (GHQ-12)), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version (GDS-15)), anxiety and suspicion (Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90)), loneliness (University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)), somatisation (Illness Attitude Scale (IAS)), and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)). RESULTS: GPs and home care personnel observed 180 patients (mean age 78.4 years; 66% female) and evaluated the draft list during a regular visit. Cronbach's α was 0.87 for the draft list and ≥0.80 for the draft problem areas (loneliness and suspicion excepted). Principal component analysis identified six components (cognition, depression + loneliness, somatisation, anxiety + suspicion, depression (other signs), and an ambiguous component). Convergent validity was shown for the indicators list as a whole (using the GHQ-12), and the subscales of depression, anxiety, loneliness, cognition, and somatisation. Using pre-set agreed criteria, the list was reduced to 14 final indicators divided over five problem areas. CONCLUSION: The Observation List for mental disorders and social Problems (OLP) proved to be preliminarily valid, reliable, and feasible for use in primary and home care settings. Copyright © John Wliey & Sons, Ltd.


Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Solidão/psicologia , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Transtornos Somatoformes/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
BMC Psychiatry ; 15: 20, 2015 Feb 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25775143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the course of depression during 2-year follow-up in a group clinically depressed older persons. Subsequently, we studied which socio-demographic and clinical characteristics predict a depression diagnoses at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Data were used from the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older persons (NESDO; N = 510). Diagnoses of depression DSM-IV-TR criteria were available from 285 patients at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. Severity of the depressive symptoms, as assessed with the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS), was obtained from 6-monthly postal questionnaires. Information about socio-demographic and clinical variables was obtained from the baseline measurement. RESULT: From the 285 older persons who were clinically depressed at baseline almost half (48.4%) also suffered from a depressive disorder two years later. Patients with more severe depressive symptoms, comorbid dysthymia, younger age of onset and more chronic diseases were more likely to be depressed at 2-year follow-up. 61% of the persons that were depressed at baseline had a chronic course of depressive symptoms during these two years. CONCLUSIONS: Late-life depression often has a chronic course, even when treated conform current guidelines for older persons. Our results suggest that physical comorbidity may be candidate for adjusted and intensified treatment strategies of older depressed patients with chronic and complex pathology.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Transtorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Transtorno Distímico/epidemiologia , Transtorno Distímico/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Inventário de Personalidade , Recidiva , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
BMC Fam Pract ; 16: 132, 2015 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26452756

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent mental health problems are frequently not identified and properly treated within general practice. Politicians in the Netherlands are promoting more primary healthcare treatment for mental health problems. The current study aims to evaluate an integrated primary mental healthcare approach for child and adolescent emotional and behavioural problems. This integrated approach allows general practitioners (GPs) to comprehensively explore the request for help, followed by an informed decision to refer, offer short-term treatment within general practice or postpone a decision by asking for additional consultations with youth mental health specialists. METHOD: The study is a naturalistic evaluation of Dutch general practices with pre-test and post-test comparison with controls based on data from Electronic Medical Records (EMR). The intervention started in September 2010. EMR data of all GP contacts with children aged 4 to 18 (including diagnosis, prescriptions, referrals) from practices involved in the intervention was used from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2012. Extra codes were added to the EMR to record aspects of the intervention. Comparable EMR data was used in control practices in 2011. RESULTS: GPs in the intervention group were able to identify more emotional and behavioural problems after the integrated service had started. They also identified more problems than GPs in the control practices. They were already reluctant to prescribe psychopharmacological medication to children before the intervention, and levels of prescription at intervention GP practices remained low for psychotropic drugs compared to control practices. Referral rates to mental healthcare remained relatively steady after the introduction of the integrated service, but referrals switched from specialized to primary mental healthcare. CONCLUSION: An integrated mental healthcare approach within general practice may lead to an increase in detected psychosocial problems among children, and these problems can mainly be treated within the primary care setting.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral/métodos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Países Baixos , Papel do Médico , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Encaminhamento e Consulta
12.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 22(9): 866-74, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23891365

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare alcohol use between depressed and nondepressed older adults, and to investigate correlates of alcohol abstinence and at-risk alcohol consumption in depressed older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Netherlands Study of Depression in Older Persons (NESDO). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 373 participants (mean [standard deviation] age: 70.6 [7.3] years; 66% women) diagnosed with a depressive disorder, and 128 nondepressed participants. MEASUREMENTS: Alcohol use was assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Participants were categorized into abstainers (AUDIT score: 0), moderate drinkers (AUDIT score: 1-4), and at-risk drinkers (AUDIT score: ≥5). Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed with AUDIT categories as outcome, and demographic, social, somatic, and psychological variables as determinants. RESULTS: The depressed group consisted of 40.2% abstainers, 40.8% moderate drinkers, and 19.0% at-risk drinkers. The depressed participants were more often abstinent and less often moderate drinkers than the nondepressed participants; they did not differ in at-risk drinking. Depressed abstainers more often used benzodiazepines but less often used antidepressants, and they had a poorer cognitive function than depressed moderate drinkers. Depressed at-risk drinkers were more often smokers and had fewer functional limitations but more severe depressive symptoms than depressed moderate drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Although alcohol abstinence was more common in depressed than in nondepressed older adults, 19% of depressed persons were at-risk drinkers. Because at-risk drinking is associated with more severe depression and may have a negative impact on health and treatment outcome, it is important that physicians consider alcohol use in depressed older adults.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/psicologia , Abstinência de Álcool/psicologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cognição , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos
13.
BMC Fam Pract ; 15: 188, 2014 Nov 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25421612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In a recent study comparing psychosocial consultations prior to and after the implementation of national clinical guidelines in the Netherlands, we found that general practitioners (GPs) showed less empathy in the more recent consultations. As a consequence, patients possibly have less scope to express their worries. The objective is to investigate whether patients have become more reluctant to open up about their concerns during psychosocial consultations and how GPs respond. METHODS: Consultations from previous study samples videotaped between 1977 and 2008 and categorized by GPs as 'completely psychosocial' were selected for the present study. These consultations were observed using the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES) to capture cues and concerns expressed by patients and GPs' immediate responses. We compared consultations prior to (N = 121) and after (N = 391) introduction of national clinical guidelines in the 1990s. RESULTS: In 92% of the consultations, patients presented at least one worry. These were most often expressed implicitly. However, the proportion of consultations containing at least one explicit concern changed from 24% to 37% over time. The increased number of expressed cues and concerns was partly explained by a change in GP characteristics; the latter sample contained more female and more experienced GPs. Furthermore, cues and concerns were more often expressed during later phases of consultations in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that patients have become somewhat more explicit in expressing their worries. However, GPs need to be aware that, still, most worries are expressed implicitly and that new concerns may appear towards the end of consultations.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Comunicação , Emoções , Empatia , Clínicos Gerais , Relações Médico-Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Sinais (Psicologia) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores Sexuais , Gravação de Videoteipe , Adulto Jovem
14.
BMC Fam Pract ; 15: 35, 2014 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24552140

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Internationally, guidelines for depression recommend a stepped care approach, implying that antidepressant medication should not be offered as a first step treatment to patients with sub-threshold or mild depression. In the Netherlands, antidepressant prescribing rates in general practice as a first treatment step are considered to be high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of guideline recommendations on antidepressant prescribing. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent naturalistic control group and three years follow-up was performed in the general practice setting in the Netherlands. General Practitioners (GPs) participated in a national Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC), focusing on the implementation of a guideline based model for a stepped care approach to depression. The model consisted of self-help and psychological treatment options for patients with milder symptoms as an alternative to antidepressants in general practice. Changes in antidepressant prescription rates of GPs were documented for a three-year period and compared to those in a control group of GPs, selected from an ongoing national registration network. RESULTS: A decrease of 23.3% (49.4%-26.1%) in antidepressant prescription rates for newly diagnosed patients with depressive symptoms was found within the intervention group, whereas no difference occurred in the reference group (50.3%-52.6%). The decrease over time was significant, compared to the usual care group (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: An implementation program using stepped care principles for the allocation of depression interventions resulted in reduced antidepressant prescription rates in general practice. GPs can change prescribing behaviour within the context of a QIC.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Geral , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 32(3): 117-23, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25142308

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Literature suggests that serious mental health problems increase the use of health services and psychological interventions can reduce this effect. This study investigates whether this effect is also found in primary care patients with less serious mental health problems. DESIGN/SETTING: Routine electronic health records (EHR) from a representative sample of 128 general practices were linked to patient files from 150 primary care psychologists participating in the NIVEL Primary Care Database, using a trusted third party. Data were linked using the date of birth, gender, and postcode. This yielded 503 unique data pairs that were listed in one of the participating GP practices in 2008-2010, for people who had psychological treatment from a psychologist that ended in 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of contacts, health problems presented, and prescribed medication in general practice were analysed before and after the psychological treatment. RESULTS: Nearly all 503 patients consulted their GP during the six months preceding the psychological treatment (90.9%) and also in the six months after this treatment had ended (83.7%). The frequency of contacts was significantly higher before than after the psychological treatment (6.1 vs. 4.8). Fewer patients contacted their GPs specifically for psychological or social problems (46.3% vs. 38.8%) and fewer patients had anxiolytic drug prescriptions (15.5% vs. 7.6%) after psychological treatment. CONCLUSION: After psychological treatment, patients contact their GPs less often and present fewer psychological or social problems. Although contact rates seem to decrease, clients of psychologists are still frequent GP attenders.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral , Transtornos Mentais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiolíticos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto Jovem
16.
BMC Fam Pract ; 14: 6, 2013 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23297810

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of antidepressants (AD), defined as either continuation in the absence of a proper indication or continuation despite the lack of therapeutic efficacy, applies to approximately half of all long term AD users. METHODS/DESIGN: We have designed a cluster randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the (cost-) effectiveness of an antidepressant cessation advice in the absence of a proper indication for maintenance treatment with antidepressants in primary care.We will select all patients using antidepressants for over 9 months from 45 general practices. Patients will be diagnosed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) version 3.0, extended with questions about the psychiatric history and previous treatment strategies. General practices will be randomized to either the intervention or the control group. In case of overtreatment, defined as the absence of a proper indication according to current guidelines, a cessation advice is given to the general practitioner. In the control groups no specific information is given. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients that successfully discontinue their antidepressants at one-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes are dimensional measures of psychopathology and costs. DISCUSSION: This study protocol provides a detailed overview of the design of the trial. Study results will be of importance for refining current guidelines. If the intervention is effective it can be used in managed care programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR2032.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Aconselhamento Diretivo/economia , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/economia , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/economia , Países Baixos , Seleção de Pacientes , Padrões de Prática Médica , Suspensão de Tratamento
17.
BMC Fam Pract ; 13: 80, 2012 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22873783

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Doctor-patient communication has been influenced over time by factors such as the rise of evidence-based medicine and a growing emphasis on patient-centred care. Despite disputes in the literature on the tension between evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine, patients' views on what constitutes high quality of doctor-patient communication are seldom an explicit topic for research. The aim of this study is to examine whether analogue patients (lay people judging videotaped consultations) perceive shifts in the quality of doctor-patient communication over a twenty-year period. METHODS: Analogue patients (N = 108) assessed 189 videotaped general practice consultations from two periods (1982-1984 and 2000-2001). They provided ratings on three dimensions (scale 1-10) and gave written feedback. With a mixed-methods research design, we examined these assessments quantitatively (in relation to observed communication coded with RIAS) and qualitatively. RESULTS: 1) The quantitative analyses showed that biomedical communication and rapport building were positively associated with the quality assessments of videotaped consultations from the first period, but not from the second. Psychosocial communication and personal remarks were related to positive quality assessments of both periods; 2) the qualitative analyses showed that in both periods, participants provided the same balance between positive and negative comments. Listening, giving support, and showing respect were considered equally important in both periods. We identified shifts in the participants' observations on how GPs explained things to the patient, the division of roles and responsibilities, and the emphasis on problem-focused communication (first period) versus solution-focused communication (last period). CONCLUSION: Analogue patients recognize shifts in the quality of doctor-patient communication from two different periods, including a shift from problem-focused communication to solution-focused communication, and they value an egalitarian doctor-patient relationship. The two research methods were complementary; based on the quantitative analyses we found shifts in communication, which we confirmed and specified in our qualitative analyses.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Relações Médico-Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Competência Clínica , Aconselhamento/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Padrões de Prática Médica/classificação , Resolução de Problemas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Classe Social , Gravação em Vídeo
18.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 30(3): 156-62, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22794194

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In the field of mental health care, a major role for general practice is advocated. However, not much is known about the treatment and referral of mental health problems in general practice. This study aims at the volume and nature of treatment of mental health problems in general practice; the degree to which treatment varies according to patients' gender, age, and social economic status; and trends in treatment and referral between 2004 and 2008. DESIGN/SETTING: Descriptive study with trends in time in general practice in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: 350,000 patients enlisted in general practice, whose data from the Netherlands Information Network of General Practice were routinely collected from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For all episodes of mental health problems recorded by the GP, the proportion of patients receiving prolonged attention, medication, and referral during each year have been calculated. RESULTS: More than 75% of patients with a recorded mental health problem received some kind of treatment, most often medication. In 15-20% of cases medication was accompanied by prolonged attention; 9-13% of these patients were referred (given referrals), the majority to specialized mental health care. Age is the most important variable associated with treatment received. During the period 2004-2008, treatment with medication declined slightly and referrals increased slightly. CONCLUSION: Treatment for psychological disorders is mostly delivered in general practice. Although in recent years restraint has been advocated in prescribing medication and collaboration between primary and secondary care has been recommended, these recommendations are only partially reflected in the treatment provided.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/tendências , Transtornos Mentais , Serviços de Saúde Mental/tendências , Fatores Etários , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Países Baixos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
19.
BMC Psychiatry ; 11: 180, 2011 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22099636

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence as to whether or not guideline concordant care in general practice results in better clinical outcomes for people with anxiety and depression. This study aims to determine possible associations between guideline concordant care and clinical outcomes in general practice patients with depression and anxiety, and identify patient and treatment characteristics associated with clinical improvement. METHODS: This study forms part of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).Adult patients, recruited in general practice (67 GPs), were interviewed to assess DSM-IV diagnoses during baseline assessment of NESDA, and also completed questionnaires measuring symptom severity, received care, socio-demographic variables and social support both at baseline and 12 months later. The definition of guideline adherence was based on an algorithm on care received. Information on guideline adherence was obtained from GP medical records. RESULTS: 721 patients with a current (6-month recency) anxiety or depressive disorder participated. While patients who received guideline concordant care (N=281) suffered from more severe symptoms than patients who received non-guideline concordant care (N=440), both groups showed equal improvement in their depressive or anxiety symptoms after 12 months. Patients who (still) had moderate or severe symptoms at follow-up, were more often unemployed, had smaller personal networks and more severe depressive symptoms at baseline than patients with mild symptoms at follow-up. The particular type of treatment followed made no difference to clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The added value of guideline concordant care could not be demonstrated in this study. Symptom severity, employment status, social support and comorbidity of anxiety and depression all play a role in poor clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 46(10): 1033-44, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20686887

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study of Australian and Dutch people with anxiety or depressive disorder aims to examine people's perceived needs and barriers to care, and to identify possible similarities and differences. METHODS: Data from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being and the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety were combined into one data set. The Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire was taken in both studies. Logistic regression analyses were performed to check if similarities or differences between Australia and the Netherlands could be observed. RESULTS: In both countries, a large proportion had unfulfilled needs and self-reliance was the most frequently named barrier to receive care. People from the Australian sample (N = 372) were more likely to perceive a need for medication (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.5), counselling (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.0) and practical support (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.7), and people's overall needs in Australia were more often fully met compared with those of the Dutch sample (N = 610). Australians were more often pessimistic about the helpfulness of medication (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.4-10.7) and skills training (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.2) and reported more often financial barriers for not having received (enough) information (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.5) or counselling (OR 5.9; 95% CI 2.9-11.9). CONCLUSIONS: In both countries, the vast majority of mental health care needs are not fulfilled. Solutions could be found in improving professionals' skills or better collaboration. Possible explanations for the found differences in perceived need and barriers to care are discussed; these illustrate the value of examining perceived need across nations and suggest substantial commonalities of experience across the two countries.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Adolescente , Adulto , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA