Molecular Modelling Approaches for the Analysis of Histamine Receptors and Their Interaction with Ligands.

Several experimental techniques to analyse histamine receptors are available, e.g. pharmacological characterisation of known or new compounds by different types of assays or mutagenesis studies. To obtain insights into the histamine receptors on a molecular and structural level, crystal structures have to be determined and molecular modelling studies have to be performed. It is widely accepted to generate homology models of the receptor of interest based on an appropriate crystal structure as a template and to refine the resulting models by molecular dynamic simulations. A lot of modelling techniques, e.g. docking, QSAR or interaction fingerprint methods, are used to predict binding modes of ligands and pharmacological data, e.g. affinity or even efficacy. However, within the last years, molecular dynamic simulations got more and more important: First of all, molecular dynamic simulations are very helpful to refine the binding mode of a ligand to a histamine receptor, obtained by docking studies. Furthermore, with increasing computational performance it got possible to simulate complete binding pathways of ions or ligands from the aqueous extracellular phase into the allosteric or orthosteric binding pocket of histamine receptors.

Dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepines and dibenzo[b,e]oxepines: Influence of the chlorine substitution pattern on the pharmacology at the H1R, H4R, 5-HT2AR and other selected GPCRs.

Inspired by VUF6884 (7-Chloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepine), reported as a dual H1/H4 receptor ligand (pKi: 8.11 (human H1R (hH1R)), 7.55 (human H4R (hH4R))), four known and 28 new oxazepine and related oxepine derivatives were synthesised and pharmacologically characterized at histamine receptors and selected aminergic GPCRs. In contrast to the oxazepine series, within the oxepine series, the new compounds showed high affinity to the hH1R (pKi: 6.8-8.7), but no or moderate affinity to the hH4R (pKi:≤5.3). For one oxepine derivative (1-(2-Chloro-6,11-dihydrodibenzo[b,e]oxepin-11-yl)-4-methylpiperazine), the enantiomers were separated and the R-enantiomer was identified as the eutomer at the hH1R (pKi: 8.83 (R), 7.63 (S)) and the guinea-pig H1R (gpH1R) (pKi: 8.82 (R), 7.41 (S)). Molecular dynamic studies suggest that the tricyclic core of the compounds is bound in a similar mode into the binding pocket, as described for doxepine in the hH1R crystal structure. Moreover, docking studies of all oxepine derivatives at the hH1R indicate that the oxygen and the position of the chlorine in the tricyclic core determines, if the R- or the S-enantiomer is the eutomer. For some of the oxazepines and oxepines the affinity to other aminergic GPCRs is in the same range as to hH1R or hH4R, thus, those compounds have to be classified as dirty drugs. However, one oxazepine derivative (3,7-Dichloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepine was identified as dual hH1/h5-HT2A receptor ligand (pKi: 9.23 (hH1R), 8.74 (h5-HT2AR), ≤7 at other analysed GPCRs), whereas one oxepine derivative (1-(3,8-Dichloro-6,11-dihydrodibenzo[b,e]oxepin-11-yl)-4-methylpiperazine) was identified as selective hH1R antagonist (pKi: 8.44 (hH1R), ≤6.7 at other analyzed GPCRs). Thus, the pharmacological results suggest that the oxazepine/oxepine moiety and additionally the chlorine substitution pattern toggles receptor selectivity and specificity.

2,4-Diaminopyrimidines as dual ligands at the histamine H1 and H4 receptor-H1/H4-receptor selectivity.

Distinct diaminopyrimidines, for example, 4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-5,6-dihydrobenzo[h]quinazolin-2-amine are histamine H4 receptor (H4R) antagonists and show high affinity to the H4R, but only a moderate affinity to the histamine H1 receptor (H1R). Within previous studies it was shown that an aromatic side chain with a distinct distance to the basic amine and aromatic core is necessary for affinity to the human H1R (hH1R). Thus, a rigid aminopyrimidine with a tricyclic core was used as a lead structure. There, (1) the flexible aromatic side chain was introduced, (2) the substitution pattern of the pyrimidine core was exchanged and (3) rigidity was decreased by opening the tricyclic core. Within the present study, two compounds with similar affinity in the one digit µM range to the human H1R and H4R were identified. While the affinity at the hH1R increased about 4- to 8-fold compared to the parent diaminopyrimidine, the affinity to the hH4R decreased about 5- to 8-fold. In addition to the parent diaminopyrimidine, two selected compounds were docked into the H1R and H4R and molecular dynamic studies were performed to predict the binding mode and explain the experimental results on a molecular level. The two new compounds may be good lead structures for the development of dual H1/H4 receptor ligands with affinities in the same range.

Binding pathway of histamine to the hH4R, observed by unconstrained molecular dynamics.

Histamine binds with high affinity to the human histamine H4 receptor (hH4R). We are the first to examine the complete binding pathway of histamine from the extracellular side to the orthosteric binding site of the hH4R by means of unconstrained molecular dynamic simulation. Furthermore, the simulations show that the positively charged amine moiety of the histamine interacts electrostatically with the highly conserved Asp(3.32), while the imidazole moiety forms a hydrogen bond interaction with Glu(5.46) and Gln(7.42).

Structure-Dependent Deconjugation of Flavonoid Glucuronides by Human ß-Glucuronidase - In Vitro and In Silico Analyses.

Flavonoid glycosides are extensively metabolized to glucuronidated compounds after oral intake. Recently, a cleavage of quercetin glucuronides by ß-glucuronidase has been found. To characterize the deglucuronidation reaction and its structural prerequisites among the flavonoid subtypes more precisely, four flavonol glucuronides with varying glucuronidation positions, five flavone 7-O-glucuronides with varying A- and B-ring substitution as well as one flavanone- and one isoflavone-7-O-glucuronide were analyzed in a human monocytic cell line. Investigation of the deglucuronidation rates by HPLC revealed a significant influence of the glucuronidation position on enzyme activity for flavonols. Across the flavonoid subtypes, the C-ring saturation also showed a significant influence on deglucuronidation, whereas A- and B-ring variations within the flavone-7-O-glucuronides did not affect the enzymes' activity. Results were compared to computational binding studies on human ß-glucuronidase. Additionally, molecular modeling and dynamic studies were performed to obtain detailed insight into the binding and cleavage mode of the substrate at the active site of the human ß-glucuronidase.

Nanofibers resulting from cooperative electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between peptides and polyelectrolytes of opposite charge.

We investigated whether cationic peptides that contain hydrophobic side chains were able to stabilize themselves via hydrophobic interactions between neighboring peptide molecules upon electrostatic binding to oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. The interaction mechanism was examined through a model system consisting of the anionic polyelectrolyte alginate and the cationic decapeptide ozarelix. The interaction resulted in the formation of highly ordered complexes that were noticeable upon visual inspection. These complexes were then investigated by microscopic techniques and shown to exhibit a branched network structure. Cryogenic-temperature transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and negative staining TEM revealed that the molecular interactions between alginate and ozarelix led to the formation of nanofibers. The rodlike nanofibers had a diameter distribution of 4-8 nm. Isothermal titration calorimetry was used to determine the thermodynamic parameters of the alginate-ozarelix interaction. The binding constant was found to be on the order of 10(6) M(-1), indicating a high binding affinity. The interaction of the peptide with the polyelectrolyte triggered profound changes in the conformation of ozarelix, which was confirmed by UV spectroscopy and circular dichroism. On the basis of these experimental results, a theoretical modeling study of the alginate-ozarelix interaction was conducted to gain a better molecular-level understanding of the complex structure. It revealed that, upon binding of ozarelix to alginate, new intermolecular and intramolecular aromatic interactions between the ozarelix molecules occurred. These interactions changed the conformation of the peptide, a modification in which the aromatic side chains played a major role. Our results indicate that the cationic peptides interact with the polyanions via electrostatic interactions, but are additionally stabilized via hydrophobic interactions. This binding mode may serve as a powerful tool to extend the duration of drug release in hydrogel drug delivery systems.

Mepyramine-JNJ7777120-hybrid compounds show high affinity to hH(1)R, but low affinity to hH(4)R.

In literature, a synergism between histamine H(1) and H(4) receptor is discussed. Furthermore, it was shown, that the combined application of mepyramine, a H(1) antagonist and JNJ7777120, a H(4) receptor ligand leads to a synergistic effect in the acute murine asthma model. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop new hybrid ligands, containing one H(1) and one H(4) pharmacophor, connected by an appropriate spacer, in order to address both, H(1)R and H(4)R. Within this study, we synthesized nine hybrid compounds, which were pharmacologically characterized at hH(1)R and hH(4)R. The new compounds revealed (high) affinity to hH(1)R, but showed only low affinity to hH(4)R. Additionally, we performed molecular dynamic studies for some selected compounds at hH(1)R, in order to obtain information about the binding mode of these compounds on molecular level.

Abolishing Dopamine D2long/D3 Receptor Affinity of Subtype-Selective Carbamoylguanidine-Type Histamine H2 Receptor Agonists.

3-(2-Amino-4-methylthiazol-5-yl)propyl-substituted carbamoylguanidines are potent, subtype-selective histamine H2 receptor (H2R) agonists, but their applicability as pharmacological tools to elucidate the largely unknown H2R functions in the central nervous system (CNS) is compromised by their concomitant high affinity toward dopamine D2-like receptors (especially to the D3R). To improve the selectivity, a series of novel carbamoylguanidine-type ligands containing various heterocycles, spacers, and side residues were rationally designed, synthesized, and tested in binding and/or functional assays at H1-4 and D2long/3 receptors. This study revealed a couple of selective candidates (among others 31 and 47), and the most promising ones were screened at several off-target receptors, showing good selectivities. Docking studies suggest that the amino acid residues (3.28, 3.32, E2.49, E2.51, 5.42, and 7.35) are responsible for the different affinities at the H2- and D2long/3-receptors. These results provide a solid base for the exploration of the H2R functions in the brain in further studies.

In silico analysis of the histaprodifen induced activation pathway of the guinea-pig histamine H(1)-receptor.

The binding of (partial) agonists in the binding pocket of biogenic amine receptors induces a conformational change from the inactive to the active state of the receptors. There is only little knowledge about the binding pathways of ligands into binding pocket on molecular level. So far, it was not possible with molecular dynamic simulations to observe the ligand binding and receptor activation. Furthermore, there is nearly nothing known, in which state of ligand binding, the receptor gets activated. The aim of this study was to get more detailed insight into the process of ligand binding and receptor activation. With the recently developed LigPath algorithm, we scanned the potential energy surface of the binding process of dimeric histaprodifen, a partial agonist at the histamine H(1)-receptor, into the guinea pig histamine H(1)-receptor, taking also into account the receptor activation. The calculations exhibited large conformational changes of Trp(6.48) and Phe(6.55) during ligand binding and receptor activation. Additionally, conformational changes were also observed for Phe(6.52), Tyr(6.51) and Phe(6.44). Conformational changes of Trp(6.48) and Phe(6.52) are discussed in literature as rotamer toggle switch in context with receptor activation. Additionally, the calculations indicate that the binding of dimeric histaprodifen, accompanied by receptor activation is energetically preferred. In general, this study gives new, theoretical insights onto ligand binding and receptor activation on molecular level.

Contribution of binding enthalpy and entropy to affinity of antagonist and agonist binding at human and guinea pig histamine H(1)-receptor.

For several GPCRs, discrimination between agonism and antagonism is possible on the basis of thermodynamics parameters, such as binding enthalpy and entropy. In this study, we analyze whether agonists and antagonists can also be discriminated thermodynamically at the histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R). Because previous studies revealed species differences in pharmacology between human H(1)R (hH(1)R) and guinea pig H(1)R (gpH(1)R), we analyzed a broad spectrum of H(1)R antagonists and agonists at hH(1)R and gpH(1)R. [(3)H]Mepyramine competition binding assay were performed at five different temperatures in a range from 283.15 to 303.15 K. In addition, we performed a temperature-dependent three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship study to predict binding enthalpy and entropy for histaprodifen derivatives, which can bind to H(1)R in two different orientations. Our studies revealed significant species differences in binding enthalpy and entropy between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R for some antagonists and agonists. Furthermore, in some cases, we found changes in heat capacity of the binding process that were different from zero. Differences in flexibility of the ligands may be responsible for this observation. For most ligands, the binding process to hH(1)R and gpH(1)R is clearly entropy-driven. In contrast, for the endogenous ligand histamine, the binding process is significantly enthalpy-driven at both species isoforms. Thus, a definite discrimination between antagonism and agonism based on thermodynamic parameters is possible for neither hH(1)R nor gpH(1)R, but thermodynamic analysis of ligand-binding may be a novel approach to dissect agonist- and antagonist-specific receptor conformations.

Molecular basis for the selective interaction of synthetic agonists with the human histamine H1-receptor compared with the guinea pig H1-receptor.

Previous studies revealed that phenylhistamines and histaprodifens possess higher potency and affinity at guinea pig histamine H(1)-receptor (gpH(1)R) than at human histamine H(1)-receptor (hH(1)R). However, we recently identified an imidazolylpropylguanidine [N(1)-(3-cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N(2)-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)-propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57)] with higher potency and efficacy at hH(1)R compared with gpH(1)R. The aim of this study was to reveal the molecular basis for the species differences of synthetic ligands. We studied 11 novel phenylhistamines and phenoprodifens. H(1)R species isoforms were expressed in Sf9 insect cells, and [(3)H]mepyramine competition binding and GTPase assays were performed. We identified bulky phenylhistamines with higher potency and affinity at hH(1)R compared with gpH(1)R. Molecular dynamics simulations of ligand-H(1)R interactions revealed four potential binding modes for phenylhistamines possessing an additional histamine moiety; the terminal histamine moiety showed a high flexibility in the binding pocket. There are striking similarities in ligand properties in bulky phenylhistamines and UR-AK57. Comparison of bulky phenylhistamine binding mode with binding mode of UR-AK57 suggests that only one of these four binding modes should be established. The higher potency is explained by more effective van der Waals interaction of the compounds with Asn(2.61) (hH(1)R) relative to Ser(2.61) (gpH(1)R). In addition, two stable binding modes for phenoprodifens with different orientations in the binding-pocket were identified. Depending on phenoprodifen orientation, the highly conserved Trp(6.48), part of the toggle switch involved in receptor activation, was found in an inactive or active conformation, respectively. We identified the first phenylhistamines with higher potency at hH(1)R than at gpH(1)R and obtained insight into the binding mode of bulky phenylhistamines and imidazolylpropylguanidines.

Ligand-specific contribution of the N terminus and E2-loop to pharmacological properties of the histamine H1-receptor.

There are species differences between human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R) and guinea pig (gp) histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) for phenylhistamines and histaprodifens. Several studies showed participation of the second extracellular loop (E2-loop) in ligand binding for some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Because there are large species differences in the amino acid sequence between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R for the N terminus and E2-loop, we generated chimeric hH(1)Rs with gp E2-loop (h(gpE2)H(1)R) and gp N terminus and gp E2-loop (h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R). hH(1)R, gpH(1)R, and chimeras were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. [(3)H]Mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays were performed. In the series hH(1)R > h(gpE2)H(1)R > h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R, we observed a significant decrease in potency of histamine 1 in the GTPase assay. For phenoprodifen 5 and the chiral phenoprodifens 6R and 6S, a significant decrease in affinity and potency was found in the series hH(1)R > h(gpE2)H(1)R > h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R. In addition, we constructed new active-state H(1)R models based on the crystal structure of the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (hbeta(2)AR). Compared with the H(1)R active-state models based on the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin, the E2-loop differs in its contact to the ligand bound in the binding pocket. In the bovine rhodopsin-based model, the backbone carbonyl of Lys187 (gpH(1)R) interacts with large histaprodifens in the binding pocket, but in the hbeta(2)AR-based model, Lys187 (gpH(1)R) is located distantly from the binding pocket. In conclusion, the differences in N terminus and E2-loop between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R exert an influence on affinity and/or potency for histamine and phenoprodifens 5, 6R, and 6S.

Pharmacological profile of histaprodifens at four recombinant histamine H1 receptor species isoforms.

There are differences in the pharmacological properties of phenylhistamines and histaprodifens between guinea pig histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) and human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R). The aim of this study was to analyze species differences in more detail, focusing on histaprodifen derivatives and including the bovine histamine H(1) receptor (bH(1)R) and rat histamine H(1) receptor (rH(1)R). H(1)R species isoforms were coexpressed with the regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 in Sf9 insect cells. We performed [(3)H]mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays. For a novel class of histaprodifens, the chiral histaprodifens, unique species differences between hH(1)R, bH(1)R, rH(1)R, and gpH(1)R were observed. The chiral histaprodifens 8R and 8S were both partial agonists at gpH(1)R, but only 8R was a partial agonist at the other H(1)R species isoforms. An additional phenyl group in chiral histaprodifens 10R and 10S, respectively, resulted in a switch from agonism at gpH(1)Rto antagonism at hH(1)R, bH(1)R, and rH(1)R. In general, histaprodifens showed the order of potency hH(1)R < bH(1)R < rH(1)R < gpH(1)R. An active-state model of gpH(1)R was generated with molecular dynamics simulations. Dimeric histaprodifen was docked into the binding pocket of gpH(1)R. Hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions were detected between dimeric histaprodifen and Asp-116, Ser-120, Lys-187, Glu-190, and Tyr-432. We conclude the following: 1) chiral histaprodifens interact differentially with H(1)R species isoforms; 2) gpH(1)R and rH(1)R, on one hand, and hH(1)R and bH(1)R, on the other hand, resemble each other structurally and pharmacologically; and 3) histaprodifens interact with H(1)R at multiple sites.

Structure-Activity Relationships and Computational Investigations into the Development of Potent and Balanced Dual-Acting Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Human Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Ligands with Pro-Cognitive in Vivo Profiles.

The enzyme butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and the human cannabinoid receptor 2 (hCB2R) represent promising targets for pharmacotherapy in the later stages of Alzheimer's disease. We merged pharmacophores for both targets into small benzimidazole-based molecules, investigated SARs, and identified several dual-acting ligands with a balanced affinity/inhibitory activity and an excellent selectivity over both hCB1R and hAChE. A homology model for the hCB2R was developed based on the hCB1R crystal structure and used for molecular dynamics studies to investigate binding modes. In vitro studies proved hCB2R agonism. Unwanted µ-opioid receptor affinity could be designed out. One well-balanced dual-acting and selective hBChE inhibitor/hCB2R agonist showed superior in vivo activity over the lead CB2 agonist with regards to cognition improvement. The data shows the possibility to combine a small molecule with selective and balanced GPCR-activity/enzyme inhibition and in vivo activity for the therapy of AD and may help to rationalize the development of other dual-acting ligands.

Competitive association binding kinetic assays: a new tool to detect two different binding orientations of a ligand to its target protein under distinct conditions?

Within the last years, for several ligands, binding to G protein-coupled receptors or other target proteins, a binding of the ligand in two different orientations is described. One appropriate experimental technique to detect two different binding orientations is the crystallization of the ligand-protein-complex, but crystallization and subsequent X-ray analysis do not belong to the routine methods. By traditional competitive radioligand equilibrium binding assays, it is not possible to detect or to distinguish between two different binding orientations, but there is a possibility to identify two different binding orientations by performing kinetic competitive radioligand-binding assays. To study the limitations of this new technique, the related differential equations were defined and solved numerically for 8 different sets of rate constants, also considering an experimental error up to ~10%. In principal, the kinetic competitive radioligand binding assay is a suitable technique to detect two different ligand binding orientations. However, the present study shows that this is only possible under distinct conditions: (1) the rate constants of dissociation for both binding orientations of the cold ligand should at least be >> 10-fold different to each other and (2) the experimental error should be as small as possible. Although there are some limitations for the experimental usability of this method, it is worthwhile to perform kinetic competitive binding assays, especially if there are hints for two binding orientations of a ligand, e.g. based on molecular modelling studies.

Binding Kinetics and Pathways of Ligands to GPCRs.

Previously, drugs were developed focusing on target affinity and selectivity. However, it is becoming evident that the drug-target residence time, related to the off-rate, is an important parameter for successful drug development. The residence time influences both the on-rate and overall effectiveness of drugs. Furthermore, ligand binding is now appreciated to be a multistep process because metastable and/or intermediate binding sites in the extracellular region have been identified. In this review, we summarize experimental ligand-binding data for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and their binding pathways, analyzed by molecular dynamics (MD). The kinetics of drug binding to GPCRs are complex and depend on several factors, including charge distribution on the receptor surface, ligand-receptor interactions in the binding channel and the binding site, or solvation.

Conformational Restriction and Enantioseparation Increase Potency and Selectivity of Cyanoguanidine-Type Histamine H4 Receptor Agonists.

2-Cyano-1-[4-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)butyl]-3-[2-(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]guanidine (UR-PI376, 1) is a potent and selective agonist of the human histamine H4 receptor (hH4R). To gain information on the active conformation, we synthesized analogues of 1 with a cyclopentane-1,3-diyl linker. Affinities and functional activities were determined at recombinant hHxR (x: 1-4) subtypes on Sf9 cell membranes (radioligand binding, [(35)S]GTPγS, or GTPase assays) and in part in luciferase assays on human or mouse H4R (HEK-293 cells). The most potent H4R agonists among 14 racemates were separated by chiral HPLC, yielding eight enantiomerically pure compounds. Configurations were assigned based on X-ray structures of intermediates and a stereocontrolled synthetic pathway. (+)-2-Cyano-1-{[trans-(1S,3S)-3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)cyclopentyl]methyl}-3-[2-(phenylsulfanyl)ethyl]guanidine ((1S,3S)-UR-RG98, 39a) was the most potent H4R agonist in this series (EC50 11 nM; H4R vs H3R, >100-fold selectivity; H1R, H2R, negligible activities), whereas the optical antipode proved to be an H4R antagonist ([(35)S]GTPγS assay). MD simulations confirmed differential stabilization of the active and inactive H4R state by the enantiomers.

Aminobenzimidazoles and Structural Isomers as Templates for Dual-Acting Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibitors and hCB2 R Ligands To Combat Neurodegenerative Disorders.

A pharmacophore model for butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitors was applied to a human cannabinoid subtype 2 receptor (hCB2 R) agonist and verified it as a first-generation lead for respective dual-acting compounds. The design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of various derivatives led to the identification of aminobenzimidazoles as second-generation leads with micro- or sub-micromolar activities at both targets and excellent selectivity over hCB1 and AChE, respectively. Computational studies of the first- and second-generation lead structures by applying molecular dynamics (MD) on the active hCB2 R model, along with docking and MD on hBChE, has enabled an explanation of their binding profiles at the protein levels and opened the way for further optimization. Dual-acting compounds with "balanced" affinities and excellent selectivities could be obtained that represent leads for treatment of both cognitive and pathophysiological impairment occurring in neurodegenerative disorders.

Modulation of GPCRs by monovalent cations and anions.

The recent resolution of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures in complex with Na(+) bound to an allosteric modulatory site has renewed interest of the regulation of GPCRs by ions. Here, we summarise key data on ion modulation of GPCRs, obtained in pharmacological, crystallographic, mutagenesis and molecular modelling studies. We show that ion modulation is a highly complex process, involving not only cations but also, rather neglected until now, anions. Pharmacotherapeutic and toxicological aspects are discussed. We provide a mathematical framework for the analysis of ion effects. Finally, we discuss open questions in the field and future research directions. Most importantly, the in vivo relevance of the modulation of GPCR function by monovalent ions must be clarified.

New insights into the cross-linking and degradation mechanism of Diels-Alder hydrogels.

Eight-armed poly(ethylene glycol) was functionalized with furyl and maleimide groups. The two macromonomers were cross-linked by Diels-Alder (DA) reactions and the degradation behavior of the formed hydrogels was investigated. UV spectroscopy showed that maleimide groups were subject to ring-opening hydrolysis above pH 5.5, with the reaction rate depending on the pH and temperature. As a result of this, the gelation kinetics and stiffness of DA hydrogels were dependent on the temperature and the pH of the cross-linking medium, as demonstrated by rheological experiments. The gel time varied between 87.8 min (pH 3.0, 37 °C) and 374.7 min (pH 7.4, 20 °C). Values between 420 Pa (pH 9.0, 37 °C) and 3327 Pa (pH 3.0, 37 °C) were measured for the absolute value of the complex shear modulus. Hydrogel swelling and degradation were influenced by the same parameters. With increasing pH and temperature the degradation time was reduced from 98 days (pH 7.4, 20 °C) to 2 days (pH 7.4, 50 °C); no degradation was observed at pH 3.0 and 5.5. Molecular modeling studies of the DA and retro-Diels-Alder (rDA) moieties revealed that hydrogel degradation occurred by rDA reaction followed by OH--catalyzed ring-opening hydrolysis of maleimide groups to unreactive maleamic acid derivatives.