Colloid vs. crystalloid infusions in gastrointestinal surgery and their different impact on the healing of intestinal anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate if colloid infusions have different effects on intestinal anastomotic healing when compared to crystalloid infusions depending on the amount of the administered volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups receiving different amounts of either a crystalloid (Cry) or a colloid (Col) infusion solution. Animals with volume restriction (Cry (-) or Col (-)) were treated with a low and animals with volume overcharge (Cry (+) or Col (+)) with a high flow rate. All animals received an infusion for a 60-min period, while an end-to-end small bowel anastomosis was performed. At reoperation, the anastomotic bursting pressure (millimeters of mercury) was measured, as well as anastomotic hydroxyproline concentration. The presence of bowel wall edema was assessed histologically. RESULTS: Median bursting pressures were comparable in the Col (-) [118 mm Hg (range 113-170)], the Cry (-) [118 mm Hg (78-139)], and the Col (+) [97 mm Hg (65-152)] group. A significantly lower median bursting pressure was found in animals with crystalloid volume overload Cry (+) [73 mm Hg (60-101)]. Corresponding results were found for hydroxyproline concentration. Histology revealed submucosal edema in Cry (+) animals. CONCLUSIONS: In case of a fixed, high-volume load, colloids seem to have benefits on intestinal anastomotic healing when compared to crystalloid infusions.

Impact of different crystalloid volume regimes on intestinal anastomotic stability.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic insufficiency still remains an unsolved problem in digestive surgery. Little clinical data, regarding the impact of perioperative volume management exist, which suggest lower complication rates in intestinal surgery under restrictive volume regimens. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of the extent of intraoperative fluid administration with crystalloids on the stability of intestinal anastomoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one rats were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 7 rats/group): control group CO (9 mL kg h crystalloid infusion), volume restriction group V (-) (3 mL kg h), and animals with volume overload V (+) (36 mL kg h). After midline incision, all animals received the corresponding infusion for a 30-minute period. Infusion was continued for further 30 minutes whereas an end-to-end small bowel anastomosis was performed 15 cm proximal to the Bauhin valve with 8 nonabsorbable interrupted inverting sutures. At reoperation on the 4th postoperative day, the anastomotic segment was dissected and the bursting pressure [mmHg] was measured. As a second parameter for the quality of anastomotic healing, hydroxyproline concentration was examined with a spectrophotometric method [microg/g dry tissue]. Histologically, structural changes of the anastomotic segments were assessed by 2 pathologists. Data are given as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS: Anastomotic insufficiency was not seen in all animals. Bursting pressure of CO animals was 102 +/- 8 mmHg. Bursting pressure was lowest in V (+) with high volume exposure at 77 +/- 6 mmHg and significantly lower than V (-) (112 +/- 9 mmHg; P = 0.01) whereas the difference compared with the CO group did not reach significant values. Hydroxyproline concentration in V (+) (64.4 microg/g dry tissue +/- 7.7) was significantly lower compared with V (-) (91.7 microg/g dry tissue +/- 9.1) animals (P < 0.05). In all animals with volume overload a marked submucosal edema was found. CONCLUSION: We could demonstrate for the first time in a systematic investigation, that the quantity of crystalloid infusion, applied intraoperatively, has a significant impact on functional (bursting pressure) and structural (hydroxyproline) stability of intestinal anastomoses in the early postoperative period. Because the stability and quality of an intestinal anastomosis have an impact on insufficiency rates, it should be noted that volume overload may have deleterious effects on anastomotic healing and postoperative complications in digestive surgery, possibly because of a marked bowel wall edema.