Phase II study of carfilzomib and dexamethasone therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) has significant activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Kd has not previously been evaluated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report a single-arm phase 2 study of 72 patients with NDMM to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Kd induction. Carfilzomib was administered in two dosing cohorts with dosing of 20/45 mg/m2 in the first 25 patients and 20/56 mg/m2 in the subsequent 47 patients. Carfilzomib was administered on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 of a 28-day cycle, dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Treatment was continued to maximum response, progression of disease, or regimen intolerability. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), regimen toxicity and impact of carfilzomib on CD34+ stem cell collection yield. Sixty-five pts achieved at least a partial response (PR) for an ORR of 90%. The maximum response achieved was complete response or better in 5 (7%), very good partial response (VGPR) in 42 (58%), PR in 18 (25%) and stable disease in 7 pts (10%). Toxicities were predominantly low grade with 547 grade 1/2 adverse events and 44 grade ≥3 events. The rate of grade ≥3 cardiovascular adverse events was 11.1% with eight observed events. The activity of Kd described represents the highest rate of overall response and ≥VGPR for any 2-agent combination in NDMM reported to date. Kd demonstrated a safety profile consistent with previously reported carfilzomib studies.

The Faces of Financial Toxicity: A Qualitative Interview Study of Financial Toxicity in Advanced Cancer Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials.

Objective: To characterize the financial toxicity experienced by advanced cancer patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials. Patients and Methods: We conducted structured interviews with cancer patients participating in phase I clinical trials. Using a thematic analysis approach, we identified recurring themes in patients' experiences of financial toxicity resulting from trial participation. Results: Seven major themes emerged from the interviews: (1) the burden of travel, (2) a willingness to pursue treatment despite financial risk, (3) fear of destitution, (4) financial toxicity equaling physical toxicity, (5) changes in food spending, (6) reluctance to confide in the study investigator about financial toxicity, and (7) difficulty navigating financial aid. These themes highlight the multifaceted financial challenges faced by patients in early phase clinical trials and the need for targeted support services. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the relevance of financial toxicity in the context of phase I clinical trials and provide insights into the diverse challenges faced by advanced cancer patients. These challenges likely augment the disparities seen in trial enrollment for historically marginalized populations. Addressing financial toxicity in this population is crucial for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Future research should focus on developing effective interventions and support services tailored to the needs of patients in early phase clinical trials.

Trends in Prices of Drugs Used to Treat Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US From 2015 to 2020.

Importance: Oncology drug prices are a determinant of health disparities in the US and worldwide. Several new therapeutic agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have become available on the US market over the past decade. Although increased competition typically produces lower prices, competition among brand-name oncology drugs has not resulted in lower prices. Objective: To assess price changes in class-specific brand-name medications used to treat metastatic NSCLC in the US from 2015 to 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from August 13, 2015, to August 13, 2020, used data from the Micromedex Red Book and Medi-Span Price Rx databases. The study sample was limited to 17 brand-name medications used to treat metastatic NSCLC that were available for purchase before January 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were trends over time in average wholesale prices and wholesale acquisition cost unit prices and the correlation in price among the multiple brand-name medications within each therapeutic class (immune checkpoint inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, ROS1 inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, and MEK inhibitors), measured using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The compounded annual growth rates of different medication costs were compared with the annual inflation rate and the consumer price index for prescription drugs. Results: For all drug classes, the Pearson correlation coefficient approached 1.0, indicating an increase in drug list prices despite within-class drug competition. The median Pearson correlation coefficient values were 0.964 (range, 0.951-0.994) for immune checkpoint inhibitors, 0.898 (range, 0.665-0.950) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, 0.999 (range, 0.982-0.999) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, and 0.999 for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. The median compounded annual growth rates for most drug costs were higher than the annual inflation rate and consumer price index for prescription drugs: 1.81% (range, 1.29%-2.13%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors, 2.56% (range, 2.38%-5.26%) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, 2.46% (range, 1.75%-4.66%) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 inhibitors, and 3.06% (range, 0%-3.06%) for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, prices of brand-name medications for treatment of NSCLC increased in the US from 2015 to 2020 without evidence of price competition, raising concern about the affordability of promising oncology drugs. These findings suggest that drug pricing reform is needed.