Safety and immunopharmacology of ASP0892 in adults or adolescents with peanut allergy: two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: New treatment options with improved safety and novel mechanisms of actions are needed for patients with peanut allergy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of ASP0892, a peanut DNA vaccine, after intradermal (id) or intramuscular (im) administration in adult or adolescent patients with peanut allergy in two phase 1 studies. METHODS: ASP0892 or placebo was administered every 2 weeks for a total of 4 doses. The doses were 1 mg or 4 mg id or 4 mg im for adults, and 1 mg or 4 mg id for adolescents. Immunologic parameters were assessed longitudinally. RESULTS: Thirty-one adults (mean age 24.3 years, 17 males) received ASP0892 (9, 8, 8 patients for 1 mg id, 4 mg id or 4 mg im, respectively) or placebo (2 patients/group). Twenty adolescents (mean age 14.2 years, 11 males) received ASP0892 (8 patients/group) or placebo (2 patients/group). In both studies, the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was injection site pruritus. No deaths or treatment withdrawal were related to TEAEs. No serious TEAEs related to treatment were observed in adult or adolescent patients. ASP0892 treatment led to modest increases in allergen-specific IgG and/or IgG4 in adults (1 mg id, 4 mg im) and adolescents (1 mg id, 4 mg id). No improvements in clinical outcomes, including double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, were found after ASP0892 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In two phase 1 studies, ASP0892 was well tolerated with modest but not clinically relevant changes in immune responses. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT02851277, NCT03755713.

Phase 1 trial supports safety and mechanism of action of peptide immunotherapy for peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is a leading cause of anaphylaxis worldwide. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only treatment shown to modify the natural history of allergic disease, but application to food allergy has been hindered by risk of severe allergic reactions and short-lived efficacy. Allergen-derived peptides could provide a solution. PVX108 comprises seven short peptides representing immunodominant T-cell epitopes of major peanut allergens for treatment of peanut allergy. METHODS: Pre-clinical safety of PVX108 was assessed using ex vivo basophil activation tests (n = 185). Clinical safety and tolerability of single and repeat PVX108 doses were evaluated in a first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in peanut-allergic adults (46 active, 21 placebo). The repeat-dose cohort received six doses over 16 weeks with safety monitored to 21 weeks. Exploratory immunological analyses were performed at pre-dose, Week 21 and Month 18 after treatment. RESULTS: PVX108 induced negligible activation of peanut-sensitised basophils. PVX108 was safe and well tolerated in peanut-allergic adults. There were no treatment-related hypersensitivity events or AEs of clinical concern. The only events occurring more frequently in active than placebo were mild injection site reactions. Exploratory immunological analyses revealed a decrease in the ratio of ST2+ Th2A:CCR6+ Th17-like cells within the peanut-reactive Th pool which strengthened following treatment. CONCLUSION: This study supports the concept that PVX108 could provide a safe alternative to whole peanut immunotherapies and provides evidence of durable peanut-specific T-cell modulation. Translation of these findings to clinical efficacy in ongoing Phase 2 trials would provide important proof-of-concept for using peptides to treat food allergy.

Distinct trajectories distinguish antigen-specific T cells in peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Despite similar clinical symptoms, peanut-allergic (PA) individuals may respond quite differently to the same therapeutic interventions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether inherent qualities of cell response at baseline could influence response to peanut oral immunotherapy (PnOIT). METHODS: We first performed ex vivo T-cell profiling on peanut-reactive CD154+CD137+ T (pTeff) cells from 90 challenge-confirmed PA individuals. We developed a gating strategy for unbiased assessment of the phenotypic distribution of rare pTeff cells across different memory CD4+ T-cell subsets to define patient immunotype. In longitudinal samples of 29 PA participants enrolled onto the IMPACT trial of PnOIT, we determined whether patient immunotype at baseline could influence response to PnOIT. RESULTS: Our data emphasize the heterogeneity of pTeff cell responses in PA participants with 2 mutually exclusive phenotypic entities (CCR6-CRTH2+ and CCR6+CRTH2-). Our findings lead us to propose that peanut allergy can be classified broadly into at least 2 discrete subtypes, termed immunotypes, with distinct immunologic and clinical characteristics that are based on the proportion of TH2A pTeff cells. PnOIT induced elimination of TH2A pTeff cells in the context of the IMPACT clinical trial. Only 1 PA patient with a low level of TH2A pTeff cells at baseline experienced long-lasting benefit of remission after PnOIT discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Dividing PA patients according to their individual peanut-specific T-cell profile may facilitate patient stratification in clinical settings by identifying which immunotypes might respond best to different therapies.

Oral desensitization therapy for peanut allergy induces dynamic changes in peanut-specific immune responses.

BACKGROUND: The PALISADE study, an international, phase 3 trial of peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) with AR101, resulted in desensitization in children and adolescents who were highly allergic to peanut. An improved understanding of the immune mechanism induced in response to food allergen immunotherapy would enable more informed and effective therapeutic strategies. Our main purpose was to examine the immunological changes in blood samples from a subset of peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral desensitization immunotherapy with AR101. METHODS: Blood samples obtained as part of enrollment screening and at multiple time points during PALISADE study were used to assess basophil and CD4+ T-cell reactivity to peanut. RESULTS: The absence of clinical reactivity to the entry double-blinded placebo-controlled peanut challenge (DBPCFC) was accompanied by a significantly lower basophil sensitivity and T-cell reactivity to peanut compared with DBPCFC reactors. At baseline, peanut-reactive TH2A cells were observed in many but not all peanut-allergic patients and their level in peripheral blood correlates with T-cell reactivity to peanut and with serum peanut-specific IgE and IgG4 levels. POIT reshaped circulating peanut-reactive T-cell responses in a subset-dependent manner. Changes in basophil and T-cell responses to peanut closely paralleled clinical benefits to AR101 therapy and resemble responses in those with lower clinical sensitivity to peanut. However, no difference in peanut-reactive Treg cell frequency was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: Oral desensitization therapy with AR101 leads to decreased basophil sensitivity to peanut and reshapes peanut-reactive T effector cell responses supporting its potential as an immunomodulatory therapy.

Optimal human pathogenic TH2 cell effector function requires local epithelial cytokine signaling.

BACKGROUND: IL-33 is an emerging key factor in development of allergic diseases. The IL-33 receptor (suppressor of tumorigenicity [ST2]) is a differentially expressed gene in pathogenic TH2 cells, but its role in T-cell effector function has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of IL-33 in modulating circulating allergen-specific T-cell responses. We hypothesized that selective ST2 expression on allergen-specific CD4+ T cells would confer susceptibility to the effects of IL-33. METHODS: PBMCs from subjects with food allergy, inhalant allergy, and no allergy were obtained on the basis of clinical history and serum IgE level. A T-cell receptor-dependent CD154 upregulation assay and direct peptide major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer staining were used to profile allergen-specific CD4+ T cells by flow cytometry. Allergen-specific CD4+ T cell cytokine production was evaluated during IL-33 exposure. ST2 expression was also tracked by using a 2-color flow-based assay. RESULTS: ST2 expression on peripheral allergen-specific CD4+ T cells was confined to subjects with allergy and restricted to TH2A cells. Comparison between direct peptide major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer staining and the CD154 functional assay identified ST2 as a marker of TH2A cell activation. IL-33 exposure enhanced IL-4 and IL-5 secretion in allergen-reactive TH2A cells. Allergen-induced ST2 expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells can be used to track allergen-reactive TH2A cells from donors with allergy. CONCLUSION: ST2 expression on circulating CD4+ T cells represents a transient phenotype associated with TH2A cell activation, allowing these cells to sense locally elicited tissue cytokines. IL-33 selectively amplifies pathogenic TH2 cell effector functions, suggesting a tissue checkpoint that may regulate adaptive allergic immunity.

Clinical and immunological evaluation of cat-allergic asthmatics living with or without a cat.

BACKGROUND: Characterising the clinical and immunological impact of daily cat exposure in cat-allergic subjects with asthma who live with cats (WC) and those who do not (WoC) may provide understanding of the drivers of the allergic response. METHODS: Clinical and immunological characteristics (skin prick test, spirometry, symptom assessments, immunological markers) were compared between asthmatic subjects WC (n = 10) and WoC (n = 9). RESULTS: WC subjects had greater use of long-acting beta agonists (p < .05) and high-potency corticosteroids. No differences were observed in lung function, nasal and ocular symptoms, or asthma control between the groups. Cat dander- and Fel d 1-specific IgG4 concentrations were higher in WC than WoC subjects (both p < .05). Total IgE and cat dander-, Fel d 1- and Fel d 7-specific IgE concentrations were similar, but Fel d 4-sIgE was higher in WC subjects (p < .05) versus WoC. Basophil sensitivity to cat dander extract and Fel d 1 was lower in WC versus WoC subjects (p < .05) and correlated with higher IgG4 concentrations (r = 0.63; p = .009). Fel d 1-specific CD4+ T-cell responses polarised toward Th2A responses in WC versus WoC subjects; Fel d 1-specific IgE correlated with surface expression of CRTH2 and CD200R (both p ≤ .05). CONCLUSION: Immunological differences observed in WC versus WoC did not reflect clinical tolerance with natural cat exposure. The ability to live with a cat despite allergy could be driven by higher preventative medication use. This study may support design of novel therapeutics for allergy management.

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Expanded Clones of Islet Antigen-Reactive CD4+ T Cells in Peripheral Blood of Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes.

The significance of islet Ag-reactive T cells found in peripheral blood of type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects is unclear, partly because similar cells are also found in healthy control (HC) subjects. We hypothesized that key disease-associated cells would show evidence of prior Ag exposure, inferred from expanded TCR clonotypes, and essential phenotypic properties in their transcriptomes. To test this, we developed single-cell RNA sequencing procedures for identifying TCR clonotypes and transcript phenotypes in individual T cells. We applied these procedures to analysis of islet Ag-reactive CD4+ memory T cells from the blood of T1D and HC individuals after activation with pooled immunodominant islet peptides. We found extensive TCR clonotype sharing in Ag-activated cells, especially from individual T1D subjects, consistent with in vivo T cell expansion during disease progression. The expanded clonotype from one T1D subject was detected at repeat visits spanning >15 mo, demonstrating clonotype stability. Notably, we found no clonotype sharing between subjects, indicating a predominance of "private" TCR specificities. Expanded clones from two T1D subjects recognized distinct IGRP peptides, implicating this molecule as a trigger for CD4+ T cell expansion. Although overall transcript profiles of cells from HC and T1D subjects were similar, profiles from the most expanded clones were distinctive. Our findings demonstrate that islet Ag-reactive CD4+ memory T cells with unique Ag specificities and phenotypes are expanded during disease progression and can be detected by single-cell analysis of peripheral blood.

Immune mechanisms of oral immunotherapy.

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has demonstrated reproducibly successful desensitization in patients with food allergy completing clinical trials and, in some studies, sustained unresponsiveness. These clinical outcomes have been associated with characteristic modifications in the allergen-specific immune response, but a detailed synthesis of OIT's mechanisms of action is lacking. In this rostrum we review the current evidence regarding the human immune response to OIT, explore possible mechanisms, and identify knowledge gaps for future research.

Synchronous immune alterations mirror clinical response during allergen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Three years of treatment with either sublingual or subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy has been shown to be effective and to induce long-term tolerance. The Gauging Response in Allergic Rhinitis to Sublingual and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (GRASS) trial demonstrated that 2 years of treatment through either route was effective in suppressing the response to nasal allergen challenge, although it was insufficient for inhibition 1 year after discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine in the GRASS trial the time course of immunologic changes during 2 years of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy and for 1 year after treatment discontinuation. METHODS: We performed multimodal immunomonitoring to assess allergen-specific CD4 T-cell properties in parallel with analysis of local mucosal cytokine responses induced by nasal allergen exposure and humoral immune responses that included IgE-dependent basophil activation and measurement of serum inhibitory activity for allergen-IgE binding to B cells (IgE-facilitated allergen binding). RESULTS: All 3 of these distinct arms of the immune response displayed significant and coordinate alterations during 2 years of allergen desensitization, followed by reversal at 3 years, reflecting a lack of a durable immunologic effect. Although frequencies of antigen-specific TH2 cells in peripheral blood determined by using HLA class II tetramer analysis most closely paralleled clinical outcomes, IgE antibody-dependent functional assays remained inhibited in part 1 year after discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Two years of allergen immunotherapy were effective but insufficient for long-term tolerance. Allergen-specific TH2 cells most closely paralleled the transient clinical outcome, and it is likely that recurrence of the T-cell drivers of allergic immunity abrogated the potential for durable tolerance. On the other hand, the persistence of IgE blocking antibody 1 year after discontinuation might be an early indicator of a protolerogenic mechanism.

Human Immune Monitoring Techniques during Food Allergen Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Encouraging results from recent food allergen immunotherapy clinical trials indicate that the immune system plays an essential role in peripheral tolerance to food allergen. Thus, the monitoring of changes in immune responses and their possible correlation with clinical outcome in allergic patients receiving immunotherapies could theoretically serve as surrogate markers and be harnessed as rationale for food allergen immunotherapy development. RECENT FINDINGS: A shift towards antigen specificity in recent assays has provided a solid foundation for the elucidation of cellular mechanisms involved in food allergen immunotherapy as well as the tracking of allergen-specific immune cells. In this review, we overview the current challenges and technologies used in immune monitoring during immunotherapy in allergic patients with a focus on cell-mediated immunity. We also discuss critical steps involved in some of the cellular immune assays utilized in clinical trials.

Chronic cat allergen exposure induces a TH2 cell-dependent IgG4 response related to low sensitization.

BACKGROUND: In human subjects, allergen tolerance has been observed after high-dose allergen exposure or after completed allergen immunotherapy, which is related to the accumulation of anti-inflammatory IgG4. However, the specific T-cell response that leads to IgG4 induction during chronic allergen exposure remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between cat allergen-specific T-cell frequency, cat allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 titers, and clinical status in adults with cat allergy with and without cat ownership and the cellular mechanism by which IgG4 is produced. METHODS: Fel d 1-, Fel d 4-, Fel d 7-, and Fel d 8-specific T-cell responses were characterized by CD154 expression after antigen stimulation. RESULTS: In allergic subjects without cat ownership, the frequency of cat allergen (Fel d 1 and Fel d 4)-specific TH2 (sTH2) cells correlates with higher IgE levels and is linked to asthma. Paradoxically, we observed that subjects with cat allergy and chronic cat exposure maintain a high frequency of sTH2 cells, which correlates with higher IgG4 levels and low sensitization. B cells from allergic, but not nonallergic subjects, are able to produce IgG4 after cognate interactions with sTH2 clones and Fel d 1 peptide or the Fel d 1 recombinant protein. CONCLUSION: These experiments suggest that (1) allergen-experienced B cells with the capacity to produce IgG4 are present in allergic subjects and (2) cat allergen exposure induces an IgG4 response in a TH2 cell-dependent manner. Thus IgG4 accumulation could be mediated by chronic activation of the TH2 response, which in turn drives desensitization.

Biomarkers for antigen immunotherapy in allergy and type 1 diabetes.

Allergy and type 1 diabetes are immune mediated diseases that, despite being etiologically distinct, each have inappropriate activation and effector function of antigen-specific T cells in the pathogenic process. Understanding changes in the frequency and phenotype of these cells is critical to improve assessment of disease diagnosis and prognosis and effectively assess immunological response to therapy. In the setting of antigen-specific therapy in allergy and type 1 diabetes, assays to monitor the immunological mechanisms of disease have been improving in recent years, and we are getting closer to an accurate understanding of how the cellular immune response is modulated during treatment. In this review, we summarize the current state of cell-based immune monitoring of antigen therapy trials. We then discuss emerging advances in antigen-specific biomarkers that are transforming our knowledge about allergy and that have the potential to dramatically impact our understanding of T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes.

Specific immunotherapy modifies allergen-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses in an epitope-dependent manner.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the mechanisms by which the immune system induces and controls allergic inflammation at the T-cell epitope level is critical for the design of new allergy vaccine strategies. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize allergen-specific T-cell responses linked with allergy or peripheral tolerance and to determine how CD4(+) T-cell responses to individual allergen-derived epitopes change over allergen-specific immunotherapy. METHODS: Timothy grass pollen (TGP) allergy was used as a model for studying grass pollen allergies. The breadth, magnitude, epitope hierarchy, and phenotype of the DR04:01-restricted TGP-specific T-cell responses in 10 subjects with grass pollen allergy, 5 nonatopic subjects, and 6 allergy vaccine-treated subjects was determined by using an ex vivo peptide-MHC class II tetramer approach. RESULTS: CD4(+) T cells in allergic subjects are directed to a broad range of TGP epitopes characterized by defined immunodominance hierarchy patterns and with distinct functional profiles that depend on the epitope recognized. Epitopes that are restricted specifically to either TH2 or TH1/TR1 responses were identified. Allergen-specific immunotherapy was associated with preferential deletion of allergen-specific TH2 cells and without a significant change in the frequency of TH1/TR1 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Preferential allergen-specific TH2 cell deletion after repeated high-dose antigen stimulation can be another independent mechanism to restore tolerance to allergen during immunotherapy.

Mechanisms and Predictive Biomarkers of Allergen Immunotherapy in the Clinic.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains to be the only disease-modifying treatment for IgE-mediated allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis. It can provide long-term clinical benefits when given for 3 years or longer. Mechanisms of immune tolerance induction by AIT are underscored by the modulation of several compartments within the immune system. These include repair of disruption in epithelial barrier integrity, modulation of the innate immune compartment that includes regulatory dendritic cells and innate lymphoid cells, and adaptive immune compartments such as induction of regulatory T and B cells. Altogether, these are also associated with the dampening of allergen-specific TH2 and T follicular helper cell responses and subsequent generation of blocking antibodies. Although AIT is effective in modifying the immune response, there is a lack of validated and clinically relevant biomarkers that can be used to monitor desensitization, efficacy, and the likelihood of response, all of which can contribute to accelerating personalized medication and increasing patient care. Candidate biomarkers comprise humoral, cellular, metabolic, and in vivo biomarkers; however, these are primarily studied in small trials and require further validation. In this review, we evaluate the current candidates of biomarkers of AIT and how we can implement changes in future studies to help us identify clinically relevant biomarkers of safety, compliance, and efficacy.

Differentiation stage determines pathologic and protective allergen-specific CD4+ T-cell outcomes during specific immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The main obstacle to elucidating the role of CD4(+) T cells in allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) has been the absence of an adequately sensitive approach to directly characterize rare allergen-specific T cells without introducing substantial phenotypic modifications by means of in vitro amplification. OBJECTIVE: We sought to monitor, in physiological conditions, the allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells generated during natural pollen exposure and during allergy vaccination. METHODS: Alder pollen allergy was used as a model for studying seasonal allergies. Allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells were tracked and characterized in 12 subjects with alder pollen allergy, 6 nonallergic subjects, and 9 allergy vaccine-treated subjects by using peptide-MHC class II tetramers. RESULTS: Allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells were detected in all of the subjects with alder pollen allergy and nonallergic subjects tested. Pathogenic responses--chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule expressed on T(H)2 lymphocytes (CRTH2) expression and T(H)2 cytokine production--are specifically associated with terminally differentiated (CD27(-)) allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells, which dominate in allergic subjects but are absent in nonallergic subjects. In contrast, CD27(+) allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells are present at low frequencies in both allergic and nonallergic subjects and reflect classical features of the protective immune response with high expression of IL-10 and IFN-γ. Restoration of a protective response during SIT appears to be due to the preferential deletion of pathogenic (CD27(-)) allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells accompanied by IL-10 induction in surviving CD27(+) allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Differentiation stage divides allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells into 2 distinct subpopulations with unique functional properties and different fates during SIT.

T cells specific to multiple Bet v 1 peptides are highly cross-reactive toward the corresponding peptides from the homologous group of tree pollens.

Background: Allergens from Fagales trees frequently cause spring allergy in Europe, North America, and some parts of Asia. The definition of the birch homologous group, which includes birch (Bet v), oak (Que a), alder (Aln g), hazel (Cor a), hornbeam (Car b), beech (Fag s), and chestnut (Cas s), is based on high allergen sequence identity and extensive IgE cross-reactivity. Clinical effect was seen during the alder/hazel, birch, and oak pollen seasons after treatment with tree SLIT-tablets containing only birch allergen extract. Here, we characterize T-cell reactivity with respect to epitope specificities and cross-reactivity toward various Bet v 1 family members, (PR-10/group 1 major allergens). This cross-reactivity may be part of the immunological basis of clinical effect or cross-protection when exposed to birch homologous tree species. Method: T-cell lines were generated from 29 birch-allergic individuals through stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with birch/Bet v or oak/Que a allergen extracts. T-cell responses to allergen extracts, purified group 1 allergens, and overlapping 20-mer peptides (Bet v 1, Aln g 1, Cor a 1, and Que a 1) were investigated by T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. Cross-reactivity was evaluated based on Pearson's correlations of response strength and further investigated by flow cytometry using tetramer staining for homologous peptide pairs. Results: T-cell reactivity toward extracts and group 1 allergens from across the birch homologous group was observed for birch/Bet v as well as oak/Que a T-cell lines. T-cell lines responded to multiple Bet v 1 homologous peptides from Aln g 1 and Cor a 1 and a subset of Que a 1 peptides. Significant Pearson's correlations between frequently recognized peptides derived from Bet v 1 and the corresponding peptides derived from alder, hazel, and oak strongly supported the T-cell cross-reactivity toward these allergens. Cross-reactivity between birch and birch homologous peptides was confirmed by pMHCII tetramer staining. Conclusion: T cells from birch tree pollen allergic individuals respond to multiple trees within the birch homologous group in accordance with the level of sequence homology between Bet v 1 family members, (PR-10 allergens) from these allergen sources, confirming the basis for clinical cross-protection.

Ara h 1-reactive T cells in individuals with peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Effective immunotherapy for peanut allergy is hampered by a lack of understanding of peanut-reactive CD4(+) T cells. OBJECTIVE: To identify, characterize, and track Ara h 1-reactive cells in subjects with peanut allergy by using Ara h 1-specific class II tetramers. METHODS: Tetramer-guided epitope mapping was used to identify the antigenic peptides within the peanut allergen Ara h 1. Subsequently, HLA class II/Ara h 1-specific tetramers were used to determine the frequency and phenotype of Ara h 1-reactive T cells in subjects with peanut allergy. Cytokine profiles of Ara h 1-reactive T cells were also determined. RESULTS: Multiple Ara h 1 epitopes with defined HLA restriction were identified. Ara h 1-specific CD4(+) T cells were detected in all of the subjects with peanut allergy tested. Ara h 1-reactive T cells in subjects with allergy expressed CCR4 but did not express CRTH2. The percentage of Ara h1-reactive cells that expressed the ß7 integrin was low compared with total CD4(+) T cells. Ara h 1- reactive cells that secreted IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-17 were detected. CONCLUSION: In individuals with peanut allergy, Ara h 1-reactive T cells occurred at moderate frequencies, were predominantly CCR4(+) memory cells, and produced IL-4. Class II tetramers can be readily used to detect Ara h 1-reactive T cells in the peripheral blood of subjects with peanut allergy without in vitro expansion and would be effective for tracking peanut-reactive CD4(+) T cells during immunotherapy.

Activation of natural regulatory T cells by IgG Fc-derived peptide "Tregitopes".

We have identified at least 2 highly promiscuous major histocompatibility complex class II T-cell epitopes in the Fc fragment of IgG that are capable of specifically activating CD4(+)CD25(Hi)FoxP3(+) natural regulatory T cells (nT(Regs)). Coincubation of these regulatory T-cell epitopes or "Tregitopes" and antigens with peripheral blood mononuclear cells led to a suppression of effector cytokine secretion, reduced proliferation of effector T cells, and caused an increase in cell surface markers associated with T(Regs) such as FoxP3. In vivo administration of the murine homologue of the Fc region Tregitope resulted in suppression of immune response to a known immunogen. These data suggest that one mechanism for the immunosuppressive activity of IgG, such as with IVIG, may be related to the activity of regulatory T cells. In this model, regulatory T-cell epitopes in IgG activate a subset of nT(Regs) that tips the resulting immune response toward tolerance rather than immunogenicity.