Abrocitinib for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is ranked as the third most prevalent skin condition with a worldwide prevalence of 2.4%. Atopic dermatitis is a common form of eczema. It develops in infancy or childhood and continues into adulthood with symptoms ranging from mild to severe. Pruritis and inflammation are the hallmark symptoms of AD. MECHANISM OF ACTION, PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND PHARMACOKINETICS: Abrocitinib is a JAK1 selective inhibitor; inhibition results in a decreased interleukin (IL) 4 activation and decreased pruritis in a patient with AD. Abrocitinib is hepatically metabolized by multiple cytochrome P450 enzymes, and dose modification may be required when administered with concurrent medications. CLINICAL TRIALS: At least 6 JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) trials were conducted evaluating Investigator's Global Assessment and Eczema Area and Severity Index score for efficacy. All JADE trials showed abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg doses efficacious when compared with placebo. Common adverse reactions were related to gastrointestinal disturbances, headache, and acne. Serious adverse reactions to assess risk for include serious infections, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolisms. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCE: Abrocitinib provides a valuable treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe AD unresponsive to other therapies for those candidates without a high risk for significant adverse reaction associated with its use.

3% Hypertonic Saline Versus Normal Saline in Inpatient Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis, the most common reason for hospitalization in children younger than 1 year in the United States, has no proven therapies effective beyond supportive care. We aimed to investigate the effect of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline (HS) compared with nebulized normal saline (NS) on length of stay (LOS) in infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in an urban tertiary care children's hospital in 227 infants younger than 12 months old admitted with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis (190 completed the study); 113 infants were randomized to HS (93 completed the study), and 114 to NS (97 completed the study). Subjects received 4 mL nebulized 3% HS or 4 mL 0.9% NS every 4 hours from enrollment until hospital discharge. The primary outcome was median LOS. Secondary outcomes were total adverse events, subdivided as clinical worsening and readmissions. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in groups. In intention-to-treat analysis, median LOS (interquartile range) of HS and NS groups was 2.1 (1.2-4.6) vs 2.1 days (1.2-3.8), respectively, P = .73. We confirmed findings with per-protocol analysis, HS and NS groups with 2.0 (1.3-3.3) and 2.0 days (1.2-3.0), respectively, P = .96. Seven-day readmission rate for HS and NS groups were 4.3% and 3.1%, respectively, P = .77. Clinical worsening events were similar between groups (9% vs 8%, P = .97). CONCLUSIONS: Among infants admitted to the hospital with bronchiolitis, treatment with nebulized 3% HS compared with NS had no difference in LOS or 7-day readmission rates.

Head lice and the use of spinosad.

BACKGROUND: Head lice infestations are responsible for social and economic distress. Despite a reported increase in resistance, permethrin 1% is still the first-line treatment of head lice. Alternative topical pediculicidal agents include malathion and benzyl alcohol, but resistance is of growing concern. In 2011, a new pediculicide, spinosad, was introduced. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to review the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, tolerability, and current place in therapy of spinosad for the treatment of head lice. METHODS: Pertinent articles and abstracts were identified through searches of MEDLINE/Ebsco and MEDLINE/Ovid from 1948 to September 2011 and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1966 to September 2011. RESULTS: Two reports described 3 trials of spinosad used for the treatment of head lice. One study (n = 120) demonstrated efficacy of both spinosad 0.5% and spinosad 1% compared with placebo, with 82.5% and 86.1% of patients free of live lice 14 days after treatment, respectively, compared with 25.6% in the placebo group (P < 0.001 for each treatment). The difference between the spinosad 0.5% and 1% treatment groups was not significant. Two trials (n = 1038) comparing spinosad 0.9% with permethrin 1% reported greater efficacy for spinosad with absence of live lice 14 days after 1 or 2 treatments for 84.6% and 86.7%, respectively, of primary cases compared with 44.9% and 42.9% with permethrin (P < 0.001 for both studies). The most common reported adverse events were eye and scalp irritation, but they were not statistically significant (P = 0.329 and P = 0.395, respectively). Only application-site erythema reactions showed statistical significance, with 6.8% in the permethrin group versus 3.1% in the spinosad group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited, the available literature suggests that spinosad is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of head lice. In a time of increasing resistance, spinosad has demonstrated superior performance compared with permethrin. A review of the literature did not identify any studies comparing spinosad to benzyl alcohol 5% or malathion 0.5%.