Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 44(1): 102-110, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31939890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in restaging of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on qualified studies. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE database were searched by the index words to identify the qualified studies, and relevant literature sources were also searched. The latest research was done in April 2019. Heterogeneity of the included studies was tested, which was used to select proper effect model to calculate pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analyses were also performed. RESULT: Nineteen studies with 1262 patients were involved in the meta-analysis exploring the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for rectal cancer. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in T3-T4 rectal cancer was as follows: sensitivity, 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-90%); specificity, 67% (95% CI, 51%-80%); positive likelihood ratio, 2.48 (95% CI, 1.57-3.91); negative likelihood ratio, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.15-0.52); global DOR, 6.86 (95% CI, 3.07-15.30); the area under the SROC was high (0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.84). The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in lymphatic metastasis of rectal cancer was as follows: sensitivity, 77% (95% CI, 65%-86%); specificity, 77% (95% CI, 63%-87%); positive likelihood ratio, 3.40 (95% CI, 2.07-5.59); negative likelihood ratio, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.20-0.45); DOR, 10.81 (95% CI, 4.99-23.39); area under the SROC was high (0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies of MRI for rectal cancer. The results indicate that MRI is a highly accurate diagnostic tool for rectal cancer T3-T4 staging and N staging but sensitivity and specificity are not high.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Razão de Chances , Curva ROC , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao ; 40(5): 705-709, 2018 Oct 30.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30404706

RESUMO

The development and metastasis of uterine tumors depend highly on tumor angiogenesis. Multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can quantitatively describe the hemodynamic changes of uterine tumors based on a variety of tracer kinetic models and time-signal curves and by simulating the distribution of contrast inside and outside the blood vessels. Functional parameters can accurately and noninvasively assess tumor angiogenesis. It provides a non-invasive functional evaluation method for the differential diagnosis,staging,response evaluation,and prognostic prediction of uterine tumors.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neovascularização Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Perfusão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA