Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (RCT, CSGO-HBP-015).

BACKGROUND: The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains uncertain. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS), in patients with resectable/borderline-resectable (R/BR) PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with R/BR-PDAC were enrolled and randomly allocated. They received two cycles (2 months) of each standard protocol, followed by radical surgery for those without tumor progression in general hospitals belonging to our intergroup. The primary endpoint was to determine the superior regimen on the basis of achieving a 10% increase in the rate of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years from allocation. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 94 patients randomly assigned to the GS arm (N = 46) or GA arm (N = 48). The 2-year PFS rates did not show the stipulated difference [GA, 31% (24-38%)/GS, 26% (18-33%)], but the Kaplan-Myer analysis showed significance (median PFS, GA/GS 14 months/9 months, P = 0.048; HR 0.71). Secondary endpoint comparisons yielded the following results (GA/GS arm, P-value): rates of severe adverse events during NAC, 73%/78%, P = 0.55; completion rates of the stipulated NAC, 92%/83%, P = 0.71; resection rates, 85%/72%, P = 0.10; average tumor marker (CA19-9) reduction rates, -50%/-21%, P = 0.01; average numbers of lymph node metastasis, 1.7/3.2, P = 0.04; and median overall survival times, 42/22 months, P = 0.26. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that GA and GS are viable neoadjuvant treatment regimens in R/BR-PDAC. Although the GA group exhibited a favorable PFS outcome, the primary endpoint was not achieved.

Exploratory prospective, randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus surgery versus surgery alone for large hepatocellular carcinoma (CSGO-HBP-005): Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group.

AIM: Neoadjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for large tumors is controversial, especially in the minimally invasive surgery era. The aim of this study was to compare features between groups treated with neoadjuvant TACE followed by surgery (TACE + surgery) or upfront surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma >5 cm. METHODS: In this exploratory, multicenter, randomized phase I study, the primary measure was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary measures were resection rate, necrosis rate by TACE, 2-year overall survival, and site of recurrence. A total of 30 patients were randomly allocated to each arm. RESULTS: The two arms did not differ in patient characteristics. The median time to surgery from randomization was 48 days for TACE + surgery and 29 for surgery only (p < 0.001). Postoperative morbidities did not differ between arms. The 2-year DFS, overall survival, and resection rates were 56.7%, 80.0%, and 93.3%, respectively, in the TACE + surgery arm, and 56.1%, 89.9%, and 90.0% in the upfront surgery arm. Minimally invasive surgery was carried out in 35.7% in the TACE + surgery arm and in 29.6% in the upfront surgery arm. The median necrosis rate by TACE was 90.0%. In resected specimens, invasion to the hepatic vein was less with TACE + surgery (3.6% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0380). In cases of 100% necrosis with TACE, 2-year DFS was 100%. Site of recurrence did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant TACE did not improve 2-year DFS, and neoadjuvant TACE allowed delay of surgical treatment without increased morbidity and cancer progress. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN: 000005241.

[A Case of Laparoscopic Uterine and Vaginal Resection for Local Recurrence after Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Canal Cancer].

The patient was an 80s woman. She visited our hospital with chief complaint of melena, and further evaluation revealed anal canal cancer. We performed robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection(D3 lymphadenectomy)and lateral lymph node dissection. The pathological diagnosis was anal canal cancer, muc>por1>tub2, T3N1bM0, pStage Ⅲb. One year after the surgery, she had a mass in the soft tissue of perineum on CT scan and PET-CT showed abnormal accumulation, which was diagnosed as local recurrence. At the same time, she also had a mass with abnormal accumulation in ascending colon, and it was diagnosed as ascending colon cancer. In both cases, we judged radical resection was possible, and the policy of surgery was decided. First, laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. The local recurrence lesion became a mass, invading the soft tissue of the perineum, the posterior wall of the vagina, and the cervix. So, we performed laparoscopic excision of local recurrent region together with the uterus and the posterior wall of the vagina. Based on the result of pathological examination, the patient was diagnosed with ascending colon cancer(tub1, pT1bN1aM0, pStage Ⅲa), and recurrence of anal canal cancer. The postoperative course is good and there are no signs of recurrence for 6 months after the operation.

[A Case of Robotic-Assisted Total Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Invading the Prostate].

The patient was a 60s man, whose chief complaint of melena and weight loss. He visited our hospital, and further evaluation revealed rectal cancer(Rb)invading the prostate with obturator lymph node metastasis. The clinical diagnosis was T4b (prostate)N3M0, Stage Ⅲc. He was administered 4 courses of CAPOX plus bevacizumab. After chemotherapy the primary tumor and lymph nodes showed PR, the diagnosis of ycT4bN1bM0, Stage Ⅲc. We performed robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration. He has been cancer-free for 5 months.

[A Case of Laparoscopic Total Pelvic Exenteration for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Using Infrared Illumination System (IRIS)].

The patient was 80s woman, whose chief complaint of fever and abdominal pain. She visited our hospital, and further evaluation revealed sigmoid colon cancer invading the uterus and abdominal wall. The pooling of pus in the uterus was formed and we diagnosed as pyometra. The clinical diagnosis was T4b(uterus, abdominal wall)N0M0, cStage Ⅱc. We performed laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, uterus and bilateral ovaries. We report a case in which the intraoperative infrared illumination system(IRIS)was used to support the identification of the ureter by near-infrared light and total pelvic exenteration could be safely performed.

[A Case of Early Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma Coexisting with High-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm].

We report a case of a female in her fifties with early appendiceal adenocarcinoma coexisting with high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm(HAMN)with a review of the literature. The patient presented to our hospital because of an enlarged appendix noted by contrast-enhanced CT performed for hematuria. Contrast-enhanced CT showed that the appendix had swollen to 10 mm and mucus had accumulated inside, which had no evidence of obvious malignancy. She was followed up on CT once a year. Four years after her first visit, she underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for a definitive diagnosis. There were no adhesions or inflammation in her abdominal cavity, and the appendix root was dissected with an automatic anastomosis device. Her resected specimen macroscopically showed mild wall thickening, but no obvious neoplastic lesion. Pathological examination revealed that in many areas centered on the tip of the appendix, highly columnar atypical epithelium with enhanced mucus production was densely proliferated in the form of glandular tubular and papillary. The nuclei of the proliferating epithelium were large and the fission image was conspicuous, but they remained in the mucosa. Pathological examination diagnosed as HAMN according to the WHO classification. The atypical epithelium in a small area at the tip was particularly strong in nuclear atypia, and showed a strong positive diffusely in p53, which was an image of well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. The pathological diagnosis was V, Type 0-Ⅱb, 2 mm, tub1 in HAMN, pTis, Ly0, V0, Pn0, pPM0, pDM0, pRM0, R0. Six months have passed since the operation, but no recurrence has been observed.

[A Case of Giant Intestinal GIST That Was Resected Just after TAE].

A 42-year-old woman visited our hospital complaining of fever and diarrhea. She had abdominal swelling and muscular defense. CT revealed a lobulated tumor occupying the lower abdomen. The tumor contained solid and cystic areas. The main artery vascularizing the tumor was the ileocecal artery, so we considered the tumor to be derived from the intestine or mesentery. We anticipated massive bleeding due to resection, and immediately after the embolization of the artery just before the operation. A vascular bundle from the terminal ileum and mesentery was found on the dorsal side of the tumor, and an outflow from the inferior mesenteric vein was also observed. We ligated each vessel and performed ileocecal resection. The operation lasted 4 hours and 18 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 2,585 mL, requiring the transfusion of 6 units of concentrated red blood cells. According to histopathological findings, tumor cells with spindle-shaped to ellipsoidal nuclei proliferated in bundles and intricately, and immunostaining was positive for c-kit and DOG-1. We identified the tumor as high-risk GIST. The clinical course after the operation was uneventful. She continued to take imatinib for 3 years and is currently alive and without recurrence for 6 years after the operation.

Bridge to surgery using a self-expandable metallic stent for stages II-III obstructive colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bridge to surgery (BTS) using a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer improves the patient's quality of life. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors of obstructive colorectal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed stage II-III resectable colon cancer cases (Cur A) retrospectively registered between January 2005 and December 2017. Overall, 117 patients with Cur A obstructive colorectal cancer were evaluated: 67 of them underwent emergency surgery (ES Group) and 50 of them after BTS with SEMS placement (BTS group). We compared surgical results and prognoses between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients underwent endoscopic SEMS placement, which technical success of 96% and morbidity rate of 18%. Primary anastomosis rates were 77.6% in ES and 95.7% in BTS (p <  0.001); postoperative complication, 46.3% in ES and 10.5% in BTS (p <  0.001); pathological findings of lymphatic invasion, 66.7% in ES and 100% in BTS (p <  0.001); venous invasion were 66.8% in ES and 92% in BTS (p = 0.04); and recurrence of 25.4% in ES and 39.1% in BTS. The 3-year overall survival was significantly different between two groups (ES, 86.8%:BTS, 58.8%), BTS is worse than ES (log-rank test; p <  0.001). Venous invasion independently predicted worsened recurrence-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The vascular invasiveness was correlated with tumor progression after SEMS placement, and the survival rate was lower in BTS. SEMS potentially worsens prognostic outcomes in stage II-III obstructive colorectal cancer.

[A Case of Early Rectal Cancer Accompanied by Multiple Liver Abscesses].

An 81-year-old female who suffered from headache and general fatigue was diagnosed multiple liver abscesses by abdominal computed tomography(CT). Antibiotics and percutaneous transhepatic abscess drainage(PTAD)were performed, liver abscesses were improved. During the treatment, followed abdominal CT indicated lower rectal tumor. An early rectal cancer accompanied by multiple liver abscesses was diagnosed and performed surgery. The histological diagnosis was Rb, type 1, tub2, pT1b(SM 8,000 µm), Ly0, V1a, pN0, pStage Ⅰ. After surgery, the patient remains free from liver abscess. We report early colorectal cancer with multiple liver abscesses in Japanese literature.

[A Case of Locally Advanced Appendiceal Cancer with Radical Resection after CAPOX plus Bevacizumab].

We report a case of a male in his sixties with appendiceal cancer who underwent radical resection following CAPOX plus bevacizumab neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patient presented to our hospital with a chief complaint of chronic low abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced CT before neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed an inhomogeneous tumor in the ileocecal region. Invasion to the bladder and the sigmoid colon was also observed. A colonoscopy showed an elevated lesion, which was caused by extramural invasion to the sigmoid colon. Pathological examination of the sigmoid colon tumor revealed well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma and KRAS codon13 G13D. Hence, we diagnosed the patient with locally advanced appendiceal cancer with invasion to the bladder and sigmoid colon. We administered CAPOX plus bevacizumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed shrinkage of the primary tumor and reduction in the invasion to the bladder and sigmoid colon. We performed ileocecal resection(+D3), a partial sigmoidectomy, and partial bladder resection on the 135th day from the diagnosis. The resected specimen showed an appendiceal tumor with invasion to the bladder and sigmoid colon. The pathological diagnosis was Ⅴ, yType 5, tub2>tub1, ypT4b, ypN0, ycH0, ycM0, ycPUL0, Ly1b, V1b(VB), Pn01b, pStage Ⅱa, and the histological treatment effect of preoperative therapy was Grade 1b. Our experience indicates that in patients with locally advanced appendiceal cancer, multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective option.

[Clinical Significance of Palliative Esophageal Stent Placement for Esophageal Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma in 2007, the indication for placing an esophageal stent has changed, especially with respect to the treatment of esophageal stricture after chemoradiotherapy(CRT). For CRT cases, irradiation after stent placement and stent placement after CRT are not recommended due to the risk of perforation. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who underwent esophageal stenting in our department between January 2007 and December 2018 and who were diagnosed with thoracic esophageal cancer were included in this study. We retrospectively examined the safety and treatment effect of esophageal stent placement. RESULTS: Prior cancer therapy was observed in 16 cases(8 cases of chemotherapy and 8 cases of CRT). In the no prior therapy group, 13 cases were treated with BSC and 9 cases with chemotherapy. Esophageal stent placement after CRT was performed in 8 cases. Esophageal stent was placed 9(6-14)months after CRT. The stent patency period was 5(1-11)months, and the survival period after stent placement was 6(1-12)months. There was no difference in the frequency of complications and treatment outcomes of the CRT group compared with the non-CRT group. CONCLUSION: Cases undergoing esophageal stent placement after CRT can expect therapeutic effects similar to those of other cases. However, complications such as perforation can be fatal; thus, careful consideration should be given to each individual case for esophageal stent placement after CRT.

[A Case of Brain, Lung, and Adrenal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Loco-Regional Surgery].

A 64-year-old man presented with the chief complaint of weakness in the left half of his body. He fell down on the road while riding a bicycle and was transported to the emergency room. A contrast-enhanced brain MRI revealed a 28mm ringshaped mass in the right frontal lobe. A craniotomy was performed 14 days later. The histopathological diagnosis showed the tumor as a well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Postoperative examination revealed a rectal cancer and a left lung mass. A low-anterior resection was performed 1 month after the craniotomy, and a partial lung resection was performed 2 months after the rectal excision. Metachronous solitary metastasis of the left adrenal gland was noticed 10 months after the removal of the lung metastasis and we subsequently performed a left adrenalectomy. The patient is not undergoing any active treatment 13 months after the adrenalectomy, but has no signs of recurrence. The loco-regional surgery was enabled for local control of multi-relapsed lesions from rectal cancer.

Prognostic factors for cytology-positive gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Positive peritoneal lavage cytology for gastric carcinoma cells (CY1) is considered distant metastasis and is classified as Stage IV. However, patients with CY1 comprise a heterogeneous population, and their prognosis varies greatly. The prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients with CY1 were retrospectively reviewed. METHODS: The participants were 80 gastric cancer patients with CY1 in our institution encountered between 2005 and 2017. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The operative procedure was distal gastrectomy for 30 patients, total gastrectomy for 27 patients, staging laparoscopy for 10 patients, gastrojejunostomy for 8 patients, and probe laparotomy for 5 patients. Other distant metastases were recognized in 36 patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that other distant metastases were the strongest independent risk factor for the overall survival (p < 0.0001). When the cohort was limited to CY1 patients without other distant metastases, cN2-3 (p = 0.01), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) < 40 (p = 0.02) and Type 4 (p = 0.03) were independent risk factors according to a multivariate analysis. The survivals of patients with cN2-3 or PNI < 40 after gastrectomy were equivalent to those with other distant metastases, as assessed by log-rank analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The prognoses of CY1 gastric cancer patients with cN2-3 or PNI < 40 were poor, even after gastrectomy.

Comparison of Adverse Events and Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Drain Insertion After Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched, Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Japan (CSGO-HBP-001).

BACKGROUND: Adverse events (AEs) after hepatectomy (Hx) have decreased. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of Hx and to identify the risks and benefits of drain insertion. METHODS: From 2010 to 2012, a multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in consecutive patients who underwent Hx. Patients who were scheduled to undergo Hx with neither reconstruction of the biliary tract nor concomitant resection of other organs were excluded. AEs were graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate analysis was performed to identify the risks and benefits in all cases and in selected cases matched by propensity score. RESULTS: This study included 197 patients. AEs occurred in 20 (10.1%). In all cases, no difference in the rate of AE was observed between those with and without drain insertion. Postoperative hospital stay in the group with drains (n = 132) was statistically longer than that in the group without drains (n = 65) (17.7 vs. 11.5 days, P = 0.001). In patients without AE (n = 177), hospital stay in the group with drains was statistically longer than that in the group without drains (14.1 vs. 11.3 days, P < 0.001). In propensity score-matched cases (41 cases in each group), postoperative hospital stay in the group with drains was also statistically longer than that in the group without drains (17.3 vs. 11.4 days, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Drain insertion after hepatectomy may lead to longer hospital stay in patients with and without AE.

[Clinical Outcome of Eight Patients with Perforated Colorectal Cancer].

We studied the clinicopathological findings of 8 patients with perforated colorectal cancer. Four patients were male. In 7 patients, the primary cancer site was left side colon. Chief complaints were abdominal pain in 7 patients and diarrhea in 1 patient. The emergent operation was performed in all cases. The final stages of 8 patients were as follows: 5 patients with Stage II, 2 patients with Stage III, 1 patient with Stage IV. All patients were discharged from our hospital. Postoperative chemotherapy was performed for 5 patients. Of these 8 patients, 1 patient had peritoneal dissemination and 1 patient had local recurrence. Two patients were died of cancer and 6 patients were alive. In conclusion, patient with perforated colorectal cancer were high risk cases for recurrence.

[An Analysis of Perforated Gastric Cancer with Acute Peritonitis in Our Hospital].

Perforated gastric cancer is relatively rare and the incidence is reported about 1% of all the cases of gastric cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of the consecutive 12 patients with perforated gastric cancer who underwent operation in our hospital between January 2005 and December 2016. There were 5 men and 7 women, with an average age of 65.8 years old(34-87). Perforated gastric cancer occurred in the region U(1 cases), M(6 cases), L(5 cases). There were 11 cases with distant metastasis. We could successfully diagnosed as perforated gastric cancer in 8 cases before emergency operation. Gastrectomy was performed in 5 cases. However, the curative resection was performed only 1 case. Prognosis of perforated gastric cancer is poor. We considered as an appropriate two-step surgical strategy that the first step of surgery is an acute peritonitis treatment followed by radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy.

[A Case of Anal Canal Adenocarcinoma Locally Controlled by Rectal Amputation after Chemoradiotherapy].

A 73-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with anal pain. The 10 cm tumor was observed externally at the 3 o' clock side of his anus. He was unable to maintain the sitting position because of pain and had fecal incontinence and erosive skin inflammation. We identified this anal stenosis as anal canal adenocarcinoma(moderately differentiated). Thereby, no distant metastasis was found; we decided to treat the patient with conventional therapy. We made a double-hole colostomy in the sigmoid colon, and then the patient received preoperative chemoradiotherapy(CRT). Radiation therapy(RT)was adminis- tered at 40 Gy/20 Fr and oral capecitabine of 825mg/m / 2/time was administered twice a day on the RT days. The tumor shrinkage was good, and then we performed a laparoscopy-assisted abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Pathologically therapeutic effect was Grade 1b. His activity of daily living was dramatically improved, and he can now main tan the sitting position. Twelve months postoperatively, he has no sign of recurrence. In this case, we experienced an anal canal adenocarcinoma that was possibly locally controlled by preoperative CRT and rectal amputation.

[A Case of Transverse Colon Cancer in Which Long-Term Chemotherapy Was Performed after Palliative Colonic Stent Placement].

We report a case involving a 76-year-old woman with transverse colon cancer undergoing long-term chemotherapy following palliative colonic stent placement. She visited our hospital with a diagnosis of colonic obstruction. Her abdomen was evidently distended and tender. CT revealed the apple core sign in the transverse colon-hepatic flexure area, and then bowel obstruction. The disseminated lesion occluded the superior mesenteric vein. Multiple masses were found on both lungs; a single tumor was detected in liver S6. Hence, we diagnosed her with unresectable obstructive transverse colon cancer. A colonic stent was inserted to remove the obstruction. Because primary tumor resection was rendered impossible, mFOLFOX6 was initiated with the colonic stent intact. After 5 courses, CT revealed that the liver metastasis disappeared, and lung metastases exhibited SD of a therapeutic effect. She further received 5 courses of mFOLFOX6 and 20 courses of maintenance therapy using FU. However, single liver metastasis recurred, exhibiting PD of a therapeutic effect. Histological diagnosis of liver metastasis was a consistent finding due to metastatic colorectal cancer; RAS mutation was not detected. Currently, 2 years after the diagnosis, FOLFIRI and panitumumab are being administered as the second-line treatment, with no colonic stentrelated complications.