RESUMO
The aim of the study was to explore the clinical features related to early hypothyroidism and the relationship between the changes of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) and early hypothyroidism in the course of 131I treatment for Graves' disease. This study was a retrospective observation, including 226 patients who received the first 131I treatment. The general information and laboratory tests were collected before and after 131I treatment, and the laboratory data affecting the difference in disease outcome were analyzed. According to the changes of antibodies in the third month, whether the changes of antibodies were involved in the occurrence of early-onset hypothyroidism was analyzed. Early onset hypothyroidism occurred in 165 of 226 patients, and the results showed that the incidence of early hypothyroidism was higher in patients with low baseline TRAb level (p=0.03) and increased TRAb after treatment (p=0.007). Both baseline TRAb levels (p<0.001) and the 24-hour iodine uptake rate (p=0.004) are significant factors influencing the changes in TRAb. The likelihood of a rise in TRAb was higher when the baseline TRAb was less than 18.55 U/l and the 24-hour iodine uptake level exceeded 63.61%. Low baseline and elevated post-treatment levels of TRAb were significantly associated with early-onset hypothyroidism after 131I treatment. Monitoring this index during RAI treatment is helpful in identifying early-onset hypothyroidism and mastering the clinical outcome and prognosis of Graves' disease.
RESUMO
Fracture risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients is paradoxically increased despite no decrease in areal bone mineral density (BMD). This phenomenon, known as the "diabetic bone paradox", has been attributed to various factors including alterations in bone microarchitecture and composition, hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and comorbidities associated with T2D. Zhao et al. recently investigated the relationship between T2D and fracture risk using both genetic and phenotypic datasets. Their findings suggest that genetically predicted T2D is associated with higher BMD and lower fracture risk, indicating that the bone paradox is not observed when confounding factors are controlled using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. However, in prospective phenotypic analysis, T2D remained associated with higher BMD and higher fracture risk, even after adjusting for confounding factors. Stratified analysis revealed that the bone paradox may disappear when T2D-related risk factors are eliminated. The study also highlighted the role of obesity in the relationship between T2D and fracture risk, with BMI mediating a significant portion of the protective effect. Overall, managing T2D-related risk factors may be crucial in preventing fracture risk in T2D patients.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Fraturas Ósseas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Humanos , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The 'diabetic bone paradox' suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would have higher areal bone mineral density (BMD) but higher fracture risk than individuals without T2D. In this study, we found that the genetically predicted T2D was associated with higher BMD and lower risk of fracture in both weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. We also identified ten genomic loci shared between T2D and fracture, with the top signal at SNP rs4580892 in the intron of gene RSPO3. And the higher expression in adipose subcutaneous and higher protein level in plasma of RSPO3 were associated with increased risk of T2D, but decreased risk of fracture. In the prospective study, T2D was observed to be associated with higher risk of fracture, but BMI mediated 30.2% of the protective effect. However, when stratified by the T2D-related risk factors for fracture, we observed that the effect of T2D on the risk of fracture decreased when the number of T2D-related risk factors decreased, and the association became non-significant if the T2D patients carried none of the risk factors. In conclusion, the genetically determined T2D might not be associated with higher risk of fracture. And the shared genetic architecture between T2D and fracture suggested a top signal around RSPO3 gene. The observed effect size of T2D on fracture risk decreased if the T2D-related risk factors could be eliminated. Therefore, it is important to manage the complications of T2D to prevent the risk of fracture.