Optimizing pharmaceutical management of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical trials pharmacists have an essential role in managing the pharmaceutical part of interventional studies. The primary objective of this article was to provide a template for improving trials management for the growing number of studies without increasing personnel resources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between 2016 and 2020 at the service of pharmacy at Lausanne University Hospital in Switzerland. RESULTS: The number of clinical trials (in progress) managed at the pharmacy increased from 77 to 115 (+49%) between 2016 and 2020. The majority of these studies were in oncology and were sponsored by industry. Therefore, different changes in routine tasks were decided during the 5 years term to meet the above challenge. These modifications allowed to improve pharmaceutical and administrative management of clinical trials, without increasing personnel resources. The management template was accepted by the sponsors, and no issues were mentioned by national and international audit authorities. CONCLUSION: Changes could be made in the routine practice of the clinical trials pharmacists to improve the management of studies, while the number of trials is increasing every year.

First-line trastuzumab plus taxane-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: cost-minimization analysis.

AIM: To carry out a cost-minimization analysis including a comparison of the costs arising from first-line treatment by trastuzumab plus docetaxel versus trastuzumab plus paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: All consecutive patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2-postive metastatic breast cancer who were treated at Besançon University Hospital and Saint Vincent private hospital between 2001 and 2010 by first-line therapy containing trastuzumab plus taxane were retrospectively studied. Economic analysis took into account costs related to drugs, hospitalization, and healthcare travel. RESULTS: Progression-free survival difference between the two treatments was not significant (p = 0.65). First-line treatment by trastuzumab plus taxane was estimated at approximately €68,000 (p = 0.74). The drug costs represented around 70-75% of the total cost, mainly related to the use of trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: Our economic analysis shows that although the costs of the two trastuzumab plus taxane regimens are similar, they may contribute to the on-going debate about the availability and use of innovative chemotherapy drugs, in particular in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer with new therapies such as trastuzumab-DM1 and pertuzumab.

Organizing medical oncology care at a regional level and its subsequent impact on the quality of early breast cancer management: a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: One of the main measures of the French national cancer plan is to encourage physicians to work collectively, and to minimize territorial inequities in access to care by rethinking the geographical distribution of oncologists. For this reason, cancer care services are currently being reorganized at national level. A new infrastructure for multidisciplinary cancer care delivery has been put in place in our region. Patients can receive multidisciplinary health care services nearer their homes, thanks to a mobile team of oncologists. The objective of our study was to assess, using a quality approach, the impact on medical management and on the costs of treating early breast cancer, of the new regional structure for cancer care delivery. METHODS: Before-and-after study performed from 2007 to 2010, including patients treated for early breast cancer in three hospitals in the region of Franche-Comté in Eastern France. The main outcome measures were quality criteria, namely delayed treatment (>12 weeks), dose-intensity and assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy. Other outcomes were 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and economic evaluation. RESULTS: This study included 667 patients. The rate of chemotherapy tended to decrease, but not significantly (49.3% before versus 42.2% after, p=0.07), while the use of taxanes increased by 38% across all centres (59.6% before versus 98.0% after, p < 0.0001). There was a non-significant reduction in the time between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (6.0 ± 3.0 weeks before versus 5.6 ± 3.6 weeks after, p=0.11). Dose-dense chemotherapy improved slightly, albeit non significantly (86.3% versus 91.1% p=0.22) and time to treatment tended to decrease. The new regional infrastructure did not change 24-month PFS, which remained at about 96%. The average cost of treatment was estimated at € 7000, with no difference between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a shortage of oncologists, the new organization put in place in our region for the provision of care for early breast cancer makes it possible to maintain local community-based treatment, without negative economic consequences. This new structure for cancer care delivery offers cancer services of similar quality with no modification of 24-month PFS in early breast cancer.

Impact of ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) on muscle loss and protein metabolism in critically ill patients: A RCT.

PURPOSE: Muscle wasting deteriorates life quality after critical illness and increases mortality. Wasting starts upon admission to intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to determine whether ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB), a metabolite of leucine, can attenuate this process. METHODS: Prospective randomized, placebo-controlled double blind trial. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ICU patients depending on mechanical ventilation on day 3 having a functional gastrointestinal tract. They were randomized to HMB (3 g/day) or placebo (maltodextrin) from day 4 on for 30 days. PRIMARY OUTCOME: magnitude of loss of skeletal muscle area (SMA) of the quadriceps femoris measured by ultrasound at days 4 and 15. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: body composition, change in protein metabolism assessed by amino acids tracer pulse, and global health at 60 days. Data are mean [95% CI]. Statistics by ANCOVA with correction for confounders sex, age and/or BMI. RESULTS: Thirty patients completed the trial, aged 65 [59, 71] years, SAPS2 score 48 [43, 52] and SOFA 8.5 [7.4, 9.7]. The loss of total SMA was 11% between days 4 and 15 (p < 0.001), but not different between the groups (p = 0.86). In the HMB group, net protein breakdown (Δ Estimate HMB-Placebo: -153 [-242, -63]; p = 0.0021) and production of several amino acid was significantly reduced, while phase angle increased more (0.66 [0.09, 1.24]; p = 0.0247), and SF-12 global health improved more (Δ Estimate HMB-Placebo: 27.39 [1.594, 53.19], p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: HMB treatment did not significantly reduce muscle wasting over 10 days of observation (primary endpoint), but resulted in significantly improved amino acid metabolism, reduced net protein breakdown, a higher phase angle and better global health. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03628365.

First-line bevacizumab plus taxane-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: cost-minimisation analysis.

AIM: To carry out a cost minimisation analysis including a comparison of the costs arising from first-line treatment by bevacizumab plus docetaxel (BD) versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel (BP) of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). PATIENT AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative mBC and treated at Besançon University hospital between 2006 and 2010 by a first-line therapy containing bevacizumab plus taxane were retrospectively studied. Economic analysis took into account costs related to drugs, hospitalization and healthcare travel. RESULTS: Progression-free survival difference between the two treatments was insignificant (p-value=0.31). BP treatment was associated with a higher mean total cost than that of BD treatment, €53,093 ± 34,395 versus €60,196 ± 48,766, respectively. CONCLUSION: Whereas bevacizumab is recommended for first-line treatment of mBC with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, our study has shown that BD treatment is the most cost-efficient regimen. It could be an attractive option in France, with a potential cost saving of €24,000,000 per year.