Long-term results of minimally invasive strip craniectomy without helmet therapy for scaphocephaly - a single-centre experience.

Scaphocephaly is the most common type of craniosynostosis and various surgical techniques are used for treatment. Due to late postoperative changes of the head shape, long-term outcome data is important for evaluating any new surgical technique. At our institution, minimally invasive strip craniectomy without regular helmet therapy is the standard treatment in scaphocephalic patients. Between October 2021 and February 2023, we retrospectively examined the skull shape of patients who underwent minimally invasive strip craniectomy for scaphocephaly using a 3D surface scan technique. The cephalic index (CI), the need for helmet therapy and additional cosmetic outcome parameters were investigated. We included 70 patients (72.5% male). The mean follow-up time was 46 (10-125) months and the mean CI was 75.7 (66.7-85.2). In 58 patients, the final cosmetic result was rated as "excellent/good" (mean CI: 76.3; 70.4-85.0), in 11 as "intermediate" (mean CI: 73.3; 66.7-77.6), and in one case as "unsatisfactory" (CI 69.3). The presence of a suboccipital protrusion was associated with a "less than good" outcome. The CI correlated significantly with the overall outcome, the presence of frontal bossing, and the interval between scan and surgery (age at scan). Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is an elegant and safe method to correct scaphocephaly. Our data show good cosmetic results in the long term even without regular postoperative helmet therapy.

Cortico-cortical evoked potentials of language tracts in minimally invasive glioma surgery guided by Penfield stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the feasibility of recording cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) in patients with low- and high-grade glioma. We compared CCEPs during awake and asleep surgery, as well as those stimulated from the functional Broca area and recorded from the functional Wernicke area (BtW), and vice versa (WtB). We also analyzed CCEP properties according to tumor location, histopathology, and aphasia. METHODS: We included 20 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery in an asleep-awake-asleep setting. Strip electrode placement was guided by classical Penfield stimulation of positive language sites and fiber tracking of the arcuate fascicle. CCEPs were elicited with alternating monophasic single pulses of 1.1 Hz frequency and recorded as averaged signals. Intraoperatively, there was no post-processing of the signal. RESULTS: Ninety-seven CCEPs from 19 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in CCEP properties when comparing awake versus asleep, nor BtW versus WtB. CCEP amplitude and latency were affected by tumor location and histopathology. CCEP features after tumor resection correlated with short- and long-term postoperative aphasia. CONCLUSION: CCEP recordings are feasible during minimally invasive surgery. CCEPs might be surrogate markers for altered connectivity of the language tracts. SIGNIFICANCE: This study may guide the incorporation of CCEPs into intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.