Evaluation of Self-Collected Midturbinate Nasal Swabs and Saliva for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Rapid and accurate diagnostic testing is essential to bring the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic to an end. As the demand for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing continues to increase amid supply shortages, many laboratories have investigated the use of sources other than nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Saliva and midturbinate (MT) nasal swabs are attractive alternatives, as they allow for self-collection and are well accepted by patients. Saliva also requires limited consumables. We compared the performance of health care provider-collected NP swabs, patient-collected MT swabs, and patient-collected saliva specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a laboratory-developed PCR assay that had received Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA. Of 281 total evaluable samples, 33 (11.7%) NP swabs, 33 (11.7%) MT swabs, and 32 (11.4%) saliva specimens were positive for SARS-CoV-2 following resolution of discordant results. Compared to NP swabs, saliva exhibited a sensitivity of 90.9% (30/33) and specificity of 99.2% (246/248), while patient-collected MT swabs exhibited a sensitivity of 93.9% (31/33) and specificity of 99.2% (246/248). When comparing to the consensus standard, the sensitivity was found to be 100% (31/31) for both NP and MT swabs and 96.8% (30/31) for saliva specimens, while specificity was the same in both NP swabs and saliva specimens (98.8% [247/250]) and 99.2% (248/250) for MT swabs. Pretreatment of saliva with proteinase K and heating for 15 min prior to extraction reduced the invalid rate from 26.7% (52/195) to 0% (0/195). These data show that midturbinate nasal swabs and saliva are suitable sources for self-collection in individuals who require routine monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Description, validation, and review of a decade of experience with a laboratory-developed PCR test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens.

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex directly from clinical specimens is critical for patient care. Mycobacterial culture requires days to weeks for results and therefore many laboratories employ rapid molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. There are two FDA-cleared molecular assays for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex in the United States and both are cleared for testing of respiratory specimens only. The detection of M. tuberculosis complex in extrapulmonary specimens is often done using laboratory-developed PCR methods. In this work, the verification and subsequent validation of test performance over a decade is detailed for a laboratory-developed PCR assay (MTBRP) that detects M. tuberculosis complex from respiratory and non-respiratory specimens. The assay also provides information about potential isoniazid resistance. The performance of the MTBRP PCR assay was compared to the Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay in acid-fast smear positive and smear negative specimens and mycobacterial culture for acid-fast smear positive specimens. The MTBRP assay demonstrated 99% correlation with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay using 499 respiratory specimens. The performance of the MTBRP PCR assay compared with mycobacterial culture for 867 AFB smear positive respiratory and non-respiratory specimens demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.1%. This work provides longitudinal evidence using real-world clinical laboratory conditions and specimens to demonstrate that laboratory-developed PCR assays such as the MTBRP can provide a rapid and sensitive method for detection of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis from a wide-variety of smear positive specimen sources.