Real-life experience with hazelnut oral immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hazelnut oral immunotherapy (H-OIT), a promising alternative to hazelnut-free diet for patients with hazelnut allergy, has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of H-OIT for children with hazelnut allergy. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review of children treated by H-OIT in the University Hospital of Lyon (France) was reported. Clinical and laboratory data were collected, and the satisfaction of the children treated by H-OIT was evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients treated by H-OIT for an immunoglobulin E-mediated hazelnut allergy (94.3%) or an immunoglobulin E sensitization to hazelnut (5.7%) were included. Among these, 22.9% entered the maintenance phase at 1-year consultation and 60.0% entered the maintenance phase during the study period. At home, 57.1% of the patients experienced at least 1 adverse effect and 2.9% experienced severe systemic allergic reactions. Among the 212 oral food challenges conducted at hospital, 3.3% led to severe systemic reactions and epinephrine was used 4 times. A total of 21.4% of children discontinued treatment; aversion to hazelnut was the main reason. There were 42 children aged 8 years or more and their parents who answered the questionnaire. H-OIT was considered a strain for children but effective and was recommended to other children with allergy. CONCLUSION: H-OIT seemed to be effective and well accepted by children. This is counterbalanced by a high rate of H-OIT discontinuation, mainly owing to aversion to hazelnut, and an important rate of adverse reactions, which are however mostly mild. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04841850.

Children with eosinophilic esophagitis in real life: 10 years' experience with a focus on allergic management.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is frequently miss-diagnosed or overlooked for several years because of the invasiveness of investigations and the non-specificity of symptoms in childhood. Due to the lack of specific recommendations in children, its management remains very heterogeneous, especially concerning allergy testing. The aim of this study is to analyze our population and practices, in comparison with the literature, with a focus on allergic management, to harmonize and optimize our practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included all children with a diagnosis of EoE at the Hospital Femme Mere Enfant, Bron, France. Data were collected via retrospective chart review. RESULTS: 108 patients were included with an average age of 9.5 years. Average delay before diagnosis was 6.65 years. Symptoms varied with age, with a predominance of vomiting (60% of patients), feeding difficulties (72%) and growth difficulties (24%) in children <5 years, whereas older children often presented with feeding blockage (64%) and dysphagia (61%). Cough was frequent in our cohort (18.5%), especially in children <10 years (38.5% between three and five years). The allergic background was frequent (70.3%) and 80% of our patients benefited from allergy testing. Allergy testing was particularly useful to guide therapy as elimination diet represented an effective treatment in 60% of our patients CONCLUSIONS: Allergy testing has to be harmonized to include major allergens (egg, milk, peanut, fish, wheat, and soy), including prick and patch tests. Allergy-testing based diet seemed to be the best compromise between efficiency and constraints, especially in mono-sensitized patients.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells mediate oral tolerance.

Oral tolerance prevents oral sensitization to dietary antigens (Ags), including proteins and haptens, and development of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses. We showed here that plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) prevented oral T cell priming and were responsible for systemic tolerance to CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell-mediated DTH responses induced by Ag feeding. Systemic depletion of pDCs prevented induction of tolerance by antigen feeding. Transfer of oral Ag-loaded liver pDCs to naive recipient mice induced Ag-specific suppression of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses to protein and hapten, respectively. Liver is a site of oral Ag presentation, and pDCs appeared to induce anergy or deletion of Ag-specific T cells in the liver relatively rapidly via a CD4(+) T cell-independent mechanism. These data demonstrate that oral tolerance relies on Ag presentation by pDC to T cells and suggest that pDC could represent a key therapeutic target for intestinal and systemic inflammatory diseases.

[Eosinophilic esophagitis: 3 case reports]. / Oesophagites à oesinophiles: à propos de trois observations.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a rare entity, characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the oesophagal mucosae, with no gastroesophageal reflux. Food allergies are often involved. We report 3 paediatric cases of eosinophilic esophagitis, revealed by dysphagia, with or without stricture. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a rare disease, but its frequency is probably underestimated. Symptoms are sometimes unusual. Oesogastroscopy with biopsy is essential for the diagnosis. Food allergies can be involved and must be systematically investigated.

Influence of measles vaccination on the progression of atopic dermatitis in infants.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, affecting 10-20% of children. Measles vaccination has been reported to have contradictory effects on incidence of AD in children. Therefore, we performed the first prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to analyze the evolution of AD in infants after measles vaccination. The study included 12 infants (10-14 months old) with AD, randomly assigned to two groups: while the first group received a single dose of a standard measles vaccine ROUVAX, the second was treated with placebo (vehicle). Infants were followed-up for 6 months after administration of ROUVAX/placebo for the clinical signs associated with AD, by determination of SCORAD index. In addition, serum was taken before vaccination and 1 month later to determine the presence of seroconversion and to analyze the progression of serum levels of CCL18 (PARC) and E-selectin, known to be distinct serum markers that reflect clinical features of AD. In the vaccinated group, five of six children seroconverted 1 month after treatment and one infant showed a 50% improvement of SCORAD. Serum levels of CCL18 were significantly decreased in two treated infants (of four analyzed for this group) and E-selectin slightly decreased in one infant (of three analyzed by this test). In placebo-treated group the SCORAD improved in one patient and serum levels of CCL18 and E-selectin did not change. These data suggest that measles vaccination not only does not aggravate AD, but may also improve some of the immunological parameters of this allergic disease. Inclusion of a higher number of patients in a similar study should give a more comprehensive overview of the benefit of measles vaccination on the clinical evolution of AD patients, and potentially open new avenues to the clinical application of the anti-inflammatory effect of measles virus proteins.