Impact of a clinical pharmacist on provider prescribing patterns in a primary care clinic.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, these agents are still underutilized in primary care practice. A clinical pharmacist was embedded at a primary care clinic to provide diabetes and hypertension management under a collaborative practice agreement with a supervising physician. OBJECTIVES: This study will evaluate whether the presence of an embedded pharmacist in a primary care clinic affects prescribing patterns of novel, evidence-based diabetes therapies. METHODS: We abstracted information on SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing patterns from 3 primary care clinics across 2 time periods as a single-center, retrospective cohort study. We used a difference-in-difference analysis to compare prescription rates and assess the impact of embedding the pharmacist into clinical practice. Prescriptions written by the pharmacist were excluded. RESULTS: Across all 3 clinics, 1309 and 1489 patients were included in the pre-intervention and postintervention periods, respectively. The percentage of patients prescribed either an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist, similar between both groups at baseline, rose to 11.6% in the nonintervention clinics and 15.0% in the intervention clinic. There was a statistically significant increase in SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing in the intervention clinic compared with nonintervention clinics (P = 0.034). This change in prescribing patterns appeared even greater when excluding prescribers who were not present during both pre-intervention and postintervention periods (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The presence of a pharmacist is associated with increased SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing within a clinic, even in patients not seen directly by the pharmacist. These results suggest that an on-site clinical pharmacist providing care for patients with diabetes may indirectly influence the prescribing behavior of co-located primary care providers, increasing the adoption of novel noninsulin diabetic medications.

Patient errors in use of injectable antidiabetic medications: A need for improved clinic-based education.

OBJECTIVES: This case series was designed to educate and inform health care professionals on the importance of providing adequate education on injectable antidiabetic agents and highlighting common medication errors related to diabetes care seen in ambulatory practice. The discussion following case descriptions will attempt to characterize patients who may be at high risk for these errors and identify ways to reduce the potential for error. CASE SUMMARY: In a diabetes care clinic, 4 cases were identified in which the patient experienced an escalation of insulin or other injectable antidiabetic medication doses with no improvement in glycemic control. Two of the cases involved failure to remove an inner needle cap because of a poor understanding of pen use. One case was attributed to switching formulations without providing proper education for an adult patient with a learning impairment, and the other was attributed to suboptimal absorption of insulin doses from lipohypertrophy. Three of the 4 cases resulted in multiple instances of hypoglycemia, and all 4 patients exhibited markedly improved glycemic control once the injection error was corrected. The clinic pharmacist played an essential role in identifying and correcting administration errors within an interdisciplinary team. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Based on the observations from the 4 cases, clinicians should be prompted to review antidiabetic medication injection techniques before initiation and periodically thereafter with their patients. Factors that should prompt further education include low health literacy, language barrier, initiation of medication by another provider, switch of medication product or formulation, obvious discrepancies between refill history and patient's self-reported adherence, observed lipohypertrophy, and escalation of doses without any improvement in glycemic control. A referral to the clinic pharmacist should be considered to provide more detailed education for these patients.