Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(3): 277-286, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598830

RESUMO

PURPOSE: CT-guided MWA is a safe and effective tool that should be utilized in the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs). We aim to clarify the utility of CT-guided MWA by examining patient outcomes such as recurrence, treatment success, changes in renal function, and complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with SRMs who underwent same day renal mass biopsy (RMB) and CT-guided MWA between 2015 and 2022 was performed. Treatment safety was assessed by 30-day complications according to the Clavien-Dindo system and change in eGFR >30 days post-procedure. Treatment efficacy was defined by local recurrence and incomplete treatment rates and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 108 renal masses were found in 104 patients. The overall complication rate was 7.4% (8/108), of which 4 were major complications (3.7%). For those with renal function available >30 days post ablation, the median eGFR was 47.2 (IQR: 36.0, 57), compared to 52.3 (IQR: 43.7, 61.5) pre-ablation, p<0.0001. 5-year local recurrence free survival was 86%. Among those with biopsy proven malignancy (n= 66), there were five local recurrences (7.54%) occurring at a median of 25.1 months (IQR 19.9, 36.2) and one case (1.5%) of incomplete treatment. CONCLUSIONS: As the medical field continues to evolve towards less invasive interventions, MWA offers a valuable tool in the management of renal masses. With low major complication and recurrence rates, our findings support the utility of CT-guided MWA as a tool for treatment of SRMs.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Ablação , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Técnicas de Ablação/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Ablação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos
2.
Cancer Med ; 13(12): e7301, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923853

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine the effect of region of residence (urban vs. rural) on the odds of receiving standard of care treatment for locally advanced BCa in Louisiana and its impact on survival outcomes. METHODS: Using the Louisiana Tumor Registry, we identified American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II or III, BCa diagnoses in Louisiana residents between 2010 and 2020. Treatment received was classified as standard or non-standard of care according to American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines and location of residence was determined using Rural Urban Commuting Area-Tract-level 2010 (RUCA). Multivariable logistic regression analyses and multivariate cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 983 eligible patients, 85.6% (841/983) lived in urban areas. Overall, only 37.5% received standard-of-care (SOC) for the definitive management of locally advanced bladder cancer. Individuals living in rural areas (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31-0.91, p = 0.02) were less likely to receive standard of care treatment. Both rural residence and receipt of non-standard of care therapy were associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer-specific (adj HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.09-2.14, p = 0.01 and adj HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.43-2.39, <0.0001) and overall mortality (adj HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01-1.61, p = 0.04 and adj HR: 1.73 95% CI: 1.44-2.07, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with locally advanced bladder cancer in Louisiana do not receive SOC therapy. Individuals living in rural locations are more likely to receive non-standard of care therapy than individuals in urban areas. Nonstandard of care treatment and rural residence are both associated with worse survival outcomes for Louisiana residents with locally advanced bladder cancer.


Assuntos
População Rural , Padrão de Cuidado , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Louisiana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Bladder Cancer ; 8(2): 193-209, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38993364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The benefit of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Perform a comprehensive contemporary literature review on the benefit of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 1990 to April 20, 2020 were queried for relevant articles published in English. Each article was evaluated by at least two content experts prior to inclusion which were blinded to the other's evaluation. A third content expert was used when there was not a unanimous decision. Additional articles were added at the discretion of the authors. RESULTS: Long-term survival is possible in patients with initially unresectable and/or limited metastatic disease. Multi-modal therapy with chemotherapy and surgery have the most favorable outcomes when compared to single treatment modalities in selected populations. Patients who demonstrate a robust response to pre-surgical therapy are likely to benefit the most from consolidative surgery. Patients with distant metastatic disease may benefit from consolidative surgery; however, this benefit may only be seen in those with metastatic disease limited to one site. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer either in the setting of surgery alone, consolidative therapy or coupled with adjuvant therapy may be beneficial in well selected patients and should generally be limited to those who have a response to primary chemotherapy. Randomized clinical control trials are needed to further our understanding of the role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer.

4.
Urol Pract ; 11(5): 880-881, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913577

Assuntos
Humanos
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 50(3): 277-286, May-June 2024. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1558082

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: CT-guided MWA is a safe and effective tool that should be utilized in the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs). We aim to clarify the utility of CT-guided MWA by examining patient outcomes such as recurrence, treatment success, changes in renal function, and complications. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with SRMs who underwent same day renal mass biopsy (RMB) and CT-guided MWA between 2015 and 2022 was performed. Treatment safety was assessed by 30-day complications according to the Clavien-Dindo system and change in eGFR >30 days post-procedure. Treatment efficacy was defined by local recurrence and incomplete treatment rates and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 108 renal masses were found in 104 patients. The overall complication rate was 7.4% (8/108), of which 4 were major complications (3.7%). For those with renal function available >30 days post ablation, the median eGFR was 47.2 (IQR: 36.0, 57), compared to 52.3 (IQR: 43.7, 61.5) pre-ablation, p<0.0001. 5-year local recurrence free survival was 86%. Among those with biopsy proven malignancy (n= 66), there were five local recurrences (7.54%) occurring at a median of 25.1 months (IQR 19.9, 36.2) and one case (1.5%) of incomplete treatment. Conclusions: As the medical field continues to evolve towards less invasive interventions, MWA offers a valuable tool in the management of renal masses. With low major complication and recurrence rates, our findings support the utility of CT-guided MWA as a tool for treatment of SRMs.

6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(3): 468-477, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012330

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: To determine the impact of time from biopsy to surgery on outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) as the optimal interval between prostate biopsy and RP is unknown. Material and methods: We identified 7, 350 men who underwent RP at our institution between 1994 and 2012 and had a prostate biopsy within one year of surgery. Patients were grouped into five time intervals for analysis: ≤ 3 weeks, 4-6 weeks, 7-12 weeks, 12-26 weeks, and > 26 weeks. Oncologic outcomes were stratified by NCCN disease risk for comparison. The associations of time interval with clinicopathologic features and survival were evaluated using multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses. Results: Median time from biopsy to surgery was 61 days (IQR 37, 84). Median follow-up after RP was 7.1 years (IQR 4.2, 11.7) while the overall perioperative complication rate was 19.7% (1,448/7,350). Adjusting for pre-operative variables, men waiting 12-26 weeks until RP had the highest likelihood of nerve sparing (OR: 1.45, p = 0.02) while those in the 4-6 week group had higher overall complications (OR: 1.33, p = 0.01). High risk men waiting more than 6 months had higher rates of biochemical recurrence (HR: 3.38, p = 0.05). Limitations include the retrospective design. Conclusions: Surgery in the 4-6 week time period after biopsy is associated with higher complications. There appears to be increased biochemical recurrence rates in delaying RP after biopsy, for men with both low and high risk disease.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Biópsia , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Variância , Resultado do Tratamento , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Medição de Risco , Progressão da Doença , Gradação de Tumores , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
7.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(6): 1144-1149, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-828944

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) represents a challenging clinical entity. While various intravesical agents have been utilized in this setting, limited data exist regarding safety or efficacy. Herein, then, we evaluated the effectiveness and complications associated with intravesical alum instillation for HC in a contemporary cohort. Materials and Methods: We identified 40 patients treated with intravesical alum for HC between 1997-2014. All patients had failed previous continuous bladder irrigation with normal saline and clot evacuation. Treatment success was defined as requiring no additional therapy beyond normal saline irrigation after alum instillation. Results: Median patient age was 76.5 years (IQR 69, 83). Pelvic radiation was the most common etiology for HC (n=38, 95%). Alum use decreased patient's transfusion requirement, with 82% (32/39) receiving a transfusion within 30 days before alum instillation (median 4 units) versus 59% (23/39) within 30 days after completing alum (median 3 units) (p=0.05). In total, 24 patients (60%) required no additional therapy prior to hospital discharge. Moreover, at a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 5, 38.5), 13 patients (32.5%) remained without additional treatment for HC. Adverse effects were reported in 15 patients (38%), with bladder spasms representing the most common event (14/40; 35%). No clinical evidence of clinically significant systemic absorption was detected. Conclusion: Intravesical alum therapy is well-tolerated, with resolution of HC in approximately 60% of patients, and a durable response in approximately one-third. Given its favorable safety/efficacy profile, intravesical alum may be considered as a first-line treatment option for patients with HC.


Assuntos
Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Alúmen/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravesical , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Resultado do Tratamento , Cistite/complicações , Compostos de Alúmen/efeitos adversos , Alumínio/sangue , Hemorragia/etiologia , Irrigação Terapêutica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA