Patient satisfaction with ultrasound, whole-body CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative ovarian cancer staging: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: In addition to the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods, patient-reported satisfaction with imaging methods is important. OBJECTIVE: To report a secondary outcome of the prospective international multicenter Imaging Study in Advanced ovArian Cancer (ISAAC Study), detailing patients' experience with abdomino-pelvic ultrasound, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) for pre-operative ovarian cancer work-up. METHODS: In total, 144 patients with suspected ovarian cancer at four institutions in two countries (Italy, Czech Republic) underwent ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI for pre-operative work-up between January 2020 and November 2022. After having undergone all three examinations, the patients filled in a questionnaire evaluating their overall experience and experience in five domains: preparation before the examination, duration of examination, noise during the procedure, radiation load of CT, and surrounding space. Pain perception, examination-related patient-perceived unexpected, unpleasant, or dangerous events ('adverse events'), and preferred method were also noted. RESULTS: Ultrasound was the preferred method by 49% (70/144) of responders, followed by CT (38%, 55/144), and WB-DWI/MRI (13%, 19/144) (p<0.001). The poorest experience in all domains was reported for WB-DWI/MRI, which was also associated with the largest number of patients who reported adverse events (eg, dyspnea). Patients reported higher levels of pain during the ultrasound examination than during CT and WB-DWI/MRI (p<0.001): 78% (112/144) reported no pain or mild pain, 19% (27/144) moderate pain, and 3% (5/144) reported severe pain (pain score >7 of 10) during the ultrasound examination. We did not identify any factors related to patients' preferred method. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound was the imaging method preferred by most patients despite being associated with more pain during the examination in comparison with CT and WB-DWI/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03808792.

Sarcopenia in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Cabozantinib.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is common in advanced cancer and correlates with poor performance status, increased risk of treatment-related toxicity, and shortened survival. Inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway have been associated with development or deterioration of sarcopenia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and impact of sarcopenia on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with cabozantinib, a novel, highly potent multikinase inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with cabozantinib for mRCC progressing on other targeted therapies with available computed tomography (CT) scans acquired at the time of initiation of cabozantinib and on the first restaging were evaluated retrospectively. Muscle mass was assessed based on striated muscle area at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. RESULTS: The median muscle mass index at CT1 and CT2 was 52.2 cm2/m2 (range 33.0-69.2 cm2/m2) and 49.1 cm2/m2 (range 33.1-68.2 cm2/m2), respectively. Sarcopenia was initially present in 13 (44.8%) patients. The mean muscle mass change between CT1 and CT2 was - 2.2 cm2/m2 (range - 10.1 to + 4.8cm2/m2). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with at least 10% muscle loss, reaching 50% (95% CI 9.9-90) versus 79.8% (95% CI 62.1-90.6) in others (p = 0.022). The presence of initial sarcopenia was not associated with grade 3-4 toxicity, which was reported in six (46.2%) and seven (46.7%) patients with and without sarcopenia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant and early skeletal muscle loss occurs during treatment with cabozantinib in a high proportion of patients and is associated with poor PFS.

Sequential Treatment with Bevacizumab and Aflibercept for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab and aflibercept are currently the mainstay of antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). They are often used in sequence with first- and second-line chemotherapy, especially in patients with RAS-mutated tumours. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with mCRC treated with the bevacizumab-aflibercept sequence in real-world clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from a national clinical registry of targeted therapies for mCRC were analysed retrospectively. Overall, there were 366 patients with valid data who received first-line treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy followed by aflibercept with chemotherapy. The majority of the patients (n = 296, 80.8%) had RAS mutated tumours. RESULTS: Median cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the bevacizumab-containing regimen to progression on aflibercept was 18.2 months (95% CI 16.8-19.5). Median PFS for bevacizumab and aflibercept was 10.6 months (95% CI 9.5-11.7) and 5.6 months (95% CI 5.1-6.1), respectively. Longer PFS on aflibercept was associated with metachronous metastatic disease and longer PFS on bevacizumab. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line bevacizumab was 32.0 months (95% CI 26.6-37.5). The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis was associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with aflibercept in real-world clinical practice achieved similar survival outcomes as those treated within randomised trials. Cumulative survival data provide a benchmark for future studies and enable indirect comparisons with other treatment sequences used in mCRC.