Localized Anterior Arthrofibrosis After Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is More Common in Patients Who Are Female, Undergo Meniscal Repair, and Have Grafts of Larger Diameter.

PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with localized anterior arthrofibrosis (cyclops lesion), such as graft size, warranting early reoperation for lysis of adhesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft. METHODS: All primary ASTQT autograft ACLRs within a single surgeon's prospectively collected registry with minimum 6-month follow-up were included. Patients who underwent multiligament knee reconstruction or cartilage restoration procedures were excluded. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis was defined as the requirement for a second procedure to achieve debridement and lysis of adhesions owing to the inability to regain terminal extension within 6 months of ACLR. The sex-specific incidence of arthrofibrosis was evaluated relative to age, weight, femoral and tibial tunnel sizes, meniscal repair, and meniscectomy by a binary logistic regression. RESULTS: This study included 721 patients (46% female patients). There were 52 cases of localized anterior arthrofibrosis (7.2%). Female patients had a greater incidence of arthrofibrosis than male patients. Male patients with a femoral tunnel diameter of 9.25 mm or greater had an increased incidence of arthrofibrosis compared with those with a diameter of less than 9.25 mm, whereas a similar cutoff was not found to be statistically significant for female patients. Concomitant meniscal repair was associated with an increased risk of arthrofibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex and concomitant meniscal repair were associated with an increased localized anterior arthrofibrosis incidence. Furthermore, ASTQT with a femoral tunnel diameter of 9.25 mm or greater in male patients was associated with an increased incidence of arthrofibrosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, comparative prognostic trial.

Quadriceps tendon autograft has similar clinical outcomes when compared to hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for revision ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Research regarding revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts is lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RACLR with QT and compare its patient outcomes to RACLR with hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a search for studies using QT in RACLR was performed within PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from database date of inception through December 26, 2022. Primary outcomes sought included: failure rate, Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, IKDC grades, arthrometric knee side-to-side differences (STSD), pivot shift grade, donor site morbidity, return to sport, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. RESULTS: Nine studies were included consisting of 606 RACLR: 349 QT, 169 HT, and 88 BTB. Overall failure rates were 7.6% QT, 13.3% HT, and 8.7% BTB. Mean weighted Lysholm scores were 85.8 ± 3.8 QT, 82.5 ± 3.8 HT and 86.6 ± 4.5 BTB. IKDC average scores were 82.3 ± 1.6 QT, 80.1 ± 1.7 HT, and 81.7 ± 5.5BTB. Combined rates of IKDC A/B grades were 88.4% and 80.0% for QT and HT, respectively. VAS average scores were 0.9 ± 1.1 QT, 1.4 ± 0.2 HT, and 0.7 ± 0.8 for BTB. Side-to-side difference was reported for QT and HT with average values of 1.7 ± 0.6 mm and 2.1 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Grade 0 or 1 pivot shifts were reported in 96.2% of QT patients and 91.3% of HT. Donor site morbidity, only reported for QT and HT, was 14.6 ± 9.7% and 23.6 ± 14.1%, respectively. QT resulted in a mean Tegner score of 5.9 ± 1.5 versus HT 5.7 ± 1.5. Rate of return to pivoting sports was 38.0% QT, 48.6% HT, and 76.9% BTB. Across all outcomes, there was no significant difference when comparing QT to HT, QT to BTB, and QT compared to HT and BTB combined. CONCLUSIONS: RACLR with QT yields satisfactory patient reported outcomes, satisfactory improvement in knee laxity, expected return to sport rates, and has an overall 7.6% failure rate. Outcomes are comparative to those of HT and BTB making it an acceptable graft choice for RACLR. Surgeons should consider using QT autograft for RACLR, especially when other autografts are unavailable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Treatment strategies for ACL injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines to manage ACL injury is largely based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened determine consensus regarding best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field may assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injury Level of evidence: Level V.

Combined Oral Contraceptive Use Increases the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Knee Arthroscopy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 64,165 Patients in the Truven Database.

PURPOSE: To use the Truven MarketScan database to (1) report the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thromboses (DVTs) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing simple knee arthroscopy and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and (2) evaluate combined oral contraceptive (COCP) use as a potential risk factor for VTE in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. METHODS: All female patients between the ages of 16 and 40 years undergoing knee arthroscopy and ACL reconstruction between 2010 and 2015 were identified in the MarketScan database. Patients were stratified by whether they had a documented pharmaceutical claim for COCP therapy, and the primary outcome was the risk of DVT and or PE within 90 postoperative days. RESULTS: In total, 64,165 patients were identified for inclusion. While the overall incidence of VTE was low, patients taking COCPs had an increased risk of a DVT or PE compared with those not on COCPs (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, P < .001). When patients were analyzed by procedural subgroup (ACL reconstruction and simple knee arthroscopy), similar results held true. Furthermore, smoking and obesity had a synergistic effect when combined with COCPs use on the risk of VTE. Specifically, 3.1% of patients with obesity on COCPs (OR 3.1, P < .001) and 4.0% of smokers on COCPs (OR 4.3, P < .001) developed a postoperative VTE. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that COCP use is associated with an increased risk for a symptomatic DVT or PE (1.70% and 0.27%, respectively) after knee arthroscopy and an increased risk for DVT, but not PE (1.80% and 0.23%, respectively), after ACL reconstruction. In addition, patients with multiple risk factors present such as tobacco use, obesity, and COCP use had odds ratios greater than the sum of the individual risk factors alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III prognostic cohort study.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Has Acceptable Early and Intermediate-Term Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purposes were to (1) examine early to intermediate-term clinical outcomes and complications of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts, and (2) compare quadriceps strength between patients who had hamstring versus patella tendon autografts in their previous reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred patients (52 males/48 females; 22.6 ± 8.0 years) undergoing revision ACLR with all-soft tissue QT autografts were prospectively followed. All revision procedures were performed by a single surgeon, using a minimally invasive graft harvest technique and suspensory fixation. Subjective assessment of knee function was obtained before and after surgery with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey. Postoperative knee laxity and isokinetic quadriceps strength were collected at regular intervals. Strength was reported as limb symmetry index (LSI; surgical side divided by nonsurgical side). Complications including hematomas, postoperative loss of knee extension, and graft failures were recorded. To determine clinical significance (P ≤ .05), outcomes were compared using analysis of variance or paired samples t-tests. RESULTS: The mean IKDC scores significantly improved (54.3 ± 13.0 vs 82.8 ± 13.8), with an average follow-up of 42.2 ± 21.2 months. There were no significant changes in knee laxity side-to-side differences: 6 weeks (1.2 ± 1.5 mm), 3 months (1.2 ± 1.8 mm), 6 months (1.4 ± 1.6 mm). Quadriceps LSIs significantly improved from 71.6% ± 19.3% at 6 months to 81.5% ± 19.3% at 12 months for 60°/s isokinetic testing and 76.6% ± 16.4% at 6 months to 83.9% ± 16.9% at 12 months for 180°/s testing. Graft harvest site hematomas developed in 2 patients, postoperative loss of knee extension in 4 patients, and graft failure in 11 patients. No significant differences in quadriceps or hamstrings LSIs were noted between patients with previous hamstring versus patella tendon autografts (P > .050). CONCLUSION: Revision ACLR with all-soft tissue QT autografts has acceptable early and intermediate-term outcomes with reasonable complication rates (11/80 patients with follow-up). Secondary insult to the extensor mechanism via QT autograft harvest does not adversely affect strength after prior patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cases series subgroup analysis.

Terminal knee extension deficit and female sex predict poorer quadriceps strength following ACL reconstruction using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autografts.

PURPOSE: The all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is becoming increasingly popular for ACL reconstruction (ACLR); however, studies reporting strength recovery and early outcomes after QT autograft are limited with patient samples composed of predominantly males. The primary purpose was to characterize early, sex-specific recovery of strength, range of motion (ROM), and knee laxity in a large cohort of patients undergoing primary ACLR with standardized harvest technique of the all-soft tissue QT autograft. The secondary purpose was to examine the influence of demographic factors and clinical measures on 6-month quadriceps strength. METHODS: Patients 14-25 years who underwent primary, unilateral ACLR with all-soft tissue QT autografts were prospectively followed. Knee laxity and ROM were collected at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months; while, quadriceps normalized torques and limb symmetry indices (LSI) were collected at 3 and 6 months using isokinetic dynamometry at 60°/s. Two-way ANOVAs with repeated measures were conducted to determine recovery over time and between sexes. Stepwise linear multiple regressions were conducted to determine predictors of 6-month quadriceps strength. RESULTS: Three-hundred and twenty patients were included (18 ± 3 years; 156 males:164 females; BMI = 24 ± 4 kg/m2) with no early graft failures within the study period. For strength, there were significant main effects of time (p < 0.001) and sex (p < 0.001), indicating similar improvement from 3 to 6 months with males demonstrating greater quadriceps LSI (6 months: 72.1 vs 63.3%) and normalized strength (6 months: 2.0 vs 1.6 Nm/kg). A significantly higher proportion of females had knee extension ROM deficits ≥ 5° compared to males at 6 weeks (61 vs 39%; p = 0.002). Female sex and 3-month extension ROM deficits were identified as significant predictors of 6-month quadriceps LSI (R2 = 0.083; p < 0.001). Female sex, BMI, and 6-week extension ROM deficits were identified as significant predictors of 6-month normalized quadriceps strength (R2 = 0.190; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Females had decreased quadriceps strength and greater extension ROM deficits at 3 and 6 months following ACLR using all-soft tissue QT autografts. Female sex, higher BMI, and loss of extension ROM were independent predictors of poorer quadriceps strength at 6 months. There were no early graft failures, and laxity remained within normal ranges for both males and females. Surgeons and rehabilitation clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of postoperative loss of extension ROM in females and its implications on quadriceps strength recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative vs. non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative vs. non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organizing Committee and Session Chairs for the three working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided the initial agreement and comments on the statement via an online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty percent agreement was defined a-priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative v. non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached the consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports, early anatomic ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomic ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatments with patients after an ACL injury.Level of evidence V.

Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: THE GRAFT OF THE FUTURE!

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic surgeries performed on active people in the world. One of the most important surgical decisions is graft type for use in the reconstruction. Despite extensive research on optimal graft choice for ACL reconstruction, discrepancy exists among practicing surgeons' graft preference. Recently, the quadriceps tendon has gained popularity for use as a graft source for ACL reconstruction. The all soft tissue quadriceps graft offers many advantages over other autograft choices. Histologically it has 20% more collagen fibrils per cross-sectional area than the patellar tendon (PT). Biomechanically, its ultimate load is 70% > than that of a similar width PT graft, while its modulus is more similar to the native ACL than either the PT or hamstring graft. Anatomically the quadriceps tendon has significantly more volume than the PT. Thus, even after harvest of the quadriceps graft, the remaining quadriceps tendon is still 80% stronger than the intact PT! The length and cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon graft can be tailored to the needs of the patient. On any patient over 5 feet tall, a graft length of 7 cm can be obtained. Because the thickness of the tendon is almost twice the thickness of the same patient's PT, a graft diameter from 7 to 11 mm can easily be achieved. Thus, this graft can be customized for both primary and revision surgeries. Harvest site morbidity is minimal. An incision less than 2 cm in an area with no significant cutaneous nerves without harvest of any patella bone leads to no significant harvest site pain, numbness, or palpable defect. Clinical outcomes using this graft are excellent. Our prospective data on nearly 1,000 grafts, with a mean patient age of 20 years old, show a 4.2% failure rate. Thus, the all soft tissue quadriceps graft will be the surgical choice for ACL reconstruction for future athletes.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation Strength: Do Ultimate Load and Cyclic Deformation Really Matter?

Surgeons, therapists, and industry are very focused on anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation strength, specifically ultimate load and cyclic deformation. Although many publications have focused on the importance of these values, no significant issues with early graft fixation failure or elongation have been recently been reported. Thus, instead of focusing on the absolute maximum values, it would be more helpful to define a minimum successful fixation strength, as well as determine how to test for physiologic cyclic elongation.

Higher BMI predicts additional surgery at the time of ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Despite public recognition, obesity is a growing epidemic affecting an estimated 34% of adults and 20% of children in the U.S. POPULATION: As such, the number of ACL reconstructions performed in this population is likely to increase. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk that increasing BMI poses for additional surgery at the time of ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS-NSQIP) database for the years 2005-2015 was conducted. Logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between BMI and additional CPT codes for internal derangement at the time of ACL reconstruction. Internal derangement was defined as any CPT code for treatment of a meniscus tear, chondral lesion, or loose body removal. Surgeries for multi-ligamentous knee injuries were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 11,403 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were identified. 41.9% of patients had an associated CPT code for internal derangement. As BMI increased, there was a corresponding increase in the odds of additional surgery. Specifically, for every 1.0 increase in BMI, the risk of additional surgery increased by 1.6% (p < 0.001). Compared to patients with a BMI of 18.5-24.9, those with a BMI 25-29.9 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.112, BMI 30-34.9 had an OR of 1.137, BMI 35-39.9 had an OR of 1.249, and those ≥ 40 had an OR of 1.442 for additional surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationally-representative, population-based study demonstrates that patients with elevated BMI are much more likely to require additional surgery in the setting of primary ACL reconstruction. This risk correlates with increasing BMI. Surgeons should keep these risks in mind when evaluating and counseling patients for surgery in the setting of ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: use it now, use it often.

Traditional bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon ACL grafts are not without limitations. A growing body of anatomic, biomechanical and clinical data has demonstrated the utility of quadriceps tendon autograft in arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction. The quadriceps tendon autograft provides a robust volume of tissue that can be reliably harvested, mitigating the likelihood of variably sized grafts and obviating the necessity of allograft augmentation. Modern, minimally invasive harvest techniques offer the advantages of low rates of donor site morbidity and residual extensor mechanism strength deficits. New data suggest that quadriceps tendon autograft may possess superior biomechanical characteristics when compared with bone-patella tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. However, there have been very few direct, prospective comparisons between the clinical outcomes associated with quadriceps tendon autograft and other autograft options (eg, hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone). Nevertheless, quadriceps tendon autograft should be one of the primary options in any knee surgeon's armamentarium.

Increasing hip and knee flexion during a drop-jump task reduces tibiofemoral shear and compressive forces: implications for ACL injury prevention training.

Although most ACL injury prevention programmes encourage greater hip and knee flexion during landing, it remains unknown how this technique influences tibiofemoral joint forces. We examined whether a landing strategy utilising greater hip and knee flexion decreases tibiofemoral anterior shear and compression. Twelve healthy women (25.9 ± 3.5 years) performed a drop-jump task before and after a training session (10-15 min) that emphasised greater hip and knee flexion. Peak tibiofemoral anterior shear and compressive forces were calculated using an electromyography (EMG)-driven knee model that incorporated joint kinematics, EMG and participant-specific muscle volumes and patella tendon orientation measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Participants demonstrated a decrease in peak anterior tibial shear forces (11.1 ± 3.3 vs. 9.6 ± 2.7 N · kg-1; P = 0.008) and peak tibiofemoral compressive forces (68.4 ± 7.6 vs. 62.0 ± 5.5 N · kg-1; P = 0.015) post-training. The decreased peak anterior tibial shear was accompanied by a decrease in the quadriceps anterior shear force, while the decreased peak compressive force was accompanied by decreased ground reaction force and hamstring forces. Our data provide justification for injury prevention programmes that encourage greater hip and knee flexion during landing to reduce tibiofemoral joint loading.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results.

PURPOSE: The autograft of choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. Recently, there has been an increase in interest in the quadriceps tendon as an autologous graft option for ACL reconstruction. The purposes of this study were to provide an in-depth review of quadriceps tendon anatomy, histology, and biomechanics and to synthesize reported clinical outcomes of ACL reconstructions using quadriceps tendon autografts. We hypothesize that (1) published studies on the anatomic, histologic, and biomechanical data regarding the quadriceps tendon support its use as a graft option for ACL reconstruction and (2) clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft have similar clinical outcomes to bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts with less donor-site morbidity. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the anatomy, histology, and biomechanical studies of the quadriceps tendon, as well as a systematic review of clinical studies (Level of Evidence I-III) evaluating outcomes after ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft. Stability outcomes, functional outcomes, range of motion, patient satisfaction, morbidity, and complications were comprised. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review of clinical results, including 1,154 ACL reconstructions with quadriceps tendon autograft. Six studies directly compared quadriceps tendon autografts (n = 383) with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts (n = 484). Stability outcomes (Lachman, pivot-shift, and instrumented laxity testing), functional outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores), overall patient satisfaction, range of motion, and complications were similar between quadriceps tendon and other graft options. Less donor-site morbidity was seen in patients who underwent quadriceps tendon ACL reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction is supported by current orthopaedic literature. It is a safe, reproducible, and versatile graft that should be considered in future studies of ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.

Automated quantitative assessment of bone contusions and overlying articular cartilage following anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Quantitative methods to characterize bone contusions and associated cartilage injury remain limited. We combined standardized voxelwise normalization and 3D mapping to automate bone contusion segmentation post-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and evaluate anomalies in articular cartilage overlying bone contusions. Forty-five patients (54% female, 26.4 ± 11.8 days post-injury) with an ACL tear underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging of their involved and uninvolved knees. A novel method for voxelwise normalization and 3D anatomical mapping was used to automate segmentation, labeling, and localization of bone contusions in the involved knee. The same mapping system was used to identify the associated articular cartilage overlying bone lesions. Mean regional T1ρ was extracted from articular cartilage regions in both the involved and uninvolved knees for quantitative paired analysis against ipsilateral cartilage within the same compartment outside of the localized bone contusion. At least one bone contusion lesion was detected in the involved knee within the femur and/or tibia following ACL injury in 42 participants. Elevated T1ρ (p = 0.033) signal were documented within the articular cartilage overlying the bone contusions resulting from ACL injury. In contrast, the same cartilaginous regions deprojected onto the uninvolved knees showed no ipsilateral differences (p = 0.795). Automated bone contusion segmentation using standardized voxelwise normalization and 3D mapping deprojection identified altered cartilage overlying bone contusions in the setting of knee ACL injury.

Usefulness of Current Patient-Reported Outcome Scales for ACL Injury: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Stakeholder-Perceived Utility of Specific Constructs and Items Across the Rehabilitation Timeline.

Background: Numerous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), often with overlapping constructs of interest and limited content validity. Inefficient scale application increases burden and diminishes overall usefulness for both the patient and practitioner. Purpose: To isolate specific PROM items across a diverse set of constructs that patients and practitioners perceive as having the greatest value at various stages of recovery and return to sport (RTS) in patients after ACLR. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A combined 77 stakeholders participated in this 2-phase mixed-methods investigation. In phase 1, a total of 27 patients and 21 practitioners selected individual PROM items from various constructs that had the greatest utility or importance. In phase 2, the highest rated items were further tested in a head-to-head comparison with 29 stakeholders who attended the 2022 ACL Injury Research Retreat. In addition to the utility assessment, practitioners answered other questions related to importance and timing of PROM assessments. Results: In phase 1, both patients and practitioners shared the same top item in 6 of the 8 (75%) constructs assessed. In phase 2, the construct of psychological burden was rated as "extremely important" by 59% of respondents, followed by physical function (54%), symptoms (35%), and donor site issues (10%). The PROM items of confidence, perceived likelihood of reinjury, and difficulty stopping quickly were rated by a respective 93%, 89%, and 86% of the sample as either "very useful" or "extremely useful." All constructs except donor site issues were rated by most stakeholders to be absolutely necessary to evaluate treatment progress and RTS readiness at the 6-month postoperative time and at RTS. Conclusion: Overall, psychological burden, with specific items related to confidence and reinjury likelihood, were rated as most important and useful by both patients and practitioners. The second most important and useful PROM item was related to higher intensity function (eg, decelerating or jumping/landing activities during sports).

"Luggage Tag" Suture Modification for Closing the Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Harvest Site.

The quadriceps tendon (QT) is increasingly used as an autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Closure of the harvest site helps with fluid extravasation from the joint for the duration of the procedure. In addition, closure of the QT removes the palpable defect noticed by many patients and prevents superficial infections from spreading deep to the joint. This Technical Note describes how to perform the "luggage tag" suture modification to efficiently and reproducibly close the QT harvest site with an arthroscopic self-retrieving suture passer.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Knotless Anchor Fixation.

Recent studies have reported the biomechanical and clinical advantages of lateral extraarticular augmentation procedures including the modified lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. LET has been shown to significantly decrease re-rupture rates in high-risk patients and decrease anterior cruciate ligament graft forces during pivoting loads and instrumented anterior laxity testing. Many variations of the modified LET approaches have been described. However, concerns including lateral hematoma, wound-healing complications, and increased operative time exist. This minimally invasive, arthroscopic-assisted approach using a knotless, all-suture anchor allows for direct visualization through a 2-cm incision and inherently decreases the morbidity associated with traditional LET techniques.

A Landmark-Based Technique for Determining an Isometric Femoral Attachment Site for Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis is Inaccurate.

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a method of placing the femoral fixation location for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) within a safe isometric area using anatomic landmarks. Methods: Using a pilot cadaveric specimen, the center of the radiographic safe isometric area for femoral fixation of LET, defined as a 1 cm (proximal-distal) area located proximal to the metaphyseal flare and posterior to the posterior cortical extension line (PCEL), was located using fluoroscopy and found to be 20 mm directly proximal to the center of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) origin. Using 10 additional specimens, the center of the FCL origin and a location 20 mm directly proximal was identified. K-wires were placed at each location. A lateral radiograph was obtained, and distances of the proximal K-wire relative to the PCEL and metaphyseal flare were measured. The location of the proximal K-wire relative to the radiographic safe isometric area was assessed by 2 independent observers. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was calculated for all measurements using intraclass coefficients (ICCs). Results: There was excellent intrarater and inter-rater reliability for all radiographic measurements (.908 to .975 and .968 to .988, respectively). In 5/10 specimens, the proximal K-wire was outside of the radiographic safe isometric area, with 4/5 anterior to the PCEL. Overall, the mean distance from the PCEL was 1 mm ± 4 mm (anterior), and the mean distance from the metaphyseal flare was 7.4 mm ± 2.9 mm (proximal). Conclusion: A landmark-based technique referencing the FCL origin was inaccurate in the placement of femoral fixation within a radiographic safe isometric area for LET. Therefore intraoperative imaging should be considered to ensure accurate placement. Clinical Relevance: These findings may help to decrease the likelihood of misplacement of femoral fixation during LET by showing that landmark-based methods without intraoperative image guidance may be unreliable.

Standardized Opioid Counseling Is Underperformed Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Purpose: To characterize contemporary pain management strategies after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) within the US and international orthopaedic community. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey-based study disseminated to a consortium of expert orthopaedic surgeons in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The survey was a 27-question, multiple choice-style questionnaire with question topics ranging from demographic characteristics and practice characteristics to surgeon-specific pain management strategies in the postoperative period after ACLR. Specific topics of interest included the use of preoperative opioid education and/or counseling sessions, implementation of standardized pain management regimens, use of pain tracking systems, and use of any adjunct non-narcotic analgesic modalities. Results: A total of 34 completed surveys were collected, representing a 73.9% response rate. Over 85% of respondents reported prescribing opioids as a standardized postoperative regimen after ACLR. Surgeons reported prescribing 5- to 10-mg doses, with the tablet count ranging anywhere from fewer than 10 tablets to more than 20 tablets, often instructing their patients to stop opioid use 2 to 4 days postoperatively. Prescribed dosages remained stable or decreased over the past 6 months with increased use of non-narcotic adjuncts. Only one-third of respondents reported using standardized preoperative opioid counseling, with even fewer discussing postoperative discontinuation protocols. Conclusions: Over 85% of respondents prescribe opioids as a standardized postoperative regimen after ACLR, with only 15% providing non-narcotic pain regimens. However, prescribed dosages have remained stable or decreased over the past 6 months with increased use of non-narcotic adjuncts. Only one-third of respondents use standardized preoperative opioid counseling, with even fewer discussing postoperative discontinuation protocols. Clinical Relevance: The ongoing opioid epidemic has created an urgent need to identify the most effective pain management strategies after orthopaedic procedures, especially ACLR. This study provides important information about current pain management practices for patients who have undergone ACLR.