[Reorganisation of the service of child and adolescent psychiatrie examplified by the domaine of perinatal psychiatrie and psychiatrie of early chidlhood]. / Réorganisation d'un service de la psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent - Le domaine « Périnatalité et petite enfance ¼.

This article presents the construction of a chain of care of perinatal psychiatric situations within the University Service of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, which evolved within the framework of the departmentalization of this service. This chain of care includes the psychiatry of the liaison, the outpatient clinics as well as and day hospital care and extends from the prenatal period to the child's five years, with a focus on the relationship between child and caregivers, as well as an individual perspective on the child. Herein, we present and describe the different units and their functioning emphasizing the synergies and collaborations put in place that ensure the best possible continuity for patients and their families by promoting as much as possible the therapeutic alliance in this chain of care.

Cet article présente la mise en place d'une filière de soins pour la prise en charge des situations de psychiatrie périnatale au sein du Service universitaire de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, qui prend place dans le cadre de la départementalisation de ce service. Cette filière de soins comprend des prises en charge de liaison, en ambulatoire et en hôpital de jour, et s'étend de la période prénatale aux 5 ans de l'enfant, en se focalisant sur les aspects relationnels parents-bébé mais également sur l'enfant en tant qu'individu. Les différents lieux de prise en charge sont présentés et chacun de leur mode de fonctionnement est décrit. Cet article insiste sur l'importance capitale d'une articulation et d'une collaboration étroite entre les différents lieux de prise en charge afin d'assurer la meilleure continuité possible des soins pour les patients et leur famille en favorisant au maximum l'alliance thérapeutique.

Clinical significance of assertive community treatment among adolescents.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of assertive community treatment for children and adolescents is proven in the United States, but remains controversial in Europe. Moreover, most studies showing positive outcomes of assertive community treatment are limited to statistically significant differences and do not consider whether the treatment is also subjectively clinically meaningful for the patient. Using a naturalistic sample, the present study aims to assess statistical and clinical significance of an assertive community treatment unit for adolescents in Europe. METHODS: Linear mixed-effects models and reliable change indices were used to respectively assess the statistical and clinical significance of assertive community treatment in 179 adolescents (mean age = 15.76, SD = 1.76) with severe mental illnesses. RESULTS: Difficulties related to mental health (measured by the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents, HoNOSCA) and overall functioning (measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning scale) statistically improved (all ps < 0.001) from admission to discharge. Additionally, a considerable proportion of patients (from 14% to 21%) clinically recovered to functional levels. CONCLUSION: Our results support the fact that assertive community treatment can have convincing and positive clinical outcomes in European settings.

Can the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents predict the necessity of inpatient stay during assertive community treatment?

Understanding the trajectories of youths within Child and Adolescents Mental Health Service (CAMHS) is of primary importance. Our objective is to assess the usefulness of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) to predict inpatient (IP) stay for youths followed by assertive community treatment (ACT) teams. 82 youths followed exclusively by ACT and 42 who needed IP were assessed with the HoNOSCA at admission to the program. The HoNOSCA allowed the computing of three scores: a total score, an externalizing symptoms (Ext) score and an emotional problems (Emo) score. Logistic regressions revealed that the three HoNOSCA scores at admission of ACT predicted later need for hospitalization. Using ROC curve analyses, we set up cut off scores with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for the HoNOSCA Total and Ext to optimally predict the need for hospitalization. This study revealed that the HoNOSCA may be a useful tool to predict the need for later IP during ACT. Such knowledge is important to set up the best therapeutic strategies.